← Back to home

Universal Housing Development CorporationNon-Profit

EIN: 237416304

UEI: PU2LPNJTCD97

Audited by: Landmark PLC, Certified Public Accountants

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Universal Housing Development Corporation10 audit years3 findings
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,520,480 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 16, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 16, 2026 (17 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,503,910 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,552,286 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,058,572 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2023 — management decision was due July 22, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,070,895 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2022 — management decision was due July 4, 2022.

2021-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Lack of oversight in internal control over the check disbursements in the Paris Section 8 program. Criteria: Universal Housing Development Corporation's policy states that dual signatures are required on all checks. Effect: Checks disbursed from the Paris Section 8 program did not have dual signatures and six checks cleared the bank with no signature. Recommendation: Management should put procedures in place to verify that the process over the Paris Section 8 program disbursements is being performed monthly and they adhere to Universal Housing Development Corporation's policies and procedures. Response: Universal Housing Development Corporation will put procedures in place to ensure that all policies are being met through the Paris Section 8 program and procedures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Statement of Condition: Lack of oversight in internal control over the check disbursements in the Paris Section 8 program. Criteria: Universal Housing Development Corporation's policy states that dual signatures are required on all checks. Effect: Checks disbursed from the Paris Section 8 program did not have dual signatures and six checks cleared the bank with no signature. Recommendation: Management should put procedures in place to verify that the process over the Paris Section 8 program disbursements is being performed monthly and they adhere to Universal Housing Development Corporation's policies and procedures. Response: Universal Housing Development Corporation will put procedures in place to ensure that all policies are being met through the Paris Section 8 program and procedures.

Corrective Action Plan

Significant Deficiencies: Lack of oversight in internal control over the check disbursements in the Paris Section 8 program. Recommendation: Management should put procedures in place to verify that the process over the Paris Section 8 program disbursements is being performed monthly and they adhere to Universal Housing Development Corporation's policies and procedures. Action Taken: Management has already initiated the oversight procedures for the year ended June 30, 2022.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Special Tests and Provisions →
2021-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Lack of oversight in internal control over sub accounts within the Paris Section 8 program due to year end adjusting journal entries not being recorded. Criteria: The management agent over the Paris Section 8 program's trial balance should reconcile with Universal Housing Development Corporation's trial balance. Effect: The management agent over the Paris Section 8 program did not record the year end adjusting entries therefore the sub accounts on their books did not reconcile with Universal Development Corporation's trial balance at year end. Recommendation: Management should implement a verification and communication process with the management agent over the Paris Section 8 program to ensure that the books reconcile with their trial balance on a monthly and yearly basis. Response: Universal Housing Development Corporation will put procedures in place on a monthly and annual basis to ensure that the Paris Section 8 program management agent's trial balance reconciles with the corporation's trial balance.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Statement of Condition: Lack of oversight in internal control over sub accounts within the Paris Section 8 program due to year end adjusting journal entries not being recorded. Criteria: The management agent over the Paris Section 8 program's trial balance should reconcile with Universal Housing Development Corporation's trial balance. Effect: The management agent over the Paris Section 8 program did not record the year end adjusting entries therefore the sub accounts on their books did not reconcile with Universal Development Corporation's trial balance at year end. Recommendation: Management should implement a verification and communication process with the management agent over the Paris Section 8 program to ensure that the books reconcile with their trial balance on a monthly and yearly basis. Response: Universal Housing Development Corporation will put procedures in place on a monthly and annual basis to ensure that the Paris Section 8 program management agent's trial balance reconciles with the corporation's trial balance.

Corrective Action Plan

Significant Deficiencies: Lack of oversight in internal control over sub accounts within the Paris Section 8 program due to year end adjusting journal entries not being recorded. Recommendation: Management should implement a verification and communication process with the management agent over the Paris Section 8 program to ensure that the books reconcile with their trial balance on a monthly and yearly basis. Action Taken: Management has already initiated the oversight procedures for the year ended June 30, 2022.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Special Tests and Provisions →
2021-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Lack of oversight in internal control over the Paris Section 8 program's client deposit account balance. Criteria: Universal Housing Development Corporation's is to ensure that the dollar amount reflected in the bank and liability account for client deposits agree and have supporting documentation. Effect: Although the client deposit bank account was reconciled on a monthly basis, it did not agree with the liability account or the supporting documentation. Both accounts had a higher balance than was supported by the file documentation. Recommendation: Management should implement monthly and yearly procedures to ensure that the client deposit bank account and liability accounts are properly reflecting the correct balance and agrees with supporting documentation. Response: Universal Housing Development Corporation will put monthly and yearly procedures in place to ensure that the client deposit bank account and liability account reflects the proper amount and agrees with the supporting documentation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Statement of Condition: Lack of oversight in internal control over the Paris Section 8 program's client deposit account balance. Criteria: Universal Housing Development Corporation's is to ensure that the dollar amount reflected in the bank and liability account for client deposits agree and have supporting documentation. Effect: Although the client deposit bank account was reconciled on a monthly basis, it did not agree with the liability account or the supporting documentation. Both accounts had a higher balance than was supported by the file documentation. Recommendation: Management should implement monthly and yearly procedures to ensure that the client deposit bank account and liability accounts are properly reflecting the correct balance and agrees with supporting documentation. Response: Universal Housing Development Corporation will put monthly and yearly procedures in place to ensure that the client deposit bank account and liability account reflects the proper amount and agrees with the supporting documentation.

Corrective Action Plan

Significant Deficiencies: Lack of oversight in internal control over the Paris Section 8 program's client deposit account balance. Recommendation: Management should implement monthly and yearly procedures to ensure that the client deposit bank account and liability accounts are properly reflecting the correct balance and agrees with supporting documentation. Action Taken: Management has already initiated the oversight procedures for the year ended June 30, 2022.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,309,431 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2021 — management decision was due July 3, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,868,026 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2020 — management decision was due July 14, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,508,338 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2019 — management decision was due September 28, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,227,872 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 25, 2018 — management decision was due August 25, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,687,516 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 18, 2017 — management decision was due July 18, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Arkansas

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.