← Back to home

SOUTH MIDDLETON SCHOOLLocal Government

EIN: 236004229

UEI: X5JGL27LDTJ3

Audited by: BOYER & RITTER LLC

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

SOUTH MIDDLETON SCHOOL10 audit years3 findings
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,638,559 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 19, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 19, 2026 (43 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,474,171 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 10, 2024 — management decision was due June 10, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,663,113 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 4, 2023 — management decision was due June 4, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$2,339,115 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 14, 2022 — management decision was due June 14, 2023.

2022-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Finding 2022-001 Criteria: Federal uniform guidance under CFR 200.320 and Pennsylvania State School Code bid requirements have various thresholds for procurement procedures to be followed by all non-federal entities. The acquisition of goods and services must abide by the rules set by Federal and State guidance to ensure that they are purchased properly and responsibly. Condition and context: During the allowable cost testing of ESSER it was identified that a service consultant was utilized by the District. The service cost exceeded the ?Small Purchase Procedures? threshold of Uniform Guidance, which calls for at least 3 price or rate quotes from a reasonable number of qualified sources. The procurement policy established by the board is consistent with the various requirements, however, the District identified that this policy and procedure was not followed. Cause and effect: Although the internal controls over procurement exist and were circumvented in this situation, additional procurement tests were performed and determined the lapse was an isolated incident. The service cost in question was also allowable cost under the grant requirements. Recommendations: The District?s staff should adhere to the well-defined policy and procedures established by the District under Uniform Guidance and State regulations. Additional training for employees who are authorized to make purchases is recommended to ensure everyone who can authorize transactions follows all steps of the internal control process over disbursements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-001 Criteria: Federal uniform guidance under CFR 200.320 and Pennsylvania State School Code bid requirements have various thresholds for procurement procedures to be followed by all non-federal entities. The acquisition of goods and services must abide by the rules set by Federal and State guidance to ensure that they are purchased properly and responsibly. Condition and context: During the allowable cost testing of ESSER it was identified that a service consultant was utilized by the District. The service cost exceeded the ?Small Purchase Procedures? threshold of Uniform Guidance, which calls for at least 3 price or rate quotes from a reasonable number of qualified sources. The procurement policy established by the board is consistent with the various requirements, however, the District identified that this policy and procedure was not followed. Cause and effect: Although the internal controls over procurement exist and were circumvented in this situation, additional procurement tests were performed and determined the lapse was an isolated incident. The service cost in question was also allowable cost under the grant requirements. Recommendations: The District?s staff should adhere to the well-defined policy and procedures established by the District under Uniform Guidance and State regulations. Additional training for employees who are authorized to make purchases is recommended to ensure everyone who can authorize transactions follows all steps of the internal control process over disbursements.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The District recognizes the finding as a significant deficiency. A team of administrators has been established to review federal grants on a quarterly basis and approve all expenditures. This team consists of the Superintendent, Assistant to the Superintendent, Director of Business and Operations and Assistant Business Manager. This team will review the Uniform Grant Guidance Purchasing Procedure annually. The continuous review by this team will eliminate the possibility of circumventing the internal controls and procedures in place at the district. Additionally, the District will seek guidance from the Pennsylvania Department of Education, auditors, and solicitor when questions regarding procurement arise.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,953,510 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 30, 2021 — management decision was due June 30, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$1,072,221 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2021 — management decision was due July 5, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$946,029 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$1,031,582 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2019 — management decision was due July 9, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$1,011,122 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2018 — management decision was due July 7, 2018.

2017-003
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2016-06-30

$909,054 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2016 — management decision was due June 11, 2017.

2016-001
Other
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Pennsylvania

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.