EIN: 316402328
UEI: GBK6M7GW9QJ3
Audited by: Keith Faber, Auditor of State
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 18, 2026 (18 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on March 4, 2025 — management decision was due September 4, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on May 9, 2024 — management decision was due November 9, 2024.
2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the OMB guidance in 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.317 - 200.327 requires entities to use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The School District paid more than $250,000 to Valley Wholesale during fiscal year 2023 for food products for the Child Nutrition Cluster. This amount exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold thus the District should follow a formal competitive procurement method described in 2 CFR 200.320(b). However, the School District did not follow a formal procurement method because they chose to use this local vendor (Valley Wholesale) to allow them to get their fresh produce in a timely manner to avoid food waste. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure proper bidding procedures were followed. Failure to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors being used that are not providing the best possible prices. The School District should follow their established procurement policies and federal guidelines when choosing all vendors for the Child Nutrition Cluster.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2 CFR § 400.1 gives regulatory effect for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the OMB guidance in 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.317 - 200.327 requires entities to use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR 200.324(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR 200.324(d)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The School District paid more than $250,000 to Valley Wholesale during fiscal year 2023 for food products for the Child Nutrition Cluster. This amount exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold thus the District should follow a formal competitive procurement method described in 2 CFR 200.320(b). However, the School District did not follow a formal procurement method because they chose to use this local vendor (Valley Wholesale) to allow them to get their fresh produce in a timely manner to avoid food waste. The School District did not have the proper internal controls in place to ensure proper bidding procedures were followed. Failure to have the appropriate controls in place may result in vendors being used that are not providing the best possible prices. The School District should follow their established procurement policies and federal guidelines when choosing all vendors for the Child Nutrition Cluster.
The School District will follow proper procurement procedures related to food purchases.
FAC accepted this audit on May 10, 2023 — management decision was due November 10, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on May 17, 2022 — management decision was due November 17, 2022.
2 CFR ? 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR ? 200.313(b) through (d) which require that: (c) Equipment must be used in the program or project for which it was acquired as long as needed, whether or not the project or program continues to be supported by the Federal award or, when appropriate, under other Federal awards; however, the non-Federal entity must not encumber the equipment without prior approval of the Federal awarding agency. (d) Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements: 1. Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the Federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property. 2. A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every 2 years. 3. A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. 4. Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. 5. If the non-Federal entity is authorized or required to sell the property, proper sales procedures must be established to ensure the highest possible return. Consistent with 2 CFR section 200.311 (real property), section 200.313 (equipment), and section 200.439 (equipment and other capital expenditures), ESF funds may be used for these purposes. Recipients and subrecipients may use ESF funds to purchase equipment. Capital expenditures for general and special purpose equipment purchases are subject to prior approval by ED or the pass-through entity. In addition, with prior approval by the ED or the pass-through entity, recipients and subrecipients may use ESF funds to purchase real property and perform construction for improvements to land, buildings, or equipment that meet the overall purpose of the ESF program, which is ?to prevent, prepare for, and respond to? the COVID-19 pandemic. The School District failed to properly track assets purchased or improvements completed with ESF (specifically Elementary and Secondary Education Relief or ESSER) funds in their Equipment Inventory System. This resulted in assets in the amount of $363,038 being input into the system that were purchased with federal funds but were indicated as purchased with General Fund monies in the system. It also resulted in unrecorded assets of approximately $320,138 purchased with ESSER Funds not recorded at all in the inventory system. This would not allow for proper tracking as required above. The misposting of inventory in the system to General fund was mainly due to the fact that assets were first purchased with General fund monies but then reimbursed by ESSER funds. The unrecorded assets were a result of the School District Treasurer not adding all assets to the system. The School District Treasurer must review the Equipment Inventory System and adjust it to include all assets purchased with ESSER Funds. In addition, the assets that are miscoded in the system should be corrected as well to ensure that all assets purchased with federal funds are indicated as such. Officials? Response: The School District has a third party prepare the GAAP statements and enter the capital assets in the EIS system. The District will now meet with the third party administrator and review the capitalization of assets to ensure the asset is capitalized to the correct fund.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2 CFR ? 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR ? 200.313(b) through (d) which require that: (c) Equipment must be used in the program or project for which it was acquired as long as needed, whether or not the project or program continues to be supported by the Federal award or, when appropriate, under other Federal awards; however, the non-Federal entity must not encumber the equipment without prior approval of the Federal awarding agency. (d) Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements: 1. Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the Federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property. 2. A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every 2 years. 3. A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. 4. Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. 5. If the non-Federal entity is authorized or required to sell the property, proper sales procedures must be established to ensure the highest possible return. Consistent with 2 CFR section 200.311 (real property), section 200.313 (equipment), and section 200.439 (equipment and other capital expenditures), ESF funds may be used for these purposes. Recipients and subrecipients may use ESF funds to purchase equipment. Capital expenditures for general and special purpose equipment purchases are subject to prior approval by ED or the pass-through entity. In addition, with prior approval by the ED or the pass-through entity, recipients and subrecipients may use ESF funds to purchase real property and perform construction for improvements to land, buildings, or equipment that meet the overall purpose of the ESF program, which is ?to prevent, prepare for, and respond to? the COVID-19 pandemic. The School District failed to properly track assets purchased or improvements completed with ESF (specifically Elementary and Secondary Education Relief or ESSER) funds in their Equipment Inventory System. This resulted in assets in the amount of $363,038 being input into the system that were purchased with federal funds but were indicated as purchased with General Fund monies in the system. It also resulted in unrecorded assets of approximately $320,138 purchased with ESSER Funds not recorded at all in the inventory system. This would not allow for proper tracking as required above. The misposting of inventory in the system to General fund was mainly due to the fact that assets were first purchased with General fund monies but then reimbursed by ESSER funds. The unrecorded assets were a result of the School District Treasurer not adding all assets to the system. The School District Treasurer must review the Equipment Inventory System and adjust it to include all assets purchased with ESSER Funds. In addition, the assets that are miscoded in the system should be corrected as well to ensure that all assets purchased with federal funds are indicated as such. Officials? Response: The School District has a third party prepare the GAAP statements and enter the capital assets in the EIS system. The District will now meet with the third party administrator and review the capitalization of assets to ensure the asset is capitalized to the correct fund.
The School District has a third party prepare the GAAP statements and enter the capital assets in the EIS system. The District will now meet with the third party administrator and review the capitalization of assets to ensure the asset is capitalized to the correct fund.
FAC accepted this audit on April 7, 2021 — management decision was due October 7, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2020 — management decision was due August 20, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2019 — management decision was due September 25, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2018 — management decision was due August 27, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2017 — management decision was due September 29, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-004
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Ohio →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.