← Back to home

KEYSTONE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTLocal Government

EIN: 231725051

UEI: GHKCAL5E6B94

Audited by: BAKER TILLY US, LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

KEYSTONE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$6.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,529,555 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 2, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 2, 2026 (1 day ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$10,317,551 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$9,899,506 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,241,858 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 25, 2023 — management decision was due November 25, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,439,529 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2022 — management decision was due July 12, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,216,161 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 18, 2021 — management decision was due July 18, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,996,293 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 16, 2020 — management decision was due July 16, 2020.

2019-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

As part of our audit procedures, it was noted that the District incorrectly calculated the annual income amount for one of six free and reduced price applications selected for testing of verification procedures. This resulted in a determination of reduced price meals, when the proper determination should have been full pay based upon applicable annual income amounts. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: The District does not have in place sufficient review controls for its verification of free and reduced price applications, representing a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Effect: The District failed to make an appropriate eligibility status change based on documentation obtained through the verification process. Context: The District did appropriately sample 3 percent of free and reduced lunch applications for verification purposes, as required by Child Nutrition Cluster Program guidelines. No other instances of noncompliance were noted as part of eligibility testing. Recommendation: We recommend that District management implement more rigorous review controls over documentation and other information obtained through the verification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: CFDA #10.553, 10.555, Child Nutrition Cluster, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Passed through the Pennsylvania Department of Education and Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Pass-Through Entity Identifying Number: Not Available Criteria: By November 15th of each school year, the District must verify the current free and reduced price eligibility of households selected from a sample of applications that it has approved for free and reduced price meals. The verification sample size is based on the total number of approved applications on file on October 1st. Condition: As part of our audit procedures, it was noted that the District incorrectly calculated the annual income amount for one of six free and reduced price applications selected for testing of verification procedures. This resulted in a determination of reduced price meals, when the proper determination should have been full pay based upon applicable annual income amounts. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: The District does not have in place sufficient review controls for its verification of free and reduced price applications, representing a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Effect: The District failed to make an appropriate eligibility status change based on documentation obtained through the verification process. Context: The District did appropriately sample 3 percent of free and reduced lunch applications for verification purposes, as required by Child Nutrition Cluster Program guidelines. No other instances of noncompliance were noted as part of eligibility testing. Recommendation: We recommend that District management implement more rigorous review controls over documentation and other information obtained through the verification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Effective immediately, the District will implement a more rigorous internal monitoring system for calculating the annual income amount that will include the business manager or designee to confirm the calculation was correct.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,819,376 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2019 — management decision was due July 7, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,524,634 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 23, 2018 — management decision was due July 23, 2018.

2017-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2016-06-30

$4,318,717 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2017 — management decision was due July 10, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Pennsylvania

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.