EIN: 236004285
UEI: K8Z7SJSLM7Q1
Audited by: BOYER & RITTER LLC
Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 21, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 21, 2026 (44 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2025 — management decision was due July 24, 2025.
The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. During our audits and PDE’s monitoring review completed in fiscal year 2023-2024, the ESSER Monitoring Team and we noted the following Procurement Findings: The School District was unable to provide purchase orders for several services purchased with Federal funds. The School District did not document its rationale for noncompetitive procurement. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Procurement files for 2 vendors, which exceed $10,000 but not $22,500 for goods and $10,000 but not $250,000 for services, did not have the accompanying three price or rate quotations. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Vendor contracts did not contain the necessary contract provisions The ESSER Monitoring Team was unable to obtain and review sufficient documentation to verify that the procurement was competitively performed for 1 vendor, such as proof of advertisement, request for proposal, bid evaluation, and award letter for procurement of the following vendor Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. While the school district developed a plan to correct these procedures, it was not fully implemented until the 2023-2024 school year. Cause: Non-compliance with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: The District must implement procedures to fully comply with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. View of Responsible Officials: The District will require all payments to have either a purchase order or request for payment form completed. The Accounts Payable Coordinator is responsible for ensuring the form is signed for all disbursements. For the particular item cited by our monitors the Superintendent and Business Manager signed off on the invoice instead of a request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager discussed with the Accounts Payable Coordinator that going forward this is insufficient. All payments must have either a purchase order or request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager reviews backup documentation for check disbursements. During their review if any payments are discovered to be missing a purchase order or request for payment form, he will notify the Accounts Payable Coordinator to complete the form. This is effective immediately. The District has also reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements and has developed an electronic procurement process that all staff member making the purchase with federal funds, must complete a form prior to the procurement being made. Then the Business Manager approves the form. There is a box to check if the procurement is a sole source. If this is checked the Business Manager will require justification. This process was presented by the Business Office to Leadership Personnel on 5/9/24 and is effective now.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund; 84.027 IDEA Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement and adherence to related compliance requirements. Records should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.318(i) Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply 2 CFR 200.320(c): The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold: The item is available only from a single source; The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. adequately document costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200.403(g). The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. 2 CFR 200.324(a). Per PDE and Pennsylvania Bulletin, the Entity must perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. During our audits and PDE’s monitoring review completed in fiscal year 2023-2024, the ESSER Monitoring Team and we noted the following Procurement Findings: The School District was unable to provide purchase orders for several services purchased with Federal funds. The School District did not document its rationale for noncompetitive procurement. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Procurement files for 2 vendors, which exceed $10,000 but not $22,500 for goods and $10,000 but not $250,000 for services, did not have the accompanying three price or rate quotations. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Vendor contracts did not contain the necessary contract provisions The ESSER Monitoring Team was unable to obtain and review sufficient documentation to verify that the procurement was competitively performed for 1 vendor, such as proof of advertisement, request for proposal, bid evaluation, and award letter for procurement of the following vendor Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. While the school district developed a plan to correct these procedures, it was not fully implemented until the 2023-2024 school year. Cause: Non-compliance with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: The District must implement procedures to fully comply with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. View of Responsible Officials: The District will require all payments to have either a purchase order or request for payment form completed. The Accounts Payable Coordinator is responsible for ensuring the form is signed for all disbursements. For the particular item cited by our monitors the Superintendent and Business Manager signed off on the invoice instead of a request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager discussed with the Accounts Payable Coordinator that going forward this is insufficient. All payments must have either a purchase order or request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager reviews backup documentation for check disbursements. During their review if any payments are discovered to be missing a purchase order or request for payment form, he will notify the Accounts Payable Coordinator to complete the form. This is effective immediately. The District has also reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements and has developed an electronic procurement process that all staff member making the purchase with federal funds, must complete a form prior to the procurement being made. Then the Business Manager approves the form. There is a box to check if the procurement is a sole source. If this is checked the Business Manager will require justification. This process was presented by the Business Office to Leadership Personnel on 5/9/24 and is effective now.
Susquehanna Township School District respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2024. The finding from the schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule: A. Compliance Findings Finding 2024-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund; 84.027 IDEA Recommendation: The Subrecipient must implement procedures to fully comply with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Planned: The District will require all payments to have either a purchase order or request for payment form completed. The Accounts Payable Coordinator is responsible for ensuring the form is signed for all disbursements. For the particular item cited by our monitors the Superintendent and Business Manager signed off on the invoice instead of a request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager discussed with the Accounts Payable Coordinator that going forward this is insufficient. All payments must have either a purchase order or request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager reviews backup documentation for check disbursements. During their review if any payments are discovered to be missing a purchase order or request for payment form, he will notify the Accounts Payable Coordinator to complete the form. This is effective immediately. The District has also reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements and has developed an electronic procurement process that all staff member making the purchase with federal funds, must complete a form prior to the procurement being made. Then the Business Manager approves the form. There is a box to check if the procurement is a sole source. If this is checked the Business Manager will require justification. This process was presented by the Business Office to Leadership Personnel on 5/9/24 and is effective now. Person Responsible: Oslwen C. Anderson, Jr., Business Manager OCA Completion Date: June 30, 2024
2023-001
FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2024 — management decision was due August 1, 2024.
View of Responsible Officials: The District has reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance from the Federal Office of Management and Budget and has developed administrative procedures to aid with ensuring that all procurements financed with federal funding fully comply with Uniform Grant Guidance Federal acquisition thresholds and requirements. On June 15, 2023, business office representatives met with staff members potentially involved with procurements that may be federally funded. The business manager reviewed the newly established protocol developed to assist with compliance with all in attendance. The protocol was officially deployed on July 1, 2023, but unfortunately was not in place during the 22-23 FY. It is noted that one-half of the 22-23 FY was already over at the time the district received notification of this initial finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴View of Responsible Officials: The District has reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance from the Federal Office of Management and Budget and has developed administrative procedures to aid with ensuring that all procurements financed with federal funding fully comply with Uniform Grant Guidance Federal acquisition thresholds and requirements. On June 15, 2023, business office representatives met with staff members potentially involved with procurements that may be federally funded. The business manager reviewed the newly established protocol developed to assist with compliance with all in attendance. The protocol was officially deployed on July 1, 2023, but unfortunately was not in place during the 22-23 FY. It is noted that one-half of the 22-23 FY was already over at the time the district received notification of this initial finding.
Completion Date: June 30, 2023
2022-001
FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2023 — management decision was due July 24, 2023.
The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. Cause: When the District initially entered into the lease agreement, they were unaware that the future cost of the lease would be paid for with federal funding. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that when the District decides to utilize cooperative purchasing programs and use federal funds for those purchases that a review of compliance with the procurement policy occurs. The District should then document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. View of Responsible Officials: The District has reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance from the Federal Office of Management and Budget and has developed administrative procedures to aid with ensuring that all procurements financed with federal funding fully comply with Uniform Grant Guidance Federal acquisition thresholds and requirements. Effective the 22-23 fiscal year forward the District will fully deploy the referenced administrative procedures to all applicable District stakeholders and monitor all such procurements for compliance purposes.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2022-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Furthermore, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. Cause: When the District initially entered into the lease agreement, they were unaware that the future cost of the lease would be paid for with federal funding. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that when the District decides to utilize cooperative purchasing programs and use federal funds for those purchases that a review of compliance with the procurement policy occurs. The District should then document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. View of Responsible Officials: The District has reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance from the Federal Office of Management and Budget and has developed administrative procedures to aid with ensuring that all procurements financed with federal funding fully comply with Uniform Grant Guidance Federal acquisition thresholds and requirements. Effective the 22-23 fiscal year forward the District will fully deploy the referenced administrative procedures to all applicable District stakeholders and monitor all such procurements for compliance purposes.
Recommendation: We recommend that when the District decides to utilize cooperative purchasing programs and use federal funds for those purchases that a review of compliance with the procurement policy occurs. The District should then document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. View of Responsible Officials: The District has reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance from the Federal Office of Management and Budget and has developed administrative procedures to aid with ensuring that all procurements financed with federal funding fully comply with Uniform Grant Guidance Federal acquisition thresholds and requirements. Effective the 22-23 fiscal year forward the District will fully deploy the referenced administrative procedures to all applicable District stakeholders and monitor all such procurements for compliance purposes.
FAC accepted this audit on January 18, 2022 — management decision was due July 18, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2021 — management decision was due July 30, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2020 — management decision was due July 7, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2019 — management decision was due July 27, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2017 — management decision was due June 19, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2016 — management decision was due June 22, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Pennsylvania →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.