← Back to home

THE LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITYLocal Government

EIN: 272822805

UEI: K2MKK44NT2Q8

Audited by: BCA Watson Rice Western Region LLP

Oversight agency: 97 [Department of Homeland Security]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

THE LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$4.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,090,382 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2026 (20 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →
2025-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

Reference Number: 2025-001 Federal Program Title: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Pass-Through Agencies: California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES)/County of Los Angeles Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Grant Programs Directorate (GPD)/City of Los Angeles Federal Award Number and Year: 037-00000; Grant Years 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024 Category of Finding: Reporting – SEFA (2 CFR §200.510(b)) Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria In accordance with Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §200.510(b)), the auditee is required to prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the financial statements that includes the total Federal awards expended for each Federal program. Condition The Authority Fiscal Agent (County of Los Angeles Auditor-Controller) initially prepared the SEFA based on Federal grant reimbursements received during the fiscal year rather than Federal awards expended, as required by the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §200.510(b)). As a result, the SEFA originally prepared by the County of Los Angeles Auditor-Controller management did not accurately report Federal awards expended for the fiscal year. The SEFA was subsequently revised to properly report Federal awards expended. The methodology used to prepare the SEFA had also been applied in prior years; therefore, the SEFA amounts for the two prior fiscal years presented for comparative purposes in the current report were revised to reflect Federal awards expended. Cause The Authority’s procedures for preparing and reviewing the SEFA did not fully address the requirement to report Federal awards expended in accordance with Uniform Guidance. The methodology used to compile the SEFA relied on Federal grant reimbursements received rather than Federal program expenditures recorded in the Authority’s accounting records. As a result, the review procedures performed over the SEFA did not identify that Federal awards expended were not being reported. Effect As a result of the methodology used to prepare the SEFA, the schedule required material revisions during the audit to properly report Federal awards expended. The same methodology had also been applied in prior years, resulting in revisions to the SEFA amounts for the two prior fiscal years presented for comparative purposes in the current report. The Authority administered only one Federal program during the current and prior two fiscal years; therefore, the revisions to the SEFA did not affect major program determinations. The revisions also did not affect the Authority’s previously issued financial statements. Questioned Costs None Recommendation Management should update its procedures for preparing the SEFA to ensure the schedule is compiled based on Federal awards expended recorded in the accounting records, rather than Federal reimbursements received, and that the review process verifies the SEFA accurately reports Federal awards expended. Management’s Response We agree. The Authority Fiscal Agent (County of Los Angeles Auditor-Controller) has reviewed our procedures to record expenditures in the SEFA to ensure amounts are correctly stated in the proper period when expensed rather than when the reimbursement is received. Corrective Action Plan During the fiscal year 2024-2025 audit, we implemented internal controls to properly record the expenditures in the SEFA. Implementation Date March 23, 2026

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Reference Number: 2025-001 Federal Program Title: Homeland Security Grant Program Federal Assistance Listing Number: 97.067 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Pass-Through Agencies: California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES)/County of Los Angeles Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Grant Programs Directorate (GPD)/City of Los Angeles Federal Award Number and Year: 037-00000; Grant Years 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024 Category of Finding: Reporting – SEFA (2 CFR §200.510(b)) Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria In accordance with Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §200.510(b)), the auditee is required to prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the financial statements that includes the total Federal awards expended for each Federal program. Condition The Authority Fiscal Agent (County of Los Angeles Auditor-Controller) initially prepared the SEFA based on Federal grant reimbursements received during the fiscal year rather than Federal awards expended, as required by the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §200.510(b)). As a result, the SEFA originally prepared by the County of Los Angeles Auditor-Controller management did not accurately report Federal awards expended for the fiscal year. The SEFA was subsequently revised to properly report Federal awards expended. The methodology used to prepare the SEFA had also been applied in prior years; therefore, the SEFA amounts for the two prior fiscal years presented for comparative purposes in the current report were revised to reflect Federal awards expended. Cause The Authority’s procedures for preparing and reviewing the SEFA did not fully address the requirement to report Federal awards expended in accordance with Uniform Guidance. The methodology used to compile the SEFA relied on Federal grant reimbursements received rather than Federal program expenditures recorded in the Authority’s accounting records. As a result, the review procedures performed over the SEFA did not identify that Federal awards expended were not being reported. Effect As a result of the methodology used to prepare the SEFA, the schedule required material revisions during the audit to properly report Federal awards expended. The same methodology had also been applied in prior years, resulting in revisions to the SEFA amounts for the two prior fiscal years presented for comparative purposes in the current report. The Authority administered only one Federal program during the current and prior two fiscal years; therefore, the revisions to the SEFA did not affect major program determinations. The revisions also did not affect the Authority’s previously issued financial statements. Questioned Costs None Recommendation Management should update its procedures for preparing the SEFA to ensure the schedule is compiled based on Federal awards expended recorded in the accounting records, rather than Federal reimbursements received, and that the review process verifies the SEFA accurately reports Federal awards expended. Management’s Response We agree. The Authority Fiscal Agent (County of Los Angeles Auditor-Controller) has reviewed our procedures to record expenditures in the SEFA to ensure amounts are correctly stated in the proper period when expensed rather than when the reimbursement is received. Corrective Action Plan During the fiscal year 2024-2025 audit, we implemented internal controls to properly record the expenditures in the SEFA. Implementation Date March 23, 2026

Corrective Action Plan

During the fiscal year 2024-2025 audit, we implemented internal controls to properly record the expenditures in the SEFA.

About Reporting →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,196,722 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2025 — management decision was due September 26, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,091,429 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$35,000,000 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2023 — management decision was due September 29, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$39,652,350 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022 — management decision was due September 30, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$42,472,348 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 9, 2021 — management decision was due September 9, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$24,511,409 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 23, 2020 — management decision was due September 23, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$18,589,313 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2019 — management decision was due September 27, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$38,714,027 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2018 — management decision was due September 19, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$71,241,354 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2017 — management decision was due August 27, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.