← Back to home

CITY OF PATERSONLocal Government

EIN: 226002200

UEI: NGTUTFGUHUN3

Audited by: Wielkotz & Company LLC

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

CITY OF PATERSON8 audit years20 findings5 repeat
8
Audit Years
20
Total Findings
5
Repeat Findings
$21.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$21,114,679 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 25, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 25, 2026 (116 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2023-006
Cost Allowability / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2022-007QUESTIONED COSTS

Several payroll files selected for audit were not available for review. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the American Rescue Plan requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the federal program: American Rescue Plan, Assistance Listing #21.027 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must retain all expenditure records for a minimum of three years, as maintained by the Department Head and/or Grant Supervisor. Condition: Several payroll files selected for audit were not available for review. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the American Rescue Plan requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Corrective Action Plan

Developed and implemented a standardized procedures for documenting and retaining support for all grant activity. Reveiwed all grant paperword, reconciled with supportive documentation

Prior Finding References

2022-007

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →
2023-007
Cost Allowability / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2022-008QUESTIONED COSTS

Several payroll files selected for audit were not available for review. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the Community Program to Improve Minority Health requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the federal program: Community Program to Improve Minority Health, Assistance Listing #93.137 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must retain all expenditure records for a minimum of three years, as maintained by the Department Head and/or Grant Supervisor. Condition: Several payroll files selected for audit were not available for review. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the Community Program to Improve Minority Health requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Corrective Action Plan

Developed and implemented a standardized procedures for documenting and retaining support for all grant activity. Reveiwed all grant paperword, reconciled with supportive documentation

Prior Finding References

2022-008

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →
2023-008
Cost Allowability / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Supporting documentation provided did not agree with the quarterly reports submitted. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The inconsistencies between supporting documentation and the submitted reports raise concern regarding the reliability of the City’s records. Effect: Failure to ensure that supporting documentation aligns with the reported amounts submitted increases the risk of error, misstatement, and potential noncompliance with financial reporting requirements. Cause: The City does not have adequate review procedures in place to verify that quarterly reports are fully supported by underlying documentation before submission. Recommendation: The City should implement a review process to ensure that all financial reports are reconciled with supporting documentation before submission. Management’s response: Procedures will be implemented to ensure all supporting documentation is reconciled with quarterly reports prior to submission.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2023-008 Information on the federal program: Community Program to Improve Minority Health, Assistance Listing #93.137 Criteria or specific requirement: The City is required to ensure that financial records, such as quarterly financial reports, are accurate, consistent, and supported by appropriate documentation in accordance with the grant agreement. Condition: Supporting documentation provided did not agree with the quarterly reports submitted. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The inconsistencies between supporting documentation and the submitted reports raise concern regarding the reliability of the City’s records. Effect: Failure to ensure that supporting documentation aligns with the reported amounts submitted increases the risk of error, misstatement, and potential noncompliance with financial reporting requirements. Cause: The City does not have adequate review procedures in place to verify that quarterly reports are fully supported by underlying documentation before submission. Recommendation: The City should implement a review process to ensure that all financial reports are reconciled with supporting documentation before submission. Management’s response: Procedures will be implemented to ensure all supporting documentation is reconciled with quarterly reports prior to submission.

Corrective Action Plan

Developed and implemented a standardized procedures for documenting and retaining support for all grant activity. Reveiwed all grant paperword, reconciled with supportive documentation

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →
2023-009
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2022-009QUESTIONED COSTS

The City's current procedures for authorizing purchases under the Community Program to Improve Minority Health Program are not functioning as intended. Questioned Costs: Unable to be detennined. Context: The City has authorized a purchase that does not meet the eligibility criteria outlined in the grant agreement. Effect: Failure to perform adequate fiscal control procedures resulted in non-compliance with the specific program requirements in accordance with the grant agreement. Cause: The City lacks a system in place to ensure that purchases and authorizations comply with the Community Program to Improve Minority Health Program requirements. Recommendation: A process will be developed and implemented to ensure proper authorization is obtained prior to the expenditure of grant funds. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure proper authorization is obtained prior to expenditure of grant funds.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Community Program to Improve Minority Health, Assistance Listing #93 .13 7 Information on the federal program: Expenditures made by the City must be authorized by the CFO prior to purchase, ensuring that purchases are eligible under the grant award. Condition: The City's current procedures for authorizing purchases under the Community Program to Improve Minority Health Program are not functioning as intended. Questioned Costs: Unable to be detennined. Context: The City has authorized a purchase that does not meet the eligibility criteria outlined in the grant agreement. Effect: Failure to perform adequate fiscal control procedures resulted in non-compliance with the specific program requirements in accordance with the grant agreement. Cause: The City lacks a system in place to ensure that purchases and authorizations comply with the Community Program to Improve Minority Health Program requirements. Recommendation: A process will be developed and implemented to ensure proper authorization is obtained prior to the expenditure of grant funds. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure proper authorization is obtained prior to expenditure of grant funds.

Corrective Action Plan

Developed and implemented a standardized procedures for documenting and retaining support for all grant activity. Reveiwed all grant paperword, reconciled with supportive documentation

Prior Finding References

2022-009

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-010
Cost Allowability / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2022-010QUESTIONED COSTS

Several payroll files selected for audit were not available to verify payroll costs. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the Childhood Lead Poisoning Control Program requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the federal program: Maternal & Child Health Services Block Grant- Childhood Lead Poisoning Control Program, Assistance Listing #93 .994 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must retain all expenditure records for a minimum of three years, as maintained by the Department Head and/or Grant Supervisor. Condition: Several payroll files selected for audit were not available to verify payroll costs. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the Childhood Lead Poisoning Control Program requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Corrective Action Plan

Developed and implemented a standardized procedures for documenting and retaining support for all grant activity. Reveiwed all grant paperword, reconciled with supportive documentation

Prior Finding References

2022-010

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →
2023-011
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2022-011QUESTIONED COSTS

Quarterly reports provided did not agree to supporting documentation. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: Quarterly reports provided did not contain approving signatures. Supporting documentation did not agree to the quarterly reports provided. Effect: Without authorizing signatures, unallowable costs can be reported on the SAGE Reports submitted to the State. Cause: Lack of supporting documentation and supervising duties can lead to improper maintenance of records. Recommendation: The City must adhere to all reporting requirements, including providing sufficient expenditure support and proper approval of reports. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure reports are properly handled and approved.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the federal program: Maternal & Child Health Services Block Grant- Childhood Lead Poisoning Control Program, Assistance Listing #93.994 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must submit quarterly financial reports and maintain sufficient supporting documentation required for approval of reimbursement. Condition: Quarterly reports provided did not agree to supporting documentation. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: Quarterly reports provided did not contain approving signatures. Supporting documentation did not agree to the quarterly reports provided. Effect: Without authorizing signatures, unallowable costs can be reported on the SAGE Reports submitted to the State. Cause: Lack of supporting documentation and supervising duties can lead to improper maintenance of records. Recommendation: The City must adhere to all reporting requirements, including providing sufficient expenditure support and proper approval of reports. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure reports are properly handled and approved.

Corrective Action Plan

Developed and implemented a standardized procedures for documenting and retaining support for all grant activity. Reveiwed all grant paperword, reconciled with supportive documentation

Prior Finding References

2022-011

About Reporting →
2023-012
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Several payroll files selected for audit were not available at the time of audit. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part B requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management’s response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2023-012 Information on the federal program: HIV Care Formula Grants (Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part B), Assistance Listing #93.917 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must retain all expenditure records for a minimum of three years, as maintained by the Department Head and/or Grant Supervisor. Condition: Several payroll files selected for audit were not available at the time of audit. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part B requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management’s response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Corrective Action Plan

Developed and implemented a standardized procedures for documenting and retaining support for all grant activity. Reveiwed all grant paperword, reconciled with supportive documentation

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →
2023-013
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Several purchase orders related to this grant were not made available for review at the time of audit. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City authorized expenditures under this grant program; however, supporting documentation was not provided to verify compliance with grant requirements. Effect: The absence of supporting documentation may result in noncompliance with the allowable cost requirements under the grant agreement. Cause: Controls were not in place to ensure all required eligibility determinations and supporting documents are properly maintained and available for audit review. Recommendation: The City should develop and implement procedures to ensure records are properly maintained and in compliance with the federal grant guidance. Management’s response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2023-013 Information on the federal program: Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS, Assistance Listing #14.241 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must retain all expenditure records for a minimum of three years, as maintained by the Department Head and/or Grant Supervisor. Condition: Several purchase orders related to this grant were not made available for review at the time of audit. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City authorized expenditures under this grant program; however, supporting documentation was not provided to verify compliance with grant requirements. Effect: The absence of supporting documentation may result in noncompliance with the allowable cost requirements under the grant agreement. Cause: Controls were not in place to ensure all required eligibility determinations and supporting documents are properly maintained and available for audit review. Recommendation: The City should develop and implement procedures to ensure records are properly maintained and in compliance with the federal grant guidance. Management’s response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years

Corrective Action Plan

Developed and implemented a standardized procedures for documenting and retaining support for all grant activity. Reveiwed all grant paperword, reconciled with supportive documentation

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →

FY 2022-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$22,558,122 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 17, 2025 — management decision was due December 17, 2025.

2022-007
Cost Allowability / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Several payroll files selected for audit were not available for review. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the American Rescue Plan requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the federal program: American Rescue Plan, Assistance Listing #21.027 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must retain all expenditure records for a minimum of three years, as maintained by the Department Head and/or Grant Supervisor. Condition: Several payroll files selected for audit were not available for review. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the American Rescue Plan requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Corrective Action Plan

City was delayed due to staff shrotages. City is catching up and has controls set

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →
2022-008
Cost Allowability / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Several payroll files selected for audit were not available for review. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the Community Program to Improve Minority Health requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-008 Information on the federal program: Community Program to Improve Minority Health, Assistance Listing #93.137 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must retain all expenditure records for a minimum of three years, as maintained by the Department Head and/or Grant Supervisor. Condition: Several payroll files selected for audit were not available for review. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the Community Program to Improve Minority Health requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Corrective Action Plan

City was delayed due to staff shrotages. City is catching up and has controls set

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →
2022-009
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

The City's current procedures for authorizing purchases under the Community Program to Improve Minority Health Program are not functioning as intended. Questioned Costs: Unable to be detennined. Context: The City has authorized a purchase that does not meet the eligibility criteria outlined in the grant agreement. Effect: Failure to perform adequate fiscal control procedures resulted in non-compliance with the specific program requirements in accordance with the grant agreement. Cause: The City lacks a system in place to ensure that purchases and authorizations comply with the Community Program to Improve Minority Health Program requirements. Recommendation: A process will be developed and implemented to ensure proper authorization is obtained prior to the expenditure of grant funds. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure proper authorization is obtained prior to expenditure of grant funds.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-009 Community Program to Improve Minority Health, Assistance Listing #93 .13 7 Information on the federal program: Expenditures made by the City must be authorized by the CFO prior to purchase, ensuring that purchases are eligible under the grant award. Condition: The City's current procedures for authorizing purchases under the Community Program to Improve Minority Health Program are not functioning as intended. Questioned Costs: Unable to be detennined. Context: The City has authorized a purchase that does not meet the eligibility criteria outlined in the grant agreement. Effect: Failure to perform adequate fiscal control procedures resulted in non-compliance with the specific program requirements in accordance with the grant agreement. Cause: The City lacks a system in place to ensure that purchases and authorizations comply with the Community Program to Improve Minority Health Program requirements. Recommendation: A process will be developed and implemented to ensure proper authorization is obtained prior to the expenditure of grant funds. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure proper authorization is obtained prior to expenditure of grant funds.

Corrective Action Plan

City was delayed due to staff shrotages. City is catching up and has controls set

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-010
Cost Allowability / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Several payroll files selected for audit were not available to verify payroll costs. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the Childhood Lead Poisoning Control Program requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-010 Information on the federal program: Maternal & Child Health Services Block Grant- Childhood Lead Poisoning Control Program, Assistance Listing #93 .994 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must retain all expenditure records for a minimum of three years, as maintained by the Department Head and/or Grant Supervisor. Condition: Several payroll files selected for audit were not available to verify payroll costs. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the Childhood Lead Poisoning Control Program requirements. Recommendation: A process should be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure records are properly retained for a minimum period of three years.

Corrective Action Plan

City was delayed due to staff shrotages. City is catching up and has controls set

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →
2022-011
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Quarterly reports provided did not agree to supporting documentation. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: Quarterly reports provided did not contain approving signatures. Supporting documentation did not agree to the quarterly reports provided. Effect: Without authorizing signatures, unallowable costs can be reported on the SAGE Reports submitted to the State. Cause: Lack of supporting documentation and supervising duties can lead to improper maintenance of records. Recommendation: The City must adhere to all reporting requirements, including providing sufficient expenditure support and proper approval of reports. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure reports are properly handled and approved.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-011 Information on the federal program: Maternal & Child Health Services Block Grant- Childhood Lead Poisoning Control Program, Assistance Listing #93.994 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must submit quarterly financial reports and maintain sufficient supporting documentation required for approval of reimbursement. Condition: Quarterly reports provided did not agree to supporting documentation. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: Quarterly reports provided did not contain approving signatures. Supporting documentation did not agree to the quarterly reports provided. Effect: Without authorizing signatures, unallowable costs can be reported on the SAGE Reports submitted to the State. Cause: Lack of supporting documentation and supervising duties can lead to improper maintenance of records. Recommendation: The City must adhere to all reporting requirements, including providing sufficient expenditure support and proper approval of reports. Management's response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure reports are properly handled and approved.

Corrective Action Plan

City was delayed due to staff shrotages. City is catching up and has controls set

About Reporting →
2022-012
Cost Allowability / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Several payroll files selected for audit were not available to verify payroll costs. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the Emergency Solutions grant requirements. Recommendation: A process to be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained and in compliance with the federal grant guidance.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-012 Information on the federal program: Emergency Solutions Grant, Assistance Listing #14.231 Criteria or specific requirement: The City must retain all payroll records for a minimum of three years, as maintained by the Department Head and/or Grant Supervisor. Condition: Several payroll files selected for audit were not available to verify payroll costs. Questioned costs: Unable to be determined. Context: The City issued reimbursement of payroll expenses in which backup documentation was not available to support the claims. Effect: Without proper documentation, there is a risk that grant funds could be used for ineligible employees or activities. Cause: The City lacks a system to ensure that records related to purchases and authorizations are maintained in accordance with the Emergency Solutions grant requirements. Recommendation: A process to be developed and implemented to ensure records are properly maintained and in compliance with the federal grant guidance.

Corrective Action Plan

City was delayed due to staff shrotages. City is catching up and has controls set

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →

FY 2021-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$18,775,833 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2024 — management decision was due September 18, 2024.

FY 2020-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$12,000,484 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2022 — management decision was due August 1, 2022.

2020-002
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

There were multiple instances where eligibility files selected for review were either incomplete, or unable to be presented for audit review. Questioned Costs: Unable to be determined. Context: Per the Federal OMB Uniform Guidance Circular Compliance Supplement, each individual who receives benefits under the TANF program should have a completed eligibility determination on file which is available for audit review. Effect: By failing to provide documentation that each individual receiving TANF benefits was eligible for the program, there could be instances where ineligible program participants are receiving assistance. Cause: Controls were not in place to ensure that all required eligibility determinations and supporting documents were on file and available for audit review. Recommendation: A process be developed and implemented to ensure all files are maintained in accordance with federal grant guidance. Management?s response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure all files are maintained and in compliance with federal grant guidance.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2020-002 Information on the federal program: School-Based Youth Services (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families), CFDA #93.558 Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to the OMB Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement, a financially-needy family may be offered TANF ?assistance? through alternative education or training programs for a minor parent if determined eligible subsequent the application process. Condition: There were multiple instances where eligibility files selected for review were either incomplete, or unable to be presented for audit review. Questioned Costs: Unable to be determined. Context: Per the Federal OMB Uniform Guidance Circular Compliance Supplement, each individual who receives benefits under the TANF program should have a completed eligibility determination on file which is available for audit review. Effect: By failing to provide documentation that each individual receiving TANF benefits was eligible for the program, there could be instances where ineligible program participants are receiving assistance. Cause: Controls were not in place to ensure that all required eligibility determinations and supporting documents were on file and available for audit review. Recommendation: A process be developed and implemented to ensure all files are maintained in accordance with federal grant guidance. Management?s response: Procedures are to be implemented to ensure all files are maintained and in compliance with federal grant guidance.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2020-002: School Based Youth Services: There were multiple instances where eligible files selected for review were either incomplete, or unable to be presented for audit review. Recommendation: A process be developed and implemented to ensure all files are maintained in accordance with federal grant guidance. Corrective Action Approved by the Council: All files will be maintained in compliance with federal grant guidance and be available for the audit. Method of Implementation: It has been corrected for CY 2021. Person Responsible for Implementation: Health and Human Services Department. Completion Date of Implementation: Year 2021

About Eligibility →
2020-003
Equipment & Real Property
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

There were multiple instances in which purchases of tangible property did not include an asset identification number, nor inclusion in the fixed asset report. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Per the Federal OMB Uniform Guidance Circular Compliance Supplement, tangle and real property must be included in the fixed asset report and include an asset identification number. Effect: By failing to include equipment on the fixed asset report, there is potential for properties to be misclassified under the grant award. Cause: Controls were not in place to ensure that all tangible property has been included in the fixed asset report. Recommendation: A process be developed and implemented to ensure all expenditures made for tangible property, equipment, and real property include asset identification numbers. Management?s response: Procedures are to be implemented to report all acquisitions on the fixed asset report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2020-003 Information on the federal program: Federal Equitable Sharing, CFDA #16.922 Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to the OMB Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement, any expenditures towards tangible property must be approved by the governing body and include the asset identification number, intended use, and funding sources. Condition: There were multiple instances in which purchases of tangible property did not include an asset identification number, nor inclusion in the fixed asset report. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Per the Federal OMB Uniform Guidance Circular Compliance Supplement, tangle and real property must be included in the fixed asset report and include an asset identification number. Effect: By failing to include equipment on the fixed asset report, there is potential for properties to be misclassified under the grant award. Cause: Controls were not in place to ensure that all tangible property has been included in the fixed asset report. Recommendation: A process be developed and implemented to ensure all expenditures made for tangible property, equipment, and real property include asset identification numbers. Management?s response: Procedures are to be implemented to report all acquisitions on the fixed asset report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2020-003: Federal Equitable Sharing: There were multiple instances in which purchases of tangible property did not include as asset identification number, nor inclusion in the fixed asset report. Recommendation: A process be developed and implemented to ensure all expenditures made for tangible property, equipment, and real property include asset identification numbers. Corrective Action Approved by the Council: Procedures have been implemented to report all acquisitions. Method of Implementation: It has been corrected for CY 2020. Person Responsible for Implementation: CFO/Police Department. Completion Date of Implementation: Year 2021.

About Equipment and Real Property Management →

FY 2019-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$13,002,200 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 25, 2020 — management decision was due February 25, 2021.

FY 2018-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$17,593,010 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 12, 2019 — management decision was due March 12, 2020.

2018-001
Cash Management / Equipment & Real Property / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management, Equipment and Real Property Management, Reporting →

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$20,641,321 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 27, 2018 — management decision was due February 27, 2019.

FY 2016-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$24,687,661 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 25, 2018 — management decision was due July 25, 2018.

2016-002
Cost Allowability
MODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-003
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
MODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2016-004
Special Tests & Provisions
MODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New Jersey

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.