EIN: 226002180
UEI: L91ELRSSED25
Audited by: PKF O'Connor Davies, LLP
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on May 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 6, 2026 (67 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on June 18, 2025 — management decision was due December 18, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on June 18, 2024 — management decision was due December 18, 2024.
During our testing of the ARP ESSER Program, we identified the District was unable to provide support for payroll charges for eight employees, two employees were paid in excess of the board approved maximum and several payroll expenditures did not agree to the support provided. During our testing of Federal grant compliance, we selected a sample of payroll charges submitted for reimbursement and traced to supporting documentation. The District board approves salaried individuals to be charged to the grant, board approves hourly rates and stipends to be charged to the grant and maintains paper timesheets for hourly and stipend employees. The District was unable to provide us with any support that the eight employees identified in our testing were appropriately charged to the grant. The District provided support that two individuals were approved to be paid a maximum amount from the grant. Per review of payroll charges of the grant for the two individuals identified they were paid in excess of the maximum amount approved.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴During our testing of the ARP ESSER Program, we identified the District was unable to provide support for payroll charges for eight employees, two employees were paid in excess of the board approved maximum and several payroll expenditures did not agree to the support provided. During our testing of Federal grant compliance, we selected a sample of payroll charges submitted for reimbursement and traced to supporting documentation. The District board approves salaried individuals to be charged to the grant, board approves hourly rates and stipends to be charged to the grant and maintains paper timesheets for hourly and stipend employees. The District was unable to provide us with any support that the eight employees identified in our testing were appropriately charged to the grant. The District provided support that two individuals were approved to be paid a maximum amount from the grant. Per review of payroll charges of the grant for the two individuals identified they were paid in excess of the maximum amount approved.
Part of the payroll reconciliatiion will be revised to include review of employees charged to grants to ensure they are assigned to the grant and tracking their time properly including salaire snad stipends.
FAC accepted this audit on June 21, 2023 — management decision was due December 21, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on October 24, 2022 — management decision was due April 24, 2023.
The final federal expenditure reports remitted to the State Department of Education were not in agreement with the District?s underlying financial records Criteria: Financial reports submitted are in agreement with the Districts financial records and are accurate. Questioned Cost: NONE Effect: Reported amounts are not in agreement with the Districts financial records. Cause: Failure of Management to implement procedures and controls to ensure the amounts reported agree with the underlying financial records. Identification of Repeat Finding: NONE Recommendation: That all final Federal and State expenditure reports agree to the underlying financial records of the district.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The final federal expenditure reports remitted to the State Department of Education were not in agreement with the District?s underlying financial records Criteria: Financial reports submitted are in agreement with the Districts financial records and are accurate. Questioned Cost: NONE Effect: Reported amounts are not in agreement with the Districts financial records. Cause: Failure of Management to implement procedures and controls to ensure the amounts reported agree with the underlying financial records. Identification of Repeat Finding: NONE Recommendation: That all final Federal and State expenditure reports agree to the underlying financial records of the district.
Not Available
A detailed Capital Asset Report was not available at the time of audit. Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP) and the Uniform Chart of Accounts requires a fixed asset ledger be maintained to record the historical cost and the capitalization of costs associated with the acquisition or construction of property, plant and equipment (PPE). Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e) which require that: 1. Equipment, including replacement equipment, be used in the program or project for which it was acquired as long as needed, whether or not the project or program continues to be supported by the federal award or, when appropriate, under other federal awards; however, the non-federal entity must not encumber the equipment without prior approval of the federal awarding agency (2 CFR sections 200.313(c) and (e)). 2. Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property (2 CFR section 200.313(d)(1)). 3. A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years (2 CFR section 200.313(d)(2)). 4. A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated (2 CFR section 200.313(d)(3)). 5. Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition (2 CFR section 200.313(d)(4)). Questioned Cost: NONE Effect: The District is unable to account for equipment purchased with grant funds.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: A detailed Capital Asset Report was not available at the time of audit. Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP) and the Uniform Chart of Accounts requires a fixed asset ledger be maintained to record the historical cost and the capitalization of costs associated with the acquisition or construction of property, plant and equipment (PPE). Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e) which require that: 1. Equipment, including replacement equipment, be used in the program or project for which it was acquired as long as needed, whether or not the project or program continues to be supported by the federal award or, when appropriate, under other federal awards; however, the non-federal entity must not encumber the equipment without prior approval of the federal awarding agency (2 CFR sections 200.313(c) and (e)). 2. Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property (2 CFR section 200.313(d)(1)). 3. A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years (2 CFR section 200.313(d)(2)). 4. A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated (2 CFR section 200.313(d)(3)). 5. Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition (2 CFR section 200.313(d)(4)). Questioned Cost: NONE Effect: The District is unable to account for equipment purchased with grant funds.
Not Available
FAC accepted this audit on September 12, 2021 — management decision was due March 12, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2020 — management decision was due July 14, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on March 11, 2019 — management decision was due September 11, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on January 16, 2018 — management decision was due July 16, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2017 — management decision was due July 15, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in New Jersey →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.