Batavia Local School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 316000730

UEI: DS99VJEGL9B1

Audited by: Julian & Grube, Inc.

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Batavia Local School District8 audit years3 findings1 repeat
8
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$3.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$3,080,600 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 13, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 13, 2026 (197 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-010
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2022-011OTHER MATTERS

Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 2 CFR § 200.510(b) states, in part, that the auditee must prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. At a minimum, the schedule must: a) List individual federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. b) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. c) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listing Number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listings information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. d) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. e) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in §200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule. f) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414. The School District did prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards; however, total federal expenditures were understated by $675,306. Adjustments were made to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Inaccurate completion of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards could lead to inaccurate reporting of federal expenditures by the School District and could jeopardize future federal funding. We recommend the School District review/update their current policies and procedures, including, prior to submitting the federal schedule to the auditors, a second review of data, support and amounts be reported, to help ensure accurate information is provided. Officials' Response: See Corrective Action Plan

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 2 CFR § 200.510(b) states, in part, that the auditee must prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. At a minimum, the schedule must: a) List individual federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. b) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. c) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listing Number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listings information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. d) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. e) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in §200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule. f) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414. The School District did prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards; however, total federal expenditures were understated by $675,306. Adjustments were made to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Inaccurate completion of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards could lead to inaccurate reporting of federal expenditures by the School District and could jeopardize future federal funding. We recommend the School District review/update their current policies and procedures, including, prior to submitting the federal schedule to the auditors, a second review of data, support and amounts be reported, to help ensure accurate information is provided. Officials' Response: See Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan

The School District will review the Uniform Guidance requirements and ensure all expenditures are accurately reported on the School District’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards.

Prior Finding References

2022-011

About Other →

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$4,400,582 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2024 — management decision was due May 1, 2025.

2022-010
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Equipment & Real Property / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Questioned Cost 47 CFR § 54.1710, in part, requires entities requesting funding to certify they are only seeking support for eligible equipment and/or services provided to students and school staff who would otherwise lack connected devices and/or broadband services sufficient to engage in remote learning. Additionally, 47 CFR § 54.1715, requires equipment inventory records to be maintained and identify: (i) The device or equipment type (i.e. laptop, table, mobile hotspot, modem, router); (ii) The device or equipment make/model; (iii) The device or equipment serial number; (iv) The full name of the person to whom the device or other piece of equipment was provided; and (v) The dates the device or other piece of equipment was loaned out and returned to the school or library, or the date the school or library was notified that the device or other piece of equipment was missing, lost, or damaged. 47 CFR 54.8(d), in part, states “unless otherwise ordered, any persons suspended or debarred shall be excluded from activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries support mechanism.” Furthermore, the School District’s Board policy #6325 – Procurement – Federal Grants/Funds, in part, states “The District shall not subcontract with or award subgrants to any person or company who is debarred or suspended. For contracts over $25,000, the District shall confirm that the vendor is not debarred or suspended by either checking the Federal government’s System for Award Management, which maintains a list of such debarred or suspended vendors at www.sam.gov; collecting a certification from the vendor; or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. (2 CFR Part 180 Subpart C).” The School District estimated unmet need for eligible equipment when it applied for ECF Program funds. However, the School District was unable to provide, at the time the reimbursement request was submitted, the determination of the actual number of eligible students with the unmet need, as required by the ECF Program. Additionally, the School District did not maintain a detailed inventory listing of the equipment, consisting of 1,305 laptops, as required by the ECF Program. Therefore, $391,500 (1,305 laptops, purchased at $300/unit) in expenditures from the Emergency Connectivity Fund (ECF) Program is considered a questioned cost. Furthermore, the School District did not have proper internal controls in place to verify and maintain documentation supporting the vendor had not been suspended or debarred. Failure to maintain the appropriate supporting documentation in according with the ECF Program requirements (reimbursements requests, unmet need determinations, and inventory listings), could result in additional questioned costs, and reduced future federal funding. Additionally, not having appropriate controls in place may result in issuing payments, using federal funds, to vendors that are suspended or debarred. We recommend the School District implement additional control procedures that ensure all staff fully understand the ECF Program requirements and procedures are in place to support reimbursement requests. Additionally, we recommend that prior to entering into contracts, the School District verify and maintain supporting documentation that the vendors are not suspended or debarred.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Questioned Cost 47 CFR § 54.1710, in part, requires entities requesting funding to certify they are only seeking support for eligible equipment and/or services provided to students and school staff who would otherwise lack connected devices and/or broadband services sufficient to engage in remote learning. Additionally, 47 CFR § 54.1715, requires equipment inventory records to be maintained and identify: (i) The device or equipment type (i.e. laptop, table, mobile hotspot, modem, router); (ii) The device or equipment make/model; (iii) The device or equipment serial number; (iv) The full name of the person to whom the device or other piece of equipment was provided; and (v) The dates the device or other piece of equipment was loaned out and returned to the school or library, or the date the school or library was notified that the device or other piece of equipment was missing, lost, or damaged. 47 CFR 54.8(d), in part, states “unless otherwise ordered, any persons suspended or debarred shall be excluded from activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries support mechanism.” Furthermore, the School District’s Board policy #6325 – Procurement – Federal Grants/Funds, in part, states “The District shall not subcontract with or award subgrants to any person or company who is debarred or suspended. For contracts over $25,000, the District shall confirm that the vendor is not debarred or suspended by either checking the Federal government’s System for Award Management, which maintains a list of such debarred or suspended vendors at www.sam.gov; collecting a certification from the vendor; or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. (2 CFR Part 180 Subpart C).” The School District estimated unmet need for eligible equipment when it applied for ECF Program funds. However, the School District was unable to provide, at the time the reimbursement request was submitted, the determination of the actual number of eligible students with the unmet need, as required by the ECF Program. Additionally, the School District did not maintain a detailed inventory listing of the equipment, consisting of 1,305 laptops, as required by the ECF Program. Therefore, $391,500 (1,305 laptops, purchased at $300/unit) in expenditures from the Emergency Connectivity Fund (ECF) Program is considered a questioned cost. Furthermore, the School District did not have proper internal controls in place to verify and maintain documentation supporting the vendor had not been suspended or debarred. Failure to maintain the appropriate supporting documentation in according with the ECF Program requirements (reimbursements requests, unmet need determinations, and inventory listings), could result in additional questioned costs, and reduced future federal funding. Additionally, not having appropriate controls in place may result in issuing payments, using federal funds, to vendors that are suspended or debarred. We recommend the School District implement additional control procedures that ensure all staff fully understand the ECF Program requirements and procedures are in place to support reimbursement requests. Additionally, we recommend that prior to entering into contracts, the School District verify and maintain supporting documentation that the vendors are not suspended or debarred.

Corrective Action Plan

The School District will review the Uniform Guidance requirements and ensure all supporting documentation for federal programs is maintained and readily available.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Equipment and Real Property Management, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-011
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 2 CFR § 200.510(b) states, in part, that the auditee must prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. At a minimum, the schedule must: a) List individual federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. b) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. c) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listing Number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listings information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. d) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. e) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in §200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule. f) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414. The School District did prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards; however, total federal expenditures were understated by $1,559,951. Adjustments were made to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Inaccurate completion of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards could lead to inaccurate reporting of federal expenditures by the School District and could jeopardize future federal funding. We recommend the School District review/update their current policies and procedures, including, prior to submitting the federal schedule to the auditors, a second review of data, support and amounts be reported, to help ensure accurate information is provided.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 2 CFR § 200.510(b) states, in part, that the auditee must prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended. At a minimum, the schedule must: a) List individual federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. b) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. c) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listing Number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listings information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster. d) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. e) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in §200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule. f) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in §200.414. The School District did prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards; however, total federal expenditures were understated by $1,559,951. Adjustments were made to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Inaccurate completion of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards could lead to inaccurate reporting of federal expenditures by the School District and could jeopardize future federal funding. We recommend the School District review/update their current policies and procedures, including, prior to submitting the federal schedule to the auditors, a second review of data, support and amounts be reported, to help ensure accurate information is provided.

Corrective Action Plan

The School District will review the Uniform Guidance requirements and ensure all expenditures are accurately reported on the School District’s federal schedule.

About Other →

FY 2021-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,403,667 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 13, 2022 — management decision was due April 13, 2023.

FY 2020-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,151,358 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 28, 2021 — management decision was due October 28, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,022,895 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2020 — management decision was due September 29, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,710,362 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 5, 2019 — management decision was due September 5, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,997,329 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2018 — management decision was due September 6, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,748,177 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2017 — management decision was due September 6, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.