← Back to home

Waynesboro Area School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 251157817

UEI: GWFTFJYBAW75

Audited by: Smith Elliott Kearns & Company, LLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

Waynesboro Area School District10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$7.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

$7,066,672 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 15, 2026 (79 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$7,066,672 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 24, 2026 — management decision was due December 24, 2026.

FY 2023-06-30

$12,932,016 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2025 — management decision was due July 8, 2025.

FY 2022-06-30

$11,052,578 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 24, 2023 — management decision was due November 24, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$5,409,718 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2022 — management decision was due October 1, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$2,895,432 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 16, 2021 — management decision was due September 16, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,031,101 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2020 — management decision was due September 22, 2020.

2019-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

We noted that the quarterly cash on hand reports did not have an appropriate review by anyone other than the preparer before submission. Cause: Quarterly cash on hand reports were not reviewed by anyone other than the preparer. Effect: Quarterly cash on hand reports could have been submitted that were not accurate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: It was noted that there was no review process of the quarterly cash on hand reports. There were only two reports submitted during the year and neither of these reports were reviewed by anyone other than the preparer. For the two reports that were submitted, it appeared that the reports were substantiated and filed accurately; thus, there were no questioned costs. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District implement a process to ensure that all quarterly cash on hand reports are reviewed by someone other than the preparer to ensure proper internal controls over compliance for reporting of the Title I program.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The School District is required to have appropriate controls over the quarterly cash on hand reports for the Title I program. Condition: We noted that the quarterly cash on hand reports did not have an appropriate review by anyone other than the preparer before submission. Cause: Quarterly cash on hand reports were not reviewed by anyone other than the preparer. Effect: Quarterly cash on hand reports could have been submitted that were not accurate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: It was noted that there was no review process of the quarterly cash on hand reports. There were only two reports submitted during the year and neither of these reports were reviewed by anyone other than the preparer. For the two reports that were submitted, it appeared that the reports were substantiated and filed accurately; thus, there were no questioned costs. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District implement a process to ensure that all quarterly cash on hand reports are reviewed by someone other than the preparer to ensure proper internal controls over compliance for reporting of the Title I program.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: We noted that the quarterly cash on hand reports did not have an appropriate review by anyone other than the preparer before submission. Views of Responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The District agrees that a review of the quarterly cash on hand reports should exist, and is implementing a new process, whereby, the Federal Programs Coordinator will review and approve all reports prior to submission. This revision will also be included in our internal controls document.

About Reporting →

FY 2018-06-30

$2,889,922 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2019 — management decision was due September 12, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$3,057,391 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 21, 2018 — management decision was due August 21, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$2,911,819 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2017 — management decision was due August 20, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Pennsylvania

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.