← Back to home

Springfield City School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 316000973

UEI: WYKMYUND1FF5

Audited by: Clark Schaefer Hackett

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Springfield City School District10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$24.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$24,794,878 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 27, 2026 (35 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$32,836,928 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2025 — management decision was due July 10, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$24,530,240 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2024 — management decision was due August 26, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$22,356,488 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2023 — management decision was due August 28, 2023.

2022-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

2022-001 Wage Rate Requirements ? Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance ALN 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund ALN 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) ALN 84.425W ? American Rescue Plan ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief ?Homeless Children and Youth Condition and Criteria: In accordance with 29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6, contractors and subcontractors are required to submit to the entity, weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). During our audit of wage rate requirements, we noted the District?s contract with a certain vendor included the purchase of ionization equipment and labor costs associated with the installation of the equipment did not include a provision to ensure the contactor complied with Federal Prevailing wage rate requirements. Although, the labor portion of the contract was not material to the program, the District could not provide support that weekly certified payroll documents were provided by the contractor. Effect: Failing to receive and review certified payrolls could result in contractors and subcontractors being non-compliant with wage rate requirements. Cause: The District?s contract with this vendor did not include a provision to ensure the contactor complied with Federal Prevailing wage rate requirements. The District lacked procedures to ensure its contractors and subcontractors were submitting weekly certified payrolls for each week work was performed. Recommendation: We recommend the District develop and implement procedures to ensure that, when required by Federal program legislation, all contracts include a provision for compliance with Federal Prevailing wage rate requirements. In addition, we recommend the District implement procedures to ensure tracking of contractor and subcontractor work and subsequent submission of required certified payroll documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001 Wage Rate Requirements ? Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance ALN 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund ALN 84.425U ? American Rescue Plan ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) ALN 84.425W ? American Rescue Plan ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief ?Homeless Children and Youth Condition and Criteria: In accordance with 29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6, contractors and subcontractors are required to submit to the entity, weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). During our audit of wage rate requirements, we noted the District?s contract with a certain vendor included the purchase of ionization equipment and labor costs associated with the installation of the equipment did not include a provision to ensure the contactor complied with Federal Prevailing wage rate requirements. Although, the labor portion of the contract was not material to the program, the District could not provide support that weekly certified payroll documents were provided by the contractor. Effect: Failing to receive and review certified payrolls could result in contractors and subcontractors being non-compliant with wage rate requirements. Cause: The District?s contract with this vendor did not include a provision to ensure the contactor complied with Federal Prevailing wage rate requirements. The District lacked procedures to ensure its contractors and subcontractors were submitting weekly certified payrolls for each week work was performed. Recommendation: We recommend the District develop and implement procedures to ensure that, when required by Federal program legislation, all contracts include a provision for compliance with Federal Prevailing wage rate requirements. In addition, we recommend the District implement procedures to ensure tracking of contractor and subcontractor work and subsequent submission of required certified payroll documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Number: 2022-001 Planned Corrective Action: The District has added additional language to the federal procurement checklist to ensure that all federal contracts are compliant with Federal Prevailing wage rate requirements. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately Responsible Contact Person: Nicole Cottrell, cottrellnl@scsdoh.org, (937) 505-2825

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,954,505 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 1, 2022 — management decision was due September 1, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,285,753 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2021 — management decision was due July 14, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,829,497 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2020 — management decision was due July 26, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,686,403 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2019 — management decision was due July 17, 2019.

2018-001
Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,777,363 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 26, 2017 — management decision was due June 26, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,716,397 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 2, 2017 — management decision was due July 2, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Ohio

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.