← Back to home

Aids Services Foundation Orange County DBA Radiant Health CentersNon-Profit

EIN: 330126481

UEI: UMN6LAVB6H47

Audited by: Stephens, Reidinger & Beller LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Aids Services Foundation Orange County DBA Radiant Health Centers10 audit years2 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$4.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-02-28

$4,795,184 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 12, 2026 (22 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-02-29

GOING CONCERN$4,378,657 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2025 — management decision was due September 17, 2025.

2024-006
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

2024-006: HIV Emergency Relief Project Grant – Eligibility Determination Requirement Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Criteria: The Center is required to accurately determine a recipient’s eligibility for program benefits. Condition and Context: During our audit we reviewed the Center’s eligibility determination and selected a sample of 25 individuals who were recipients where management was required to perform eligibility determination. We found the following: Of the 25 individuals sampled, there were three instances where the eligibility screener documented incorrect inputs on the recipient’s application. In all three instances, the error did not impact the recipient’s eligibility. Of the 25 individuals sampled, ten had instances where management was unable to provide sufficient support to verify that the recipient's eligibility was correctly determined. For these ten cases, we were unable to determine if the recipient's eligibility was correctly determined. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate eligibility determinations could result in ineligible recipients receiving benefits or lead to individuals who were denied benefits who otherwise qualify. Cause: Management does not retain sufficient documentation to support the eligibility determination for recipients. Questioned Costs: $0 – The Center does not provide direct assistance to recipients. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a formal review of case files for eligibility determination to both determine that eligibility was correctly and accurately determined and that the case file retains documentation sufficient to demonstrate a recipient's eligibility. Management’s Response: Management has initiated a formal review of case files to determine that eligibility was and will be correctly and accurately determined and that the case file retains documentation sufficient to demonstrate a recipient's eligibility.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-006: HIV Emergency Relief Project Grant – Eligibility Determination Requirement Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Criteria: The Center is required to accurately determine a recipient’s eligibility for program benefits. Condition and Context: During our audit we reviewed the Center’s eligibility determination and selected a sample of 25 individuals who were recipients where management was required to perform eligibility determination. We found the following: Of the 25 individuals sampled, there were three instances where the eligibility screener documented incorrect inputs on the recipient’s application. In all three instances, the error did not impact the recipient’s eligibility. Of the 25 individuals sampled, ten had instances where management was unable to provide sufficient support to verify that the recipient's eligibility was correctly determined. For these ten cases, we were unable to determine if the recipient's eligibility was correctly determined. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate eligibility determinations could result in ineligible recipients receiving benefits or lead to individuals who were denied benefits who otherwise qualify. Cause: Management does not retain sufficient documentation to support the eligibility determination for recipients. Questioned Costs: $0 – The Center does not provide direct assistance to recipients. Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a formal review of case files for eligibility determination to both determine that eligibility was correctly and accurately determined and that the case file retains documentation sufficient to demonstrate a recipient's eligibility. Management’s Response: Management has initiated a formal review of case files to determine that eligibility was and will be correctly and accurately determined and that the case file retains documentation sufficient to demonstrate a recipient's eligibility.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan For the Fiscal year ending February 29, 2024 Finding 2024-006: HIV Emergency Relief Project Grant – Eligibility Determination Requirement Corrective Action Plan: The plan we have implemented will address and remediate the Finding 2024-006: HIV Emergency Relief Project Grant – Eligibility Determination regarding compliance and internal controls over compliance. Timeline: The Corrective Action Plan has been initiated. Plan and Status of Corrective Action: In collaboration with our Director of Operations and our Compliance Officer, our Programs team has initiated a formal review of our case files to determine that eligibility was and will be correctly and accurately determined and that the case file retains documentation sufficient to demonstrate a recipient's eligibility. In certain cases, such as when engagement commences but services/program participation is declined, improved documentation is being implemented. We are confident that our new electronic health record will afford us additional workflows and efficiencies that will ensure compliance. Furthermore, we remain in close collaboration with the Orange County Health Care Agency’s HIV Planning and Coordination office (HIVPAC). In addition to overseeing our provision of Ryan White services, HIVPAC trains providers on all aspects of service delivery, including eligibility reviews, and we will rely closely on this partner to ensure staff is compliant and trained, which will avoid these Eligibility shortcomings in the future. Name of Responsible Person: Name Mark Gonzales Title Chief Operating Officer Email: mgonzales@radianthealthcenters.org Phone: (949) 809-5762

About Eligibility →

FY 2023-02-28

$4,311,863 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2026 — management decision was due August 10, 2026.

FY 2022-02-28

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,131,928 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 3, 2023 — management decision was due August 3, 2023.

2022-002
Cost Allowability
REPEAT OF 2021-001OTHER MATTERS

We identified the following Other Matter related to internal controls over federal awards: 2022-002 Documentation of Timesheet Review Federal Program: HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants CFDA Number: 93.914 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Year: 2022 Questioned Costs: $0 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430, Compensation ? personal services, states, in part: ?(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated;? Condition We reviewed a sample of employee timesheets and approvals were not documented either by paper or system electronic approvals. Recommendation We recommend the Center review timesheets and document timesheet review either by documenting it in paper or by system electronic approvals.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

We identified the following Other Matter related to internal controls over federal awards: 2022-002 Documentation of Timesheet Review Federal Program: HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants CFDA Number: 93.914 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Year: 2022 Questioned Costs: $0 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430, Compensation ? personal services, states, in part: ?(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated;? Condition We reviewed a sample of employee timesheets and approvals were not documented either by paper or system electronic approvals. Recommendation We recommend the Center review timesheets and document timesheet review either by documenting it in paper or by system electronic approvals.

Corrective Action Plan

Radiant Health Centers has recently transitioned to a new Human Resources Information System, PayCom, that will better help the organization track timesheets, including a more accurate reflection of time staff worked and electronic documentation of review and approval by supervisors of their staff.

Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-02-28

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,580,294 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2021 — management decision was due March 28, 2022.

FY 2020-02-29

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,907,625 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 24, 2020 — management decision was due February 24, 2021.

FY 2019-02-28

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,046,621 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 7, 2019 — management decision was due December 7, 2019.

FY 2018-02-28

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,938,889 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 15, 2018 — management decision was due January 15, 2019.

FY 2017-02-28

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,527,418 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 1, 2017 — management decision was due February 1, 2018.

FY 2016-02-29

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,477,400 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 11, 2016 — management decision was due February 11, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.