← Back to home

Mifflinburg Area School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 246001910

UEI: WJ35PKSC6EU9

Audited by: Klacik and Associates PC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 14, 2026

Mifflinburg Area School District11 audit years4 findings
11
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,679,987 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 24, 2026 (9 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

GOING CONCERNLOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,361,022 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 2, 2025 — management decision was due October 2, 2025.

2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The District's procurement policies do not comply with the federal procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. Specifically, the policies lack adequate procedures to ensure full and open competition, and they do not include provisions addressing the use of small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises as required by federal regulations. Cause: The District has not updated its procurement policies to reflect current federal requirements, which were revised under the Uniform Guidance. The lack of training and resources contributed to the oversight. Effect: Noncompliance with federal procurement standards could lead to questioned costs for expenditures under the Child Nutrition Cluster. It also incresaes the risk of noncompetitive practices and missed opportunities to engage small and disadvantaged businesses. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: In order to correct the procurement process for Child Nutrition the client should revise the District's procurement policies to fully comply with 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327, provide training for staff involved in procurement to ensure they understand and implement the updtaed policies, conduct periodic reviews of procurement activities to verify compliance with the revised policies, document efforts to engage small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises in procurement activiites. Prior Year Finding: None. Auditee Response: See attached response.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.318, non-federal entities are required to maintain documented procurement procedures that align with applicable federal, state, and local laws. Additionally, entities must ensure that all procurements provide full and open competition and take steps to utilize small and minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms when possible. Condition: The District's procurement policies do not comply with the federal procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. Specifically, the policies lack adequate procedures to ensure full and open competition, and they do not include provisions addressing the use of small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises as required by federal regulations. Cause: The District has not updated its procurement policies to reflect current federal requirements, which were revised under the Uniform Guidance. The lack of training and resources contributed to the oversight. Effect: Noncompliance with federal procurement standards could lead to questioned costs for expenditures under the Child Nutrition Cluster. It also incresaes the risk of noncompetitive practices and missed opportunities to engage small and disadvantaged businesses. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: In order to correct the procurement process for Child Nutrition the client should revise the District's procurement policies to fully comply with 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327, provide training for staff involved in procurement to ensure they understand and implement the updtaed policies, conduct periodic reviews of procurement activities to verify compliance with the revised policies, document efforts to engage small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises in procurement activiites. Prior Year Finding: None. Auditee Response: See attached response.

Corrective Action Plan

Management Response: The Mifflinburg Area School District agrees with the finding. The SFA has updated Policy #626 Procurement - Federal Programs. The SFA has removed the RFP reference from the informal procurement method. The SFA reviewed the bidding requirements and will adhere to the policy. This policy was approved by the School Board in May 2024. The SFA has updated future produce solicitations to include the following: Pricing will be a cost-plus fixed fee structure. All prices bid for all products will be net, Free on Board (F.O.B.). SFA will consider individual product price changes both as part of a renewal to the awarded contract and during the contract year. Product price changes may not exceed the U.S. Department of Labor-Bureau of Labor statistics Northeast region not seasonally adjusted consumer price index percentage change annual average for the previous 12 months. Vendors must submit both the supplier charge and the fixed fee, which much be listed separately. Additionally, the SFA implemented a formal requisition process in the Food Service department, in which pricing would be entered into the requisition and verified against the bid or other respective documents, then submitted for approval. The SFA employees responsible were trained in this procedure. Individual Responsible: Superintendent, Business Manager, Food Service Director Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2024

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The District's procurement policies do not comply with the federal procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. Specifically, the policies lack adequate procedures to ensure full and open competition, and they do not include provisions addressing the use of small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises as required by federal regulations. Cause: The District has not updated its procurement policies to reflect current federal requirements, which were revised under the Uniform Guidance. The lack of training and resources contributed to the oversight. Effect: Noncompliance with federal procurement standards could lead to questioned costs for expenditures under the Child Nutrition Cluster. It also incresaes the risk of noncompetitive practices and missed opportunities to engage small and disadvantaged businesses. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: In order to correct the procurement process for Child Nutrition the client should revise the District's procurement policies to fully comply with 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327, provide training for staff involved in procurement to ensure they understand and implement the updtaed policies, conduct periodic reviews of procurement activities to verify compliance with the revised policies, document efforts to engage small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises in procurement activiites. Prior Year Finding: None. Auditee Response: See attached response.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.318, non-federal entities are required to maintain documented procurement procedures that align with applicable federal, state, and local laws. Additionally, entities must ensure that all procurements provide full and open competition and take steps to utilize small and minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms when possible. Condition: The District's procurement policies do not comply with the federal procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. Specifically, the policies lack adequate procedures to ensure full and open competition, and they do not include provisions addressing the use of small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises as required by federal regulations. Cause: The District has not updated its procurement policies to reflect current federal requirements, which were revised under the Uniform Guidance. The lack of training and resources contributed to the oversight. Effect: Noncompliance with federal procurement standards could lead to questioned costs for expenditures under the Child Nutrition Cluster. It also incresaes the risk of noncompetitive practices and missed opportunities to engage small and disadvantaged businesses. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: In order to correct the procurement process for Child Nutrition the client should revise the District's procurement policies to fully comply with 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327, provide training for staff involved in procurement to ensure they understand and implement the updtaed policies, conduct periodic reviews of procurement activities to verify compliance with the revised policies, document efforts to engage small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises in procurement activiites. Prior Year Finding: None. Auditee Response: See attached response.

Corrective Action Plan

Management Response: The Mifflinburg Area School District agrees with the finding. The SFA has updated Policy #626 Procurement - Federal Programs. The SFA has removed the RFP reference from the informal procurement method. The SFA reviewed the bidding requirements and will adhere to the policy. This policy was approved by the School Board in May 2024. The SFA has updated future produce solicitations to include the following: Pricing will be a cost-plus fixed fee structure. All prices bid for all products will be net, Free on Board (F.O.B.). SFA will consider individual product price changes both as part of a renewal to the awarded contract and during the contract year. Product price changes may not exceed the U.S. Department of Labor-Bureau of Labor statistics Northeast region not seasonally adjusted consumer price index percentage change annual average for the previous 12 months. Vendors must submit both the supplier charge and the fixed fee, which much be listed separately. Additionally, the SFA implemented a formal requisition process in the Food Service department, in which pricing would be entered into the requisition and verified against the bid or other respective documents, then submitted for approval. The SFA employees responsible were trained in this procedure. Individual Responsible: Superintendent, Business Manager, Food Service Director Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2024

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2024-06-30

GOING CONCERN$2,361,022 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2025 — management decision was due September 27, 2025.

2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The District's procurement policies do not comply with the federal procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. Specifically, the policies lack adequate procedures to ensure full and open competition, and they do not include provisions addressing the use of small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises as required by federal regulations. Cause: The District has not updated its procurement policies to reflect current federal requirements, which were revised under the Uniform Guidance. The lack of training and resources contributed to the oversight. Effect: Noncompliance with federal procurement standards could lead to questioned costs for expenditures under the Child Nutrition Cluster. It also incresaes the risk of noncompetitive practices and missed opportunities to engage small and disadvantaged businesses. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: In order to correct the procurement process for Child Nutrition the client should revise the District's procurement policies to fully comply with 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327, provide training for staff involved in procurement to ensure they understand and implement the updtaed policies, conduct periodic reviews of procurement activities to verify compliance with the revised policies, document efforts to engage small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises in procurement activiites. Prior Year Finding: None. Auditee Response: See attached response.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.318, non-federal entities are required to maintain documented procurement procedures that align with applicable federal, state, and local laws. Additionally, entities must ensure that all procurements provide full and open competition and take steps to utilize small and minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms when possible. Condition: The District's procurement policies do not comply with the federal procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. Specifically, the policies lack adequate procedures to ensure full and open competition, and they do not include provisions addressing the use of small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises as required by federal regulations. Cause: The District has not updated its procurement policies to reflect current federal requirements, which were revised under the Uniform Guidance. The lack of training and resources contributed to the oversight. Effect: Noncompliance with federal procurement standards could lead to questioned costs for expenditures under the Child Nutrition Cluster. It also incresaes the risk of noncompetitive practices and missed opportunities to engage small and disadvantaged businesses. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: In order to correct the procurement process for Child Nutrition the client should revise the District's procurement policies to fully comply with 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327, provide training for staff involved in procurement to ensure they understand and implement the updtaed policies, conduct periodic reviews of procurement activities to verify compliance with the revised policies, document efforts to engage small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises in procurement activiites. Prior Year Finding: None. Auditee Response: See attached response.

Corrective Action Plan

Management Response: The Mifflinburg Area School District agrees with the finding. The SFA has updated Policy #626 Procurement - Federal Programs. The SFA has removed the RFP reference from the informal procurement method. The SFA reviewed the bidding requirements and will adhere to the policy. This policy was approved by the School Board in May 2024. The SFA has updated future produce solicitations to include the following: Pricing will be a cost-plus fixed fee structure. All prices bid for all products will be net, Free on Board (F.O.B.). SFA will consider individual product price changes both as part of a renewal to the awarded contract and during the contract year. Product price changes may not exceed the U.S. Department of Labor-Bureau of Labor statistics Northeast region not seasonally adjusted consumer price index percentage change annual average for the previous 12 months. Vendors must submit both the supplier charge and the fixed fee, which much be listed separately. Additionally, the SFA implemented a formal requisition process in the Food Service department, in which pricing would be entered into the requisition and verified against the bid or other respective documents, then submitted for approval. The SFA employees responsible were trained in this procedure. Individual Responsible: Superintendent, Business Manager, Food Service Director Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2024

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The District's procurement policies do not comply with the federal procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. Specifically, the policies lack adequate procedures to ensure full and open competition, and they do not include provisions addressing the use of small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises as required by federal regulations. Cause: The District has not updated its procurement policies to reflect current federal requirements, which were revised under the Uniform Guidance. The lack of training and resources contributed to the oversight. Effect: Noncompliance with federal procurement standards could lead to questioned costs for expenditures under the Child Nutrition Cluster. It also incresaes the risk of noncompetitive practices and missed opportunities to engage small and disadvantaged businesses. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: In order to correct the procurement process for Child Nutrition the client should revise the District's procurement policies to fully comply with 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327, provide training for staff involved in procurement to ensure they understand and implement the updtaed policies, conduct periodic reviews of procurement activities to verify compliance with the revised policies, document efforts to engage small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises in procurement activiites. Prior Year Finding: None. Auditee Response: See attached response.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.318, non-federal entities are required to maintain documented procurement procedures that align with applicable federal, state, and local laws. Additionally, entities must ensure that all procurements provide full and open competition and take steps to utilize small and minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms when possible. Condition: The District's procurement policies do not comply with the federal procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. Specifically, the policies lack adequate procedures to ensure full and open competition, and they do not include provisions addressing the use of small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises as required by federal regulations. Cause: The District has not updated its procurement policies to reflect current federal requirements, which were revised under the Uniform Guidance. The lack of training and resources contributed to the oversight. Effect: Noncompliance with federal procurement standards could lead to questioned costs for expenditures under the Child Nutrition Cluster. It also incresaes the risk of noncompetitive practices and missed opportunities to engage small and disadvantaged businesses. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: In order to correct the procurement process for Child Nutrition the client should revise the District's procurement policies to fully comply with 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327, provide training for staff involved in procurement to ensure they understand and implement the updtaed policies, conduct periodic reviews of procurement activities to verify compliance with the revised policies, document efforts to engage small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises in procurement activiites. Prior Year Finding: None. Auditee Response: See attached response.

Corrective Action Plan

Management Response: The Mifflinburg Area School District agrees with the finding. The SFA has updated Policy #626 Procurement - Federal Programs. The SFA has removed the RFP reference from the informal procurement method. The SFA reviewed the bidding requirements and will adhere to the policy. This policy was approved by the School Board in May 2024. The SFA has updated future produce solicitations to include the following: Pricing will be a cost-plus fixed fee structure. All prices bid for all products will be net, Free on Board (F.O.B.). SFA will consider individual product price changes both as part of a renewal to the awarded contract and during the contract year. Product price changes may not exceed the U.S. Department of Labor-Bureau of Labor statistics Northeast region not seasonally adjusted consumer price index percentage change annual average for the previous 12 months. Vendors must submit both the supplier charge and the fixed fee, which much be listed separately. Additionally, the SFA implemented a formal requisition process in the Food Service department, in which pricing would be entered into the requisition and verified against the bid or other respective documents, then submitted for approval. The SFA employees responsible were trained in this procedure. Individual Responsible: Superintendent, Business Manager, Food Service Director Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2024

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-06-30

$3,727,940 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$6,217,299 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2023 — management decision was due September 26, 2023.

2022-003
Equipment & Real Property
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

During testing, it was noted the District purchased two pieces of equipment over the capitalization threshold using ESSER funds without receiving prior approval from the Pennsylvania Department of Education. These assets were also not included in the District?s property records. Cause: Due to staff oversight, the District was not aware that certain costs needed to be pre-approved under the grant. Effect: Internal controls are not functioning as designed and the District is not in compliance with equipment and real property management requirements of the program. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: The District should establish procedures to ensure all equipment purchased with grant funding is appropriately approved prior to purchase and property records are maintained in sufficient detail to allow for the adequate tracking of all equipment purchased with grant funds. Management?s Response: The District obtained guidance from PDE resources on the approval process for equipment over the capitalization threshold when utilizing ESSER funds. The District further identified its capitalization threshold of $1,500 is lower than the standard minimum capitalization threshold of $5,000. The capitalization policy will be updated. The value of any single item for inclusion in the fixed assets accounts shall be not less than $5,000 and have an estimated useful life of one (1) year or more.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-003 Equipment and Real Property Management Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) ? ALN# 84.425 Criteria: Pursuant to 2 CFR part 200 section 439, capital expenditures for equipment are allowable as direct costs, provided that items with a unit cost of the lessor of $5,000 or the entity?s capitalization threshold have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Furthermore, section 313(d)(1) specifies that property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial or identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property. Condition: During testing, it was noted the District purchased two pieces of equipment over the capitalization threshold using ESSER funds without receiving prior approval from the Pennsylvania Department of Education. These assets were also not included in the District?s property records. Cause: Due to staff oversight, the District was not aware that certain costs needed to be pre-approved under the grant. Effect: Internal controls are not functioning as designed and the District is not in compliance with equipment and real property management requirements of the program. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: The District should establish procedures to ensure all equipment purchased with grant funding is appropriately approved prior to purchase and property records are maintained in sufficient detail to allow for the adequate tracking of all equipment purchased with grant funds. Management?s Response: The District obtained guidance from PDE resources on the approval process for equipment over the capitalization threshold when utilizing ESSER funds. The District further identified its capitalization threshold of $1,500 is lower than the standard minimum capitalization threshold of $5,000. The capitalization policy will be updated. The value of any single item for inclusion in the fixed assets accounts shall be not less than $5,000 and have an estimated useful life of one (1) year or more.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan The Mifflinburg Area School District respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2022. Finding 2022-003: Equipment and Real Property Management Contact Person: Renee M. Jilinski, Business Administrator Recommendation: The District should establish procedures to ensure all equipment purchased with grant funding is appropriately approved prior to purchase and property records are maintained in sufficient detail to allow for the adequate tracking of all equipment purchased with grant funds. Action: The District obtained guidance from PDE resources on the approval process for equipment over the capitalization threshold when utilizing ESSER funds. The District further identified its capitalization threshold of $1,500 is lower than the standard minimum capitalization threshold of $5,000. The capitalization policy will be updated. The value of any single item for inclusion in the fixed assets accounts shall be not less than $5,000 and have an estimated useful life of one (1) year or more. Date for Completion: December 6, 2022

About Equipment and Real Property Management →
2022-004
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

During testing, it was noted two of the four PDE-2030 reports did not contain accurate information as the expenditures reported did not agree to the District?s general ledger. Cause: Due to oversight, the District was not reporting expenditures on a cumulative basis. Effect: Internal controls are not functioning as designed and the District is not in compliance with reporting requirements of the program. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: The District should develop procedures to ensure accurate information is reported to allow for adequate tracking of the financial results of each Federal award. In addition, reports should be reviewed by an appropriate individual prior to submission to ensure the data entered into the reports is consistent with the District?s records. Management?s Response: The District developed procedures for assigning expenditures for State and Federal awards and created reporting specific to funding sources to identify all awards. Prior to submissions to reporting agencies, quarterly and annual reports will be reviewed by the Business Administrator to ensure accuracy for the reporting period(s).

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-004 Reporting Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) ? ALN# 84.425 Criteria: Pursuant to 2 CFR part 200 section 302(b)(2), a non-Federal entity must provide for accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program. Condition: During testing, it was noted two of the four PDE-2030 reports did not contain accurate information as the expenditures reported did not agree to the District?s general ledger. Cause: Due to oversight, the District was not reporting expenditures on a cumulative basis. Effect: Internal controls are not functioning as designed and the District is not in compliance with reporting requirements of the program. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: The District should develop procedures to ensure accurate information is reported to allow for adequate tracking of the financial results of each Federal award. In addition, reports should be reviewed by an appropriate individual prior to submission to ensure the data entered into the reports is consistent with the District?s records. Management?s Response: The District developed procedures for assigning expenditures for State and Federal awards and created reporting specific to funding sources to identify all awards. Prior to submissions to reporting agencies, quarterly and annual reports will be reviewed by the Business Administrator to ensure accuracy for the reporting period(s).

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan The Mifflinburg Area School District respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2022. Finding 2022-004: Reporting Contact Person: Renee M. Jilinski, Business Administrator Recommendation: The District should develop procedures to ensure accurate information is reported to allow for adequate tracking of the financial results of each Federal award. In addition, reports should be reviewed by an appropriate individual prior to submission to ensure the data entered into the reports is consistent with the District?s records. Action: The District developed procedures for assigning expenditures for State and Federal awards and created reporting specific to funding sources to identify all awards. Prior to submissions to reporting agencies, quarterly and annual reports will be reviewed by the Business Administrator to ensure accuracy for the reporting period(s). Date for Completion: August 30, 2022

About Reporting →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,283,768 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2022 — management decision was due September 29, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,387,446 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 10, 2021 — management decision was due September 10, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,450,439 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 28, 2020 — management decision was due July 28, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,464,154 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2019 — management decision was due July 17, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,614,093 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 19, 2018 — management decision was due August 19, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,624,109 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 14, 2017 — management decision was due August 14, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Pennsylvania

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.