← Back to home

POVERELLO CENTER, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 237439391

UEI: FQCXFR3MWB78

Audited by: CARVER FLOREK & JAMES, CPA'S

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 29, 2026

POVERELLO CENTER, INC.4 audit years7 findings1 repeat
4
Audit Years
7
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$1.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,902,954 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 15, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 15, 2026 (167 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2023-003

During our testing we found that 24 of the 40 transactions had not been properly checked to ensure that the vendor was not suspended nor debarred prior to making payment. Management has since verified that these vendors are not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization does not have written policies to provide guidance over these matters but have procedures in place to check vendors for suspension and debarment, but controls were missed for an instance of evaluation and appears to be an oversight. Effects: The Organization could do business with a vendor which has been suspended or debarred resulting in non-compliance with federal awards and subject federal dollars to possible fraud, waste, or abuse. Recommendation: We recommend that management establishes written policy to guide the procedures over the checks and implements a comprehensive plan to ensure that all vendors are checked for suspension/debarment prior to making payment.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-001 Evaluation of Suspension and Debarment of Vendors – Significant Deficiency Criteria: Federal grant agreements and contracts require policies and procedures are in place to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred by the Federal government. Condition: During our testing we found that 24 of the 40 transactions had not been properly checked to ensure that the vendor was not suspended nor debarred prior to making payment. Management has since verified that these vendors are not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization does not have written policies to provide guidance over these matters but have procedures in place to check vendors for suspension and debarment, but controls were missed for an instance of evaluation and appears to be an oversight. Effects: The Organization could do business with a vendor which has been suspended or debarred resulting in non-compliance with federal awards and subject federal dollars to possible fraud, waste, or abuse. Recommendation: We recommend that management establishes written policy to guide the procedures over the checks and implements a comprehensive plan to ensure that all vendors are checked for suspension/debarment prior to making payment.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend that management establishes written policy to guide the procedures over the checks and implements a comprehensive plan to ensure that all vendors are checked for suspension/debarment prior to making payment. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree with the auditors' comments, and the following actions will be taken to improve the situation. We will continue to check every new vendor for suspension or debarment before using them for good and services, and the proper documentation showing this will be kept in our records. In addition, we have established a written policy to guide the procedures over the checks. This policy also details a comprehensive plan to ensure that all vendors are checked for suspension and debarment prior to making any payments.

Prior Finding References

2023-003

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2024-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

For 1 of the 40 transactions tested we found that the Organization had allowed for a member of management to self-approve payroll expenditure. Cause: Undetermined. Effects: The Organization could allow payroll expenditures that are not due or allowed as the self-review would allow for activities to pass through. Recommendation: We recommend that management implements a comprehensive plan to ensure payroll transactions are not self-approved.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-002 Approval of Payroll – Significant Deficiency Criteria: Federal grant agreements and contracts require entities to have an approval process in place for expenditure of federal awards to ensure that activities are allowed under federal agreements. Condition: For 1 of the 40 transactions tested we found that the Organization had allowed for a member of management to self-approve payroll expenditure. Cause: Undetermined. Effects: The Organization could allow payroll expenditures that are not due or allowed as the self-review would allow for activities to pass through. Recommendation: We recommend that management implements a comprehensive plan to ensure payroll transactions are not self-approved.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend that management implements a comprehensive plan to ensure payroll transactions are not approved by the individual for which the payroll is for. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned corrective Actions: We agree with the auditors' findings and are taking the following corrective actions to address the issue. We have implemented a comprehensive plan to ensure that all timecards are reviewed and approved by someone other than the individual sub:nitting the timecard. Additionally, the plan includes a formal policy outlining procedures to ensure continued compliance during staff transitions, including the reassignment of timecard approval responsibilities when personnel changes occur.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2023-12-31

$2,094,567 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 19, 2024 — management decision was due February 19, 2025.

2023-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

We found that the SEFA prepared by the Organization included expenditures from the prior year. Cause: The Organization’s procedure for evaluating the proper period of SEFA reporting did not detect this error on the SEFA. Effects: The SEFA initially provided to us over reported expenditures, this matter has been corrected in the accompanying SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement procedures to verify proper period for all expenditure of federal funds.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-001 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER PREPARATION OF SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL AWARDS Criteria: The Organization should have proper controls in place over the preparation of the SEFA to ensure accurate reporting of federal awards. Condition: We found that the SEFA prepared by the Organization included expenditures from the prior year. Cause: The Organization’s procedure for evaluating the proper period of SEFA reporting did not detect this error on the SEFA. Effects: The SEFA initially provided to us over reported expenditures, this matter has been corrected in the accompanying SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement procedures to verify proper period for all expenditure of federal funds.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2023 - 001 Internal Controls Over Preparation of Schedule of Federal Awards Recommendations: We recommend the Organization implement procedures to verify proper period for all expenditure of federal funds. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree with the auditors' comments and the following action will be taken to improve the situation. We have worked internally to improve the accuracy of the documentation of federal funds. The proper period for reporting has been confirmed with all financial staff.

About Reporting →
2023-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

For 1 of the 25 transactions tested we found that the Organization had not followed their policy of obtaining authorization from the appropriate level of management. Cause: The Organization does have controls in place to ensure that this compliance is checked on a daily basis, but the control was deficient on various occasions and appears to be an oversight. Effects: The Organization could allow expenditures that are not allowable in the lines of the federal agreement that could produce the Organization being noncompliant with laws and regulations with the agreement and be subject to penalties or withdraw of federal funding status. Recommendation: We recommend that management implements a comprehensive plan to ensure that all transactions receive proper approval after a thorough review of each transaction.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-002 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER ALLOWABLE COST PRINCIPLES Criteria: Federal grant agreements and contracts require entities to have an approval process in place for expenditure of federal awards to ensure that activities are allowed under federal agreements. Condition: For 1 of the 25 transactions tested we found that the Organization had not followed their policy of obtaining authorization from the appropriate level of management. Cause: The Organization does have controls in place to ensure that this compliance is checked on a daily basis, but the control was deficient on various occasions and appears to be an oversight. Effects: The Organization could allow expenditures that are not allowable in the lines of the federal agreement that could produce the Organization being noncompliant with laws and regulations with the agreement and be subject to penalties or withdraw of federal funding status. Recommendation: We recommend that management implements a comprehensive plan to ensure that all transactions receive proper approval after a thorough review of each transaction.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2023 - 002 Internal Controls Over Allowable Cost Principles Recommendations: We recommend that management implements a comprehensive plan to ensure that all transactions receive proper approval after a thorough review of each transaction Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree with the auditors' comments, and the following actions will be taken to improve the situation. We have now improved our internal process for proper approval from the appropriate level of management. We have put into place an internal process that should eliminate this oversight in the future. We also are in the process of updating our financial policies to be up to date.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2023-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our testing we found that 2 of the 25 transactions had not been properly checked to ensure that the vendor was not suspended nor debarred prior to making payment. Management as since verified that these vendors are not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization did have procedures in place to check vendors for suspension and debarment, but controls were missed for an instance of evaluation and appears to be an oversight. Effects: The Organization could do business with a vendor which has been suspended or debarred resulting in non-compliance with federal awards and subject federal dollars to possible fraud, waste, or abuse. Recommendation: We recommend that management implements a comprehensive plan to ensure that all vendors are checked for suspension/debarment prior to making payment.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-003 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER COMPLIANCE OF SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT Criteria: Federal grant agreements and contracts require ensuring vendors are not suspended or debarred by the Federal government. Condition: During our testing we found that 2 of the 25 transactions had not been properly checked to ensure that the vendor was not suspended nor debarred prior to making payment. Management as since verified that these vendors are not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization did have procedures in place to check vendors for suspension and debarment, but controls were missed for an instance of evaluation and appears to be an oversight. Effects: The Organization could do business with a vendor which has been suspended or debarred resulting in non-compliance with federal awards and subject federal dollars to possible fraud, waste, or abuse. Recommendation: We recommend that management implements a comprehensive plan to ensure that all vendors are checked for suspension/debarment prior to making payment.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2023 - 003 Internal Controls Over suspension and Debarment Recommendations: We recommend that management implements a comprehensive plan to ensure that all vendors are checked for suspension/debarment prior to making payment. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree with the auditors' comments, and the following actions will be taken to improve the situation. We will continue to check every new vendor for suspension or debarment before using them for good and services, and the proper documentation showing this will be kept in our records. We have added an additional check point internally to prevent this oversight in the future.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-12-31

$1,717,293 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 3, 2023 — management decision was due February 3, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

$965,232 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2022 — management decision was due March 18, 2023.

2021-002
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

We found that the SEFA prepared by the Organization included expenditures from the prior year. Cause: The Organization?s procedure for evaluating the proper period of SEFA reporting did not detect this error on the SEFA. Effects: The SEFA provided to us reported the incorrect expenditures of federal awards. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement procedures to verify proper period for all expenditure of federal funds.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-002 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER PREPARATION OF SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL AWARDS Criteria: The Organization should have proper controls in place over the preparation of the SEFA to ensure accurate reporting of federal awards. Condition: We found that the SEFA prepared by the Organization included expenditures from the prior year. Cause: The Organization?s procedure for evaluating the proper period of SEFA reporting did not detect this error on the SEFA. Effects: The SEFA provided to us reported the incorrect expenditures of federal awards. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement procedures to verify proper period for all expenditure of federal funds.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2021 ? 002 Internal Controls Over Preparation of Schedule of Federal Awards Recommendations: We recommend the Organization implement procedures to verify proper period for all expenditure of federal funds. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree with the auditors? comments, and the following actions will be taken to improve the situation. We are now reconciling amounts billed to federal grants with accounting records before bills are submitted, and a copy of GL is attached to the bills. Payroll billed to any grants is taken directly from the payroll journal provided by our payroll service provider. We will also prepare bills so they do not overlap accounting years, and the SEFA as well.

About Reporting →
2021-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

We noted the Organization had not checked with the System for Award Management to determine if any vendors were suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization did not have procedures in place to check vendors for suspension and debarment. Effects: The Organization could do business with a vendor which has been suspended or debarred resulting in non-compliance with federal awards and subject federal dollars to possible fraud, waste, or abuse. Recommendation: Upon notification of this finding, the Organization has gone through and checked all vendors used during the year ended December 31, 2021 for suspension and debarment using the System for Award Management noting no vendors were suspended or debarred. We recommend the System for Award Management be used to check every new vendor for suspension or debarment before using them for goods or services.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-003 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT Criteria: Federal grant agreements and contracts require ensuring vendors are not suspended or debarred by the Federal government. Condition: We noted the Organization had not checked with the System for Award Management to determine if any vendors were suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization did not have procedures in place to check vendors for suspension and debarment. Effects: The Organization could do business with a vendor which has been suspended or debarred resulting in non-compliance with federal awards and subject federal dollars to possible fraud, waste, or abuse. Recommendation: Upon notification of this finding, the Organization has gone through and checked all vendors used during the year ended December 31, 2021 for suspension and debarment using the System for Award Management noting no vendors were suspended or debarred. We recommend the System for Award Management be used to check every new vendor for suspension or debarment before using them for goods or services.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2021 ? 003 Internal Controls Over suspension and Debarment Recommendations: Upon notification of this finding, the Organization has gone through and checked all vendors used during the year ended December 31, 2021 for suspension and debarment using the System for Award Management noting no vendors were suspended or debarred. We recommend the System for Award Management be used to check every new vendor for suspension or debarment before using them for goods or services. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree with the auditors? comments, and the following actions will be taken to improve the situation. We will continue to check every new vendor for suspension or debarment before using them for good and services, and the proper documentation showing this will be kept in our records.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.