← Back to home

Bais Reuven KamenitzNon-Profit

EIN: 223540862

UEI: K1VUFJ1ZKZR3

Audited by: Hutman & Hutman LLP

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Bais Reuven Kamenitz5 audit years1 findings
5
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$960.2K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$960,234 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 11, 2026 (91 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

$788,916 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2025 — management decision was due August 4, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$1,241,776 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$872,082 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.

2022-221
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The School did not document the procurement process according to the procurement standards as codified under OMB Circular 2 CFR 200. Criteria: The School is required to follow certain procurement procedures including maintaining records of its procurement history and following the requirements of each procurement method being used. Cause: The School did not have clear communication with its employees about the division of responsibility relating to procurement and, although procurement was in fact done, the School failed to document it properly. Effect of Finding: After discussions with management, the auditor has determined that although the School failed to document the procurement process properly, they were in fact following the required procurement process as codified under OMB Circular 2 CFR. As such, the effects of this deficiency are minimal. 10 Recommendation: To ensure that each employee involved in the procurement process has a clear understanding of their responsibilities to ensure that the procurement process is documented properly. View of Responsible Party and Planned Corrective Action: Since being made aware of the issue, the school’s administrator has begun to routinely monitor the net cash resources to ensure it does not exceed three months of average expenditures. As such, the required correction actions have been implemented.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: The School did not document the procurement process according to the procurement standards as codified under OMB Circular 2 CFR 200. Criteria: The School is required to follow certain procurement procedures including maintaining records of its procurement history and following the requirements of each procurement method being used. Cause: The School did not have clear communication with its employees about the division of responsibility relating to procurement and, although procurement was in fact done, the School failed to document it properly. Effect of Finding: After discussions with management, the auditor has determined that although the School failed to document the procurement process properly, they were in fact following the required procurement process as codified under OMB Circular 2 CFR. As such, the effects of this deficiency are minimal. 10 Recommendation: To ensure that each employee involved in the procurement process has a clear understanding of their responsibilities to ensure that the procurement process is documented properly. View of Responsible Party and Planned Corrective Action: Since being made aware of the issue, the school’s administrator has begun to routinely monitor the net cash resources to ensure it does not exceed three months of average expenditures. As such, the required correction actions have been implemented.

Corrective Action Plan

Bais Reuven Kamenetz of Lakewood, Inc. respectfully submits the following corrective action plans for the year ended June 30, 2022. Finding 22-1: The School did not document the procurement process according to the procurement standards as codified under OMB Circular 2 CFR 200. Recommendation: To ensure that each employee involved in the procurement process has a clear understanding of their responsibilities to ensure that the procurement process is documented properly. Action Taken: Since being made aware of the issue, the School’s food service director met with all the employees involved in procurement and ensured that each one had a clear understanding of their role and what’s required of them. Implementation Date: Corrective Action Plan has been implemented as of March 23, 2023. Person Responsible for Implementation: Avrohom Rabin, the food service director, is the responsible party for implementation of the CAP. Telephone Number: (732)-363-0579

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2021-06-30

$1,412,627 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 6, 2022 — management decision was due April 6, 2023.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New Jersey

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.