← Back to home

NORTHLAND HEALTH PARTNERS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERNon-Profit

EIN: 331029318

UEI: WLW2Z31346E5

Audited by: BRADY MARTZ & ASSOCIATES PC

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

NORTHLAND HEALTH PARTNERS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER10 audit years8 findings4 repeat
10
Audit Years
8
Total Findings
4
Repeat Findings
$4.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-01-31

$4,229,763 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 8, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 8, 2026 (207 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2024-003OTHER MATTERS

Significant Deficiency – Sliding Fee Discount Program Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – Health Center Program Cluster AL# 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria Section 42 USC 254b(k)(3)(E), (F), and (G); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(e), (f), and (g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303(e), (f), and (g)) requires that health centers provide discounted fees for individuals and families with incomes above 100% and at or below 200% of the federal poverty guidelines. Condition For the year ended January 31, 2025, we requested the supporting documentation for a sample of patient visits with discounted fees under the sliding fee program to support that patients were eligible for the discount and that it was applied in accordance with the Center’s internal policies and procedures. In a sample of 40 patient visits, we noted one patient visit where discounted fees were applied incorrectly and one where the SFS audit form was incomplete. Cause Internal controls, while designed appropriately, were not implemented consistently to allow for the detection and correction of these types of errors. Effect or potential effect The sliding fee discount program may not be operating in accordance with federal regulations causing a potential loss of funding. Questioned costs None noted. Context One patient visit had the sliding fee discount applied to their account at a higher level than what they qualified for based on their income and family size. One patient’s SFS audit form was completed incorrectly with the income verification not fully supported based on the Organization’s policy. Repeat finding This is a repeat finding of finding 2024-003 from the prior year. Recommendation The entity should revisit their current internal control policies and provide additional training for staff to ensure compliance with documented controls. Additional research should be done into the cause of the incorrectly applied sliding fee discounts to determine if this was a system issue to determine the best course of action. If this is determined to be a manual adjustment done incorrectly, we recommend additional training be provided to staff as well as additional controls to review the manually applied discounts for accuracy.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Significant Deficiency – Sliding Fee Discount Program Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – Health Center Program Cluster AL# 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria Section 42 USC 254b(k)(3)(E), (F), and (G); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(e), (f), and (g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303(e), (f), and (g)) requires that health centers provide discounted fees for individuals and families with incomes above 100% and at or below 200% of the federal poverty guidelines. Condition For the year ended January 31, 2025, we requested the supporting documentation for a sample of patient visits with discounted fees under the sliding fee program to support that patients were eligible for the discount and that it was applied in accordance with the Center’s internal policies and procedures. In a sample of 40 patient visits, we noted one patient visit where discounted fees were applied incorrectly and one where the SFS audit form was incomplete. Cause Internal controls, while designed appropriately, were not implemented consistently to allow for the detection and correction of these types of errors. Effect or potential effect The sliding fee discount program may not be operating in accordance with federal regulations causing a potential loss of funding. Questioned costs None noted. Context One patient visit had the sliding fee discount applied to their account at a higher level than what they qualified for based on their income and family size. One patient’s SFS audit form was completed incorrectly with the income verification not fully supported based on the Organization’s policy. Repeat finding This is a repeat finding of finding 2024-003 from the prior year. Recommendation The entity should revisit their current internal control policies and provide additional training for staff to ensure compliance with documented controls. Additional research should be done into the cause of the incorrectly applied sliding fee discounts to determine if this was a system issue to determine the best course of action. If this is determined to be a manual adjustment done incorrectly, we recommend additional training be provided to staff as well as additional controls to review the manually applied discounts for accuracy.

Corrective Action Plan

Contact Person Nadine Boe, CEO Corrective Action Plan Management will work to ensure that the SFS discount applications are completed accurately and that the SFS discounts are recorded accurately in the system by auditing the SFS applications and verifying the SFS in the system matches the SFS application. In addition, Management will audit a sample of the SFS discounts on a monthly basis to assure the SFS is applied correctly. Management will also provide additional training to staff as needed and provide further guidance on the internal SFS policies and procedures.

Prior Finding References

2024-003

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2024-01-31

$3,850,635 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 16, 2024 — management decision was due March 16, 2025.

2024-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

2024 – 003: Significant Deficiency – Sliding Fee Discount Program Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – Health Center Program Cluster AL# 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria – Section 42 USC 254b(k)(3)(E), (F), and (G); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(e), (f), and (g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303(e), (f), and (g)) requires that health centers provide discounted fees for individuals and families with incomes above 100% and at or below 200% of the federal poverty guidelines. Condition – For the year ended January 31, 2024, we requested the supporting documentation for a sample of patient visits with discounted fees under the sliding fee program to support that patients were eligible for the discount and that it was applied in accordance with the Center’s internal policies and procedures. In a sample of 40 patient visits, we noted two patient visits where discounted fees were applied incorrectly and one where the SFS audit form wasn’t completed correctly. Cause – Internal controls, while designed appropriately, were not implemented consistently to allow for the detection and correction of these types of errors. Effect or potential effect – The sliding fee discount program may not be operating in accordance with federal regulations causing a potential loss of funding. Questioned costs – None noted. Context – One patient visit had the sliding fee discount applied to their account at a higher level than what they qualified for based on their income and family size. One patient had sliding fee discounts applied to their charges after their previous application had expired and another application was not completed. One patient’s SFS audit form was completed incorrectly not supporting the SFS calculation in the file. Repeat finding – This is a new finding. Recommendation – The entity should revisit their current internal control policies and provide additional training for staff to ensure compliance with documented controls. Additional research should be done into the cause of the incorrectly applied sliding fee discounts to determine if this was a system issue to determine the best course of action. If this is determined to be a manual adjustment done incorrectly, we recommend additional training be provided to staff as well as additional controls to review the manually applied discounts for accuracy.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024 – 003: Significant Deficiency – Sliding Fee Discount Program Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – Health Center Program Cluster AL# 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria – Section 42 USC 254b(k)(3)(E), (F), and (G); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(e), (f), and (g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303(e), (f), and (g)) requires that health centers provide discounted fees for individuals and families with incomes above 100% and at or below 200% of the federal poverty guidelines. Condition – For the year ended January 31, 2024, we requested the supporting documentation for a sample of patient visits with discounted fees under the sliding fee program to support that patients were eligible for the discount and that it was applied in accordance with the Center’s internal policies and procedures. In a sample of 40 patient visits, we noted two patient visits where discounted fees were applied incorrectly and one where the SFS audit form wasn’t completed correctly. Cause – Internal controls, while designed appropriately, were not implemented consistently to allow for the detection and correction of these types of errors. Effect or potential effect – The sliding fee discount program may not be operating in accordance with federal regulations causing a potential loss of funding. Questioned costs – None noted. Context – One patient visit had the sliding fee discount applied to their account at a higher level than what they qualified for based on their income and family size. One patient had sliding fee discounts applied to their charges after their previous application had expired and another application was not completed. One patient’s SFS audit form was completed incorrectly not supporting the SFS calculation in the file. Repeat finding – This is a new finding. Recommendation – The entity should revisit their current internal control policies and provide additional training for staff to ensure compliance with documented controls. Additional research should be done into the cause of the incorrectly applied sliding fee discounts to determine if this was a system issue to determine the best course of action. If this is determined to be a manual adjustment done incorrectly, we recommend additional training be provided to staff as well as additional controls to review the manually applied discounts for accuracy.

Corrective Action Plan

Management will work to ensure that the SFS discount applications are completed accurately and that the SFS discounts are recorded accurately in the system by auditing the SFS applications and verifying the SFS in the system matches the SFS application. In addition, Management will audit a sample of the SFS discounts on a monthly basis to assure the SFS is applied correctly. Management will also provide additional training to staff as needed and provide further guidance on the internal SFS policies and procedures.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-01-31

$4,769,374 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 27, 2023 — management decision was due April 27, 2024.

FY 2022-01-31

$5,517,375 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 2, 2022 — management decision was due May 2, 2023.

FY 2021-01-31

$4,559,285 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2021 — management decision was due May 1, 2022.

2021-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Criteria The Organization must follow procurement policies in accordance with Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.318. Condition The Organization did not follow their procurement policy for the purchase of a van. Cause Oversight by management and breakdown of controls for monitoring compliance. Effect The Organization is not incompliance with Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.318. Recommendation The Organization should review their current procurement policy for updated thresholds and compliance with Unform Guidance and implement controls to ensure compliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management has implemented process and controls to adhere to procurement process or produce adequate documentation as to why it was not followed. Indication of Repeat Finding None.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria The Organization must follow procurement policies in accordance with Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.318. Condition The Organization did not follow their procurement policy for the purchase of a van. Cause Oversight by management and breakdown of controls for monitoring compliance. Effect The Organization is not incompliance with Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.318. Recommendation The Organization should review their current procurement policy for updated thresholds and compliance with Unform Guidance and implement controls to ensure compliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management has implemented process and controls to adhere to procurement process or produce adequate documentation as to why it was not followed. Indication of Repeat Finding None.

Corrective Action Plan

Contact Person Nadine Boe, CEO Corrective Action Plan Management has implemented process and controls to adhere to procurement process or produce adequate documentation as to why it was not followed.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2020-01-31

$3,700,938 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 15, 2020 — management decision was due January 15, 2021.

2020-003
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2019-003OTHER MATTERS

2019-003: Material Weakness - Program Income / Application of SFS Discount Criteria The Organization is required to have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. The corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted should be based on the patient?s ability to pay. The patient?s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Condition During our testing of the Sliding Fee Schedule (SFS), we noted the Organization properly has an SFS schedule whereby the basis of the patient?s ability to pay is based upon the patient?s income, using the federal poverty guidelines as a basis for the percentage of the SFS discount. However, in three of the forty patient files tested, the SFS discount was improperly applied and the patient should have paid more. Cause The Organization is not following policies and procedures set in place to ensure the SFS discount is correctly determined and applied to patient accounts. Effect The SFS discount applied is incorrect. Recommendation We recommend management correctly apply the SFS discount. Management should review policies and procedures regarding the SFS program with staff that is responsible for determining the SFS discount. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management will correctly apply the SFS discounts to all patient accounts and review all current accounts for proper SFS discounts. Management will train and guide Patient Services to verify income status and assure SFS are applied correctly. Indication of Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding in the current year.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-003: Material Weakness - Program Income / Application of SFS Discount Criteria The Organization is required to have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. The corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted should be based on the patient?s ability to pay. The patient?s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Condition During our testing of the Sliding Fee Schedule (SFS), we noted the Organization properly has an SFS schedule whereby the basis of the patient?s ability to pay is based upon the patient?s income, using the federal poverty guidelines as a basis for the percentage of the SFS discount. However, in three of the forty patient files tested, the SFS discount was improperly applied and the patient should have paid more. Cause The Organization is not following policies and procedures set in place to ensure the SFS discount is correctly determined and applied to patient accounts. Effect The SFS discount applied is incorrect. Recommendation We recommend management correctly apply the SFS discount. Management should review policies and procedures regarding the SFS program with staff that is responsible for determining the SFS discount. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management will correctly apply the SFS discounts to all patient accounts and review all current accounts for proper SFS discounts. Management will train and guide Patient Services to verify income status and assure SFS are applied correctly. Indication of Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding in the current year.

Corrective Action Plan

Contact Person Nadine Boe, CEO Corrective Action Plan Management will work to ensure that the SFS discount applications are completed accurately and that the SFS discounts are recorded accurately in the system by auditing the SFS applications and verifying the SFS in the system matches the SFS application. In addition, Management will audit a sample of the SFS discounts on a monthly basis to assure the SFS is applied correctly. Management will also provide additional training to staff as needed and provide further guidance on the internal SFS policies and procedures.

Prior Finding References

2019-003

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-01-31

$3,599,506 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 29, 2019 — management decision was due April 29, 2020.

2019-003
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2018-003OTHER MATTERS

2019-003: Material Weakness - Program Income / Application of SFS Discount Criteria The Organization is required to have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover the reasonable costs of operation. The corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted should be based on the patient?s ability to pay. The patient?s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Condition During our testing of the Sliding Fee Schedule (SFS), we noted the Organization properly has an SFS schedule whereby the basis of the patient?s ability to pay is based upon the patient?s income, using the federal poverty guidelines as a basis for the percentage of the SFS discount. However, in three of the forty patient files tested, the SFS discount was incorrectly calculated based on income and one file where the Organization did not follow their internal controls policy regarding the SFS discount. Cause The Organization is not following policies and procedures set in place to ensure the SFS discount is correctly determined and applied to patient accounts. Effect The SFS discount applied is incorrect. Recommendation We recommend management correctly apply the SFS discount. Management should review policies and procedures regarding the SFS program with staff that is responsible for determining the SFS discount. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management will correctly apply the SFS discounts to all patient accounts and review all current accounts for proper SFS discounts. Management will train and guide Patient Services to verify income status and assure SFS are applied correctly. Indication of Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding of finding 2018-003 in the prior year.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-003: Material Weakness - Program Income / Application of SFS Discount Criteria The Organization is required to have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover the reasonable costs of operation. The corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted should be based on the patient?s ability to pay. The patient?s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Condition During our testing of the Sliding Fee Schedule (SFS), we noted the Organization properly has an SFS schedule whereby the basis of the patient?s ability to pay is based upon the patient?s income, using the federal poverty guidelines as a basis for the percentage of the SFS discount. However, in three of the forty patient files tested, the SFS discount was incorrectly calculated based on income and one file where the Organization did not follow their internal controls policy regarding the SFS discount. Cause The Organization is not following policies and procedures set in place to ensure the SFS discount is correctly determined and applied to patient accounts. Effect The SFS discount applied is incorrect. Recommendation We recommend management correctly apply the SFS discount. Management should review policies and procedures regarding the SFS program with staff that is responsible for determining the SFS discount. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management will correctly apply the SFS discounts to all patient accounts and review all current accounts for proper SFS discounts. Management will train and guide Patient Services to verify income status and assure SFS are applied correctly. Indication of Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding of finding 2018-003 in the prior year.

Corrective Action Plan

Contact Person Nadine Boe, CEO Corrective Action Plan Management will work to ensure that the SFS discount applications are completed accurately and that the SFS discounts are recorded accurately in the system by auditing the SFS applications and verifying the SFS in the system matches the SFS application. In addition, Management will audit a sample of the complex specialty dental SFS discounts on a monthly basis to assure the SFS is applied correctly. Management will also provide additional training to staff as needed.

Prior Finding References

2018-003

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-01-31

$3,871,420 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 5, 2018 — management decision was due February 5, 2019.

2018-003
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2017-003OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-003

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2017-01-31

$3,045,395 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 28, 2017 — management decision was due February 28, 2018.

2017-003
Program Income
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Program Income →
2017-004
Cash Management
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →

FY 2016-01-31

$798,327 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 8, 2016 — management decision was due February 8, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in North Dakota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.