← Back to home

CALIFORNIA VETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 300186044

UEI: D3KHD8K1DEJ8

Audited by: Engelson and Associates Ltd

Oversight agency: 64 [Department of Veterans Affairs]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

CALIFORNIA VETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION, INC.10 audit years2 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$1.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,739,119 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 12, 2026 (74 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,894,063 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 22, 2025 — management decision was due November 22, 2025.

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,694,690 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 20, 2024 — management decision was due November 20, 2024.

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,643,328 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 24, 2023 — management decision was due November 24, 2023.

2022-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2021-001

2022-001 - Segregation of Duties (design deficiency)

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001 - Segregation of Duties (design deficiency)

Corrective Action Plan

Management concurred with the finding and did fill the position as identified in the Schedule of Prior Year Findings and

Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Other →

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,860,875 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 7, 2022 — management decision was due December 7, 2022.

2021-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

There is a lack of proper segregation of duties between the functions of record keeping, asset custody and authorization. Context: Due to the limited number of office personnel within the Organization, segregation of the accounting functions necessary to ensure adequate internal accounting control is not possible. This is not unusual in operations the size of Organization; however, the Organization?s management should constantly be aware of this condition and realize that the concentration of duties and responsibilities in a limited number of individuals is not desirable from an accounting point of view. Effect: Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the Organization?s ability to detect misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements in a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Cause: When accounting staff left the Organization, the Organization experienced hiring difficulties in order to maintain a proper segregation of duties. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization?s board and management be aware of the lack of segregation of duties of the accounting functions and, where possible, implement oversight procedures to ensure that the internal control policies and procedures are being implemented by staff to the extent possible. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Organization will continue to segregate duties whenever possible and implement oversight procedures to ensure that the internal control policies and procedures are being implemented by staff to the extent possible.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-001 - Segregation of Duties Criteria: A good system of internal control provides for an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. Condition: There is a lack of proper segregation of duties between the functions of record keeping, asset custody and authorization. Context: Due to the limited number of office personnel within the Organization, segregation of the accounting functions necessary to ensure adequate internal accounting control is not possible. This is not unusual in operations the size of Organization; however, the Organization?s management should constantly be aware of this condition and realize that the concentration of duties and responsibilities in a limited number of individuals is not desirable from an accounting point of view. Effect: Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the Organization?s ability to detect misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements in a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Cause: When accounting staff left the Organization, the Organization experienced hiring difficulties in order to maintain a proper segregation of duties. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization?s board and management be aware of the lack of segregation of duties of the accounting functions and, where possible, implement oversight procedures to ensure that the internal control policies and procedures are being implemented by staff to the extent possible. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Organization will continue to segregate duties whenever possible and implement oversight procedures to ensure that the internal control policies and procedures are being implemented by staff to the extent possible.

Corrective Action Plan

Management concurred with the finding and is in the process of implementing actions to address the issue identified. CVAF is actively recruiting for an Accounts Specialist position, which will allow for appropriate segregation of duty. Through several postings and interviews, we have not identified a suitable candidate. At this time, we will contract with a temp agency, Resolute HR to assist in our recruiting and hiring efforts. We anticipate having this position filled within 30 days.

About Other →

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,933,309 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2021 — management decision was due December 30, 2021.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,724,125 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 23, 2020 — management decision was due January 23, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,019,510 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 13, 2019 — management decision was due November 13, 2019.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,077,795 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 14, 2018 — management decision was due November 14, 2018.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,633,906 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 18, 2017 — management decision was due November 18, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.