EIN: 273339369
UEI: VXXXAZQ1PD16
Audited by: Symphona LLP
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 17, 2026 (78 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Over Award of Federal Pell Grant Program Funds Cause: No cause could be determined. Effect: The students in question were not awarded properly based upon the students’ eligibility. Questioned Costs: Total Questioned Costs: $769 $350 in 2023-2024 Federal Pell Grant program funds. $419 in 2024-2025 Federal Pell Grant program funds. Description of the Nature and Extent of the Issues Reported: Our review of fifty (50) student files disclosed that two (2) students were incorrectly awarded Federal Pell Grant program funds based on eligibility. Twenty five (25) of the student files were reviewed for Eligibility (EL), and twenty five (25) were reviewed for Verification (VR). For student #20 (VR), the Institution awarded $2,465 in 2023-2024 Federal Pell Grant program funds. The student was eligible for $2,115, resulting in an over award of $350 in 2023-2024 Federal Pell Grant program funds. For student #2 (EL), the Institution awarded $2,465 in 2024-2025 Federal Pell Grant program funds. The student was eligible for $2,046, resulting in an over award of $419 in 2024-2025 Federal Pell Grant program funds. Subsequent to the audit, the Institution refunded $350 in 2023-2024 Federal Pell Grant program funds on behalf of student #20 (VR). In addition the Institution refunded $419 in 2024-2025 Federal Pell Grant program funds on behalf of student #2 (EL). The instances of noncompliance represent an error rate in the number of sampled items tested equal to 4% (2 of 50) from a population of 4,182 and in the dollar amount of the sampled items tested equal to 0.18% ($769 of $432,530) from a population of $36,539,535. This is a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendations: We recommend that the institution review and update procedures to ensure that Federal Pell Grant awards are calculated and disbursed in accordance with 34 C.F.R. § 690.63 based on each student’s eligibility. Views of Responsible Officials: The Institution agrees with the finding and recommendation.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Identification of the Federal Program: United States Department of Education Federal Pell Grant Program (84.063) Criteria: 34 CFR 690.63 Condition: Over Award of Federal Pell Grant Program Funds Cause: No cause could be determined. Effect: The students in question were not awarded properly based upon the students’ eligibility. Questioned Costs: Total Questioned Costs: $769 $350 in 2023-2024 Federal Pell Grant program funds. $419 in 2024-2025 Federal Pell Grant program funds. Description of the Nature and Extent of the Issues Reported: Our review of fifty (50) student files disclosed that two (2) students were incorrectly awarded Federal Pell Grant program funds based on eligibility. Twenty five (25) of the student files were reviewed for Eligibility (EL), and twenty five (25) were reviewed for Verification (VR). For student #20 (VR), the Institution awarded $2,465 in 2023-2024 Federal Pell Grant program funds. The student was eligible for $2,115, resulting in an over award of $350 in 2023-2024 Federal Pell Grant program funds. For student #2 (EL), the Institution awarded $2,465 in 2024-2025 Federal Pell Grant program funds. The student was eligible for $2,046, resulting in an over award of $419 in 2024-2025 Federal Pell Grant program funds. Subsequent to the audit, the Institution refunded $350 in 2023-2024 Federal Pell Grant program funds on behalf of student #20 (VR). In addition the Institution refunded $419 in 2024-2025 Federal Pell Grant program funds on behalf of student #2 (EL). The instances of noncompliance represent an error rate in the number of sampled items tested equal to 4% (2 of 50) from a population of 4,182 and in the dollar amount of the sampled items tested equal to 0.18% ($769 of $432,530) from a population of $36,539,535. This is a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendations: We recommend that the institution review and update procedures to ensure that Federal Pell Grant awards are calculated and disbursed in accordance with 34 C.F.R. § 690.63 based on each student’s eligibility. Views of Responsible Officials: The Institution agrees with the finding and recommendation.
The Institution has reviewed the details of the finding and determined the error to be due to human error and the responsibility of the Institution. Subsequent to the audit, the Institution refunded $350 in 2023-2024 Federal Pell Grant program funds on behalf of student #20 (VR). In addition the Institution refunded $419 in 2024-2025 Federal Pell Grant program funds on behalf of student #2 (EL). These two students over-award was due to a schedule or grade change that took place after the start of student’s term or payment period. The Institution will implement reporting from our SIS to monitor schedule or grade changes that take place after the start of a student’s term or payment period.
FAC accepted this audit on September 10, 2024 — management decision was due March 10, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2023 — management decision was due June 13, 2024.
Incorrect Return of Title IV Funds (“R2T4”) Cause: The Institution determined the errors to be due to human error. Effect: Federal funds that would have been available to other eligible Title IV recipients were not available. Further, the United States Department of Education may have been subject to unnecessary interest and special allowance. Questioned Costs: Total Questioned Costs $953. $962 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant program funds. $(9) in 2022-2023 Federal Subsidized Direct Loan program funds. Description of the Nature and Extent of the Issues Reported: The Institution had a total of one thousand four hundred twenty-eight (1,428) students who withdrew during the audit period. We tested the files of twenty-five (25) of those students. It was determined that three (3) R2T4’s were not calculated correctly. For student #13, the R2T4 in question was returned on June 15, 2023, in the amount of $595 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds. The institutions should have recalculated the Federal Pell Grant funds to include in the R2T4 calculation. The Institution used $1,261 as Federal Pell Grant disbursed, when it should have only used the Less-than half-time amount of $420. After recalculating the Federal Pell grant, the Institution should have returned $214 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds, which resulted in an under return of $460 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant program funds. The Institution also used an incorrect number of days in the payment period in the R2T4 calculation, resulting in an incorrect percentage of aid earned. For student #AR1, the R2T4 in question was returned on May 31, 2023, in the amount of $9 in 2022-2023 Federal Subsidized Direct Loan Program funds. The $9 was the amount of return of funds due by Student, and not required to be returned by the institution. The institution did not have authorization to return on the students behalf. This resulted in an over return of $9 in 2022-2023 Federal Subsidized Direct Loan Program funds. For student #AR15, the R2T4 in question was returned on October 24, 2022, in the amount of $929 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds. The institution should have returned $1,431 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds, which resulted in an under return of $502 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds. The Institution used an incorrect number of days in the payment period in the R2T4 calculation, resulting in an incorrect percentage of aid earned. Subsequent to the audit, the Institution returned $962 to the 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant program funds on behalf of student #13 and AR#15. The instance of noncompliance represents an error rate in the number of sampled items tested equal to 12.0% (3 of 25) from a population of 1,428 and in the dollar amount of the sampled items tested equal to 0.68% ($953 of 140,563) from a population of $6,743,942. This is a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendations: The Institution needs to review and update its procedures to ensure that the R2T4 calculation process is completed correctly. Views of Responsible Officials: The institution agrees with the finding and recommendation. The Institution has planned the following immediate solutions to ensure accuracy for R2T4 calculations. • Share Corrective Action Plan (CAP) with accountable staff. • Create a scheduled hours chart for all programs to address the incorrect number of days being calculated in a payment period. Additionally, the Institution will standardize the usage of the automated calculations within the Institution’s Student Information System (Anthology) to help minimize potential human errors within our processes. • Evaluate and update R2T4 policies and procedures as necessary to incorporate these solutions. • Train staff on R2T4 calculations as well as conduct ongoing training on an annual basis. o This will also incorporate training on the Institution’s R2T4 policies, including covering the requirement that student files should be reviewed for appropriate student authorizations as well as the full-time/part-time status of a student. • Re-train staff on the Institution’s R2T4 peer review process. • Establish target dates to review CAP effectiveness. o The Institution will conduct a monthly review of the CAP’s effectiveness for the first six months after implementation of the CAP and then will conduct periodic reviews of the CAP thereafter.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2023-001 Identification of the Federal Program: United States Department of Education Federal Pell Grant Program (84.063) Federal Direct Loan Program (84.268) Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22 Condition: Incorrect Return of Title IV Funds (“R2T4”) Cause: The Institution determined the errors to be due to human error. Effect: Federal funds that would have been available to other eligible Title IV recipients were not available. Further, the United States Department of Education may have been subject to unnecessary interest and special allowance. Questioned Costs: Total Questioned Costs $953. $962 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant program funds. $(9) in 2022-2023 Federal Subsidized Direct Loan program funds. Description of the Nature and Extent of the Issues Reported: The Institution had a total of one thousand four hundred twenty-eight (1,428) students who withdrew during the audit period. We tested the files of twenty-five (25) of those students. It was determined that three (3) R2T4’s were not calculated correctly. For student #13, the R2T4 in question was returned on June 15, 2023, in the amount of $595 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds. The institutions should have recalculated the Federal Pell Grant funds to include in the R2T4 calculation. The Institution used $1,261 as Federal Pell Grant disbursed, when it should have only used the Less-than half-time amount of $420. After recalculating the Federal Pell grant, the Institution should have returned $214 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds, which resulted in an under return of $460 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant program funds. The Institution also used an incorrect number of days in the payment period in the R2T4 calculation, resulting in an incorrect percentage of aid earned. For student #AR1, the R2T4 in question was returned on May 31, 2023, in the amount of $9 in 2022-2023 Federal Subsidized Direct Loan Program funds. The $9 was the amount of return of funds due by Student, and not required to be returned by the institution. The institution did not have authorization to return on the students behalf. This resulted in an over return of $9 in 2022-2023 Federal Subsidized Direct Loan Program funds. For student #AR15, the R2T4 in question was returned on October 24, 2022, in the amount of $929 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds. The institution should have returned $1,431 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds, which resulted in an under return of $502 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds. The Institution used an incorrect number of days in the payment period in the R2T4 calculation, resulting in an incorrect percentage of aid earned. Subsequent to the audit, the Institution returned $962 to the 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant program funds on behalf of student #13 and AR#15. The instance of noncompliance represents an error rate in the number of sampled items tested equal to 12.0% (3 of 25) from a population of 1,428 and in the dollar amount of the sampled items tested equal to 0.68% ($953 of 140,563) from a population of $6,743,942. This is a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendations: The Institution needs to review and update its procedures to ensure that the R2T4 calculation process is completed correctly. Views of Responsible Officials: The institution agrees with the finding and recommendation. The Institution has planned the following immediate solutions to ensure accuracy for R2T4 calculations. • Share Corrective Action Plan (CAP) with accountable staff. • Create a scheduled hours chart for all programs to address the incorrect number of days being calculated in a payment period. Additionally, the Institution will standardize the usage of the automated calculations within the Institution’s Student Information System (Anthology) to help minimize potential human errors within our processes. • Evaluate and update R2T4 policies and procedures as necessary to incorporate these solutions. • Train staff on R2T4 calculations as well as conduct ongoing training on an annual basis. o This will also incorporate training on the Institution’s R2T4 policies, including covering the requirement that student files should be reviewed for appropriate student authorizations as well as the full-time/part-time status of a student. • Re-train staff on the Institution’s R2T4 peer review process. • Establish target dates to review CAP effectiveness. o The Institution will conduct a monthly review of the CAP’s effectiveness for the first six months after implementation of the CAP and then will conduct periodic reviews of the CAP thereafter.
Finding 2023-001 A. Comments on Findings and Recommendations: We agree with the finding and recommendation. B. Actions Taken or Planned: The Institution has reviewed the details of the findings and determined the errors to be due to human error. For student #13, the R2T4 in question was a refund which was returned on June 15, 2023, in the amount of $595 to the 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds. The Institution should have recalculated the Federal Pell Grant funds to include in the R2T4 calculation. The Institution used $1,261 as Federal Pell disbursed, when we should have only used $420 (due to the student being less than ½ time). After recalculating the Federal Pell, the Institution should have returned $214 to 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant program funds. This resulted in an under return of $460 in 2022-2023 Federal Pell program funds. In addition, the Institution used an incorrect number of days in the payment period in the R2T4 calculation, resulting in an incorrect percentage of aid earned. For student #AR1, the R2T4 in question was a refund which was returned on May 31, 2023, in the amount of $9 in 2022-2023 Federal Subsidized Direct Loan Program funds. The $9 was in the amount of R2T4 funds which was due to the student and not required to be returned by the Institution. The Institution did not have authorization from the student to return funds to the Federal Subsidized Direct Loan Program. This resulted in an over return of $9. For student #AR15, the R2T4 in question was a refund which was returned on October 24, 2022, in the amount of $929 to the 2022-2023 Federal Pell Grant Program funds. The Institution should have returned $1,431, which resulted in an under return of $502. The Institution used an incorrect number of days in the payment period in the R2T4 calculation, resulting in an incorrect percentage of aid earned. Subsequent to the audit, the Institution returned $962 to the Federal Pell Grant Program funds on behalf of student #13 and student #AR15. The Institution has planned the following immediate solutions to ensure accuracy for R2T4 calculations. • Share Corrective Action Plan (CAP) with accountable staff. • Create a scheduled hours chart for all programs to address the incorrect number of days being calculated in a payment period. Additionally, the Institution will standardize the usage of the automated calculations within the Institution’s Student Information System (Anthology) to help minimize potential human errors within our processes. • Evaluate and update R2T4 policies and procedures as necessary to incorporate these solutions. • Train staff on R2T4 calculations as well as conduct ongoing training on an annual basis. o This will also incorporate training on the Institution’s R2T4 policies, including covering the requirement that student files should be reviewed for appropriate student authorizations as well as the full-time/part-time status of a student. • Re-train staff on the Institution’s R2T4 peer review process. • Establish target dates to review CAP effectiveness. o The Institution will conduct a monthly review of the CAP’s effectiveness for the first six months after implementation of the CAP and then will conduct periodic reviews of the CAP thereafter.
2022-001
FAC accepted this audit on November 15, 2022 — management decision was due May 15, 2023.
Incorrect Return of Title IV Funds (?R2T4?)Cause:The cause was human error.Effect:Federal funds that would have been available to other eligible grant recipients were not available. Further, the United States Department of Education may have been subject to unnecessary interest and special allowance.Questioned Costs:$268 in 2020-2021 Federal Pell Grant program funds.Description of the Nature and Extent of the Issues Reported:The Institution had a total of one thousand seven hundred twenty-six (1,726) students who withdrew during the audit period. We tested the files of twenty-five (25) of those students. It was determined that one (1) R2T4 was not calculated correctly.For student #AR8, the R2T4 in question was returned on August 3, 2021, in the amount of $1,101 in 2020-2021 Federal Pell Grant Program funds, in the amount of $1,732 in 2020-2021 Subsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds, and in the amount of $2,969 in 2020-2021 Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. The Institution should have returned $1,369 in 2020-2021 Federal Pell Grant Program funds $1,732 in 2020-2021 Subsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds and $2,969 in 2020-2021 Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds, which resulted in an under return of $268 in 2020-2021 Federal Pell Grant program funds. The Institution used an incorrect number of days in the payment period in the R2T4 calculation, resulting in an incorrect percentage of aid earned.Subsequent to the audit, the Institution returned $268 to the 2020-2021 Federal Pell Grant program funds on behalf of student #AR8.The instance of noncompliance represents an error rate in the number of sampled items tested equal to 4.0% (1 of 25) from a population of 1,726 and in the dollar amount of the sampled items tested equal to 0.45% ($268 of 59,908) from a population of $8,601,672. This is a statistically valid sample.Repeat Finding:This is not a repeat finding.Recommendations:The Institution needs to review and update its procedures to ensure that the R2T4 calculation process is completed correctly.Views of Responsible Officials:The Institution agrees with the finding and recommendationThe Institution has reviewed the details of the finding and determined the error to be an isolated instance due to human error. The Institution returned $268 to the Federal Pell Grant Program on behalf of student #AR8. Student AR8 failed a class/module for the payment period in a non-standard program. On the Return to Title IV (R2T4) calculation, the payment period ending date should have been extended by an additional class/module. File Review will be added to the final review of all R2T4 calculations prepared for non-standard programs. If the academic transcript includes repeat classes/modules, payment periods used in the calculation will be reviewed for accuracy.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴SECTION 3. FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDSFinding 2022-001Identification of the Federal Program:United States Department of EducationFederal Pell Grant Program (84.063)Criteria:34 CFR 668.22Condition:Incorrect Return of Title IV Funds (?R2T4?)Cause:The cause was human error.Effect:Federal funds that would have been available to other eligible grant recipients were not available. Further, the United States Department of Education may have been subject to unnecessary interest and special allowance.Questioned Costs:$268 in 2020-2021 Federal Pell Grant program funds.Description of the Nature and Extent of the Issues Reported:The Institution had a total of one thousand seven hundred twenty-six (1,726) students who withdrew during the audit period. We tested the files of twenty-five (25) of those students. It was determined that one (1) R2T4 was not calculated correctly.For student #AR8, the R2T4 in question was returned on August 3, 2021, in the amount of $1,101 in 2020-2021 Federal Pell Grant Program funds, in the amount of $1,732 in 2020-2021 Subsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds, and in the amount of $2,969 in 2020-2021 Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. The Institution should have returned $1,369 in 2020-2021 Federal Pell Grant Program funds $1,732 in 2020-2021 Subsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds and $2,969 in 2020-2021 Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds, which resulted in an under return of $268 in 2020-2021 Federal Pell Grant program funds. The Institution used an incorrect number of days in the payment period in the R2T4 calculation, resulting in an incorrect percentage of aid earned.Subsequent to the audit, the Institution returned $268 to the 2020-2021 Federal Pell Grant program funds on behalf of student #AR8.The instance of noncompliance represents an error rate in the number of sampled items tested equal to 4.0% (1 of 25) from a population of 1,726 and in the dollar amount of the sampled items tested equal to 0.45% ($268 of 59,908) from a population of $8,601,672. This is a statistically valid sample.Repeat Finding:This is not a repeat finding.Recommendations:The Institution needs to review and update its procedures to ensure that the R2T4 calculation process is completed correctly.Views of Responsible Officials:The Institution agrees with the finding and recommendationThe Institution has reviewed the details of the finding and determined the error to be an isolated instance due to human error. The Institution returned $268 to the Federal Pell Grant Program on behalf of student #AR8. Student AR8 failed a class/module for the payment period in a non-standard program. On the Return to Title IV (R2T4) calculation, the payment period ending date should have been extended by an additional class/module. File Review will be added to the final review of all R2T4 calculations prepared for non-standard programs. If the academic transcript includes repeat classes/modules, payment periods used in the calculation will be reviewed for accuracy.
A. Comments on Findings and Recommendations: We agree with the finding and recommendation. B. Actions Taken or Planned: The Institution has reviewed the details of the finding and determined the error to be an isolated instance due to human error. The Institution returned $268 to the Federal Pell Grant Program on behalf of student #AR8. Student AR8 failed a class/module for the payment period in a non-standard program. On the Return of Title IV (R2T4) calculation, the payment period ending date should have been extended by an additional class/module. File Review will be added to the final review of all R2T4 calculations prepared for non-standard term programs. If the academic transcript includes repeat classes/modules, payment periods used in the calculation will be reviewed for accuracy.
FAC accepted this audit on November 21, 2021 — management decision was due May 21, 2022.
Over Award of Federal Direct Loan Program Funds Cause: The cause was human error. Effect: The student in question was not awarded properly based upon the student?s eligibility. Questioned Costs: $654 in 2020-2021 Subsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. $832 in 2020-2021 Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. Description of the Nature and Extent of the Issues Reported: Our review of forty (40) student files disclosed that one (1) student was incorrectly awarded Subsidized/Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds based on eligibility. For student #34, the Institution awarded $3,920 in 2020-2021 Subsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. The student was eligible for $3,266, resulting in an over award of $654 in 2020-2021 Subsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. In addition, the Institution awarded $4,988 in 2020-2021 Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. The student was eligible for $4,156, resulting in an over award of $832 in 2020-2021 Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. The Institution did not properly prorate the student?s loans for the student?s remaining period of study. Subsequent to the audit, the Institution refunded $654 to the 2020-2021 Subsidized Federal Direct Loan program and $832 to the 2020-2021 Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program on behalf of student #34. The instance of noncompliance represents an error rate in the number of sampled items tested equal to 2.5% (1 of 40) from a population of 6,014 and in the dollar amount of the sampled items tested equal to 0.3% ($1,486 of $431,654) from a population of $60,951,796. This is a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendations: The Institution needs to review and update its procedures to ensure that all students are awarded properly. Views of Responsible Officials: The Institution agrees with the finding and recommendations.The Institution and the Institution?s servicer have reviewed the details of the finding and determined the error to be an isolated instance due to human error. The servicer has taken additional action to clarify the Institution?s packaging notes to reduce future occurrences of the issue. The following packaging notes have been implemented as of October 25, 2021: ?All Remington students are required to have a schedule submitted with their repack, if the repack is submitted prior to the repack date. If the academic transcript includes grades for all terms up to the repack date, then no schedule needs to be submitted. File Review will calculate the number of credit hours earned prior to the student?s repack date and all hours that are currently in session as assumed hours. File Review will add the scheduled hours to the earned/assumed hours and subtract from the total program hours to determine the remaining hours in the final period of study. NOTE: If the hours (earned, assumed, and scheduled) exceed the total program hours, the File Reviewer will reject the student?s file back to the school for clarification.?
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴REMINGTON COLLEGE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Year Ended June 30, 2021 SECTION 3. FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS Finding 2021-001 Identification of the Federal Program: United States Department of Education Federal Direct Loan Program (84.268) Criteria: 34 CFR 685.301 Condition: Over Award of Federal Direct Loan Program Funds Cause: The cause was human error. Effect: The student in question was not awarded properly based upon the student?s eligibility. Questioned Costs: $654 in 2020-2021 Subsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. $832 in 2020-2021 Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. Description of the Nature and Extent of the Issues Reported: Our review of forty (40) student files disclosed that one (1) student was incorrectly awarded Subsidized/Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds based on eligibility. For student #34, the Institution awarded $3,920 in 2020-2021 Subsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. The student was eligible for $3,266, resulting in an over award of $654 in 2020-2021 Subsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. In addition, the Institution awarded $4,988 in 2020-2021 Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. The student was eligible for $4,156, resulting in an over award of $832 in 2020-2021 Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program funds. The Institution did not properly prorate the student?s loans for the student?s remaining period of study. Subsequent to the audit, the Institution refunded $654 to the 2020-2021 Subsidized Federal Direct Loan program and $832 to the 2020-2021 Unsubsidized Federal Direct Loan program on behalf of student #34. The instance of noncompliance represents an error rate in the number of sampled items tested equal to 2.5% (1 of 40) from a population of 6,014 and in the dollar amount of the sampled items tested equal to 0.3% ($1,486 of $431,654) from a population of $60,951,796. This is a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendations: The Institution needs to review and update its procedures to ensure that all students are awarded properly. Views of Responsible Officials: The Institution agrees with the finding and recommendations.The Institution and the Institution?s servicer have reviewed the details of the finding and determined the error to be an isolated instance due to human error. The servicer has taken additional action to clarify the Institution?s packaging notes to reduce future occurrences of the issue. The following packaging notes have been implemented as of October 25, 2021: ?All Remington students are required to have a schedule submitted with their repack, if the repack is submitted prior to the repack date. If the academic transcript includes grades for all terms up to the repack date, then no schedule needs to be submitted. File Review will calculate the number of credit hours earned prior to the student?s repack date and all hours that are currently in session as assumed hours. File Review will add the scheduled hours to the earned/assumed hours and subtract from the total program hours to determine the remaining hours in the final period of study. NOTE: If the hours (earned, assumed, and scheduled) exceed the total program hours, the File Reviewer will reject the student?s file back to the school for clarification.?
REMINGTON COLLEGE NON-PROFIT . - - 7131 Business Park Lane Lake Mary, FL 32746 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Finding 2021-001 A Comments on Findings and Recommendations: The Institution agrees with the finding and recommendations. B. Actions Taken or Planned: The Institution and the Institution's servicer have reviewed the details of the finding and.determined the error to be an isolated instance due to human error. The servicer has taken additional action to clarify the lnstitution's packaging notes to reduce future occurrences of the issue. The following packaging notes have been implemented as of October 25, 2021: "All Remington students are required to have a schedule submitted with their repack, if the repack is submitted prior to the repack date. If the academic transcript includes grades for all terms up to the repack date, then no schedule needs to be submitted. File Review will calculate the number of credit hours earned prior to the student's repack date and all hours that are currently in session as assumed hours. File Review will add the scheduled hours to the earned/assumed hours and subtract from the total program hours to determine the remaining hours in the final period of study. NOTE: If the hours (earned, assumed, and scheduled) exceed the total program hours, the File Reviewer will reject the student's file back to the school for clarification." Title: Senior VP of Financial Aid Date: 10/26/2021 E-mail Address: Deborah,diaz@remingtoncollege.edu Telephone: (407) 562-5569 Fax Number (866) 422-2487
FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2021 — management decision was due September 7, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2020 — management decision was due July 13, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2019 — management decision was due August 27, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on February 22, 2018 — management decision was due August 22, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2017 — management decision was due September 6, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Texas →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
