EIN: 251239335
UEI: E4MBSCCKZ2N8
Audited by: Loius Plung & Company
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on October 20, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 20, 2026 (134 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on November 27, 2024 — management decision was due May 27, 2025.
Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed and in place to prevent, detect, and correct material misstatement in the financial statements in a timely manner. The internal controls were unable to prevent, detect, and correct a material error in the preparation of the financial statements as of and for the year ended February 29, 2024, in a timely manner. This resulted in resulted in a significant adjustment related to assets and expenses. Cause: Existing internal controls over financial reporting require that management perform meaningful analysis of internal records and general ledger accounts on a regular basis. Managements analysis of the allowance for credit losses and credit loss expense was not substantive enough which results in financial statements that contain a material error. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend that management improve upon established internal controls related to review of accounts receivable and the allowance for credit losses to ensure the estimate is adequate going forward. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management is taking steps to improve their analysis of the allowance for credit losses to ensure it is adequate for all future periods.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-001: Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Criteria and Condition: Internal controls over financial reporting should be designed and in place to prevent, detect, and correct material misstatement in the financial statements in a timely manner. The internal controls were unable to prevent, detect, and correct a material error in the preparation of the financial statements as of and for the year ended February 29, 2024, in a timely manner. This resulted in resulted in a significant adjustment related to assets and expenses. Cause: Existing internal controls over financial reporting require that management perform meaningful analysis of internal records and general ledger accounts on a regular basis. Managements analysis of the allowance for credit losses and credit loss expense was not substantive enough which results in financial statements that contain a material error. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend that management improve upon established internal controls related to review of accounts receivable and the allowance for credit losses to ensure the estimate is adequate going forward. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management is taking steps to improve their analysis of the allowance for credit losses to ensure it is adequate for all future periods.
Corrective Action: Comment: Due to illnesses, vacations, and holidays within our billing department at the end of 2023, we became almost 3 months in processing claims. This in turn caused a very large accrual at the fiscal year end into our AR. Most AR adjustments aren’t done until EOB’s are returned from the insurance companies. The auditors felt we didn’t account for enough adjustments per their sampling. • Recognize billing cycles are getting behind quicker by management. • Start having the billing director report new metrics monthly so management can react quicker to any potential issues. • Management needs to quickly formulate a plan to support the billing department to achieve an acceptable number of cycle days. o This could include approving overtime. o Adding temporary employees. o Having other staff with any experience assist the department.
Single Audits must be completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the issued auditors’ report. or nine months after the end of the audit period. The Single Audit was not timely completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months form the end of the audit period. Context: The Center provided information to their prior third party auditor in a timely fashion, however the auditor of record for the year ended June 30, 2023 was unable to process the information in a timely fashion. This resulted in the financial statements and Single Audit to not be finalized and issued in order to be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months of the end of the audit period. Effect: The data collection form and reporting package for the Single Audit for the year ended February 28, 2023 were not submitted within the specified timeframe resulting in award drawdown restrictions. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Internal controls over reporting and compliance were not effective at ensuring that the required reports were being completed and submitted in a timely manner. Recommendations: We recommend that management improve their reporting processes and controls to ensure that the Single Audit is completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management is taking steps to improve the internal controls over financial reporting and compliance to ensure that reporting can be completed in an accurate and timely manner. In addition, management has engaged a new third party auditor to help ensure timely filing. These changes include updates of internal processes.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-002: Timely Single Audit Submission Criteria and Condition: Single Audits must be completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the issued auditors’ report. or nine months after the end of the audit period. The Single Audit was not timely completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months form the end of the audit period. Context: The Center provided information to their prior third party auditor in a timely fashion, however the auditor of record for the year ended June 30, 2023 was unable to process the information in a timely fashion. This resulted in the financial statements and Single Audit to not be finalized and issued in order to be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months of the end of the audit period. Effect: The data collection form and reporting package for the Single Audit for the year ended February 28, 2023 were not submitted within the specified timeframe resulting in award drawdown restrictions. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Internal controls over reporting and compliance were not effective at ensuring that the required reports were being completed and submitted in a timely manner. Recommendations: We recommend that management improve their reporting processes and controls to ensure that the Single Audit is completed and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management is taking steps to improve the internal controls over financial reporting and compliance to ensure that reporting can be completed in an accurate and timely manner. In addition, management has engaged a new third party auditor to help ensure timely filing. These changes include updates of internal processes.
Corrective Action: Comment: Because our fiscal year ends on the month of February, we didn’t supply data to our financial auditors until August into September. Because our auditors were behind in their commitments, it pushed back our final audit by a couple of months. • First, we changed auditing firms. o We needed a firm that could commit to having financials completed in a timelier manner. • Most of our information had to be supplied to the auditors in the 3rd month after fiscal year end. • Sampling and testing need to begin as soon as data is received from BTAMC.
FAC accepted this audit on February 9, 2024 — management decision was due August 9, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on November 29, 2022 — management decision was due May 29, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on November 29, 2021 — management decision was due May 29, 2022.
Criteria: 42 CFR 51c.303(f) and 42 CFR 51c.303(g) requires a community health center grant recipient to have a sliding fee discount (?SFD?) program, and to establish systems for determining eligibility, billing and collection to ensure that payments are secured from patients for services in accordance with the SFD program. Chapter 9 of the Health Center Program Compliance Manual (the ?Compliance Manual?) contains requirements for a SFD program, along with guidance and other considerations as to how a health center will demonstrate compliance with these requirements. The Compliance Manual allows certain flexibility for the Center to determine a sliding fee discount program that is appropriate for its patient base; however, once such a program has been approved by the board it must be adhered to. It also allows a health center to establish a nominal fee for services that may be collected from patients at or below 100% of the federal poverty guideline (?FPG?), and also states that patients who are eligible for a SFD and have third-party insurance coverage should not be charged more for out-of-pocket costs than they would have paid under the SFD program. The Center has a Patient Accounting Sliding Fee Schedule within its policies and procedures which has been approved by the board of directors. This policy requires sliding fee discount applications to be completed for all patients. This application form contains a box that is to be checked if a patient declines the program, and the policy requires signature of waiver by the patient. All applications and proof of household income are to be maintained as part of the patient?s electronic health record. Applications are required to be renewed annually, and the sliding fee schedule year runs from March 1st to February 28th or 29th each year. Furthermore, this policy allows for a nominal charge of $20 to be charged to patients at or below 100% of the FPG. Condition/Context: As part of our audit of the Health Center Program cluster, we noted that the Center did not properly maintain all applications, whether accepted or declined, that were completed by patients related to sliding fee discounts received for the year-ended February 28, 2021. Such applications were not properly maintained for eight (8) out of the fifty-two (52) files selected for testing. Four (4) of the files selected for testing did have a completed applications but not for the fiscal year in which the services were provided, and four (4) of the files contained no application. All of these individuals had insurance coverage and the medical claims were submitted to their insurance company for payment. The sample was not statistically valid. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined. Effect: Due to the lack of documentation that was maintained, it is possible that patients were denied a sliding fee discount despite being eligible to receive one. Maintaining such supporting documentation is a normal and required component of internal control over compliance; failure to maintain such documentation constitutes a material weakness. Cause: There had been some turnover in the front desk position at the some of the Center?s sites. Staff training had occurred, but staff was new and inexperienced. In addition, at another acute care site, there were times during the year when they were abnormally busy and staff were juggling duties of multiple roles and not focused on making sure all proper sliding fee applications were completed and maintained. Recommendation: We recommend that SFD program applications and proof of household income are maintained for all patients within the electronic health record in accordance with the Center?s policy. We also recommend continuing re-education to all employees responsible for obtaining and maintaining such applications immediately. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: 42 CFR 51c.303(f) and 42 CFR 51c.303(g) requires a community health center grant recipient to have a sliding fee discount (?SFD?) program, and to establish systems for determining eligibility, billing and collection to ensure that payments are secured from patients for services in accordance with the SFD program. Chapter 9 of the Health Center Program Compliance Manual (the ?Compliance Manual?) contains requirements for a SFD program, along with guidance and other considerations as to how a health center will demonstrate compliance with these requirements. The Compliance Manual allows certain flexibility for the Center to determine a sliding fee discount program that is appropriate for its patient base; however, once such a program has been approved by the board it must be adhered to. It also allows a health center to establish a nominal fee for services that may be collected from patients at or below 100% of the federal poverty guideline (?FPG?), and also states that patients who are eligible for a SFD and have third-party insurance coverage should not be charged more for out-of-pocket costs than they would have paid under the SFD program. The Center has a Patient Accounting Sliding Fee Schedule within its policies and procedures which has been approved by the board of directors. This policy requires sliding fee discount applications to be completed for all patients. This application form contains a box that is to be checked if a patient declines the program, and the policy requires signature of waiver by the patient. All applications and proof of household income are to be maintained as part of the patient?s electronic health record. Applications are required to be renewed annually, and the sliding fee schedule year runs from March 1st to February 28th or 29th each year. Furthermore, this policy allows for a nominal charge of $20 to be charged to patients at or below 100% of the FPG. Condition/Context: As part of our audit of the Health Center Program cluster, we noted that the Center did not properly maintain all applications, whether accepted or declined, that were completed by patients related to sliding fee discounts received for the year-ended February 28, 2021. Such applications were not properly maintained for eight (8) out of the fifty-two (52) files selected for testing. Four (4) of the files selected for testing did have a completed applications but not for the fiscal year in which the services were provided, and four (4) of the files contained no application. All of these individuals had insurance coverage and the medical claims were submitted to their insurance company for payment. The sample was not statistically valid. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined. Effect: Due to the lack of documentation that was maintained, it is possible that patients were denied a sliding fee discount despite being eligible to receive one. Maintaining such supporting documentation is a normal and required component of internal control over compliance; failure to maintain such documentation constitutes a material weakness. Cause: There had been some turnover in the front desk position at the some of the Center?s sites. Staff training had occurred, but staff was new and inexperienced. In addition, at another acute care site, there were times during the year when they were abnormally busy and staff were juggling duties of multiple roles and not focused on making sure all proper sliding fee applications were completed and maintained. Recommendation: We recommend that SFD program applications and proof of household income are maintained for all patients within the electronic health record in accordance with the Center?s policy. We also recommend continuing re-education to all employees responsible for obtaining and maintaining such applications immediately. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Contact person: Chris Crawshaw, CFO (814) 635-7351 Ext:1404 Corrective Action: ? Immediate review of the HRSA Compliance Manual, Chapter 9: Sliding Fee Discount Program ? Immediate review of current, Board approved policy and procedure for Sliding Fee Discount Program ? We (BTAMC) will draft an amendment to the policy and address ineffective or inefficient workflow for staff to reduce improper procedure; meanwhile maintaining demonstration of compliance with established systems to determine eligibility for all patients. A revised policy and procedure will be presented to Board for consideration. ? With Board approval, staff will be provided immediate education and training to implement the revised procedure workflow ? Periodic retraining for all staff will continue, stressing the importance of proper patient education and requirements for data collection ? Periodic internal audits will continue to assure sustained compliance with revised policy and procedure, as well as assess for issues or problems with new workflow
2020-002
Criteria: 45 CFR 75.342(b) requires a community health center grant recipient to submit performance reports at the interval required by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service awarding agency or pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Current terms and conditions of the Center?s grant require the Center to submit the annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for the budget period ending January 31st by April 30th of each year. In addition, 45 CFR 75-302(b) requires that the financial management system of each non-federal entity provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 45 CFR 75.341 and 75.342. Condition/Context: During testing of the Center?s compliance with the reporting requirements in connection with the federal grants, we noted that the annual FFR for the budget period ending January 31, 2021 was not submitted until May 28, 2021; almost a month after the due date of April 30, 2021. Furthermore, the amount of Total Federal Expenditures for the budget period reported could not be reconciled to the actual federal expenditures for the grant period per the financial reporting system. In addition, when we examined the Federal Cash Transactions Report for the quarter ending June 30, 2020, the amounts reported as cash receipts and disbursements did not reconcile to the actual cash drawn down during that time period per the detail obtained from PMS. The sample was not statistically valid. Questioned Costs: N/A Effect: The Center did not comply with the reporting requirements of their Federal Award. Cause: During 2020, HRSA implemented an initiative to integrate the annual SF-425 FFR reporting into the Payment Management System (PMS). Previously, this annual FFR was completed using HRSA?s Electronic Handbooks (EHBs) but beginning in late 2020 and early 2021, HRSA now requires this annual FFR to be submitted through PMS. When this transition from EHBs to PMS occurred, many entities reported errors with the pre-populated fields which would generate incorrect information. The Center noted that there was an issue with the prepopulated field on their FFR for the Cumulative Funds Authorized. The Center reached out to their grant management official through HRSA to get this amount corrected before the due date of April 30th, 2021; however, the issue was not resolved and the prepopulated field was not updated to the correct amount until a few weeks later. The Center waited to submit the annual FFR until the prepopulated field was corrected. In addition, the Center engaged an outside consultant to prepare their annual FFR form for the grant year ending January 31, 2021. The transition as well as the integration of the annual FFR reporting into the PMS software contributed to inaccuracies noted in the reports. Recommendation: A procedure and process should be developed to ensure that all reporting is completed by their required due dates, and that all reports are accurately prepared. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: 45 CFR 75.342(b) requires a community health center grant recipient to submit performance reports at the interval required by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service awarding agency or pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Current terms and conditions of the Center?s grant require the Center to submit the annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for the budget period ending January 31st by April 30th of each year. In addition, 45 CFR 75-302(b) requires that the financial management system of each non-federal entity provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 45 CFR 75.341 and 75.342. Condition/Context: During testing of the Center?s compliance with the reporting requirements in connection with the federal grants, we noted that the annual FFR for the budget period ending January 31, 2021 was not submitted until May 28, 2021; almost a month after the due date of April 30, 2021. Furthermore, the amount of Total Federal Expenditures for the budget period reported could not be reconciled to the actual federal expenditures for the grant period per the financial reporting system. In addition, when we examined the Federal Cash Transactions Report for the quarter ending June 30, 2020, the amounts reported as cash receipts and disbursements did not reconcile to the actual cash drawn down during that time period per the detail obtained from PMS. The sample was not statistically valid. Questioned Costs: N/A Effect: The Center did not comply with the reporting requirements of their Federal Award. Cause: During 2020, HRSA implemented an initiative to integrate the annual SF-425 FFR reporting into the Payment Management System (PMS). Previously, this annual FFR was completed using HRSA?s Electronic Handbooks (EHBs) but beginning in late 2020 and early 2021, HRSA now requires this annual FFR to be submitted through PMS. When this transition from EHBs to PMS occurred, many entities reported errors with the pre-populated fields which would generate incorrect information. The Center noted that there was an issue with the prepopulated field on their FFR for the Cumulative Funds Authorized. The Center reached out to their grant management official through HRSA to get this amount corrected before the due date of April 30th, 2021; however, the issue was not resolved and the prepopulated field was not updated to the correct amount until a few weeks later. The Center waited to submit the annual FFR until the prepopulated field was corrected. In addition, the Center engaged an outside consultant to prepare their annual FFR form for the grant year ending January 31, 2021. The transition as well as the integration of the annual FFR reporting into the PMS software contributed to inaccuracies noted in the reports. Recommendation: A procedure and process should be developed to ensure that all reporting is completed by their required due dates, and that all reports are accurately prepared. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Contact person: Chris Crawshaw, CFO (814) 635-7351 Ext:1404 Corrective Action: ? As soon as the FFR report is available to complete in the PMS, we will check all prepopulated data to verify if the data matches our records. ? If the prepopulated data does not match our internal records, we will investigate and attempt to determine the root cause of the difference. ? If we think we have determined the difference is in our records, we will then fix our records and continue with our normal reporting process to meet deadlines established. ? If we think the difference is due to an error on the end of the PMS portal, we will immediately contact our case manager to discuss the difference and how it can be corrected. This contact will be in email and phone form. ? If we are using any outside consulting firm to calculate our data for us, we will make sure they have all pertinent information provided to them at least one month in advance of the reporting FFR deadline.
FAC accepted this audit on October 7, 2020 — management decision was due April 7, 2021.
Criteria: 42 CFR 51c.303(f) and 42 CFR 51c.303(g) requires a community health center grant recipient to have a sliding fee discount (?SFD?) program, and to establish systems for determining eligibility, billing and collection to ensure that payments are secured from patients for services in accordance with the SFD program. Chapter 9 of the Health Center Program Compliance Manual (the ?Compliance Manual?) contains requirements for a SFD program, along with guidance and other considerations as to how a health center will demonstrate compliance with these requirements. The Compliance Manual allows certain flexibility for the Center to determine a sliding fee discount program that is appropriate for its patient base; however, once such a program has been approved by the board it must be adhered to. It also allows a health center to establish a nominal fee for services that may be collected from patients at or below 100% of the federal poverty guideline (?FPG?), and also states that patients who are eligible for a SFD and have third-party insurance coverage should not be charged more for out-of-pocket costs than they would have paid under the SFD program. The Center has a Patient Accounting Sliding Fee Schedule within its policies and procedures which has been approved by the board of directors. This policy requires sliding fee discount applications to be completed for all patients. This application form contains a box that is to be checked if a patient declines the program, and the policy requires signature of waiver by the patient. All applications and proof of household income are to be maintained as part of the patient?s electronic health record. Applications are required to be renewed annually, and the sliding fee schedule year runs from March 1st to February 28th or 29th each year. Furthermore, this policy allows for a nominal charge of $20 to be charged to patients at or below 100% of the FPG. Condition/Context: As part of our audit of the Health Center Program cluster, it was noted that the Center did not properly maintain all applications, whether accepted or declined, that were completed by patients related to sliding fee discounts received for the year-ended February 29, 2020. Such applications were not properly maintained for six out of the fifty-two files selected for testing. Four of the files selected for testing did not have a completed application for the fiscal year in which the services were provided, one of the files contained no application, one of the files contained an application that had been approved but it was not properly signed. All of these individuals had insurance coverage and the medical claims were submitted to their insurance company for payment. The sample was not statistically valid. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined Effect: Due to the lack of documentation that was maintained, it is possible that patients were denied a sliding fee discount despite being eligible to receive one. Maintaining such supporting documentation is a normal and required component of internal control over compliance; failure to maintain such documentation constitutes a material weakness. Cause: Due to turnover in management and staff, the Center was not properly documenting the required steps related to sliding fee visits in accordance with internal and Federal requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that SFD program applications and proof of household income are maintained for all patients within the electronic health record in accordance with the Center?s policy. We also recommend continuing re-education to all employees responsible for obtaining and maintaining such applications immediately. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: 42 CFR 51c.303(f) and 42 CFR 51c.303(g) requires a community health center grant recipient to have a sliding fee discount (?SFD?) program, and to establish systems for determining eligibility, billing and collection to ensure that payments are secured from patients for services in accordance with the SFD program. Chapter 9 of the Health Center Program Compliance Manual (the ?Compliance Manual?) contains requirements for a SFD program, along with guidance and other considerations as to how a health center will demonstrate compliance with these requirements. The Compliance Manual allows certain flexibility for the Center to determine a sliding fee discount program that is appropriate for its patient base; however, once such a program has been approved by the board it must be adhered to. It also allows a health center to establish a nominal fee for services that may be collected from patients at or below 100% of the federal poverty guideline (?FPG?), and also states that patients who are eligible for a SFD and have third-party insurance coverage should not be charged more for out-of-pocket costs than they would have paid under the SFD program. The Center has a Patient Accounting Sliding Fee Schedule within its policies and procedures which has been approved by the board of directors. This policy requires sliding fee discount applications to be completed for all patients. This application form contains a box that is to be checked if a patient declines the program, and the policy requires signature of waiver by the patient. All applications and proof of household income are to be maintained as part of the patient?s electronic health record. Applications are required to be renewed annually, and the sliding fee schedule year runs from March 1st to February 28th or 29th each year. Furthermore, this policy allows for a nominal charge of $20 to be charged to patients at or below 100% of the FPG. Condition/Context: As part of our audit of the Health Center Program cluster, it was noted that the Center did not properly maintain all applications, whether accepted or declined, that were completed by patients related to sliding fee discounts received for the year-ended February 29, 2020. Such applications were not properly maintained for six out of the fifty-two files selected for testing. Four of the files selected for testing did not have a completed application for the fiscal year in which the services were provided, one of the files contained no application, one of the files contained an application that had been approved but it was not properly signed. All of these individuals had insurance coverage and the medical claims were submitted to their insurance company for payment. The sample was not statistically valid. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined Effect: Due to the lack of documentation that was maintained, it is possible that patients were denied a sliding fee discount despite being eligible to receive one. Maintaining such supporting documentation is a normal and required component of internal control over compliance; failure to maintain such documentation constitutes a material weakness. Cause: Due to turnover in management and staff, the Center was not properly documenting the required steps related to sliding fee visits in accordance with internal and Federal requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that SFD program applications and proof of household income are maintained for all patients within the electronic health record in accordance with the Center?s policy. We also recommend continuing re-education to all employees responsible for obtaining and maintaining such applications immediately. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Contact person: Chris Crawshaw, CFO (814) 635-7351 Ext:1404 Corrective Action: ?Immediate retraining for all staff will be issued, emphasizing the failure to properly obtain and maintain declined or accepted Sliding Fee Scale program applications for all patients ?Periodic retraining for all staff will continue, stressing the importance of proper patient education about Sliding Fee Scale program benefits and program requirements for data collection ?Periodic internal audits will continue for assurance of proper data collection, timely data entry and patient accounting ?We (BTAMC) will provide for staff and patients, access to a Certified Applications Counselor who will be available on-site or via phone to assist with education and application completion
2019-003
Criteria: 42 CFR 51c.303(d) requires a community health center grant recipient to develop and maintain management and control systems that are in accordance with sound financial management procedures. Accordingly, the Center has established a policy whereby any changes to an employee?s department assignment, position, pay rate or other relevant personnel change must be documented on a payroll change form. This form also contains signatures noting approval of the change and the effective date of the change. These forms are to be maintained in employee personnel files. Condition/Context: During testing of the Center?s allowable costs incurred in connection with the Federal grants, we noted two employees whose personnel files did not include the required documentation (the payroll change form) supporting the employee?s wage rate within the Center?s accounting system. The sample was not statistically valid. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined. Effect: Due to the lack of documentation maintained, it is possible that grant funding was improperly expended for an employee whose wage rate was not properly documented or input into the accounting system. Maintaining such supporting documentation is a normal and required component of internal control over compliance; failure to maintain such documentation constitutes a significant deficiency. Cause: The personnel form was not maintained due to an oversight at the Center. Recommendation: Procedures should be established to ensure that the Center is maintaining documentation and support for employee wages and personnel files. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: 42 CFR 51c.303(d) requires a community health center grant recipient to develop and maintain management and control systems that are in accordance with sound financial management procedures. Accordingly, the Center has established a policy whereby any changes to an employee?s department assignment, position, pay rate or other relevant personnel change must be documented on a payroll change form. This form also contains signatures noting approval of the change and the effective date of the change. These forms are to be maintained in employee personnel files. Condition/Context: During testing of the Center?s allowable costs incurred in connection with the Federal grants, we noted two employees whose personnel files did not include the required documentation (the payroll change form) supporting the employee?s wage rate within the Center?s accounting system. The sample was not statistically valid. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined. Effect: Due to the lack of documentation maintained, it is possible that grant funding was improperly expended for an employee whose wage rate was not properly documented or input into the accounting system. Maintaining such supporting documentation is a normal and required component of internal control over compliance; failure to maintain such documentation constitutes a significant deficiency. Cause: The personnel form was not maintained due to an oversight at the Center. Recommendation: Procedures should be established to ensure that the Center is maintaining documentation and support for employee wages and personnel files. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Contact Person: Chris Crawshaw, CFO (814) 635-7351 Ext:1404 Corrective Actions: ?The hiring of new employees warrants a payroll change form. ?The Payroll Change form is added to the employment paperwork packet and to the checklist for all new hires. ?For all current staff, any wage, hours, or transferring of office location; a payroll change form will be executed to complete. This will be authorized by the CEO. Any personnel changes throughout the year, employees are to contact HR department and a payroll change form will be given to employee to complete and sign and will be returned to the HR director for signature and placed in employees personnel file. ?HR department will do monthly internal audits of personnel records to make sure files are completed with necessary forms.
FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2020 — management decision was due August 2, 2020.
Criteria: 42 CFR 51c.303(f) and 42 CFR 51c.303(g) requires a community health center grant recipient to have a sliding fee discount (?SFD?) program, and to establish systems for determining eligibility, billing and collection to ensure that payments are secured from patients for services in accordance with the SFD program. Chapter 9 of the Health Center Program Compliance Manual (the ?Compliance Manual?) contains requirements for a SFD program, along with guidance and other considerations as to how a health center will demonstrate compliance with these requirements. The Compliance Manual allows certain flexibility for the Center to determine a sliding fee discount program that is appropriate for its patient base; however, once such a program has been approved by the board it must be adhered to. It also allows a health center to establish a nominal fee for services that may be collected from patients at or below 100% of the federal poverty guideline (?FPG?), and also states that patients who are eligible for a SFD and have third-party insurance coverage should not be charged more for out-of-pocket costs than they would have paid under the SFD program. The Center has a Patient Accounting Sliding Fee Schedule within its policies and procedures which has been approved by the board of directors. This policy requires sliding fee discount applications to be completed for all patients. This application form contains a box that is to be checked if a patient declines the program, and the policy requires signature of waiver by the patient. All applications and proof of household income are to be maintained as part of the patient?s electronic health record. Applications are required to be renewed annually, and the sliding fee schedule year runs from March 1 to February 28 each year. Furthermore, this policy allows for a nominal charge of $20 to be charged to patients at or below 100% of the FPG. Condition/Context: As part of our audit of the Health Center Program cluster, it was noted that the Center did not properly maintain all applications, whether accepted or declined, that were completed by patients related to sliding fee discounts received for the year-ended February 28, 2019. Such applications were not available for eighteen out of the forty-eight files selected for testing. Fourteen of the files selected for testing did not have a completed application for the fiscal year in which the services were provided, two of the files contained no application, one of the files contained an application but it was not properly signed, and one file had an application that was completed but a prior year form with incorrect federal poverty guidelines was utilized. Twelve of these individuals had insurance coverage and the medical claims were submitted to their insurance company for payment. In addition, we noted that for five of the ten individuals which had completed the application for the SFD, proof of income was not properly maintained in the file. The sample was not statistically valid. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined Effect:Due to the lack of documentation that was maintained, it is possible that patients were denied a sliding fee discount despite being eligible to receive one. Maintaining such supporting documentation is a normal and required component of internal control over compliance; failure to maintain such documentation constitutes a material weakness. Cause: Due to turnover in management and staff, the Center was not properly documenting the required steps related to sliding fee visits in accordance with internal and Federal requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that SFD program applications and proof of household income are maintained for all patients within the electronic health record in accordance with the Center?s policy. We also recommend re-education to all employees responsible for obtaining and maintaining such applications immediately. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: 42 CFR 51c.303(f) and 42 CFR 51c.303(g) requires a community health center grant recipient to have a sliding fee discount (?SFD?) program, and to establish systems for determining eligibility, billing and collection to ensure that payments are secured from patients for services in accordance with the SFD program. Chapter 9 of the Health Center Program Compliance Manual (the ?Compliance Manual?) contains requirements for a SFD program, along with guidance and other considerations as to how a health center will demonstrate compliance with these requirements. The Compliance Manual allows certain flexibility for the Center to determine a sliding fee discount program that is appropriate for its patient base; however, once such a program has been approved by the board it must be adhered to. It also allows a health center to establish a nominal fee for services that may be collected from patients at or below 100% of the federal poverty guideline (?FPG?), and also states that patients who are eligible for a SFD and have third-party insurance coverage should not be charged more for out-of-pocket costs than they would have paid under the SFD program. The Center has a Patient Accounting Sliding Fee Schedule within its policies and procedures which has been approved by the board of directors. This policy requires sliding fee discount applications to be completed for all patients. This application form contains a box that is to be checked if a patient declines the program, and the policy requires signature of waiver by the patient. All applications and proof of household income are to be maintained as part of the patient?s electronic health record. Applications are required to be renewed annually, and the sliding fee schedule year runs from March 1 to February 28 each year. Furthermore, this policy allows for a nominal charge of $20 to be charged to patients at or below 100% of the FPG. Condition/Context: As part of our audit of the Health Center Program cluster, it was noted that the Center did not properly maintain all applications, whether accepted or declined, that were completed by patients related to sliding fee discounts received for the year-ended February 28, 2019. Such applications were not available for eighteen out of the forty-eight files selected for testing. Fourteen of the files selected for testing did not have a completed application for the fiscal year in which the services were provided, two of the files contained no application, one of the files contained an application but it was not properly signed, and one file had an application that was completed but a prior year form with incorrect federal poverty guidelines was utilized. Twelve of these individuals had insurance coverage and the medical claims were submitted to their insurance company for payment. In addition, we noted that for five of the ten individuals which had completed the application for the SFD, proof of income was not properly maintained in the file. The sample was not statistically valid. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined Effect:Due to the lack of documentation that was maintained, it is possible that patients were denied a sliding fee discount despite being eligible to receive one. Maintaining such supporting documentation is a normal and required component of internal control over compliance; failure to maintain such documentation constitutes a material weakness. Cause: Due to turnover in management and staff, the Center was not properly documenting the required steps related to sliding fee visits in accordance with internal and Federal requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that SFD program applications and proof of household income are maintained for all patients within the electronic health record in accordance with the Center?s policy. We also recommend re-education to all employees responsible for obtaining and maintaining such applications immediately. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Contact person: Chris Crawshaw, CFO (814) 635-7351 Ext:1404 Corrective Action: ?Retraining of the staff on proper instructions how to collect Sliding Scale Fee ?Internal audit reports performed to ensure data was being collected properly ?We, (BTAMC) have determined most of our patients refused to supply us with their financial data. We, (BTAMC) have and will continue to train staff on how to approach patients with the need of the information. We, (BTAMC) need our patients to understand that the information they provide is confidential and could be beneficial to them. ?We have decided to change the form so that patients will no longer be required to write down a specific yearly income. They will be given the option to choose from income ranges that correspond with the sliding fee ranges.
2018-003
Criteria: 45 CFR 75.342(b) requires a community health center grant recipient to submit performance reports at the interval required by the U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services awarding agency or pass-through entity to be informed improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Current terms and conditions of the Center?s grant require the Center to submit the annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for the budget period ending January 31st by April 30th of each year. In addition, 45 CFR 75.302(b) requires that the financial management system of each non-federal entity provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 45CFR 75.341 and 75.342. Condition/Context: During testing of the Center?s compliance with the reporting requirements in connection with the federal grants, we noted that the annual FFR for the budget period ending January 31,2019 was not submitted until May 6, 2019; six days after the due date of April 30, 2019. In addition, the amount of Total Federal Expenditures for the budget period reported was overstated by $58,499, and the total reported as Unobligated Balance of Federal Funds was understated by $58,499. The sample was not statistically valid. Questioned Costs: N/A Effect: The Center is not in compliance with the reporting requirements of their Federal award.. Cause: Due to turnover in management and staff at the Center, new management was unfamiliar with all of the specific reporting requirements relating to the Federal award. The Center?s new management personnel made a mistake in recording the expenditures on the annual FFR. Recommendation: We recommend that a procedure and process be established to ensure that all reporting is completed by the due dates, and that reports are accurately prepared. We encourage the Center to educate all new management with the reporting requirements of the Federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: 45 CFR 75.342(b) requires a community health center grant recipient to submit performance reports at the interval required by the U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services awarding agency or pass-through entity to be informed improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Current terms and conditions of the Center?s grant require the Center to submit the annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for the budget period ending January 31st by April 30th of each year. In addition, 45 CFR 75.302(b) requires that the financial management system of each non-federal entity provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 45CFR 75.341 and 75.342. Condition/Context: During testing of the Center?s compliance with the reporting requirements in connection with the federal grants, we noted that the annual FFR for the budget period ending January 31,2019 was not submitted until May 6, 2019; six days after the due date of April 30, 2019. In addition, the amount of Total Federal Expenditures for the budget period reported was overstated by $58,499, and the total reported as Unobligated Balance of Federal Funds was understated by $58,499. The sample was not statistically valid. Questioned Costs: N/A Effect: The Center is not in compliance with the reporting requirements of their Federal award.. Cause: Due to turnover in management and staff at the Center, new management was unfamiliar with all of the specific reporting requirements relating to the Federal award. The Center?s new management personnel made a mistake in recording the expenditures on the annual FFR. Recommendation: We recommend that a procedure and process be established to ensure that all reporting is completed by the due dates, and that reports are accurately prepared. We encourage the Center to educate all new management with the reporting requirements of the Federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Contact Person: Chris Crawshaw, CFO (814) 635-7351 Ext:1404 Corrective Actions: ?Company officer turnover was rectified in early 2019. Unfortunately, there was a lack of knowledge on what reports were due, when they were due, who was the responsible person, and what information was required within these reports. ?We, (BTAMC) have incorporated Policies & Procedures dealing with employee accountability and responsibilities. ?BTAMC produced a calendar that list months and all the required reports needed to be produced for each month. This is reviewed monthly. ?BTAMC has hired a new AP/Cashier which will enable the financial assistant to assist with data entry. ?The CFO has developed spreadsheets which enable BTAMC to more easily produce timely financial statements once data is entered. ?More interactive files will be created that can tie numerous reporting requirements into a centralized file.
Criteria: The Center is required to undergo and complete a Single Audit and file the Single Audit and related Data Collection Form within 9 months followings its year-end. Condition/Context: The Center?s Single Audit and reporting package was delayed for the year ended February 28, 2019 beyond the 9-month due date. Questioned Costs: N/A Effect: The Center is not in compliance with the Single Audit reporting requirements Cause: The Center was behind schedule in completing its Single Audit due to problems experienced with its billing system, as well as turnover in management and staff throughout the year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Center develop an internal procedure to ensure the books are closed expediently to enable the preparation and completion of the Single Audit within the appropriate time frame. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: The Center is required to undergo and complete a Single Audit and file the Single Audit and related Data Collection Form within 9 months followings its year-end. Condition/Context: The Center?s Single Audit and reporting package was delayed for the year ended February 28, 2019 beyond the 9-month due date. Questioned Costs: N/A Effect: The Center is not in compliance with the Single Audit reporting requirements Cause: The Center was behind schedule in completing its Single Audit due to problems experienced with its billing system, as well as turnover in management and staff throughout the year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Center develop an internal procedure to ensure the books are closed expediently to enable the preparation and completion of the Single Audit within the appropriate time frame. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.
Contact Person: Chris Crawshaw, CFO (814) 635-7351 Ext:1404 Corrective Actions: ?Again, New officers along with a lack of training delayed certain processes and thus delayed certain reporting timeliness. ?BTAMC believes that all the corrective actions mentioned in the previous four corrective action plans would all apply to correcting this specific deficiency. ?With a stable financial team in place for a prolonged period, more consistent and timely financial data will be achieved. ?With the prior year?s adjustments accounted for, future audits should be easier now that we able to produce timely financial information.
2018-005
FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2019 — management decision was due September 24, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2018 — management decision was due July 8, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on October 16, 2016 — management decision was due April 16, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Pennsylvania →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.