EIN: 272657899
UEI: GSA_MIGRATION
Audited by: CROWE LLP
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on July 11, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 11, 2023 (1330 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The Organization was unable to provide sufficient payroll documentation for certain employees who were funded by the TANF program. More specifically, certain timesheets did not show evidence of approval by a direct supervisor. This is a repeat finding. Cause: The Organization experienced turnover and did not have effective policies and procedures in place to ensure supervisory approval on timekeeping records. As a result, the timesheets for certain employees that were charged against the federal program were not being properly approved by a direct supervisor. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with federal requirements of costs charged to the TANF program. The costs may be disallowed. Questioned Costs: Due to insufficient payroll documentation for 7 individuals selected in our testing, certain salary/wages, and related taxes and benefits are considered known questioned costs in the amount of $19,660.49. We question costs when we find the Organization has not complied with grant regulations or when it does not have adequate documentation to support its expenditures. We must report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000 for a type of compliance requirement for a major program. Context: We tested 60 transactions charged against the federal program. The test found that 7 employees did not have sufficient payroll documentation. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: The Organization should implement a process to properly document approval by a direct supervisor before payroll is processed and charges are made against the federal program. The Organization should consult with the grantor to discuss whether the questioned costs identified in the audit should be repaid. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-001 Noncompliance with Allowable Costs U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through Texas Workforce Commission CFDA No. 93.558 ? Temporary Assistance for Needy Families TWC Contract No. 2919TAN001 Criteria: Internal controls should be in place in accordance with Federal award guidelines that provide reasonable assurance that employees who works, in whole or in part, on a federal program or cost objective are added to the payroll only after proper management approval Condition: The Organization was unable to provide sufficient payroll documentation for certain employees who were funded by the TANF program. More specifically, certain timesheets did not show evidence of approval by a direct supervisor. This is a repeat finding. Cause: The Organization experienced turnover and did not have effective policies and procedures in place to ensure supervisory approval on timekeeping records. As a result, the timesheets for certain employees that were charged against the federal program were not being properly approved by a direct supervisor. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with federal requirements of costs charged to the TANF program. The costs may be disallowed. Questioned Costs: Due to insufficient payroll documentation for 7 individuals selected in our testing, certain salary/wages, and related taxes and benefits are considered known questioned costs in the amount of $19,660.49. We question costs when we find the Organization has not complied with grant regulations or when it does not have adequate documentation to support its expenditures. We must report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000 for a type of compliance requirement for a major program. Context: We tested 60 transactions charged against the federal program. The test found that 7 employees did not have sufficient payroll documentation. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: The Organization should implement a process to properly document approval by a direct supervisor before payroll is processed and charges are made against the federal program. The Organization should consult with the grantor to discuss whether the questioned costs identified in the audit should be repaid. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding Number: 2021-001 Planned Corrective Action: FIRST in Texas will implement a formal time sheet system that requires a digital signature for both employee and supervisor. This was discovered in May, 2022. Anticipated Completion Date: July 1, 2022 Responsible Contact Person: Jason Arms, CEO (512) 953-7701 Jason.Arms@firstintexas.org
2020-001
FAC accepted this audit on July 11, 2022 — management decision was due January 11, 2023.
The Organization was unable to provide sufficient payroll documentation for certain employees who were funded by the TANF program. More specifically, certain timesheets did not show evidence of approval by a direct supervisor. Cause: The Organization experienced turnover and did not have effective policies and procedures in place to ensure supervisory approval on timekeeping records. As a result, the timesheets for certain employees that were charged against the federal program were not being properly approved by a direct supervisor. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with federal requirements of costs charged to the TANF program. The costs may be disallowed. Questioned Costs: Due to insufficient payroll documentation for 9 individuals selected in our testing, certain salary/wages, and related taxes and benefits are considered known questioned costs in the amount of $18,451.63. We question costs when we find the Organization has not complied with grant regulations or when it does not have adequate documentation to support its expenditures. We must report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000 for a type of compliance requirement for a major program. Context: We tested 60 transactions charged against the federal program. The test found that 9 employees did not have sufficient payroll documentation. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: The Organization should implement a process to properly document approval by a direct supervisor before payroll is processed and charges are made against the federal program. The Organization should consult with the grantor to discuss whether the questioned costs identified in the audit should be repaid. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2020-001 Noncompliance with Allowable Costs U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through Texas Workforce Commission CFDA No. 93.558 ? Temporary Assistance for Needy Families TWC Contract No. 2920TAN006 Criteria: Internal controls should be in place in accordance with Federal award guidelines that provide reasonable assurance that employees who works, in whole or in part, on a federal program or cost objective are added to the payroll only after proper management approval. Condition: The Organization was unable to provide sufficient payroll documentation for certain employees who were funded by the TANF program. More specifically, certain timesheets did not show evidence of approval by a direct supervisor. Cause: The Organization experienced turnover and did not have effective policies and procedures in place to ensure supervisory approval on timekeeping records. As a result, the timesheets for certain employees that were charged against the federal program were not being properly approved by a direct supervisor. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with federal requirements of costs charged to the TANF program. The costs may be disallowed. Questioned Costs: Due to insufficient payroll documentation for 9 individuals selected in our testing, certain salary/wages, and related taxes and benefits are considered known questioned costs in the amount of $18,451.63. We question costs when we find the Organization has not complied with grant regulations or when it does not have adequate documentation to support its expenditures. We must report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000 for a type of compliance requirement for a major program. Context: We tested 60 transactions charged against the federal program. The test found that 9 employees did not have sufficient payroll documentation. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: The Organization should implement a process to properly document approval by a direct supervisor before payroll is processed and charges are made against the federal program. The Organization should consult with the grantor to discuss whether the questioned costs identified in the audit should be repaid. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding Number: 2020-001 Planned Corrective Action: FIRST in Texas will implement a formal time sheet system that requires a digital signature for both employee and supervisor. This was discovered in May, 2022. Anticipated Completion Date: July 1, 2022 Responsible Contact Person: Jason Arms, CEO (512) 953-7701 Jason.Arms@firstintexas.org
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2020 — management decision was due September 30, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2019 — management decision was due August 12, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on December 4, 2017 — management decision was due June 4, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2017 — management decision was due July 31, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Texas →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.