← Back to home

DOWNRIVER UTILITY WASTEWATER AUTHORITYLocal Government

EIN: 272954461

UEI: TZ6LZHRGL517

Audited by: PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC

Oversight agency: 66 [Environmental Protection Agency]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

DOWNRIVER UTILITY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY5 audit years1 findings
5
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$21.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

$21,085,836 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 8, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 8, 2026 (99 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$19,525,242 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 20, 2025 — management decision was due December 20, 2025.

2024-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name ALN 21.027, United States Department of the Treasury COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year SLFRP0127, 2021 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy Finding Type Material weakness Repeat Finding No Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 180.300, nonfederal entities are required to verify that external parties are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into a covered transaction. This requirement can be satisfied by conducting an exclusions search on SAM.gov, obtaining a certification from the contracted entity, or including a clause in the agreement that ensures compliance with nonexclusion requirements. Condition The Authority did not retain documentation to demonstrate that the Authority checked for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the contract. Questioned Costs None If Questioned Costs are not Determinable, Description of Why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could not be Reported Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Not applicable Context We tested two contracts for compliance with this requirement. For one of the contracts tested, we noted that the Authority did not retain the proper documentation to demonstrate that the requirement was performed prior to entering into the contract. Subsequently, the Authority performed the check and noted the contractors were not suspended or debarred, therefore, creating no questioned costs. Cause and Effect The Authority utilized an existing contractor to perform procurement, suspension and debarment activities related to a separately procured contractor; however, it did not have controls in place to monitor that activity was appropriately documented. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority incorporate controls to obtain and retain documentation of the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan DUWA agrees with this comment. Agreements will be reviewed by the system manager and accountant for all appropriate documentation according to the federal award guidelines prior to board approval. In the event that a consultant is used for oversight of the project, the guidelines will be provided in advance of the notice of bid and included in the bid documents.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name ALN 21.027, United States Department of the Treasury COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year SLFRP0127, 2021 Pass through Entity Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy Finding Type Material weakness Repeat Finding No Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR § 180.300, nonfederal entities are required to verify that external parties are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into a covered transaction. This requirement can be satisfied by conducting an exclusions search on SAM.gov, obtaining a certification from the contracted entity, or including a clause in the agreement that ensures compliance with nonexclusion requirements. Condition The Authority did not retain documentation to demonstrate that the Authority checked for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the contract. Questioned Costs None If Questioned Costs are not Determinable, Description of Why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could not be Reported Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Not applicable Context We tested two contracts for compliance with this requirement. For one of the contracts tested, we noted that the Authority did not retain the proper documentation to demonstrate that the requirement was performed prior to entering into the contract. Subsequently, the Authority performed the check and noted the contractors were not suspended or debarred, therefore, creating no questioned costs. Cause and Effect The Authority utilized an existing contractor to perform procurement, suspension and debarment activities related to a separately procured contractor; however, it did not have controls in place to monitor that activity was appropriately documented. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority incorporate controls to obtain and retain documentation of the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan DUWA agrees with this comment. Agreements will be reviewed by the system manager and accountant for all appropriate documentation according to the federal award guidelines prior to board approval. In the event that a consultant is used for oversight of the project, the guidelines will be provided in advance of the notice of bid and included in the bid documents.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Number 2024-002 Condition: The Authority entered into a contract with a contractor funded through a grant. The Authority did not retain documentation to demonstrate that the Authority checked for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the contract. Planned Corrective Action: Agreements will be reviewed by the system manager and accountant for all appropriate documentation according to the federal award guidelines prior to board approval. In the event that a consultant is used for oversight of the project, the guidelines will be provided in advance of the notice of bid and included in the bid documents. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Doug Drysdale Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2025

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,850,000 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 8, 2024 — management decision was due January 8, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

$17,850,000 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2023 — management decision was due December 26, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

$17,850,000 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 20, 2022 — management decision was due December 20, 2022.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.