← Back to home

BOARD OF EDUCATION CITY OF PLAINFIELDLocal Government

EIN: 226002218

UEI: FHXNTEVKN5A8

Audited by: PKF O'Connor Davies, LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

BOARD OF EDUCATION CITY OF PLAINFIELD13 audit years4 findings
13
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$17.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$17,891,302 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 6, 2026 (63 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Reporting
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, we noted that the District did not record $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing 21.027) in the appropriate fund. Instead of recording this activity in the Special Revenue Fund, the transactions were recorded in the General Fund. Based on grant receipts received by the District of $4,860,733 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 it was determined that expenditures relating to the grant were incurred in the General Fund in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 in the amounts of $1,017,513 and $3,843,220 respectively. The receipts in the amount of $1,017,513 related to expenditures incurred in the year ended June 30, 2025 were reclassified to the Special Revenue Fund. Questioned Costs: None Context: $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds were recorded in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund. Effect: Recording of the $4,860,733 in federally restricted grant activity in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund reduces the transparency of the financial statements and may obscure the tracking of federal expenditures. This misclassification increases the risk of noncompliance with federal grant reporting requirements, and may result in inaccurate reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), which could impact audit results or federal program oversight. The expenditures incurred in both years were subject to a single audit in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. Cause: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure that all federal grant activity is recorded in the appropriate fund, consistent with GASB and Uniform Guidance requirements. Specifically, all activity related to Assistance Listing 21.027 should be accounted for in the Special Revenue Fund to maintain proper accountability. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management has reviewed this finding and has indicated a corrective action plan will be developed to address this finding and recommendation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Federal Assistance Listing No. 21.027) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.302(a) of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), non-federal entities must maintain financial management systems that provide for the identification, in their accounts, of all federal awards received and expended, and must ensure accurate, current, and complete disclosure of financial results. Additionally, according to Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, special revenue funds are used to account for specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditures for specified purposes other than debt service or capital projects. Since funds received under Assistance Listing 21.027 are restricted for specific uses, they should be accounted for in a special revenue fund. Condition: During our audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, we noted that the District did not record $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing 21.027) in the appropriate fund. Instead of recording this activity in the Special Revenue Fund, the transactions were recorded in the General Fund. Based on grant receipts received by the District of $4,860,733 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 it was determined that expenditures relating to the grant were incurred in the General Fund in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 in the amounts of $1,017,513 and $3,843,220 respectively. The receipts in the amount of $1,017,513 related to expenditures incurred in the year ended June 30, 2025 were reclassified to the Special Revenue Fund. Questioned Costs: None Context: $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds were recorded in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund. Effect: Recording of the $4,860,733 in federally restricted grant activity in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund reduces the transparency of the financial statements and may obscure the tracking of federal expenditures. This misclassification increases the risk of noncompliance with federal grant reporting requirements, and may result in inaccurate reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), which could impact audit results or federal program oversight. The expenditures incurred in both years were subject to a single audit in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. Cause: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure that all federal grant activity is recorded in the appropriate fund, consistent with GASB and Uniform Guidance requirements. Specifically, all activity related to Assistance Listing 21.027 should be accounted for in the Special Revenue Fund to maintain proper accountability. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management has reviewed this finding and has indicated a corrective action plan will be developed to address this finding and recommendation.

Corrective Action Plan

Management has reviewed this finding and has indicated a corrective action plan will be developed to address this finding and recommendation.

About Reporting →
2025-002
Reporting
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, we noted that the District did not record $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing 21.027) in the appropriate fund. Instead of recording this activity in the Special Revenue Fund, the transactions were recorded in the General Fund. Based on grant receipts received by the District of $4,860,733 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 it was determined that expenditures relating to the grant were incurred in the General Fund in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 in the amounts of $1,017,513 and $3,843,220 respectively. The receipts in the amount of $1,017,513 related to expenditures incurred in the year ended June 30, 2025 were reclassified to the Special Revenue Fund. Questioned Costs: None Context: $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds were recorded in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund. Effect: Recording of the $4,860,733 in federally restricted grant activity in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund reduces the transparency of the financial statements and may obscure the tracking of federal expenditures. This misclassification increases the risk of noncompliance with federal grant reporting requirements, and may result in inaccurate reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), which could impact audit results or federal program oversight. The expenditures incurred in both years were subject to a single audit in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. Cause: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure that all federal grant activity is recorded in the appropriate fund, consistent with GASB and Uniform Guidance requirements. Specifically, all activity related to Assistance Listing 21.027 should be accounted for in the Special Revenue Fund to maintain proper accountability. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management has reviewed this finding and has indicated a corrective action plan will be developed to address this finding and recommendation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Federal Assistance Listing No. 21.027) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.302(a) of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), non-federal entities must maintain financial management systems that provide for the identification, in their accounts, of all federal awards received and expended, and must ensure accurate, current, and complete disclosure of financial results. Additionally, according to Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, special revenue funds are used to account for specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditures for specified purposes other than debt service or capital projects. Since funds received under Assistance Listing 21.027 are restricted for specific uses, they should be accounted for in a special revenue fund. Condition: During our audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, we noted that the District did not record $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing 21.027) in the appropriate fund. Instead of recording this activity in the Special Revenue Fund, the transactions were recorded in the General Fund. Based on grant receipts received by the District of $4,860,733 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 it was determined that expenditures relating to the grant were incurred in the General Fund in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 in the amounts of $1,017,513 and $3,843,220 respectively. The receipts in the amount of $1,017,513 related to expenditures incurred in the year ended June 30, 2025 were reclassified to the Special Revenue Fund. Questioned Costs: None Context: $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds were recorded in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund. Effect: Recording of the $4,860,733 in federally restricted grant activity in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund reduces the transparency of the financial statements and may obscure the tracking of federal expenditures. This misclassification increases the risk of noncompliance with federal grant reporting requirements, and may result in inaccurate reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), which could impact audit results or federal program oversight. The expenditures incurred in both years were subject to a single audit in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. Cause: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure that all federal grant activity is recorded in the appropriate fund, consistent with GASB and Uniform Guidance requirements. Specifically, all activity related to Assistance Listing 21.027 should be accounted for in the Special Revenue Fund to maintain proper accountability. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management has reviewed this finding and has indicated a corrective action plan will be developed to address this finding and recommendation.

Corrective Action Plan

Management has reviewed this finding and has indicated a corrective action plan will be developed to address this finding and recommendation.

About Reporting →

FY 2025-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$17,891,302 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2026 — management decision was due July 30, 2026.

2025-002
Reporting
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, we noted that the District did not record $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing 21.027) in the appropriate fund. Instead of recording this activity in the Special Revenue Fund, the transactions were recorded in the General Fund. Based on grant receipts received by the District of $4,860,733 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 it was determined that expenditures relating to the grant were incurred in the General Fund in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 in the amounts of $1,017,513 and $3,843,220 respectively. The receipts in the amount of $1,017,513 related to expenditures incurred in the year ended June 30, 2025 were reclassified to the Special Revenue Fund. Questioned Costs: None Context: $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds were recorded in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund. Effect: Recording of the $4,860,733 in federally restricted grant activity in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund reduces the transparency of the financial statements and may obscure the tracking of federal expenditures. This misclassification increases the risk of noncompliance with federal grant reporting requirements, and may result in inaccurate reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), which could impact audit results or federal program oversight. The expenditures incurred in both years were subject to a single audit in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. Cause: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure that all federal grant activity is recorded in the appropriate fund, consistent with GASB and Uniform Guidance requirements. Specifically, all activity related to Assistance Listing 21.027 should be accounted for in the Special Revenue Fund to maintain proper accountability. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management has reviewed this finding and has indicated a corrective action plan will be developed to address this finding and recommendation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Federal Assistance Listing No. 21.027) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.302(a) of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), non-federal entities must maintain financial management systems that provide for the identification, in their accounts, of all federal awards received and expended, and must ensure accurate, current, and complete disclosure of financial results. Additionally, according to Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, special revenue funds are used to account for specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditures for specified purposes other than debt service or capital projects. Since funds received under Assistance Listing 21.027 are restricted for specific uses, they should be accounted for in a special revenue fund. Condition: During our audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, we noted that the District did not record $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing 21.027) in the appropriate fund. Instead of recording this activity in the Special Revenue Fund, the transactions were recorded in the General Fund. Based on grant receipts received by the District of $4,860,733 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 it was determined that expenditures relating to the grant were incurred in the General Fund in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 in the amounts of $1,017,513 and $3,843,220 respectively. The receipts in the amount of $1,017,513 related to expenditures incurred in the year ended June 30, 2025 were reclassified to the Special Revenue Fund. Questioned Costs: None Context: $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds were recorded in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund. Effect: Recording of the $4,860,733 in federally restricted grant activity in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund reduces the transparency of the financial statements and may obscure the tracking of federal expenditures. This misclassification increases the risk of noncompliance with federal grant reporting requirements, and may result in inaccurate reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), which could impact audit results or federal program oversight. The expenditures incurred in both years were subject to a single audit in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. Cause: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure that all federal grant activity is recorded in the appropriate fund, consistent with GASB and Uniform Guidance requirements. Specifically, all activity related to Assistance Listing 21.027 should be accounted for in the Special Revenue Fund to maintain proper accountability. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management has reviewed this finding and has indicated a corrective action plan will be developed to address this finding and recommendation.

Corrective Action Plan

Management has reviewed this finding and has indicated a corrective action plan will be developed to address this finding and recommendation.

About Reporting →
2025-002
Reporting
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, we noted that the District did not record $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing 21.027) in the appropriate fund. Instead of recording this activity in the Special Revenue Fund, the transactions were recorded in the General Fund. Based on grant receipts received by the District of $4,860,733 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 it was determined that expenditures relating to the grant were incurred in the General Fund in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 in the amounts of $1,017,513 and $3,843,220 respectively. The receipts in the amount of $1,017,513 related to expenditures incurred in the year ended June 30, 2025 were reclassified to the Special Revenue Fund. Questioned Costs: None Context: $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds were recorded in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund. Effect: Recording of the $4,860,733 in federally restricted grant activity in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund reduces the transparency of the financial statements and may obscure the tracking of federal expenditures. This misclassification increases the risk of noncompliance with federal grant reporting requirements, and may result in inaccurate reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), which could impact audit results or federal program oversight. The expenditures incurred in both years were subject to a single audit in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. Cause: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure that all federal grant activity is recorded in the appropriate fund, consistent with GASB and Uniform Guidance requirements. Specifically, all activity related to Assistance Listing 21.027 should be accounted for in the Special Revenue Fund to maintain proper accountability. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management has reviewed this finding and has indicated a corrective action plan will be developed to address this finding and recommendation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Federal Assistance Listing No. 21.027) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.302(a) of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), non-federal entities must maintain financial management systems that provide for the identification, in their accounts, of all federal awards received and expended, and must ensure accurate, current, and complete disclosure of financial results. Additionally, according to Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, special revenue funds are used to account for specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditures for specified purposes other than debt service or capital projects. Since funds received under Assistance Listing 21.027 are restricted for specific uses, they should be accounted for in a special revenue fund. Condition: During our audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, we noted that the District did not record $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Assistance Listing 21.027) in the appropriate fund. Instead of recording this activity in the Special Revenue Fund, the transactions were recorded in the General Fund. Based on grant receipts received by the District of $4,860,733 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 it was determined that expenditures relating to the grant were incurred in the General Fund in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 in the amounts of $1,017,513 and $3,843,220 respectively. The receipts in the amount of $1,017,513 related to expenditures incurred in the year ended June 30, 2025 were reclassified to the Special Revenue Fund. Questioned Costs: None Context: $4,860,733 in transactions related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds were recorded in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund. Effect: Recording of the $4,860,733 in federally restricted grant activity in the General Fund instead of the Special Revenue Fund reduces the transparency of the financial statements and may obscure the tracking of federal expenditures. This misclassification increases the risk of noncompliance with federal grant reporting requirements, and may result in inaccurate reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), which could impact audit results or federal program oversight. The expenditures incurred in both years were subject to a single audit in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. Cause: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure that all federal grant activity is recorded in the appropriate fund, consistent with GASB and Uniform Guidance requirements. Specifically, all activity related to Assistance Listing 21.027 should be accounted for in the Special Revenue Fund to maintain proper accountability. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management has reviewed this finding and has indicated a corrective action plan will be developed to address this finding and recommendation.

Corrective Action Plan

Management has reviewed this finding and has indicated a corrective action plan will be developed to address this finding and recommendation.

About Reporting →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$21,624,931 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 5, 2025 — management decision was due August 5, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$26,303,767 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 9, 2024 — management decision was due October 9, 2024.

2023-002
Other
OTHER MATTERS

The School District did not limit it’s net cash resources to three months average expenditures for it’s school food service fund as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. Questioned Costs: None Context: The School District’s food service fund net cash resources at June 30, 2023 was $2,842,133 and it’s three month average expenditures was $2,041,664, resulting in an excess amount totaling $800,470. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with CFR section 210.14 and requirements as prescribed by the Office of School Finance, Department of Education, State of New Jersey Audit Program. Cause: The School District’s food service revenues increased more than anticipated. Recommendation: The School District should develop a plan to reduce the food service fund’s net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 10.555, 10.553, 10.559 and 10.582) Criteria: CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net cash resources requires a school food authority to limit its net cash resources to an amount that does not exceed 3 months average expenditures for its’ nonprofit school food service or an amount approved by the State agency in accordance with CFR Section 210.019(a). Condition: The School District did not limit it’s net cash resources to three months average expenditures for it’s school food service fund as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. Questioned Costs: None Context: The School District’s food service fund net cash resources at June 30, 2023 was $2,842,133 and it’s three month average expenditures was $2,041,664, resulting in an excess amount totaling $800,470. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with CFR section 210.14 and requirements as prescribed by the Office of School Finance, Department of Education, State of New Jersey Audit Program. Cause: The School District’s food service revenues increased more than anticipated. Recommendation: The School District should develop a plan to reduce the food service fund’s net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will develop a plan to reduce the food service fund's net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources.

About Other →
2023-002
Other
OTHER MATTERS

The School District did not limit it’s net cash resources to three months average expenditures for it’s school food service fund as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. Questioned Costs: None Context: The School District’s food service fund net cash resources at June 30, 2023 was $2,842,133 and it’s three month average expenditures was $2,041,664, resulting in an excess amount totaling $800,470. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with CFR section 210.14 and requirements as prescribed by the Office of School Finance, Department of Education, State of New Jersey Audit Program. Cause: The School District’s food service revenues increased more than anticipated. Recommendation: The School District should develop a plan to reduce the food service fund’s net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 10.555, 10.553, 10.559 and 10.582) Criteria: CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net cash resources requires a school food authority to limit its net cash resources to an amount that does not exceed 3 months average expenditures for its’ nonprofit school food service or an amount approved by the State agency in accordance with CFR Section 210.019(a). Condition: The School District did not limit it’s net cash resources to three months average expenditures for it’s school food service fund as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. Questioned Costs: None Context: The School District’s food service fund net cash resources at June 30, 2023 was $2,842,133 and it’s three month average expenditures was $2,041,664, resulting in an excess amount totaling $800,470. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with CFR section 210.14 and requirements as prescribed by the Office of School Finance, Department of Education, State of New Jersey Audit Program. Cause: The School District’s food service revenues increased more than anticipated. Recommendation: The School District should develop a plan to reduce the food service fund’s net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will develop a plan to reduce the food service fund's net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources.

About Other →

FY 2023-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$26,303,767 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 19, 2024 — management decision was due October 19, 2024.

2023-002
Other
OTHER MATTERS

The School District did not limit it’s net cash resources to three months average expenditures for it’s school food service fund as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. Questioned Costs: None Context: The School District’s food service fund net cash resources at June 30, 2023 was $2,842,133 and it’s three month average expenditures was $2,041,664, resulting in an excess amount totaling $800,470. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with CFR section 210.14 and requirements as prescribed by the Office of School Finance, Department of Education, State of New Jersey Audit Program. Cause: The School District’s food service revenues increased more than anticipated. Recommendation: The School District should develop a plan to reduce the food service fund’s net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 10.555, 10.553, 10.559 and 10.582) Criteria: CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net cash resources requires a school food authority to limit its net cash resources to an amount that does not exceed 3 months average expenditures for its’ nonprofit school food service or an amount approved by the State agency in accordance with CFR Section 210.019(a). Condition: The School District did not limit it’s net cash resources to three months average expenditures for it’s school food service fund as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. Questioned Costs: None Context: The School District’s food service fund net cash resources at June 30, 2023 was $2,842,133 and it’s three month average expenditures was $2,041,664, resulting in an excess amount totaling $800,470. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with CFR section 210.14 and requirements as prescribed by the Office of School Finance, Department of Education, State of New Jersey Audit Program. Cause: The School District’s food service revenues increased more than anticipated. Recommendation: The School District should develop a plan to reduce the food service fund’s net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will develop a plan to reduce the food service fund's net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources.

About Other →
2023-002
Other
OTHER MATTERS

The School District did not limit it’s net cash resources to three months average expenditures for it’s school food service fund as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. Questioned Costs: None Context: The School District’s food service fund net cash resources at June 30, 2023 was $2,842,133 and it’s three month average expenditures was $2,041,664, resulting in an excess amount totaling $800,470. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with CFR section 210.14 and requirements as prescribed by the Office of School Finance, Department of Education, State of New Jersey Audit Program. Cause: The School District’s food service revenues increased more than anticipated. Recommendation: The School District should develop a plan to reduce the food service fund’s net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 10.555, 10.553, 10.559 and 10.582) Criteria: CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net cash resources requires a school food authority to limit its net cash resources to an amount that does not exceed 3 months average expenditures for its’ nonprofit school food service or an amount approved by the State agency in accordance with CFR Section 210.019(a). Condition: The School District did not limit it’s net cash resources to three months average expenditures for it’s school food service fund as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. Questioned Costs: None Context: The School District’s food service fund net cash resources at June 30, 2023 was $2,842,133 and it’s three month average expenditures was $2,041,664, resulting in an excess amount totaling $800,470. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with CFR section 210.14 and requirements as prescribed by the Office of School Finance, Department of Education, State of New Jersey Audit Program. Cause: The School District’s food service revenues increased more than anticipated. Recommendation: The School District should develop a plan to reduce the food service fund’s net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will develop a plan to reduce the food service fund's net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources.

About Other →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$26,303,767 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 29, 2024 — management decision was due October 29, 2024.

2023-002
Other
OTHER MATTERS

The School District did not limit it’s net cash resources to three months average expenditures for it’s school food service fund as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. Questioned Costs: None Context: The School District’s food service fund net cash resources at June 30, 2023 was $2,842,133 and it’s three month average expenditures was $2,041,664, resulting in an excess amount totaling $800,470. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with CFR section 210.14 and requirements as prescribed by the Office of School Finance, Department of Education, State of New Jersey Audit Program. Cause: The School District’s food service revenues increased more than anticipated. Recommendation: The School District should develop a plan to reduce the food service fund’s net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 10.555, 10.553, 10.559 and 10.582) Criteria: CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net cash resources requires a school food authority to limit its net cash resources to an amount that does not exceed 3 months average expenditures for its’ nonprofit school food service or an amount approved by the State agency in accordance with CFR Section 210.019(a). Condition: The School District did not limit it’s net cash resources to three months average expenditures for it’s school food service fund as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. Questioned Costs: None Context: The School District’s food service fund net cash resources at June 30, 2023 was $2,842,133 and it’s three month average expenditures was $2,041,664, resulting in an excess amount totaling $800,470. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with CFR section 210.14 and requirements as prescribed by the Office of School Finance, Department of Education, State of New Jersey Audit Program. Cause: The School District’s food service revenues increased more than anticipated. Recommendation: The School District should develop a plan to reduce the food service fund’s net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will develop a plan to reduce the food service fund's net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources.

About Other →
2023-002
Other
OTHER MATTERS

The School District did not limit it’s net cash resources to three months average expenditures for it’s school food service fund as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. Questioned Costs: None Context: The School District’s food service fund net cash resources at June 30, 2023 was $2,842,133 and it’s three month average expenditures was $2,041,664, resulting in an excess amount totaling $800,470. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with CFR section 210.14 and requirements as prescribed by the Office of School Finance, Department of Education, State of New Jersey Audit Program. Cause: The School District’s food service revenues increased more than anticipated. Recommendation: The School District should develop a plan to reduce the food service fund’s net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 10.555, 10.553, 10.559 and 10.582) Criteria: CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net cash resources requires a school food authority to limit its net cash resources to an amount that does not exceed 3 months average expenditures for its’ nonprofit school food service or an amount approved by the State agency in accordance with CFR Section 210.019(a). Condition: The School District did not limit it’s net cash resources to three months average expenditures for it’s school food service fund as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. Questioned Costs: None Context: The School District’s food service fund net cash resources at June 30, 2023 was $2,842,133 and it’s three month average expenditures was $2,041,664, resulting in an excess amount totaling $800,470. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with CFR section 210.14 and requirements as prescribed by the Office of School Finance, Department of Education, State of New Jersey Audit Program. Cause: The School District’s food service revenues increased more than anticipated. Recommendation: The School District should develop a plan to reduce the food service fund’s net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will develop a plan to reduce the food service fund's net cash resources below its three month average expenditures as required by CFR Section 210.14 Resource Management (b) Net Cash Resources.

About Other →

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$29,248,469 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2023 — management decision was due September 29, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,865,058 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 10, 2022 — management decision was due September 10, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,066,093 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2021 — management decision was due July 14, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,028,810 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2020 — management decision was due July 14, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,884,000 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 24, 2019 — management decision was due August 24, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,518,862 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2017 — management decision was due June 27, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,681,848 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2016 — management decision was due June 18, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New Jersey

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.