EIN: 311480524
UEI: GQDFBDLZRFJ1
204111730, 210643358, 210648335, 221574538, 222567703, 223681799, 223693840, 472827647, 474925894, 521572691 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing
Audited by: BAKER TILLY US LLP
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 14, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 14, 2024 (903 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on December 6, 2022 — management decision was due June 6, 2023.
Finding 2021-001 - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control - Review and Approval of Allowable Costs Assistance Listing Number: 93.498 COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency: Not Applicable Award Number / Year: Not Applicable / 2021 Criteria: Uniorm Administrative Requirements, 45 CFR 75.303 Internal Controls: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition/Context: During the testing of activities allowed or unallowed, allowable costs/cost principles we observed bonus payments that did not contain a documented review and approval of bonuses paid. The Company did have established policies for these bonus programs, and such payments were deemed to be allowable. Bonuses paid were supported by source documents evidencing the employee met the criteria for bonus payment. However, the source documents did not contain evidence of approval prior to payment. Effect: Transactions containing no evidence of review or approval could result in unallowable costs being charged to the federal program. Questioned Costs: None reported. Cause: As a result of COVID-19 pandemic, the Company experienced an unprecedented increase in the demand on existing resources across all lines of business. The Company prioritized the health and safety of staff and residents first and foremost. While the Company's policy is to document a review and approval of bonuses, resource constraints and competing priorities led to the missing documentation noted in testing. Recommendation: We recommend that management review their existing policies and procedures to ensure that during times of increased demand, the review and approval of transactions charged to the federal award may still be consummated through the use of alternative reviews and approvals. Views of Responsible Officials: Management's adherence to internal controls over review and approval of allowable costs is paramount. Multiple ways to ensure accurate payroll processing are in place, including various monitoring reports that are provided and reviewed throughout all levels of the organization. In a very small number of circumstances, supervisors were unable to document their approvals. Operating in an unprecedented pandemic, management's ultimate responsibility was the safety and care of our residents and employees.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2021-001 - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control - Review and Approval of Allowable Costs Assistance Listing Number: 93.498 COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency: Not Applicable Award Number / Year: Not Applicable / 2021 Criteria: Uniorm Administrative Requirements, 45 CFR 75.303 Internal Controls: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition/Context: During the testing of activities allowed or unallowed, allowable costs/cost principles we observed bonus payments that did not contain a documented review and approval of bonuses paid. The Company did have established policies for these bonus programs, and such payments were deemed to be allowable. Bonuses paid were supported by source documents evidencing the employee met the criteria for bonus payment. However, the source documents did not contain evidence of approval prior to payment. Effect: Transactions containing no evidence of review or approval could result in unallowable costs being charged to the federal program. Questioned Costs: None reported. Cause: As a result of COVID-19 pandemic, the Company experienced an unprecedented increase in the demand on existing resources across all lines of business. The Company prioritized the health and safety of staff and residents first and foremost. While the Company's policy is to document a review and approval of bonuses, resource constraints and competing priorities led to the missing documentation noted in testing. Recommendation: We recommend that management review their existing policies and procedures to ensure that during times of increased demand, the review and approval of transactions charged to the federal award may still be consummated through the use of alternative reviews and approvals. Views of Responsible Officials: Management's adherence to internal controls over review and approval of allowable costs is paramount. Multiple ways to ensure accurate payroll processing are in place, including various monitoring reports that are provided and reviewed throughout all levels of the organization. In a very small number of circumstances, supervisors were unable to document their approvals. Operating in an unprecedented pandemic, management's ultimate responsibility was the safety and care of our residents and employees.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN December 6, 2022 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Springpoint Senior Living, Inc. respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2021. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Baker Tilly U.S., LLP One Liberty Place, 1650 Market Street, Suite 4500, Philadelphia, PA 19103 Audit period: Year Ending December 31, 2021 The finding from the December 31, 2021 schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the number assigned in the schedule. Financial Statement Finding Finding 2021-001 Recommendation: We recommend that management review their existing policies and procedures to ensure that during times of increased demand, the review and approval of transactions charged to the federal award may still be consummated through the use of alternative reviews and approvals. Action Taken: Education has been conducted so that going forward these separate bonus payments will be formally approved. Additional steps will be added to track bonuses and approvals prior to payment.
FAC accepted this audit on November 15, 2022 — management decision was due May 15, 2023.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in New Jersey →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.