EIN: 251181266
UEI: HGNNRLXN89S9
Audited by: Cypher & Cypher, CPAs
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 23, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 23, 2026 (16 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on January 28, 2025 — management decision was due July 28, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2024 — management decision was due September 20, 2024.
Finding Criteria – 2 CFR 200.318(i) - A component of compliance relating to federal awards is maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 200.320(a)(2)(i) - The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-chase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified services as determined appropriate by the entity. Condition Found – The District used federal ESSER funds to make purchases greater than $10,000 to $22,500 without obtaining at least three quotes, made purchases greater than $22,500 and did not obtain at least three public bids, or adequate documentation for sole source procurement. Cause of the Finding – Unable to obtain and review sufficient documentation to verify that purchases were competitively procured such as quote/bid evaluation of three vendors, or sole source procurement. Effect of the Finding – The District was not in compliance with procurement requirements for federal funds. Questioned Costs – While expenditure meet eligibility of grant expenditures, the district did not obtain three quotes/bids to document competitive procurement. The district utilized ESSER funds to make twelve purchases totaling $279,041 that did not include the relevant elements such as date, rationale for method of procurement, basis, and reasonableness, to substantiate the purchase when utilizing sole source. Recommendations - Documentation is key for all federal purchases. Obtain adequate quote/bid information from three vendors, advertise when appropriate, and thoroughly document the “reason” and “cost analysis” of sole source noncompetitive procurement exceptions. A purchase price from cooperative purchasing programs can be considered one competitive price proposal and cannot replace a procurement process. Management's Response -The district will follow the policy for obtaining three quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases and improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria. In the event purchases are made through cooperative purchasing programs, three quotes will be documented when federal purchases are made.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding Criteria – 2 CFR 200.318(i) - A component of compliance relating to federal awards is maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 200.320(a)(2)(i) - The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-chase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified services as determined appropriate by the entity. Condition Found – The District used federal ESSER funds to make purchases greater than $10,000 to $22,500 without obtaining at least three quotes, made purchases greater than $22,500 and did not obtain at least three public bids, or adequate documentation for sole source procurement. Cause of the Finding – Unable to obtain and review sufficient documentation to verify that purchases were competitively procured such as quote/bid evaluation of three vendors, or sole source procurement. Effect of the Finding – The District was not in compliance with procurement requirements for federal funds. Questioned Costs – While expenditure meet eligibility of grant expenditures, the district did not obtain three quotes/bids to document competitive procurement. The district utilized ESSER funds to make twelve purchases totaling $279,041 that did not include the relevant elements such as date, rationale for method of procurement, basis, and reasonableness, to substantiate the purchase when utilizing sole source. Recommendations - Documentation is key for all federal purchases. Obtain adequate quote/bid information from three vendors, advertise when appropriate, and thoroughly document the “reason” and “cost analysis” of sole source noncompetitive procurement exceptions. A purchase price from cooperative purchasing programs can be considered one competitive price proposal and cannot replace a procurement process. Management's Response -The district will follow the policy for obtaining three quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases and improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria. In the event purchases are made through cooperative purchasing programs, three quotes will be documented when federal purchases are made.
Name of Contact Person - Mr. Michael Turek, Interim Superintendent Corrective Action - We will follow our policy for federal purchases subject to quotation/bid/sole source requirements moving forward. The district will follow the policy for obtaining three quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases. In the event purchases are made through cooperative purchasing programs, three quotes will be documented when federal purchases are disbursed. We also implemented processes to improve documentation relating to the “reason” and “cost analysis” of sole source noncompetitive procurement. Anticipated Completion Date - The District will implement the above procedure immediately.
FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2023 — management decision was due August 1, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2022 — management decision was due September 29, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on February 15, 2021 — management decision was due August 15, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2020 — management decision was due August 12, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on February 11, 2019 — management decision was due August 11, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2018 — management decision was due August 27, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2017 — management decision was due August 26, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Pennsylvania →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
