← Back to home

Marinette School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 311042586

UEI: KNJYZCGCVVZ9

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen, LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

Marinette School District10 audit years3 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$2.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,087,998 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 17, 2026 (77 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,392,403 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 26, 2024 — management decision was due May 26, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,373,459 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 12, 2023 — management decision was due June 12, 2024.

2023-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Type of Finding Significant deficiency in internal control over financial reporting. Criteria or Specific Requirements 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires non-federal entities to follow suspension and debarment regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. When a nonfederal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition The District could not provide proof of verification of the suspension and debarment status of vendors before entering into services. Questioned Costs None. Context The District did not review 1 of 2 vendors tested in our sample to ensure they were not suspended or debarred when initiating covered transactions in the current year. Cause The District did not follow their Federal Funds Suspension and Debarment Policy related to appropriate methods of verifying vendors are not suspended or debarred. Effect The District could contract with a vendor that has been suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend the District include contract language which ensures vendor are not suspended or debarred as well as utilize sam.gov to review vendors at the beginning of the year or before a transaction is incurred in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. View of Reasonable Officials There is no disagreement with this finding and management has developed a plan to correct the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Type of Finding Significant deficiency in internal control over financial reporting. Criteria or Specific Requirements 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires non-federal entities to follow suspension and debarment regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. When a nonfederal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition The District could not provide proof of verification of the suspension and debarment status of vendors before entering into services. Questioned Costs None. Context The District did not review 1 of 2 vendors tested in our sample to ensure they were not suspended or debarred when initiating covered transactions in the current year. Cause The District did not follow their Federal Funds Suspension and Debarment Policy related to appropriate methods of verifying vendors are not suspended or debarred. Effect The District could contract with a vendor that has been suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend the District include contract language which ensures vendor are not suspended or debarred as well as utilize sam.gov to review vendors at the beginning of the year or before a transaction is incurred in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. View of Reasonable Officials There is no disagreement with this finding and management has developed a plan to correct the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend the District include contract language which ensures vendor are not suspended or debarred as well as utilize sam.gov to review vendors at the beginning of the year or before a transaction is incurred in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: Procedures will be updated to include verification that a vendor has not been suspended or debarred. A record of this verification will be retained.

About Reporting →

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,833,634 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 1, 2022 — management decision was due June 1, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,120,834 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 7, 2021 — management decision was due June 7, 2022.

2021-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Repeat Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D Pass-Through Entity Identifying Number: 2021-514620-DPI-ESSERF-160, 2021-514620-DPI-GEERF-162 Award Period: July 1, 2020 - June 30, 2021 Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Condition There is no review of the grant claims which are the basis of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Criteria Review of grant claims is an internal control intended to prevent or decrease the occurrence of errors or intentional fraud. Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that no procedure for the review of the grant claims was in place at the District. Cause The District does not have a system of internal controls in place to ensure compliance over the program. Effect Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of review of grant claims. Recommendation We recommend the District implement procedures to ensure adherence to the program requirements. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Repeat Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D Pass-Through Entity Identifying Number: 2021-514620-DPI-ESSERF-160, 2021-514620-DPI-GEERF-162 Award Period: July 1, 2020 - June 30, 2021 Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Condition There is no review of the grant claims which are the basis of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Criteria Review of grant claims is an internal control intended to prevent or decrease the occurrence of errors or intentional fraud. Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that no procedure for the review of the grant claims was in place at the District. Cause The District does not have a system of internal controls in place to ensure compliance over the program. Effect Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of review of grant claims. Recommendation We recommend the District implement procedures to ensure adherence to the program requirements. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Management will implement procedures to ensure adherence to the program requirements.

About Reporting →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,102,190 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2020 — management decision was due June 22, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,000,392 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,959,381 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2019 — management decision was due July 3, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,953,479 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2018 — management decision was due July 4, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,845,881 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 5, 2017 — management decision was due September 5, 2017.

2015-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-003

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-003

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Wisconsin

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.