← Back to home

SPECTRUM HEALTH SERVICES, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 231686225

UEI: WBP8V8YKAFD3

Audit also covers EIN: 453459252 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: BAKER TILLY US, LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

SPECTRUM HEALTH SERVICES, INC.10 audit years7 findings3 repeat
10
Audit Years
7
Total Findings
3
Repeat Findings
$3.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$3,590,665 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 7, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 7, 2026 (66 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,554,784 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2025 — management decision was due September 27, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,696,338 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2024 — management decision was due September 29, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$4,189,903 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$4,220,624 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 28, 2022 — management decision was due February 28, 2023.

FY 2020-06-30

$3,753,754 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 9, 2021 — management decision was due February 9, 2022.

2020-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2019-002OTHER MATTERS

Health Center Program Cluster ? CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 6 H80CS00389-19-04 Program Year 2020 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f)) Identification as a repeat finding ? 2019-002 and 2018-002 Condition ? The Organization transitioned to a new practice management system during the period and due to the migration of data, information to support the income and family size of the sliding fee recipients for medical was not maintained for the period prior to the conversion. Questioned cost ? None Context ? A sample of 40 patients were tested out of total population of 47,808 with twelve relating to the period before the practice management system conversion. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Of the 28 tested in dental or after the conversion for medical there was one error noted with the incorrect sliding fee adjustment applied. Proper documentation was not maintained for 12 patients relating to the period prior to the conversion of the medical practice management system. Effect ? Supporting documentation for the sliding fee discounts provided by the Organization was not maintained. An improper sliding fee discount was provided to another patient based on their eligibility. Cause ? The Organization transitioned to a new practice management system during the period. Recommendation ? The Organization should maintain all documentation supporting sliding fee discounts recorded.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Health Center Program Cluster ? CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 6 H80CS00389-19-04 Program Year 2020 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f)) Identification as a repeat finding ? 2019-002 and 2018-002 Condition ? The Organization transitioned to a new practice management system during the period and due to the migration of data, information to support the income and family size of the sliding fee recipients for medical was not maintained for the period prior to the conversion. Questioned cost ? None Context ? A sample of 40 patients were tested out of total population of 47,808 with twelve relating to the period before the practice management system conversion. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Of the 28 tested in dental or after the conversion for medical there was one error noted with the incorrect sliding fee adjustment applied. Proper documentation was not maintained for 12 patients relating to the period prior to the conversion of the medical practice management system. Effect ? Supporting documentation for the sliding fee discounts provided by the Organization was not maintained. An improper sliding fee discount was provided to another patient based on their eligibility. Cause ? The Organization transitioned to a new practice management system during the period. Recommendation ? The Organization should maintain all documentation supporting sliding fee discounts recorded.

Corrective Action Plan

When Spectrum cut over to a new electronic health record in December 2019, the migration away from VRS (Centricity) to AthenaNet was unconventional and necessitated significant legal interaction. Spectrum identified the Centricity product as having deficiencies to the practice management system and especially to the reporting and financial aspect of the record. The only financial reporting that Spectrum was able to access were designed pivot tables out of the system that VRS controlled. The pivot tables were not able to be drilled down and any claims level reporting that we requested we also had to pay as a separate one-time fee. These reports sometimes ranged in the $2,000 to $3,000 range. When Spectrum was finally able to migrate away from Centricity, the legality of the separation left us with limited time for any conversion and an expensive process to migrate. Spectrum was able to transfer clinical notes, demographics, and zip codes but we were not successful transferring UDS, financial information or revenue cycle information. At the onset of the audit, Spectrum explained to BKD that we did not have access to any information from the Centricity system because of the limited information from our previous vendor due to the volatility of the separation. Spectrum has now been in AthenaNet for 18 months and the UDS, financial information and ability to report on dozens of different metrics is greatly improved. Unfortunately, due to the circumstances with the previous vendor and the limitation in the Centricity system, findings for sliding fee and documentation were unavoidable. Timeline- Already implemented and Spectrum staffing are continually trained to understand and administer the sliding fee program to qualifying patients. Responsible- The sliding fee program starts with operations and medical and dental integration at the front desk. The Director of Operations, the Clinical Director are responsible to ensure that call center and front desk team members are administering the program correctly. Senior management is responsible to monitor and make corrections as needed.

Prior Finding References

2019-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2019-003OTHER MATTERS

Health Center Program Cluster ? CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 6 H80CS00389-19-04 Program Year 2020 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Reporting Identification as a repeat finding ? 2019-003 Condition ? The Organization is required to prepare certain reports as a grant recipient. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned cost ? None Context ? The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation for the information that was included in the reports submitted for the year ended June 30, 2020, for 6 out of the 19 attributes tested. Therefore, the Organization could not substantiate that the information submitted on the reports was accurate. Effect ? The Organization does not have documentation supporting certain information in submitted reports. Cause ? The Organization?s policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure all documentation was maintained related to required reports. Recommendation ? Policies and procedures over federal grant reporting should be modified to ensure required reports are properly and accurately completed using the correct financial information and that information must be retained to support the reports.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Health Center Program Cluster ? CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 6 H80CS00389-19-04 Program Year 2020 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Reporting Identification as a repeat finding ? 2019-003 Condition ? The Organization is required to prepare certain reports as a grant recipient. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned cost ? None Context ? The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation for the information that was included in the reports submitted for the year ended June 30, 2020, for 6 out of the 19 attributes tested. Therefore, the Organization could not substantiate that the information submitted on the reports was accurate. Effect ? The Organization does not have documentation supporting certain information in submitted reports. Cause ? The Organization?s policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure all documentation was maintained related to required reports. Recommendation ? Policies and procedures over federal grant reporting should be modified to ensure required reports are properly and accurately completed using the correct financial information and that information must be retained to support the reports.

Corrective Action Plan

As discussed in Finding 2020-02 above, When Spectrum was finally able to migrate away from Centricity, the legality of the separation left us with limited time for any conversion and an expensive process to migrate. Spectrum was able to transfer clinical notes, demographics, and zip codes but we were not successful transferring UDS, financial information or revenue cycle information. At the onset of the audit, Spectrum explained to BKD that we did not have access to any information from the Centricity system because of the limited information or our previous vendor due to the volatility of the separation. Spectrum has now been in AthenaNet for 18 months and the UDS, financial information and ability to report on dozens of different metrics is greatly improved. Unfortunately, due to the circumstances with the previous vendor and the limitation in the Centricity system, findings for sliding fee and documentation were unavoidable. Timeline- Already implemented and reporting capability is vastly improved. Responsible- CFO and Controller

Prior Finding References

2019-003

About Reporting →
2020-004
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

2020-004 Health Center Program Cluster ? CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 6 H80CS00389-19-04, H8CCS35227-01-00, H8DCS36612-01-00, and H8ECS38943-01-00 Program Year 2020 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Cash Management ? 45 CFR 75.305 Identification as a repeat finding ? Not a repeat finding. Condition ? The Organization is required to only draw approved funds from the Division of Payment Management for use in paying qualifying expenditures. Questioned cost ? None Context ? The Organization received three supplementary awards due to the Coronavirus. They drew down the full award of $58,792 from their Coronavirus Supplemental Funding for Health Centers (H8C) grant on April 2, 2020. They drew down the full award of $708,740 from their Health Center Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act Funding (H8D) grant on May 4, 2020. They then drew down the full award balance of $294,754 from their Expanding Capacity for Coronavirus Testing (H8E) grant on June 9, 2020. When drawn, approximately $5,500 of the H8C, $80,000 of the H8D, and $9,500 of the H8E money had been expended, with the balance of the funding being advance drawn. In addition, the Organization?s monthly grant draw for the Community Health Center grant was for the monthly payroll, but was during the first half of the month and sooner than was administratively necessary for the date the payrolls for the month were paid. Effect ? The funds were drawn sooner than was administratively necessary, prior to expending the funds. Cause ? The Organization?s policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure federal funds were not drawn sooner than is administratively necessary to expend the federal grant funds on qualifying expenditures. Recommendation ? Management should review policies and procedures over cash draws to prevent a recurrence of this matter. The policy and procedures should be designed to ensure grant funds are spent on qualifying expenditures within a reasonable time of incurrence of those expenditures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-004 Health Center Program Cluster ? CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 6 H80CS00389-19-04, H8CCS35227-01-00, H8DCS36612-01-00, and H8ECS38943-01-00 Program Year 2020 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Cash Management ? 45 CFR 75.305 Identification as a repeat finding ? Not a repeat finding. Condition ? The Organization is required to only draw approved funds from the Division of Payment Management for use in paying qualifying expenditures. Questioned cost ? None Context ? The Organization received three supplementary awards due to the Coronavirus. They drew down the full award of $58,792 from their Coronavirus Supplemental Funding for Health Centers (H8C) grant on April 2, 2020. They drew down the full award of $708,740 from their Health Center Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act Funding (H8D) grant on May 4, 2020. They then drew down the full award balance of $294,754 from their Expanding Capacity for Coronavirus Testing (H8E) grant on June 9, 2020. When drawn, approximately $5,500 of the H8C, $80,000 of the H8D, and $9,500 of the H8E money had been expended, with the balance of the funding being advance drawn. In addition, the Organization?s monthly grant draw for the Community Health Center grant was for the monthly payroll, but was during the first half of the month and sooner than was administratively necessary for the date the payrolls for the month were paid. Effect ? The funds were drawn sooner than was administratively necessary, prior to expending the funds. Cause ? The Organization?s policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure federal funds were not drawn sooner than is administratively necessary to expend the federal grant funds on qualifying expenditures. Recommendation ? Management should review policies and procedures over cash draws to prevent a recurrence of this matter. The policy and procedures should be designed to ensure grant funds are spent on qualifying expenditures within a reasonable time of incurrence of those expenditures.

Corrective Action Plan

Spectrums management was fully aware that drawing down funds related to COVID funding earlier than expenses necessitated was a divergent funding strategy compared to the 330 grant funds. During our discussions with HRSA, there was little direction in the chaos of the moment. During the pandemic outbreak, Spectrum found itself in a very uncertain position. As medical offices were shutting down, Spectrum had no long-term assurance that telehealth funding was going to be available or how we were going to implement such a colossal change in such a volatile time. There were also significant discussions surrounding the funding and the current administration?s desire to pull back funding or limit its application or availability. These grant funds that were drawn down were kept in a non-interest bearing HRSA account and were not used by the health center until all of the funds were accounted for. The CFO and the CEO had immediate discussions with our HRSA program official and had 2 subsequent follow up meetings with HRSA to demonstrate our expenses and at that time HRSA passed the funding as acceptable and there was no further discussion needed. Timeline- Already implemented, ongoing Responsible- CFO and Controller.

About Cash Management →

FY 2019-06-30

$3,609,495 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 9, 2020 — management decision was due January 9, 2021.

2019-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2018-002OTHER MATTERS

Health Center Program Cluster ? CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 6 H80CS00389-18-02 Program Year 2019 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f)). Identification as a repeat finding ? 2018-002. Condition ? The Organization sliding fee program provides discounts to eligible patients based on patient?s income and poverty levels. However, the Organization did not maintain supporting documentation in patient?s medical records in order to determine if the patients were eligible for the sliding fee discounts that were given. Questioned cost ? None Context ? A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 21,827 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Proper documentation was not maintained for 29 patients selected to verify if the patients were eligible for the sliding fee discount given. Effect ? Improper sliding fee discounts were potentially given to patients. Cause ? The Organization did not maintain proper documentation to show patient eligibility for the sliding fee discount program to be in compliance with the Health Center Compliance Manual. Recommendation ? Management should maintain proper documentation in patient medical records to ensure they can support the sliding fee discounts that are provided to patients.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Health Center Program Cluster ? CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 6 H80CS00389-18-02 Program Year 2019 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f)). Identification as a repeat finding ? 2018-002. Condition ? The Organization sliding fee program provides discounts to eligible patients based on patient?s income and poverty levels. However, the Organization did not maintain supporting documentation in patient?s medical records in order to determine if the patients were eligible for the sliding fee discounts that were given. Questioned cost ? None Context ? A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 21,827 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Proper documentation was not maintained for 29 patients selected to verify if the patients were eligible for the sliding fee discount given. Effect ? Improper sliding fee discounts were potentially given to patients. Cause ? The Organization did not maintain proper documentation to show patient eligibility for the sliding fee discount program to be in compliance with the Health Center Compliance Manual. Recommendation ? Management should maintain proper documentation in patient medical records to ensure they can support the sliding fee discounts that are provided to patients.

Corrective Action Plan

Spectrum has taken the following action to halt, identify and correct these inaccuracies: Team Training Spectrum has conducted four separate trainings for all of our Managers, PSR?s and other operational staff The topics at these trainings covered: ? The overall philosophy and purpose of collecting accurate data ? The call centers role in scheduling the patient appointment and how to set the document expectations ? The importance of collecting all necessary forms and documents from patients in order to insert their financial status into Spectrums sliding fee scale. ? How to enter accurate information into all the applicable forms in the EHR ? What the end user data for both sliding fee and UDS data looks like and how this data translates into actionable information for HRSA Documented Trainings: ? PSR team meeting overview from 4/5/2019 as well as sign in sheet showing all PSR staff that participated in the training. One of the topics from the 4/5/2019 training was Sliding Fee Income. We addressed the proper way to obtain financial assessment information from patients. ? PSR team meeting overview from 6/21/2019 as well as sign in sheet showing all PSR staff that participated in the training. UDS demographics were addressed during this training session. We addressed how to enter financial assessment information into the UDS module in Centricity. We also addressed what to enter when patients do not provide financial information. ? PSR team meeting overview from 7/19/2019 as well as sign in sheet showing all PSR staff that participated in the training. The new sliding scale policies were addressed and reviewed in this meeting. Family Planning/Access Matters was also addressed in this meeting. The program no longer exists and patients here for family planning will be eligible for the normal medical sliding scale discounts. ? On 6/10/2019, all PSR staff were brought into the executive conference room to be instructed on the proper way to fee assess a Spectrum patient for sliding fee discounts. The VP of Human Resources, CFO, CMO, Site Manager, and Revenue Cycle Director were present for the entirety of this meeting. Staff were instructed that all patients are eligible for sliding fee discounts not just uninsured patients. Call Center Scripting and Training Spectrum recognizes that the process of documentation and effective data management starts with our call center staff. Spectrum has implemented a more prescribed and descriptive approach as to how we set these expectations with our patients. Our call center is now educating our patients and explaining the importance of bringing in income verification for our sliding fee scale. The new script addresses the idea that all patients are eligible for the sliding fee discounts, not just uninsured patients. Meaning, if insured patients provide proof of income they may be eligible for a discount on their copay, coinsurance, and/or deductible. The script also addresses the patient's right to decline the financial fee assessment. It further states that refusal to provide proof of income or financial information will result in the patient not being eligible for any discounts. Timeline- The timeline for corrective measures is ongoing but has been address in detail with our staff since April 2019. Responsible- There are multiple team members that are actively responsible for the documentation and preservation of these documents in the correct patient charts. Our revenue cycle director in correlation with our clinical supervisor are directly responsible to make sure that all patients are fee assessed the subsequent documentation is collected. Our patient financial counselor that was hired specifically to closely deal with uninsured patients will facilitate the sliding fee process with Spectrum?s population of uninsured. Ultimately, Spectrum views this as a measure that the CEO, CFO and CMO all hold responsibility to ensure this policy is adhered to closely. Training sheets, weekly internal audit form, UDS control form supporting documentation attached.

Prior Finding References

2018-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2019-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

Health Center Program Cluster ? CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 6 H80CS00389-18-02 Program Year 2019 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Reporting. Identification as a repeat finding ? Not applicable. Condition ? The Organization is required to prepare certain reports as a grant recipient. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned cost ? None Context ? The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation for the information that was included in the reports submitted for the year ended June 30, 2019. Therefore, could not verify if the information submitted on the reports was accurate and properly submitted. Effect ? The Organization was not in compliance with reporting requirements. Cause ? The Organization policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure all required reports were submitted accurately. Recommendation ? Policies and procedures over federal grant reporting should be modified to ensure required reports are properly and accurately completed using the correct financial information.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Health Center Program Cluster ? CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 6 H80CS00389-18-02 Program Year 2019 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Reporting. Identification as a repeat finding ? Not applicable. Condition ? The Organization is required to prepare certain reports as a grant recipient. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned cost ? None Context ? The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation for the information that was included in the reports submitted for the year ended June 30, 2019. Therefore, could not verify if the information submitted on the reports was accurate and properly submitted. Effect ? The Organization was not in compliance with reporting requirements. Cause ? The Organization policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure all required reports were submitted accurately. Recommendation ? Policies and procedures over federal grant reporting should be modified to ensure required reports are properly and accurately completed using the correct financial information.

Corrective Action Plan

Spectrum has highlighted this recommendation as a point of emphasis moving forward. Spectrum has formally address this finding in two separate policies that address the grants management process effective January 8, 2020 and a grant drawdown policy effective January 8, 2020. Spectrum has created a new grant drawn down template that highlights the drawdown timing and allows both the Controller and CFO to sign off on grant draw down. This will formalize the process that we previously in effect of the CFO emailing out the draw down timing and schedule. Timeline- The timeline for the grant process policies and drawdown are already in effect; the implementation of adherence to the new grant draw down document began on June 1, 2020 and is stored as a shared document on Spectrums internal serves allowing all finance staff to view and audit the document for timing and accuracy. Responsible- CFO and Controller. Updated Grants management policy and drawn down policy documents attached

About Reporting →

FY 2018-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$3,036,478 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 23, 2019 — management decision was due October 23, 2019.

2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,316,900 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 28, 2017 — management decision was due May 28, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,961,253 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 30, 2016 — management decision was due April 30, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Pennsylvania

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.