← Back to home

LICKING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTLocal Government

EIN: 316400074

UEI: G6Y1W4U6CZM6

Audited by: perry and associates

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

LICKING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT19 audit years2 findings
19
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,895,907 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 30, 2026 (119 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$32,937,641 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2025 — management decision was due March 25, 2026.

FY 2024-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$2,956,717 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 19, 2025 — management decision was due March 19, 2026.

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$30,619,210 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 17, 2024 — management decision was due March 17, 2025.

2023-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Sound accounting practices require public officials to design and operate a system of internal controls that are adequate to provide reasonable assurance over the reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. There was one transaction out of forty (2.5%) tested during the Federal Transit Formula Cluster, where the invoice was not signed by the Director of the Transit Department indicating allowability. The actual expenditure was found to be allowable under the grant agreement. Failure to properly implement sufficient internal controls for determining allowability for a federal transaction could lead to improper spending of federal dollars. The County should monitor internal controls over purchases to ensure they are properly implemented and expenditures are reviewed for allowability and compliance with Federal laws and regulations.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Sound accounting practices require public officials to design and operate a system of internal controls that are adequate to provide reasonable assurance over the reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. There was one transaction out of forty (2.5%) tested during the Federal Transit Formula Cluster, where the invoice was not signed by the Director of the Transit Department indicating allowability. The actual expenditure was found to be allowable under the grant agreement. Failure to properly implement sufficient internal controls for determining allowability for a federal transaction could lead to improper spending of federal dollars. The County should monitor internal controls over purchases to ensure they are properly implemented and expenditures are reviewed for allowability and compliance with Federal laws and regulations.

Corrective Action Plan

The individual preparing invoice payments (I.e. the Fiscal Officer), will initial next to the authorizing signature on all invoices before submitting them for processing.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$2,323,420 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2024 — management decision was due June 17, 2025.

2023-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Sound accounting practices require public officials to design and operate a system of internal controls that are adequate to provide reasonable assurance over the reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. There was one transaction out of forty (2.5%) tested during the Federal Transit Formula Cluster, where the invoice was not signed by the Director of the Transit Department indicating allowability. The actual expenditure was found to be allowable under the grant agreement. Failure to properly implement sufficient internal controls for determining allowability for a federal transaction could lead to improper spending of federal dollars. The County should monitor internal controls over purchases to ensure they are properly implemented and expenditures are reviewed for allowability and compliance with Federal laws and regulations.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Sound accounting practices require public officials to design and operate a system of internal controls that are adequate to provide reasonable assurance over the reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. There was one transaction out of forty (2.5%) tested during the Federal Transit Formula Cluster, where the invoice was not signed by the Director of the Transit Department indicating allowability. The actual expenditure was found to be allowable under the grant agreement. Failure to properly implement sufficient internal controls for determining allowability for a federal transaction could lead to improper spending of federal dollars. The County should monitor internal controls over purchases to ensure they are properly implemented and expenditures are reviewed for allowability and compliance with Federal laws and regulations.

Corrective Action Plan

The individual preparing invoice payments (I.e. the Fiscal Officer), will initial next to the authorizing signature on all invoices before submitting them for processing.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$29,189,603 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2023 — management decision was due March 25, 2024.

FY 2022-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$2,153,923 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2023 — management decision was due January 31, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$23,322,725 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2022 — management decision was due March 26, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$3,179,843 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2022 — management decision was due March 28, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$3,253,438 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 22, 2021 — management decision was due May 22, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$30,608,060 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 12, 2021 — management decision was due March 12, 2022.

FY 2019-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$1,824,518 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 2, 2020 — management decision was due March 2, 2021.

FY 2019-12-31

$22,949,173 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 30, 2020 — management decision was due March 2, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

$20,629,634 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 12, 2019 — management decision was due February 12, 2020.

FY 2018-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,784,142 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 2, 2019 — management decision was due March 2, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,602,872 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2018 — management decision was due March 27, 2019.

2017-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2017-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$19,343,145 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 19, 2018 — management decision was due February 19, 2019.

2017-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2016-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,372,112 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 22, 2017 — management decision was due November 22, 2017.

FY 2016-12-31

$18,371,858 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 3, 2017 — management decision was due February 3, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Ohio

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.