← Back to home

Fort Cherry School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 256007829

UEI: JH3KQT59H3E5

Audited by: Butler Agnew & Associates

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Fort Cherry School District5 audit years3 findings
5
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,068,169 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 9, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 9, 2026 (38 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

During testing of procurement transactions charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster, we noted that the District did not consistently follow the federal procurement standards required by 2 CFR 200.318-327. Specifically: The District did not obtain the required number of price or rate quotations for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. • For procurements that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold, the District did not maintain documentation supporting full and open competition. • In several cases, the District was unable to provide evidence that vendors were verified against the SAM.gov exclusion list prior to contract award. • Procurement files did not contain required elements such as cost/price analysis, written procurement method selection, or justification for sole-source procurements. The transactions identified totaled approximately $50,000, which represents a material portion of federal expenditures tested under this major program. Cause: The District did not employ adequate internal controls to ensure that all federally funded procurements consistently followed the federal procurement standards. Staff turnover and insufficient training regarding federal procurement requirements also contributed to the deficiencies. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District design and follow internal controls to ensure proper procurement procedures are followed to comply with Uniform Guidance standards. Effect: Failure to follow federal procurement requirements increases the risk of: • Noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance, • Potential favoritism or lack of competition, • Unallowable costs being charged to federal programs, and • Federal funds being used inefficiently or in a manner inconsistent with federal regulations. The nature and extent of the exceptions identified represent a material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with procurement requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan included in this report package.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance - Child Nutrition Cluster Criteria: Federal regulations require non-federal entities to follow specific procurement standards when making purchases with federal award funds: • 2 CFR 200.320 requires the use of specific procurement methods (micro-purchase, small purchase, sealed bids, competitive proposals, etc.) based on the value of the transaction. • 2 CFR 200.318 requires the District to maintain oversight that ensures contractors perform in accordance with terms, conditions, and specifications. • 2 CFR 200.319 requires full and open competition and prohibits practices that restrict competition. • 2 CFR 200.324 requires cost or price analysis for certain procurements. • 2 CFR 200.213 requires verification that contractors are not suspended or debarred Condition: During testing of procurement transactions charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster, we noted that the District did not consistently follow the federal procurement standards required by 2 CFR 200.318-327. Specifically: The District did not obtain the required number of price or rate quotations for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. • For procurements that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold, the District did not maintain documentation supporting full and open competition. • In several cases, the District was unable to provide evidence that vendors were verified against the SAM.gov exclusion list prior to contract award. • Procurement files did not contain required elements such as cost/price analysis, written procurement method selection, or justification for sole-source procurements. The transactions identified totaled approximately $50,000, which represents a material portion of federal expenditures tested under this major program. Cause: The District did not employ adequate internal controls to ensure that all federally funded procurements consistently followed the federal procurement standards. Staff turnover and insufficient training regarding federal procurement requirements also contributed to the deficiencies. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District design and follow internal controls to ensure proper procurement procedures are followed to comply with Uniform Guidance standards. Effect: Failure to follow federal procurement requirements increases the risk of: • Noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance, • Potential favoritism or lack of competition, • Unallowable costs being charged to federal programs, and • Federal funds being used inefficiently or in a manner inconsistent with federal regulations. The nature and extent of the exceptions identified represent a material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with procurement requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan included in this report package.

Corrective Action Plan

Management's Response: The School District concurs with the recommendation. We recognize the importance of maintaining strong internal controls to ensure that all procurement activities are conducted in full compliance with Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) requirements. To address this recommendation, the District will enhance its existing procurement procedures by: 1. Developing and Formalizing Written Internal Controls. 2. Implementing Staff Training. 3. Strengthening Monitoring and Review Processes.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →
2025-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The School District has a limited number of staff responsible for or access to various stages of the accounting processes. Cause: The District does not have the number of employees necessary in the business office to properly segregate all duties. Recommendation: Ideally, the District would hire the number of staff necessary to segregate all duties. However, we realize segregation of duties is not practical, if not impossible. Because of this internal control situation, the responsibility of the Business Manager is greatly increased because the Board must rely on her knowledge of the everyday operations to discover any material changes in the School District's fmancial position. Effect: A lack in separation of duties makes the School District more susceptible to misappropriation of District Assets. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan included in this report package.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Segregation of Duties - Child Nutrition Cluster Criteria: The small size of the School District's business office staff limits the extent of separation of duties. The basic premise in an ideal accounting office is that no one employee should have access to both physical assets and the related accounting records or to all phases of a transaction. Some examples of lack of segregation of duties at the School District are as follows: The individual who receives checks on a routine basis also prepares the deposit. The same individual also reviews the receivables aging trial balance, investigates receivable discrepancies, and maintains or authorizes receivables adjustments as well as investigates discrepancies or issues related to revenue. For the cafeteria, one person receives the cash receipts, enters the deposit into the accounting system, and makes the deposit at the fmancial institution. One employee initiates checks for expenditures, edits the vendor master file, and investigates discrepancies or issues related to expenditures. Condition: The School District has a limited number of staff responsible for or access to various stages of the accounting processes. Cause: The District does not have the number of employees necessary in the business office to properly segregate all duties. Recommendation: Ideally, the District would hire the number of staff necessary to segregate all duties. However, we realize segregation of duties is not practical, if not impossible. Because of this internal control situation, the responsibility of the Business Manager is greatly increased because the Board must rely on her knowledge of the everyday operations to discover any material changes in the School District's fmancial position. Effect: A lack in separation of duties makes the School District more susceptible to misappropriation of District Assets. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan included in this report package.

Corrective Action Plan

Management's Response: The School District recognizes that the limited number of staff adds to the risk associated with the daily operations. To mitigate this risk, the Business Manager has to take an active role in the day-to-day operations of the Business Unit. She actively reviews all reconciliations and receipts to ensure they are posted to the accounting system properly. In addition, she approves all check disbursements and is reviewing the general ledger on a consistent basis.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2024-06-30

$1,420,525 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 14, 2025 — management decision was due November 14, 2025.

2024-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Equipment & Real Property / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Reporting / Subrecipient Monitoring / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The School District has a limited number of staff responsible for or access to various stages of the accounting processes. Cause: The District does not have the number of employees necessary in the business office to properly segregate all duties. Recommendation: Ideally, the District would hire the number of staff necessary to segregate all duties. However, we realize segregation of duties is not practical, if not impossible. Because of this internal control situation, the responsibility of the Business Manager is greatly increased because the Board must rely on her knowledge of the everyday operations to discover any material changes in the School District’s financial position. Effect: A lack in separation of duties makes the School District more susceptible to misappropriation of District Assets. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan included in this report package.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-2 Segregation of Duties Criteria: The small size of the School District’s business office staff limits the extent of separation of duties. The basic premise in an ideal accounting office is that no one employee should have access to both physical assets and the related accounting records or to all phases of a transaction. Some examples of lack of segregation of duties at the School District are as follows: The individual who receives checks on a routine basis also prepares the deposit. The same individual also reviews the receivables aging trial balance, investigates receivable discrepancies, and maintains or authorizes receivables adjustments as well as investigates discrepancies or issues related to revenue. For the cafeteria, one person receives the cash receipts, enters the deposit into the accounting system, and makes the deposit at the financial institution. One employee initiates checks for expenditures, edits the vendor master file, and investigates discrepancies or issues related to expenditures. Condition: The School District has a limited number of staff responsible for or access to various stages of the accounting processes. Cause: The District does not have the number of employees necessary in the business office to properly segregate all duties. Recommendation: Ideally, the District would hire the number of staff necessary to segregate all duties. However, we realize segregation of duties is not practical, if not impossible. Because of this internal control situation, the responsibility of the Business Manager is greatly increased because the Board must rely on her knowledge of the everyday operations to discover any material changes in the School District’s financial position. Effect: A lack in separation of duties makes the School District more susceptible to misappropriation of District Assets. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan included in this report package.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: Ideally, the District would hire the number of staff necessary to segregate all duties. However, we realize segregation of duties is not practical, if not impossible. Because of this internal control situation, the responsibility of the Business Manager is greatly increased because the Board must rely on her knowledge of the everyday operations to discover any material changes in the School District’s financial position. Management’s Response: The School District recognizes that the limited number of staff adds to the risk associated with the daily operations. To mitigate this risk, the Business Manager has to take an active role in the day-to-day operations of the Business Unit. She actively reviews all reconciliations and receipts to ensure they are posted to the accounting system properly. In addition, she approves all check disbursements and is reviewing the general ledger on a consistent basis.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Equipment and Real Property Management, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting, Subrecipient Monitoring, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-06-30

$1,394,218 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2024 — management decision was due September 26, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$1,602,985 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2023 — management decision was due September 27, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$1,089,951 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2022 — management decision was due September 24, 2022.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Pennsylvania

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.