← Back to home

Trinity Area School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 251158133

UEI: DENVXCRBV1F8

Audited by: Cypher & Cypher, CPAs

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

Trinity Area School District10 audit years3 findings
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,909,394 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 6, 2026 (27 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$5,012,346 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2025 — management decision was due September 17, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,237,658 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2024 — management decision was due September 18, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,209,813 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2023 — management decision was due September 26, 2023.

2022-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
OTHER MATTERS

Finding Criteria ? A component of compliance relating to federal awards is maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition Found ? The District used federal ESSER funds to make a purchase greater than $10,000 to $21,900 without obtaining at least three quotes. Cause of the Finding ? The District was under the false notion that purchases made through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania?s cooperative purchasing program COSTARS satisfied compliance requirement of quote/bid requirements for federal purchases. Effect of the Finding ? The District was not in compliance with procurement requirements for federal funds. Questioned Costs ? No questioned cost Recommendations - Documentation is key for all federal purchases. A purchase price from cooperative purchasing programs can be considered one competitive price proposal and cannot replace a procurement process. Advertise when appropriate, obtain adequate quote/bid information from three vendors, and thoroughly document the ?reason? and ?cost analysis? of sole source noncompetitive procurement exceptions. Management's Response - The District will follow the policy for quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases and not use cooperative purchasing programs as the only source of quotations/bids for federal purchases. The District will also improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding Criteria ? A component of compliance relating to federal awards is maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition Found ? The District used federal ESSER funds to make a purchase greater than $10,000 to $21,900 without obtaining at least three quotes. Cause of the Finding ? The District was under the false notion that purchases made through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania?s cooperative purchasing program COSTARS satisfied compliance requirement of quote/bid requirements for federal purchases. Effect of the Finding ? The District was not in compliance with procurement requirements for federal funds. Questioned Costs ? No questioned cost Recommendations - Documentation is key for all federal purchases. A purchase price from cooperative purchasing programs can be considered one competitive price proposal and cannot replace a procurement process. Advertise when appropriate, obtain adequate quote/bid information from three vendors, and thoroughly document the ?reason? and ?cost analysis? of sole source noncompetitive procurement exceptions. Management's Response - The District will follow the policy for quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases and not use cooperative purchasing programs as the only source of quotations/bids for federal purchases. The District will also improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria.

Corrective Action Plan

We were under the false notion that purchases made through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania?s cooperative purchasing program (COSTAR) satisfied compliance of quote/bid requirements of federal purchases. We will follow our policy for federal purchases subject to quotation/bid requirements moving forward. When federal money is used, we will not use cooperative purchasing programs as the only source of quotation/bid for federal purchases. We also implemented processes to improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria. Anticipated Completion Date: The District will implement the above procedure immediately

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,682,529 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 12, 2022 — management decision was due December 12, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$3,150,173 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2021 — management decision was due August 27, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$2,361,215 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 8, 2020 — management decision was due September 8, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$2,314,515 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 19, 2019 — management decision was due August 19, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$1,945,353 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2018 — management decision was due September 12, 2018.

2017-001
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2017-002
Eligibility
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →

FY 2016-06-30

$1,752,656 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 9, 2017 — management decision was due September 9, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Pennsylvania

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.