EIN: 237319371
UEI: K6LULEM32354
Audited by: Sutton Frost Cary, LLP
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 9, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 9, 2026 (87 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2024 — management decision was due July 11, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2023 — management decision was due September 20, 2023.
While the Organization has controls in place such as Program Director review of employee grant hours per time sheets, approval of employee wage rates, and Accounting Department review of total payroll costs allocated to the grant, there was a lack of review of the methodology used to calculate the wage rate per hour charged to the Emergency Shelter Grant as well as a lack of review of the calculation that was used to apply total salaries under the program to certain grants. Questioned costs: None Context: The following errors were noted in allowable cost testing over payroll: 1. Though employee wage rates tested were properly reviewed and approved, on two of the fourteen payroll testing selections for the audit, the hourly rate used to calculate the payroll costs for the grant was not the correct rate. The rates that were used were the approved pay rates prior to a raise. We note the rate was lower than the approved rate resulting in no questioned costs. Further, we note that all wage rates selected for testing were properly reviewed and approved by the Organization. 2. One employee left the organization mid-month. The organization used the prior month's timesheet to calculate the employee's payroll to the grant resulting in incorrect hours being used. However, the Organization did not apply the full potential pay related to the Emergency Shelter Grant Program for the month resulting in no questioned costs. 3. Beginning in February 2022, the Organization started using an average wage rate allocation as a good faith effort to incorporate PTO and 403b costs, rather than using only the actual approved wage rate and hours directly worked on the grant (i.e. the Organization previously did not charge PTO and other benefits that it is allowed to charge). The method of calculating the rate per hour resulted in differences between the amounts paid to employees versus what was applied to the Emergency Shelter Grant Program. As noted above, the Organization did not apply the full potential pay related to the Emergency Shelter Grant Program each month resulting in no questioned costs and no material noncompliance. Cause: Lack of review of the method of calculating the rate per hour used to charge wages to the grant as well as a lack of review of the calculation that was used to apply total salaries under the program to applicable grants. Effect: Inaccurate capturing of costs charged to grant. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The organization should establish a process for review of the calculation of the rate per hour used to charge wages to the grant as well as a process for review of the calculation that is used to apply total salaries under the program to applicable grants. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022 ? 001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Title: Emergency Shelter Grant Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 Pass-Through Agency: United Way of Denton County, Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, and City of Denton Pass-Through Number(s): 42206070025, 42216070024, 44206070041, and 43206070082 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Under the Uniform Guidance, the Organization's records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: While the Organization has controls in place such as Program Director review of employee grant hours per time sheets, approval of employee wage rates, and Accounting Department review of total payroll costs allocated to the grant, there was a lack of review of the methodology used to calculate the wage rate per hour charged to the Emergency Shelter Grant as well as a lack of review of the calculation that was used to apply total salaries under the program to certain grants. Questioned costs: None Context: The following errors were noted in allowable cost testing over payroll: 1. Though employee wage rates tested were properly reviewed and approved, on two of the fourteen payroll testing selections for the audit, the hourly rate used to calculate the payroll costs for the grant was not the correct rate. The rates that were used were the approved pay rates prior to a raise. We note the rate was lower than the approved rate resulting in no questioned costs. Further, we note that all wage rates selected for testing were properly reviewed and approved by the Organization. 2. One employee left the organization mid-month. The organization used the prior month's timesheet to calculate the employee's payroll to the grant resulting in incorrect hours being used. However, the Organization did not apply the full potential pay related to the Emergency Shelter Grant Program for the month resulting in no questioned costs. 3. Beginning in February 2022, the Organization started using an average wage rate allocation as a good faith effort to incorporate PTO and 403b costs, rather than using only the actual approved wage rate and hours directly worked on the grant (i.e. the Organization previously did not charge PTO and other benefits that it is allowed to charge). The method of calculating the rate per hour resulted in differences between the amounts paid to employees versus what was applied to the Emergency Shelter Grant Program. As noted above, the Organization did not apply the full potential pay related to the Emergency Shelter Grant Program each month resulting in no questioned costs and no material noncompliance. Cause: Lack of review of the method of calculating the rate per hour used to charge wages to the grant as well as a lack of review of the calculation that was used to apply total salaries under the program to applicable grants. Effect: Inaccurate capturing of costs charged to grant. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The organization should establish a process for review of the calculation of the rate per hour used to charge wages to the grant as well as a process for review of the calculation that is used to apply total salaries under the program to applicable grants. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Christian Community Action respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2022. Audit period: 07/01/2021 ? 06/30/2022. The finding from the schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the number assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS?FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 2022-001 Emergency Shelter Grant Program ? Assistance Listing No. 14.231 Recommendation: The organization should establish a process for review of the calculation of the rate per hour used to charge wages to the grant as well as a process for review of the calculation that is used to apply total salaries under the program to applicable grants. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: I. A process has been implemented for the CFO Consultant to perform and document review of the calculation of the rate per hour used to charge wages to the grant. II. A process has been implemented for the Controller to perform and document review of payroll data used to calculate the rate per hour. III. A process is being implemented for the Controller and CFO Consultant to perform and document review the report of total salaries and fringe benefits applied to the applicable grant program. Names of the contact persons responsible for corrective action: Janet Moore Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 02/28/2023 If the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding this plan, please call Janet Moore at 972-219-4375.
FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2022 — management decision was due July 3, 2022.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Texas →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.