← Back to home

Kansas Association of Conservation DistrictsNon-Profit

EIN: 300661669

UEI: WBPKVHCUP6F2

Audited by: James Gordon & Associates CPA, P.A.

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Kansas Association of Conservation Districts2 audit years2 findings1 repeat
2
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$2.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$2,574,962 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 29, 2026 (168 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →
2024-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2023-001

The District does not have a written procurement policy as required by the Uniform Guidance. Context: During the audit it was noted that the District lacked a documented procurement policy. Cause: The District did not have an adequate procurement policy. Questioned Costs: None Effect: An important component of internal controls and compliance is the existence of operating policies and procedures. Without those, there is a higher risk of noncompliance with program requirements. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: Management should determine the scope of written policies and procedures to comply with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials (unaudited): Management agrees with the findings and recommendation. The District has updated its policies and procedures during 2025 to ensure they meet the Uniform Guidance Requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.319(c) the District must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Condition: The District does not have a written procurement policy as required by the Uniform Guidance. Context: During the audit it was noted that the District lacked a documented procurement policy. Cause: The District did not have an adequate procurement policy. Questioned Costs: None Effect: An important component of internal controls and compliance is the existence of operating policies and procedures. Without those, there is a higher risk of noncompliance with program requirements. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: Management should determine the scope of written policies and procedures to comply with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials (unaudited): Management agrees with the findings and recommendation. The District has updated its policies and procedures during 2025 to ensure they meet the Uniform Guidance Requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the findings and recommendation. The District has updated its policies and procedures during 2025 to ensure they meet the Uniform Guidance Requirements.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Other →

FY 2023-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,363,054 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2024 — management decision was due June 18, 2025.

2023-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The District does not have a written procurement policy as required by the Uniform Guidance. Context: During the audit it was noted tha.t the District lacked a documented procurement policy. Cause: The District did not have an adequate procurement policy Questioned Costs: None Effect: An important component of internal controls and compliance is the existence of operating policies and procedures. Without those, there is a higher risk of noncompliance with program requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should determine the scope of written policies and procedures to comply with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials (unaudited): Management agrees with the findings and recommendation. The District will update its policies and procedures to ensure they meet the Uniform Guidance Requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-001 (Significant Deficiency): Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.319( c) the District must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Condition: The District does not have a written procurement policy as required by the Uniform Guidance. Context: During the audit it was noted tha.t the District lacked a documented procurement policy. Cause: The District did not have an adequate procurement policy Questioned Costs: None Effect: An important component of internal controls and compliance is the existence of operating policies and procedures. Without those, there is a higher risk of noncompliance with program requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should determine the scope of written policies and procedures to comply with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials (unaudited): Management agrees with the findings and recommendation. The District will update its policies and procedures to ensure they meet the Uniform Guidance Requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the findings and recommendation. The District will update its policies and procedures to ensure they meet the Uniform Guidance Requirements. .

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kansas

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.