EIN: 250496976
UEI: YJ9XVUTKJ1T9
Audited by: Baker Tilly US, LLP
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2026 (32 days from today).
What is a management decision? →The University did not notify the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely manner for 3 students with status changes in our sample of 25 students. Additionally, 1 student was reported with an inaccurate effective date. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Cause: The University's procedures for reporting all students were not designed appropriately in order to allow for timely reporting to the NSLDS. Effect or Potential Effect: The accuracy of Title IV student loan records depends heavily on the accuracy of the enrollment information reported by schools. If an institution does not review, update and verify student enrollment statuses, effective dates of the enrollment status and the anticipated completion dates, then the Title IV student loan records will be inaccurate. Recommendations: We recommend that the University review its procedures for student status changes and NSLDS notifications to ensure there are follow-up and review procedures being performed for all students with status changes at the University. Management Response: Management concurs with the finding and the University will periodically perform independent reviews of the information provided to the NSLDS to ensure the status change information has been updated in the NSLDS during the required time period. The University has also hired a new Assistant Registrar with experience submitting enrollment and graduate files to NSC and NSLDS that will help with ensuring status on NSLDS are reported timely.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025-001: Significant Deficiency - Student Status Changes Repeat of Prior Year Finding 2024-001 Assistance Listing: 84.268 Student Financial Assistance Cluster, Federal Direct Student Loans Federal Award Year: June 30, 2024 Federal Award Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria: Title IV regulations (34 CFR Section 685.309(b)) require that upon receipt of an enrollment report from the Secretary, institutions must update all information included in the report and return the report to the Secretary: (i) in the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary; and (ii) within the timeframe prescribed by the Secretary. Unless it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, an institution must notify the Secretary within 30 days after the date the institution discovers that: (i) a loan under Title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the institution, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or (ii) a student who is enrolled at the institution and who received a loan under Title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. Condition: The University did not notify the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely manner for 3 students with status changes in our sample of 25 students. Additionally, 1 student was reported with an inaccurate effective date. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Cause: The University's procedures for reporting all students were not designed appropriately in order to allow for timely reporting to the NSLDS. Effect or Potential Effect: The accuracy of Title IV student loan records depends heavily on the accuracy of the enrollment information reported by schools. If an institution does not review, update and verify student enrollment statuses, effective dates of the enrollment status and the anticipated completion dates, then the Title IV student loan records will be inaccurate. Recommendations: We recommend that the University review its procedures for student status changes and NSLDS notifications to ensure there are follow-up and review procedures being performed for all students with status changes at the University. Management Response: Management concurs with the finding and the University will periodically perform independent reviews of the information provided to the NSLDS to ensure the status change information has been updated in the NSLDS during the required time period. The University has also hired a new Assistant Registrar with experience submitting enrollment and graduate files to NSC and NSLDS that will help with ensuring status on NSLDS are reported timely.
Finding 2025-001 Condition The University did not notify the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely manner for four students with status changes. Corrective Action Plan 1. Finding: Incorrect Status Date Reported to NSC/NSLDS for a withdrawn student Corrective Actions: • Root Cause Analysis: A review was conducted to determine why NSC/NSLDS received the incorrect date despite Colleague displaying the correct withdrawal date of 3/20/2025. The analysis confirmed that the Colleague reporting process pulls the date from the course drop/withdrawal field rather than the student status withdrawal date screen. According to system documentation, “SITX determines the enrollment status, enrollment status start date, and the anticipated graduation date for the students included in the extract. If the enrollment status changes during the reporting period since the last census date, the status change date is calculated from schedule changes and hiatus record information.” • Process Improvement: o Staff have been instructed to ensure that all relevant screens reflect the correct status change date prior to reporting. o Documentation is being developed outlining the withdrawal process workflow, including all screens requiring updates. This will promote consistency and serve as a reference for future staff transitions. 2. Finding: Failure to Report Three Graduates to NSLDS Within the 60 Day Requirement Corrective Actions: • Root Cause Analysis: The University Registrar contacted the NSC to investigate the delay. Although the NSC Degree Verify file was submitted within the required timeframe, it was determined that the “G Not Applied” process on the NSC site was not completed promptly by Registrar’s Office staff, resulting in the late NSLDS reporting. • Process Redesign: The University Registrar is working with Gannon IT Services to develop a “Graduates Only” reporting process directly from Colleague. This enhancement will eliminate reliance on the NSC “G Not Applied” step, which has been a recurring compliance challenge. This new process will be implemented no later than July 1, 2026. Until then, the “G Not Applied” list will be processed within 10 days of processing availability (at times the G Not Applied cannot be updated while an Enrollment file submission is pending acceptance). • Proactive Audit Measures: Given the significant staffing transitions and shifts in reporting responsibilities over the past year, an internal audit of the 2025–2026 reporting completed to date is underway, in collaboration with the NSC Audit Department, to determine the full extent of any additional reporting deficiencies that may have carried into the new academic year. 3. As previously stated in the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings for the Year-Ended June 30, 2024 Update, the following corrective actions are being initiated: • Additional staff have been designated to ensure that at least three individuals possess the knowledge and system access required to submit reports and process corrections. • All designated staff are required to complete NSC-provided training to ensure full understanding of reporting requirements and procedures. • Each staff member must submit test reports and review resulting errors using the NSC test submission process, working closely with assigned NSC analysts to demonstrate competency in accurate reporting and effective error resolution. Name(s) of Contact Person(s) Responsible o Barbara Helms, University Registrar – primary responsibility for enrollment reporting submissions, back-up for G reporting o Heidi Thomas, Processing and Data Specialist – assists with enrollment error report cleanup, secondary for enrollment reporting submissions, additional back-up for G reporting o Ashley Dinger, Academic Records and Graduation Specialist – primary responsibility of the G reporting, additional back-up for enrollment reporting. • Although documentation exists from the previous corrective action plan, it has been determined that it is not sufficiently detailed. New documentation is being developed to ensure that any individual responsible for these processes in the future has the necessary tools and guidance to meet all regulatory requirements. Estimated timeline for corrective action to be implemented: April 2026
2024-001
FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2025 — management decision was due September 24, 2025.
The University did not notify the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely manner for 10 students with status changes in our sample of 25 students. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Cause: The University's procedures for reporting all students were not designed appropriately in order to allow for timely reporting to the NSLDS. Effect or Potential Effect: The accuracy of Title IV student loan records depends heavily on the accuracy of the enrollment information reported by schools. If an institution does not review, update and verify student enrollment statuses, effective dates of the enrollment status and the anticipated completion dates, then the Title IV student loan records will be inaccurate. Recommendations: We recommend that the University review its procedures for student status changes and NSLDS notifications to ensure there are follow-up and review procedures being performed for all students with status changes at the University. Management Response: Management concurs with the finding and the University will periodically perform independent reviews of the information provided to the NSLDS to ensure the status change information has been updated in the NSLDS during the required time period.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Title IV regulations (34 CFR Section 685.309(b)) require that upon receipt of an enrollment report from the Secretary, institutions must update all information included in the report and return the report to the Secretary: (i) in the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary; and (ii) within the timeframe prescribed by the Secretary. Unless it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, an institution must notify the Secretary within 30 days after the date the institution discovers that: (i) a loan under Title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the institution, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or (ii) a student who is enrolled at the institution and who received a loan under Title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. Condition: The University did not notify the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely manner for 10 students with status changes in our sample of 25 students. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Cause: The University's procedures for reporting all students were not designed appropriately in order to allow for timely reporting to the NSLDS. Effect or Potential Effect: The accuracy of Title IV student loan records depends heavily on the accuracy of the enrollment information reported by schools. If an institution does not review, update and verify student enrollment statuses, effective dates of the enrollment status and the anticipated completion dates, then the Title IV student loan records will be inaccurate. Recommendations: We recommend that the University review its procedures for student status changes and NSLDS notifications to ensure there are follow-up and review procedures being performed for all students with status changes at the University. Management Response: Management concurs with the finding and the University will periodically perform independent reviews of the information provided to the NSLDS to ensure the status change information has been updated in the NSLDS during the required time period.
Finding 2024-001 Condition The University did not notify the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely manner for 10 students with status changes in our sample of 25 students. Corrective Action Plan: 1. Documentation has been updated to include the following: a. Adjustment to the frequency by which reports are run. b. How to handle students with a G Not Applied error from the National Student Clearinghouse. c. Implications for not fixing G Not Applied records with the 60-day requirement window. 2. New Assistant Registrar Rachael Felton was brought onto the Gannon Registrar’s Office team in August 2024, with experience submitting enrollment and graduates files to the NSC in previous institutions’ registrar’s offices, and with experience in NSLDS from previous work in other institutions’ financial aid departments. 3. Monthly reports of graduates are being run and submitted to the National Student Clearinghouse, unless there are no graduates for the reporting period. 4. Existing G Not Applied records are being assessed and corrected as soon as error reports are available by the NSC after each graduates file submitted. Rachael has advised Gannon begin submitting an enrollment file of the graduates after they are submitted to correct the G Not Applied records. 5. Individuals will be designated as back-ups to Rachael; they will review all documentation and be trained on the procedures to ensure the appropriate actions can be sustained by the departments should there be turnover in key positions. Name(s) of Contact Person(s) Responsible for Corrective Action: 1. Megan Loibl, Registrar 2. Rachael Felton, Assistant Registrar Anticipated Completion Date: The plan devised in response to last year’s same finding is already underway. Continued successful application of the plan will prevent any new errors in the FY 2025 single audit sample, which will be determined when next year’s audit selections are made.
2023-001
FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2024 — management decision was due September 29, 2024.
The University did not notify the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely manner for 3 students with status changes in our sample of 25 students. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Cause: The University's procedures for reporting all students were not designed appropriately in order to allow for timely reporting to the NSLDS. Effect or Potential Effect: The accuracy of Title IV student loan records depends heavily on the accuracy of the enrollment information reported by schools. If an institution does not review, update and verify student enrollment statuses, effective dates of the enrollment status and the anticipated completion dates, then the Title IV student loan records will be inaccurate. Recommendations: We recommend that the University review its procedures for student status changes and NSLDS notifications to ensure there are follow-up and review procedures being performed for all students with status changes at the University. Management Response: Management concurs with the finding and the University will periodically perform independent reviews of the information provided to the NSLDS to ensure the status change information has been updated in the NSLDS during the required time period.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Title IV regulations (34 CFR Section 685.309(b)) require that upon receipt of an enrollment report from the Secretary, institutions must update all information included in the report and return the report to the Secretary: (i) in the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary; and (ii) within the timeframe prescribed by the Secretary. Unless it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, an institution must notify the Secretary within 30 days after the date the institution discovers that: (i) a loan under Title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the institution, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or (ii) a student who is enrolled at the institution and who received a loan under Title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. Condition: The University did not notify the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely manner for 3 students with status changes in our sample of 25 students. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Cause: The University's procedures for reporting all students were not designed appropriately in order to allow for timely reporting to the NSLDS. Effect or Potential Effect: The accuracy of Title IV student loan records depends heavily on the accuracy of the enrollment information reported by schools. If an institution does not review, update and verify student enrollment statuses, effective dates of the enrollment status and the anticipated completion dates, then the Title IV student loan records will be inaccurate. Recommendations: We recommend that the University review its procedures for student status changes and NSLDS notifications to ensure there are follow-up and review procedures being performed for all students with status changes at the University. Management Response: Management concurs with the finding and the University will periodically perform independent reviews of the information provided to the NSLDS to ensure the status change information has been updated in the NSLDS during the required time period.
Finding 2023-001 Condition The University did not notify the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely manner for 3 students with status changes in our sample of 25 students. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Corrective Action Plan Corrective Action Planned: • Documentation will be updated to include the following: o Adjustment to the frequency by which reports are run. o How to handle students with a G Not Applied error from the National Student Clearinghouse. o Implications for not fixing G Not Applied records with the 60-day requirement window. • Monthly reports of graduates will be run and submitted to the National Student Clearinghouse unless there are no graduates for the reporting period. • Existing G Not applied records will be assessed and corrected as needed. • Individuals will be designated as back-ups; they will review all documentation and be trained on the procedures to ensure the appropriate actions can be sustained by the departments should there be turnover in key positions. Name(s) of Contact Person(s) Responsible for Corrective Action: 1. Megan Loibl, Registrar 2. Zachary Hopkins, Director of Institutional Research Assessment and Analytics Anticipated Completion Date: Corrective action with associated documentation will be created, tested, and confirmed that it resolves the root cause of the finding by Friday, May 31st, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on February 19, 2023 — management decision was due August 19, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on July 11, 2022 — management decision was due January 11, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on June 15, 2021 — management decision was due December 15, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2020 — management decision was due January 31, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2019 — management decision was due September 21, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2018 — management decision was due September 21, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2017 — management decision was due September 27, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.