EIN: 341518873
UEI: UB96ANK1KLN8
Audited by: MEADEN & MOORE, LTD.
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 26, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 26, 2026 (67 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Although the Organization had an established procurement process in practice, the policy had not been documented in writing at the time of our audit procedures. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our audit procedures. Cause: This condition occurred because the Organization’s procurement policy had not yet been formalized in a written document. Effect: Failure to have the written procurement policy results in noncompliance with federal and grant award regulations. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization develop and adopt a written procurement policy to ensure compliance with federal regulations and grant award requirements.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds AL Number: 21.027 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed-through: Greater Cleveland Habitat for Humanity, Habitat for Humanity of Ohio, and City of Akron Award No. and Year: 23HFHH-7XW-1120, 23HFHH-7LP-1120, and SC2024-000198 FY 2025 Compliance Requirements: Procurement - Procurement policies and procedures are implemented. Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Instance of Non-Compliance Criteria: The Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement and applicable grant award agreements require that the Habitat for Humanity of Summit County, Inc. (“Organization”) maintain a written procurement policy outlining the Organization’s bid and purchasing processes. Condition: Although the Organization had an established procurement process in practice, the policy had not been documented in writing at the time of our audit procedures. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our audit procedures. Cause: This condition occurred because the Organization’s procurement policy had not yet been formalized in a written document. Effect: Failure to have the written procurement policy results in noncompliance with federal and grant award regulations. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization develop and adopt a written procurement policy to ensure compliance with federal regulations and grant award requirements.
Management's Response: Management concurs with the finding and has taken corrective action by formalizing the procurement policy in a written document reviewed by the Board of Trustees at their meeting on August 26, 2025.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Ohio →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.