EIN: 237066134
UEI: JA6MVA9E4SR3
Audited by: PBMares, LLP
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2026 (32 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2025 — management decision was due August 28, 2025.
We noted that certain information that is required by Head Start was excluded from the property and equipment records. Cause: The property and equipment files did not contain all the necessary information documented. Effect: There is potential for the equipment and property records to be inaccurate. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: The property and equipment records required to be maintained for Head Start were reviewed. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency’s equipment and property records be updated to include the necessary information required. This includes, but is not limited to, serial number or other identifier, funding source, and use and condition of the item. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Records for property purchased with Head Start funds are required to maintain certain information. Condition: We noted that certain information that is required by Head Start was excluded from the property and equipment records. Cause: The property and equipment files did not contain all the necessary information documented. Effect: There is potential for the equipment and property records to be inaccurate. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: The property and equipment records required to be maintained for Head Start were reviewed. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency’s equipment and property records be updated to include the necessary information required. This includes, but is not limited to, serial number or other identifier, funding source, and use and condition of the item. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee's corrective action plan. The Agency added funding sourcse to the asset listing and completed an inventory of equipment to add applicable identification numbers and asset condition to the asset listing. Corrective Action contact person(s), Mridul Singh, Interim Head Start Director, (757) 229-9332, msingh@weareace.org; Kristy Gamble, Chief Financial Officer, (630) 280-2580, kristy.gamble@wipfli.com. Completed December, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on August 28, 2024 — management decision was due February 28, 2025.
It was noted that the Form SF-429 was not filed in a timely manner. Cause: There was turnover in the accounting department during the year and delays with getting access to the system to the Agency’s third party contractor for accounting services. Effect: The Agency was not in compliance with the grant’s reporting requirements. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: The report required to be filed for the grant was tested and was not submitted timely. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the report be completed and submitted prior to or by the October 31st deadline. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: The Form SF-429 report should be completed and filed in a timely manner by the Agency (by October 31, 2023 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023). Condition: It was noted that the Form SF-429 was not filed in a timely manner. Cause: There was turnover in the accounting department during the year and delays with getting access to the system to the Agency’s third party contractor for accounting services. Effect: The Agency was not in compliance with the grant’s reporting requirements. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: The report required to be filed for the grant was tested and was not submitted timely. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the report be completed and submitted prior to or by the October 31st deadline. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
Criteria: The form SF-429 report should be completed and filed in a timely manner by the Agency (by October 31, 2023 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023). Condition: It was noted that the Form SF-429 was not filed in a timely manner. Cause: There was turnover in the accounting department during the year and delays with getting access to the system to the Agency's third party contractor for accounting services. Effect: The Agency was not in compliance with the grant's reporting requirements. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: The report required to be filed for the grant was tested and was not submitted timely. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the report be completed and submitted prior to the October 31st deadline. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee's corrective action plan. Permissions have now been granted to provide outsourced accounting firm with access to Grant Solutions. The SF-429 reports will be filed in a timely manner going forward. Corrective action contact person: Kristy Gamble, Chief Financial Officer, (630) 280-2580; Kristy-gamble@wipfli.com. Completion Date: November 21, 2023.
2022-002
Monthly financial reports were not provided to the Board for the entire fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. Cause: The delay in the financial reports to the Board was due to turnover within the accounting department during the year. The Agency was not able to secure accounting services from a third-party contractor until the end of the fiscal year. However, the focus of the contract was to get the Agency caught up and assist with the prior fiscal year’s audit. Effect: During this period, internal financial information was not reviewed or approved by the Board timely. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: Twelve out of twelve months of financial reports were not provided to the Board during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency implement controls to ensure that financial reports are provided to the Board in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Monthly financial reporting information should be shared with the Board of Directors in a timely manner. Condition: Monthly financial reports were not provided to the Board for the entire fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. Cause: The delay in the financial reports to the Board was due to turnover within the accounting department during the year. The Agency was not able to secure accounting services from a third-party contractor until the end of the fiscal year. However, the focus of the contract was to get the Agency caught up and assist with the prior fiscal year’s audit. Effect: During this period, internal financial information was not reviewed or approved by the Board timely. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: Twelve out of twelve months of financial reports were not provided to the Board during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency implement controls to ensure that financial reports are provided to the Board in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
Criteria: Monthly financial reporting information should be shared with the Board of Directors in a timely manner. Condition: Monthly financial reports were not provided to the Board for the entire fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. Cause: The delay in the financial reports to the Board was due to turnover in the accounting department during the year. The Agency was not able to secure accounting services from a third-party contractor until the end of the fiscal year. However, the focus of the contract was to get the Agency caught up and assist with the prior fiscal year's audit. Effect: During this period, internal financial information was not reviewed or approved by the Board timely. Questioned cost amount: None noted. Persepctive Information: Twelve out of Twelve months of financial reports were not provided to the Board during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency implement controls to ensure that financial reports are provided to the Board in a timely manner. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee's corrective action plan. Monthly financial reports will be prepared by the outsourced accoutant, reviewed by the CFO and Executive Director, and presented to the Board in a timely manner. Corrective action contact person: Kristy Gamble, Chief Financial Officer, (630) 280-2580; Kristy-gamble@wipfli.com. Completion Date: October 26, 2023.
2022-003
FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2024 — management decision was due July 29, 2024.
Expenditures charged to the Head Start grant were not appropriately reviewed and approved. Cause: The Agency’s staff did not follow the procedures put in place over review and approval of expenditures charged to the grant. Effect: There is potential for expenditures that are not allowed to be charged to the grant. Questioned Cost Amount: Total questioned costs were $10,447. Perspective Information: Seven out of the total forty expenses tested did not contain evidence of review or approval. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that all expenditures charged to the grant be reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer and that such review and approval be formally documented. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: All expenditures charged to the grant should be reviewed and approved. Condition: Expenditures charged to the Head Start grant were not appropriately reviewed and approved. Cause: The Agency’s staff did not follow the procedures put in place over review and approval of expenditures charged to the grant. Effect: There is potential for expenditures that are not allowed to be charged to the grant. Questioned Cost Amount: Total questioned costs were $10,447. Perspective Information: Seven out of the total forty expenses tested did not contain evidence of review or approval. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that all expenditures charged to the grant be reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer and that such review and approval be formally documented. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
Criteria: All expenditures charged to the grant should be reviewed and approved. Condition: Expenditures charged to the Head Start grant were not appropriately reviewed and approved. Cause: The Agency's staff did not follow the procedures put in place over review and approval of expenditures charged to the grant. Effect: There is potentital for expenditures that are not allowed to be charged to the grant. Questioned Costs Amount: Total questioned costs were $10,447. Perspective Information: Seven out of the total forty expenses did not contain evidence of review or approval. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommentation: We recommend that expenditures charged to the grant be reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer and that such review and approval be formally documented. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See client's corrective action plan. Due to turnover is staffing, the Agency has contracted with Wipfli for accounting services. Bill.com has been implemented to be used as the accounts payable software so that all expenses and supporting documentation can be reviewed and approved by the Executive Director and a member of the Board of Directors through the software. Corrective action contact person: Accounting Support Specialist, Yaitzel Barrientos, (757) 995-9141 ybarrientos@weareace.org Completion Date: July 1, 2023
It was noted that the Forms SF-425 and SF-429 were not filed in a timely manner. Cause: The former Chief Executive Officer/President left the Agency prior to the completion and submission of the forms and there was subsequently turnover in the accounting department. There were also delays with the new staff within the accounting department obtaining access to the necessary systems to submit the reports. Effect: The Agency was not in compliance with the grant’s reporting requirements. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: All of the reports required to be filed for the grant were tested and none were submitted timely. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the reports be completed and submitted prior to or by the October 31st deadline. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: These reports should be completed and filed in a timely manner by the Agency (by October 31, 2022 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022). Condition: It was noted that the Forms SF-425 and SF-429 were not filed in a timely manner. Cause: The former Chief Executive Officer/President left the Agency prior to the completion and submission of the forms and there was subsequently turnover in the accounting department. There were also delays with the new staff within the accounting department obtaining access to the necessary systems to submit the reports. Effect: The Agency was not in compliance with the grant’s reporting requirements. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: All of the reports required to be filed for the grant were tested and none were submitted timely. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the reports be completed and submitted prior to or by the October 31st deadline. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
Criteria: These reports should have been completed and filed in a timely manner by the Agency (by October 31, 2022 for clients current fiscal year ended June 30, 2022). Condition: It was noted that the Forms SF-425 and SF-429 were not filed in a timely manner. Cause: The former Chief Executive Officer/President left the Agency prior to the completion and submission of the forms and there was subsequently turnover in the accounting department. There were also delays with the new staff within the accounting department obtaining access to the necessary systems to submit the reports. Effect: The Agency was not in compliance with the grant's reporting requirements. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: All of the reports required to be filed for the grant were tested and none were submitted timely. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the reports be completed and submitted prior to or by the October 31st deadline. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See client's corrective action plan. Permissions have now been granted to provide outsourced accounting firm with access to Grant Solutions. The SF-425 and SF-429 reports will be filed in a timely manner going forward. Corrective action contact person: Chief Financial Officer, Kristy Gamble, (630) 280-2580 Kristy-gamble@wipfli.com Completion Date: November 21, 2023
2021-002
Monthly financial reports were not provided to the Board for the period of April to June 2022. Cause: The delay in the financial reports to the Board was due to turnover in key management positions, including within the accounting department. Effect: During this period, internal financial information was not reviewed or approved by the Board timely. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: Three out of twelve months of financial reports were not provided to the Board during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 or soon thereafter. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency implement controls to ensure that financial reports are provided to the Board in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Monthly financial reporting information should be shared with the Board of Directors in a timely manner. Condition: Monthly financial reports were not provided to the Board for the period of April to June 2022. Cause: The delay in the financial reports to the Board was due to turnover in key management positions, including within the accounting department. Effect: During this period, internal financial information was not reviewed or approved by the Board timely. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: Three out of twelve months of financial reports were not provided to the Board during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 or soon thereafter. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency implement controls to ensure that financial reports are provided to the Board in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
Criteria: Monthly financial reporting information should be shared with the Board of Directors in a timely manner. Condition: Monthly financial reports were not provided to the Board for the period of April to June 2022. Cause: The delay in the financial reports to the Board was due to turnover in key management positions, including within the accounting department. Effect: During this period, internal financial information was not reviewed or approved by the Board timely. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: Three out of twelve months of financial reports were not provided to the Board during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 or soon thereafter. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency implement controls to ensure that financial reports are provide to the Board in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees wtih this finding. See client's corrective action plan. Monthly financial reports will be prepared by the outsourced accountant, reviewed by the CFO and Executive Director, and presented to the Board in a timely manner. Corrective action plan contact person: Chief Financial Officer, Kristy Gamble, (630) 280-2580 Kristy-gamble@wipfli.com Competion Date: October 26, 2023
The SF-429 Form was reviewed and approved by the individual who prepared the report. Cause: The former Chief Executive Officer/President left the Agency prior to the completion and submission of the form and there was subsequently turnover in the accounting department. Effect: There is potential that the report submitted was incorrect. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: This report, which is required to be filed for the grant, was tested and not reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency implements controls to ensure that reports are reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: The SF-429 Form should be reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer. Condition: The SF-429 Form was reviewed and approved by the individual who prepared the report. Cause: The former Chief Executive Officer/President left the Agency prior to the completion and submission of the form and there was subsequently turnover in the accounting department. Effect: There is potential that the report submitted was incorrect. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: This report, which is required to be filed for the grant, was tested and not reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency implements controls to ensure that reports are reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See auditee’s corrective action plan.
Criteria: The SF-429 Form should be reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer. Condition: The SF-429 Form was reviewed and approved by the individual who prepared the report. Cause: The former Chief Executive Officer/President left the Agency prior to the completion and submission of the form and there was subsequently turnover in the accounting department. Effect: There is potential that the report submitted was incorrect. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: This report which is required to be filed for the grant was tested and not reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency implement controls to ensure that the reports are reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Agency agrees with this finding. See client's corrective action plan. The outsourced accountant will prepare the SF-429 report, and the CFO or Executive Director will approve the reports. In the event of an absence, the CFO will prepare, and the CEO will cerfity, or vice versa. Corrective action plan contact person: Chief Financial Officer, Kristy Gamble, (630) 280-2580 Kristy-gamble@wipfli.com Estimated completion date: August 31, 2024 (next 429 report to come due)
FAC accepted this audit on May 23, 2022 — management decision was due November 23, 2022.
It was noted that the individual who approved and reviewed the SF-429 was the same individual as the preparer. Criteria: The SF-429 should be reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer. Cause: The former CEO left the Agency prior to the completion and submission of the form. Normally, this individual would have been the individual to perform the review and approve it. Effect: There is potential that the submitted report was incorrect. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: The annual SF-429 was tested as part of our compliance audit work. Recommendation: We recommend that the report be reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See client?s corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: It was noted that the individual who approved and reviewed the SF-429 was the same individual as the preparer. Criteria: The SF-429 should be reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer. Cause: The former CEO left the Agency prior to the completion and submission of the form. Normally, this individual would have been the individual to perform the review and approve it. Effect: There is potential that the submitted report was incorrect. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: The annual SF-429 was tested as part of our compliance audit work. Recommendation: We recommend that the report be reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See client?s corrective action plan.
Condition: It was noted that the individual who approved and reviewed the SF-429 was the same individual as the preparer. Criteria: The SF-429 should be reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer. Cause: The former CEO left the Agency prior to the completion and submission of the form. Normally, this individual would have been the individual to perform the review and approve it. Effect: There is potential that the submitted report was incorrect. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: The annual SF-429 were tested as part of our compliance audit work. Recommendation: We recommend that the report be reviewed and approved by someone other than the preparer. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See client?s corrective action plan. The Staff Accountant will prepare SF-429 an COO or CEO will approval the documents. In the event of absence, the COO will prepare the report and the CEO will do the approval and vice versa. Responsible Contact Person: Hazel Thomas, Chief Operations Officer, phone number 757-660-2224
It was noted that the SF-425, SF-428, and SF-429 were not filed timely. Criteria: The necessary reports should be completed and filed timely by the Agency. Cause: The former CEO left the Agency prior to the completion and submission of the forms, and there was a change in how the forms had to be prepared and submitted which lead to the untimely submission. Effect: The Agency is not in compliance with the grant?s reporting requirement as part of our program compliance audit. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: All three of the reports required to be filed for the grant were tested. Recommendation: We recommend that the report be completed and submitted prior to or by the October 31st deadline. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See client?s corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: It was noted that the SF-425, SF-428, and SF-429 were not filed timely. Criteria: The necessary reports should be completed and filed timely by the Agency. Cause: The former CEO left the Agency prior to the completion and submission of the forms, and there was a change in how the forms had to be prepared and submitted which lead to the untimely submission. Effect: The Agency is not in compliance with the grant?s reporting requirement as part of our program compliance audit. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: All three of the reports required to be filed for the grant were tested. Recommendation: We recommend that the report be completed and submitted prior to or by the October 31st deadline. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See client?s corrective action plan.
Condition: It was noted that the SF-425, SF-428, and SF-429 were not filed timely. Criteria: The necessary reports should be completed and filed timely by the Agency. Cause: The former CEO left the Agency prior to the completion and submission of the forms, and there was a change in how the forms had to be prepared and submitted which lead to the untimely submission. Effect: The Agency is not in compliance with the grant?s reporting requirement as part of our compliance audit. Questioned Cost Amount: None noted. Perspective Information: All three of the reports required to be filed for the grant were tested. Recommendation: We recommend that the report be completed and submitted prior to or by the October 31st deadline. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See client?s corrective action plan. Permissions were granted to allow for more access to the reporting agency. The Staff Accountant, COO and CEO will have the ability to file the SF-425, SF-428, and SF-429. It will be the responsibility of the Staff Accountant to prepare the reports, the COO and the CEO to certify. In the event of an absence the agency would be fully functional, the COO will prepare, and the CEO will certify. The COO will be responsible for the timely filings. Responsible Contact Person: Hazel Thomas, Chief Operations Officer, phone number 757-660-2224
FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2021 — management decision was due August 28, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on May 11, 2020 — management decision was due November 11, 2020.
During 2019, the SF-429 for Real Property report was not filed timely. Cause: The Agency was not aware that it was a requirement for the report to be filed, but the Agency filed the report once they were made aware. Effect: The Agency was not in compliance with the grant?s reporting requirement. Questioned costs: None. Systemic Problem: The issue identified is a systematic problem which should be rectified by instituting controls to ensure that the report is filed timely. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendations: The Agency should take steps to ensure that the report is properly completed and filed timely. Views of responsible official: The Agency agrees with the finding and will continue making improvements in review and approval of required reporting and ensuring timely filing. Contact person: Hazel Thomas, Finance Officer Corrective Action Plan: See Client?s Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Proper reporting should be completed and filed timely by the Agency. Condition: During 2019, the SF-429 for Real Property report was not filed timely. Cause: The Agency was not aware that it was a requirement for the report to be filed, but the Agency filed the report once they were made aware. Effect: The Agency was not in compliance with the grant?s reporting requirement. Questioned costs: None. Systemic Problem: The issue identified is a systematic problem which should be rectified by instituting controls to ensure that the report is filed timely. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendations: The Agency should take steps to ensure that the report is properly completed and filed timely. Views of responsible official: The Agency agrees with the finding and will continue making improvements in review and approval of required reporting and ensuring timely filing. Contact person: Hazel Thomas, Finance Officer Corrective Action Plan: See Client?s Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: Proper reporting should be completed and filed timely by the Agency. Action Taken: Now that we are aware of the SF-429 requirement, we have included this as part of our annual filing process that is due on 10/31. The Finance and Human Resources Officer will be responsible for the timely filings. Anticipated Completion Date: 03/2020
During 2019, the financial information was not provided to the Board in a timely manner. Cause: The Agency was in the process of cleaning up accounting records and ensuring accuracy in the current fiscal year. As a result, the monthly financial reports were not prepared and shared timely. Effect: The Board was not reviewing and approving financial information in a timely manner. Questioned costs: None. Systemic Problem: The issue identified is a systematic problem which should be rectified once the Agency gets their accounting records cleaned up. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendations: The Agency should implement controls to ensure that financial reports are provided to the Board timely. Views of responsible official: The Agency agrees with the finding and will implement the appropriate controls. Contact person: Hazel Thomas, Finance Officer Corrective Action Plan: See Client?s Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Monthly financial reporting information should be shared with the Board of Directors timely. Condition: During 2019, the financial information was not provided to the Board in a timely manner. Cause: The Agency was in the process of cleaning up accounting records and ensuring accuracy in the current fiscal year. As a result, the monthly financial reports were not prepared and shared timely. Effect: The Board was not reviewing and approving financial information in a timely manner. Questioned costs: None. Systemic Problem: The issue identified is a systematic problem which should be rectified once the Agency gets their accounting records cleaned up. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendations: The Agency should implement controls to ensure that financial reports are provided to the Board timely. Views of responsible official: The Agency agrees with the finding and will implement the appropriate controls. Contact person: Hazel Thomas, Finance Officer Corrective Action Plan: See Client?s Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: Monthly financial reporting information is shared with the governing body and policy council. Action Taken: As of December 12th, 2019's Board meeting, we have been presenting the Board of Directors with Financial Management Report. The Financial Management Report includes the Profit and Loss, Balance Sheet, Statement of Cash Flows, Quarterly Profit and Loss Summary and Budget vs Actual Report. Ms. Renee Carr was seated and voted in as Treasurer at our February 2020 Board of Directors Meeting. From that point forward, the reports are reviewed by Ms. Carr and the Finance Committee. The Chair of the Finance Committee along with the Finance & Human Resources Officer presents the Financial Management Report to the Board of Directors for review and approval. Anticipated Completion Date: 12/2019
2018-008
FAC accepted this audit on August 17, 2019 — management decision was due February 17, 2020.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on February 15, 2018 — management decision was due August 15, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-001
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2017 — management decision was due August 28, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Virginia →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
