← Back to home

MOUNT PLEASANT GOOD SAMARITAN HSG DBA MT PLEASANT PLACE 075-11072-REF

EIN: 320493968

UEI: SJCMRBUAHEJ1

Audited by: EIDE BAILLY LLP

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

MOUNT PLEASANT GOOD SAMARITAN HSG DBA MT PLEASANT PLACE 075-11072-REF5 audit years6 findings1 repeat
5
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$3.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2022)

FY 2022-01-31

$3,191,003 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on November 6, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by May 6, 2023 (1213 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2022-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Our testing of the use of Project funds detected one instance where an employee?s timesheet was not approved and one instance where an employee?s timesheet was approved after payroll; however, we were unable to determine whether the review occurred within a reasonable amount of time after the payroll period. Cause: There was a lapse in oversight of the internal control process designed to ensure timesheets are properly approved and approved within a reasonable amount of time after the payroll period. Effect: Lack of compliance with designed internal controls over use of Project funds could adversely affect the Project?s compliance with HUD regulations. Questioned Costs: $0 Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 60 of the Project?s 660 disbursements ($235,759 of $1,234,314 total disbursements), including payroll and non-payroll, was selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend the Project review policies and procedures with applicable employees and remind them of the importance of established review and monitoring processes. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and the recommendation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-002 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Financial Assistance Listing #14.155 Section 223(f) Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase of Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects Special Tests and Provisions: Property and Operations, Distributions, and Reimbursement of Advances Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CRF 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: Our testing of the use of Project funds detected one instance where an employee?s timesheet was not approved and one instance where an employee?s timesheet was approved after payroll; however, we were unable to determine whether the review occurred within a reasonable amount of time after the payroll period. Cause: There was a lapse in oversight of the internal control process designed to ensure timesheets are properly approved and approved within a reasonable amount of time after the payroll period. Effect: Lack of compliance with designed internal controls over use of Project funds could adversely affect the Project?s compliance with HUD regulations. Questioned Costs: $0 Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 60 of the Project?s 660 disbursements ($235,759 of $1,234,314 total disbursements), including payroll and non-payroll, was selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend the Project review policies and procedures with applicable employees and remind them of the importance of established review and monitoring processes. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and the recommendation.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2022-002 Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program Name: Section 223(f) Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase of Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects Federal Financial Assistance Listing #14.155 Finding Summary: The Project?s internal control process requires approval of timesheets. During testing, there was one instance where an employee?s timesheet was not approved and one instance where an employee?s timesheet was approved after payroll; however, we were unable to determine whether the review occurred within a reasonable amount of time after the payroll period. Responsible Individuals: Lana Walter, Manager, Regional Affordable Housing and Matt Sieler, Supervisor Accounting Corrective Action Plan: We will review our procedures with applicable employees to ensure compliance with designed controls. Anticipated Correction Date: January 31, 2022

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Our testing identified the Project transacted more than $25,000 with a vendor but did not retain documentation to support verification that the vendor was not included as an excluded party within the System for Award Management (SAM). Cause: There was a lapse in oversight of the internal control process over suspension and debarment. Effect: The Project could execute a covered transaction with a party that is suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None Reported Context/Sampling: Sampling was not used. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend the Project?s sponsor review its policies and procedures to ensure all vendors are compared to the SAM and documentation is retained before the Project executes a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and the recommendation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-003 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Financial Assistance Listing #14.155 Section 223(f) Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase of Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects Suspension and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CRF 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition: Our testing identified the Project transacted more than $25,000 with a vendor but did not retain documentation to support verification that the vendor was not included as an excluded party within the System for Award Management (SAM). Cause: There was a lapse in oversight of the internal control process over suspension and debarment. Effect: The Project could execute a covered transaction with a party that is suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None Reported Context/Sampling: Sampling was not used. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend the Project?s sponsor review its policies and procedures to ensure all vendors are compared to the SAM and documentation is retained before the Project executes a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and the recommendation.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2022-003 Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program Name: Section 223(f) Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase of Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects Federal Financial Assistance Listing #14.155 Finding Summary: The Project transacted more than $25,000 with a vendor but did not retain documentation to support verification that the vendor was not included as an excluded party within the System for Award Management (SAM). Responsible Individuals: Daniel Schneider, Supervisor, Finance and Matt Sieler, Supervisor Accounting Corrective Action Plan: We will review our procedures with applicable employees to ensure compliance with designed controls. Anticipated Correction Date: January 31, 2022

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2020-12-31

GOING CONCERNLOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,185,240 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 21, 2021 — management decision was due October 21, 2021.

2020-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Our testing of disbursements identified that a disbursement of surplus cash to the member was not approved at a level required by the Project?s internal control policy. Cause: A recent change in the design of the internal control process surrounding intercompany transactions and the disbursement of Project funds through these transactions did not adequately consider all elements of intercompany disbursements. Effect: Disbursements of the Project?s funds that are not in compliance with HUD regulations could occur. Questioned Costs: None reported Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 40 of the Project?s 565 disbursements ($239,324 of $876,546 total disbursements), including payroll and non-payroll, was selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend the Project review policies and procedures relating to disbursement of surplus cash to ensure disbursements are approved at the level required by the Project?s internal control policy. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and the recommendation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-001 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Financial Assistance Listing #14.155 Section 223(f) Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase of Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects Special Tests and Provisions: Property and Operations, Distributions, and Reimbursement of Advances Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: The Project?s internal control process requires cash disbursements be reviewed and approved by an authorized employee based on assigned approval levels. Condition: Our testing of disbursements identified that a disbursement of surplus cash to the member was not approved at a level required by the Project?s internal control policy. Cause: A recent change in the design of the internal control process surrounding intercompany transactions and the disbursement of Project funds through these transactions did not adequately consider all elements of intercompany disbursements. Effect: Disbursements of the Project?s funds that are not in compliance with HUD regulations could occur. Questioned Costs: None reported Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 40 of the Project?s 565 disbursements ($239,324 of $876,546 total disbursements), including payroll and non-payroll, was selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend the Project review policies and procedures relating to disbursement of surplus cash to ensure disbursements are approved at the level required by the Project?s internal control policy. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and the recommendation.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2020-001 Phone: 605-362-3100 Fax: 605-362-3309 wviw.good-sam.com Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program Name: Section 223(f) Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase of Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects Federal Financial Assistance Listing #14.155 Finding Summary: The Project's internal control process requires cash disbursements be reviewed and approved by an authorized employee based on assigned approval levels. The auditors identified that a disbursement of surplus cash to the member was not approved at a level required by the Project's internal control policy. Responsible Individuals: Susan Beaman, Director, Accounting Corrective Action Plan: We will review our procedures with applicable employees to ensure compliance with designed controls. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2021

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-12-31

$3,238,982 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 22, 2020 — management decision was due October 22, 2020.

FY 2018-12-31

$3,269,873 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 24, 2019 — management decision was due October 24, 2019.

2018-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2017-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-001

About Eligibility →
2018-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2017-12-31

$3,126,769 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 24, 2018 — management decision was due October 24, 2018.

2017-001
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in South Dakota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.