← Back to home

Veterans Place of Washington Boulevard, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 251787030

UEI: VEANFKGNA8N4

Audited by: Herbein + Company, Inc.

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Veterans Place of Washington Boulevard, Inc.8 audit years1 findings
8
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$4.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,223,802 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 30, 2026 (157 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

2024-001 MISSING DOCUMENTATION AND DUPLICATE INVOICE SUBMISSION - MATERIAL WEAKNESS Federal Program Economic Development Initiative, Community Project Funding and Miscellaneous Grants - ALN 14.251 Criteria In order to be allowable under federal awards, costs must meet general criteria, which includes adequate documentation. Under OMB guidance, Public Law (Pub. L) No. 116-117, Payments Integrity Information Act of 2019, and Executive Order 13520 on reducing improper payments, federal agencies are required to take actions to prevent improper payments, review federal awards for such payments, and as applicable, recover improper payments, including any duplicate payment. Condition While performing tests over activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles, we noted documentation for one invoice charged to the grant could not be located. As a result, we were unable to determine that the cost was allowable per the terms of the grant award. We also noted that a second invoice charged to the grant was submitted for reimbursement twice. Cause This is a new grant in the current year to cover the portion of the cost for a new building. While management submitted invoices to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for review and approval prior to reimbursement, they did not maintain a record of the costs submitted for each reimbursement request by either listing the invoices and amounts charged or other means. Effect The Organization was unable to provide documentation for one of the invoices charged to the program, and a second invoice was charged to the program twice. Questioned Costs $54,461 Context The grant was for a portion of construction costs with the difference coming from donations or other assets of Veterans Place of Washington Boulevard, Inc. In order to receive reimbursement for expenses, the Organization was required to submit invoices to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for approval prior to uploading the invoices for reimbursement. The expenses in question were approved by HUD prior to requesting or receiving reimbursement. Furthermore, there were approximately $96,000 of construction costs that were incurred but not reimbursed by HUD that appear to meet the terms and conditions of the grant. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend that Veterans Place of Washington Boulevard, Inc. establish a system of internal control related to the costs charged to Federal programs. The process should establish procedures and responsibilities for the documentation and review of costs incurred and charged to Federal awards. This process should include a file, such as a spreadsheet, that shows the costs incurred, invoiced, and paid. The supporting invoices should also be maintained with the file. Review and approval of this documentation should be performed by a person other than the preparer prior to submission to the Federal agency. Management Response See corrective action plan included in this report package.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-001 MISSING DOCUMENTATION AND DUPLICATE INVOICE SUBMISSION - MATERIAL WEAKNESS Federal Program Economic Development Initiative, Community Project Funding and Miscellaneous Grants - ALN 14.251 Criteria In order to be allowable under federal awards, costs must meet general criteria, which includes adequate documentation. Under OMB guidance, Public Law (Pub. L) No. 116-117, Payments Integrity Information Act of 2019, and Executive Order 13520 on reducing improper payments, federal agencies are required to take actions to prevent improper payments, review federal awards for such payments, and as applicable, recover improper payments, including any duplicate payment. Condition While performing tests over activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles, we noted documentation for one invoice charged to the grant could not be located. As a result, we were unable to determine that the cost was allowable per the terms of the grant award. We also noted that a second invoice charged to the grant was submitted for reimbursement twice. Cause This is a new grant in the current year to cover the portion of the cost for a new building. While management submitted invoices to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for review and approval prior to reimbursement, they did not maintain a record of the costs submitted for each reimbursement request by either listing the invoices and amounts charged or other means. Effect The Organization was unable to provide documentation for one of the invoices charged to the program, and a second invoice was charged to the program twice. Questioned Costs $54,461 Context The grant was for a portion of construction costs with the difference coming from donations or other assets of Veterans Place of Washington Boulevard, Inc. In order to receive reimbursement for expenses, the Organization was required to submit invoices to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for approval prior to uploading the invoices for reimbursement. The expenses in question were approved by HUD prior to requesting or receiving reimbursement. Furthermore, there were approximately $96,000 of construction costs that were incurred but not reimbursed by HUD that appear to meet the terms and conditions of the grant. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend that Veterans Place of Washington Boulevard, Inc. establish a system of internal control related to the costs charged to Federal programs. The process should establish procedures and responsibilities for the documentation and review of costs incurred and charged to Federal awards. This process should include a file, such as a spreadsheet, that shows the costs incurred, invoiced, and paid. The supporting invoices should also be maintained with the file. Review and approval of this documentation should be performed by a person other than the preparer prior to submission to the Federal agency. Management Response See corrective action plan included in this report package.

Corrective Action Plan

Veterans Place of Washington Boulevard, Inc. submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2024. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Herbein + Company, Foster Plaza 10, 680 Andersen Drive, Suite 205, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Audit period: Year ended December 31, 2024 The finding from the December 31, 2024 schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the number assigned in the schedule. Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs 2024-001 MISSING DOCUMENTATION AND DUPLICATE INVOICE SUBMISSION - MATERIAL WEAKNESS Federal Program Economic Development Initiative, Community Project Funding and Miscellaneous Grants - ALN 14.251 Criteria In order to be allowable under federal awards, costs must meet general criteria, which includes adequate documentation. Under OMB guidance, Public Law (Pub. L) No. 116-117, Payments Integrity Information Act of 2019, and Executive Order 13520 on reducing improper payments, federal agencies are required to take actions to prevent improper payments, review federal awards for such payments, and as applicable, recover improper payments, including any duplicate payment. Condition While performing tests over activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles, we noted documentation for one invoice charged to the grant could not be located. As a result, we were unable to determine that the cost was allowable per the terms of the grant award. We also noted that a second invoice charged to the grant was submitted for reimbursement twice. Cause This is a new grant in the current year to cover the portion of the cost for a new building. While management submitted invoices to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for review and approval prior to reimbursement, they did not maintain a record of the costs submitted for each reimbursement request by either listing the invoices and amounts charged or other means. Effect The Organization was unable to provide documentation for one of the invoices charged to the program, and a second invoice was charged to the program twice. Questioned Costs $54,461 Context The grant was for a portion of construction costs with the difference coming from donations or other assets of Veterans Place of Washington Boulevard, Inc. In order to receive reimbursement for expenses, the Organization was required to submit invoices to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for approval prior to uploading the invoices for reimbursement. The expenses in question were approved by HUD prior to requesting or receiving reimbursement. Furthermore, there were approximately $96,000 of construction costs that were incurred but not reimbursed by HUD that appear to meet the terms and conditions of the grant. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend that detailed documentation of the costs submitted for reimbursement are maintained in a separate file so that costs charged to the program are easily identified. Management Response In the situation concerning our inability to identify invoices associated with a requested reimbursement, costs for a particular area were submitted for review and approval by HUD and the costs were not clearly attributed to one singular invoice but reflected as portions of the total invoice submitted by one vendor. In the future, when requesting reimbursement, costs will be more clearly indicated to a specific invoice and identified so they can be more easily tracked. In the case of a duplicate invoice, we typically checked against our records of paid invoices and in this case, our belief was that it was paid but not marked as submitted for reimbursement. In the future, invoices will be verified against both our record of paid invoices as well as a separate record of reimbursed invoices.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,943,453 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 13, 2024 — management decision was due March 13, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,263,827 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 21, 2023 — management decision was due March 21, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,820,082 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2022 — management decision was due March 26, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,210,177 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 21, 2021 — management decision was due May 21, 2022.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,090,066 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 17, 2020 — management decision was due May 17, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

$1,033,077 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2019 — management decision was due March 26, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

$909,248 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 21, 2018 — management decision was due February 21, 2019.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Pennsylvania

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.