← Back to home

COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 237037248

UEI: KVHVANJMNKZ6

Audited by: Armanino

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, INC.10 audit years3 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$12.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,787,089 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 11, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 11, 2026 (73 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,267,907 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 1, 2025 — management decision was due November 1, 2025.

2024-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During eligibility testing, it was identified that one intake form out of a sample of 40 exhibited a discrepancy in the timing of documentation completion and staff review. Specifically, for a client who received food pantry services on January 25, 2024, the client received and signed the Food Pantry Service Sheet on that same day, confirming eligibility determination. However, the CAASTLC staff member did not sign the form until January 31, 2024, several days after the client had received services. The MIS intake report reflects a date of February 2, 2024, which corresponds to when the data was entered into the system, rather than the date eligibility was actually determine. Cause: The procedures in place prioritized maintaining traffic flow during drive-through food pantry operations over contemporaneous documentation practices. As a result, the staff review and signature confirming eligibility were delayed and not completed on the date of service. Effect: Although eligibility was assessed and determined prior to the provision of services, the absence of timely staff signatures weakens the audit trail. This increases the risk that services may be provided without proper approval or that documentation may not adequately support compliance with eligibility requirements during an audit or program review. Recommendation: The Organization should strengthen internal controls and provide additional staff training to ensure all eligibility documentation—including staff review and signatures—is completed contemporaneously with client service. Where operational constraints exist, the Organization should consider implementing procedures to document eligibility determinations in real-time, or adopt digital tools to capture staff approval at the point of intake. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Major Program: Community Service Block Grant AL #93.569 Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance of Major Programs Criteria: The Community Action Agency must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of compliance with applicable federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award, in accordance with 2 CFR §200.303. For the eligibility compliance requirement, documentation must clearly demonstrate that eligibility was determined prior to the provision of benefits, and that all required approvals were contemporaneously documented. Condition: During eligibility testing, it was identified that one intake form out of a sample of 40 exhibited a discrepancy in the timing of documentation completion and staff review. Specifically, for a client who received food pantry services on January 25, 2024, the client received and signed the Food Pantry Service Sheet on that same day, confirming eligibility determination. However, the CAASTLC staff member did not sign the form until January 31, 2024, several days after the client had received services. The MIS intake report reflects a date of February 2, 2024, which corresponds to when the data was entered into the system, rather than the date eligibility was actually determine. Cause: The procedures in place prioritized maintaining traffic flow during drive-through food pantry operations over contemporaneous documentation practices. As a result, the staff review and signature confirming eligibility were delayed and not completed on the date of service. Effect: Although eligibility was assessed and determined prior to the provision of services, the absence of timely staff signatures weakens the audit trail. This increases the risk that services may be provided without proper approval or that documentation may not adequately support compliance with eligibility requirements during an audit or program review. Recommendation: The Organization should strengthen internal controls and provide additional staff training to ensure all eligibility documentation—including staff review and signatures—is completed contemporaneously with client service. Where operational constraints exist, the Organization should consider implementing procedures to document eligibility determinations in real-time, or adopt digital tools to capture staff approval at the point of intake. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

CAASTLC acknowledges the timing discrepancy in the documentation of staff review and signature during the drive-through food pantry operations in early 2024. Although eligibility was appropriately determined prior to the distribution of food, we recognize the importance of ensuring that all related documentation is contemporaneously completed and appropriately approved to maintain a strong internal control environment. The current intake and eligibility verification procedures was revised to include explicit language requiring staff signatures and approval of eligibility documentation on the date of service. These updated procedures will reflect both in-office and drive-through (if resumed) operations. All relevant staff members will receive updated training on intake documentation requirements, including the importance of contemporaneous staff review and approval. Training materials will be revised to emphasize compliance with federal requirements related to eligibility documentation. While data entry into MIS may still occur post-service, staff will be required to document and date eligibility approvals on the intake fonns at the time of service. Intake forms will now include a section for immediate staff verification with date stamps to reflect real-time approval. Name of Responsible Person: Linda Huntspon, Chief Executive Officer Anticipated Completion Date: Implemented in January 31, 2025

About Eligibility →

FY 2023-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,302,773 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 1, 2024 — management decision was due January 1, 2025.

FY 2022-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,765,904 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 10, 2023 — management decision was due November 10, 2023.

FY 2021-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,329,202 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 9, 2022 — management decision was due November 9, 2022.

FY 2020-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,978,140 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 16, 2021 — management decision was due December 16, 2021.

FY 2019-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,150,375 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 21, 2020 — management decision was due October 21, 2020.

2019-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-001

During our audit, Wipfli tested 25 participant files and their associated disbursements related to this grant award. Of the 25 disbursements, one was not paid within 45 days of the date of crisis. All transactions tested were for services provided that are allowable to be charged to the grant award. Criteria: A requirement of the LIHEAP manual from the State of Missouri Department of Social Services Family Support Division indicates that payments must be issued no later than 45 calendar days after an eligible household applied for assistance or 45 days from the date of crisis if it differs from and occurs later than the application date. View of responsible officials: Management agrees with the assessment and has committed to a corrective action plan. Recommendation: We recommend that CAASTLC review their procedures for monitoring outstanding invoices so that vendors can be consistently paid within 45 days of the date of crisis or application date. Effect: As a result of the compliance matter identified in the condition paragraph, a significant deficiency exists in CAASTLC?s compliance of the major program. Cause: CAASTLC lacked adequate fiscal oversight to ensure all vendors were paid consistently within 45 days. View of responsible officials: Management agrees with the assessment and has committed to a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Questioned Costs: None Condition: During our audit, Wipfli tested 25 participant files and their associated disbursements related to this grant award. Of the 25 disbursements, one was not paid within 45 days of the date of crisis. All transactions tested were for services provided that are allowable to be charged to the grant award. Criteria: A requirement of the LIHEAP manual from the State of Missouri Department of Social Services Family Support Division indicates that payments must be issued no later than 45 calendar days after an eligible household applied for assistance or 45 days from the date of crisis if it differs from and occurs later than the application date. View of responsible officials: Management agrees with the assessment and has committed to a corrective action plan. Recommendation: We recommend that CAASTLC review their procedures for monitoring outstanding invoices so that vendors can be consistently paid within 45 days of the date of crisis or application date. Effect: As a result of the compliance matter identified in the condition paragraph, a significant deficiency exists in CAASTLC?s compliance of the major program. Cause: CAASTLC lacked adequate fiscal oversight to ensure all vendors were paid consistently within 45 days. View of responsible officials: Management agrees with the assessment and has committed to a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Pledges will be monitored from the utility websites monthly, to verify for MIS entry/processing/payment. This additional procedure will be completed monthly by reviewing line by line verification of the report from the utility companies to the MIS report. Any discrepancies will be verified and paid immediately to stay within the 45 day time frame. The results of the monthly review will be reported to the Director of Program Administration and the Chief Financial Officer. Any missed pledges from MIS will be batched and paid immediately by the Service Integration Coordinator.

Prior Finding References

2018-001

About Other →

FY 2018-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,319,332 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 29, 2019 — management decision was due November 29, 2019.

2018-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →

FY 2017-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,696,553 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 13, 2018 — management decision was due December 13, 2018.

FY 2016-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,785,883 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 19, 2017 — management decision was due December 19, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Missouri

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.