EIN: 222432417
UEI: ED1JV1NT35J3
Audited by: CUSACK & COMPANY CPAS LLC
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 5, 2026 (86 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The Supervisory review of various accounting functions was lacking. We noted the following during the audit: • The trial balance we were given for the audit indicated a profit of $742,000. The nature of the organization makes it highly unlikely that a profit at this level could be achieved, which should have been investigated and resolved. (The final audited profit was $3,000.) • Cash accounts had inaccurate reconciling items requiring a $39,000 adjustment to cash. • The detail of accounts receivable did not agree to the general ledger by $253,000. • The detail of accounts payable includes two debit balances totaling $19,000 which appear incorrect. • The opening balance of opening equity did not agree to the previous years audited balance by $635,000. • The Profit and Loss by Job report profit did not agree to the general ledger by $5,668. Additionally, we noted that RTH Rental Subsidies were $4,106,618 per the Profit and Loss by Job report, but $4,099,230 per the general ledger. • There is a procedure to close the books monthly by a certain date, even if certain subcontractors have not submitted invoices for that time period. While this procedure may be fine for the interim period, at September 30, all subcontractor invoices must be recognized. We made an adjustment of $215,682 for August and September subcontractor invoices that had not been accrued. • There were no procedures to reconcile grant receivables and revenues. Our reconciliations resulted in adjustments (mostly immaterial) to all grant receivable and revenue accounts. • There was a mechanism to record unbilled grant receivables. At September 30, 2024, three of the four accounts used to record unbilled receivables had credit balances, which is not possible. Cause: There was no written procedures to require account reconciliations and the supervisory review of those reconciliations. Effect: In order for the financial statements to be fairly stated, the auditors made many adjustments, some of which were material. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement procedure to perform and review all account reconciliations on a timely basis.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Supervisory Review of Accounting Function Criteria: Accurate and timely records are required for GAAP and grant reporting. Condition: The Supervisory review of various accounting functions was lacking. We noted the following during the audit: • The trial balance we were given for the audit indicated a profit of $742,000. The nature of the organization makes it highly unlikely that a profit at this level could be achieved, which should have been investigated and resolved. (The final audited profit was $3,000.) • Cash accounts had inaccurate reconciling items requiring a $39,000 adjustment to cash. • The detail of accounts receivable did not agree to the general ledger by $253,000. • The detail of accounts payable includes two debit balances totaling $19,000 which appear incorrect. • The opening balance of opening equity did not agree to the previous years audited balance by $635,000. • The Profit and Loss by Job report profit did not agree to the general ledger by $5,668. Additionally, we noted that RTH Rental Subsidies were $4,106,618 per the Profit and Loss by Job report, but $4,099,230 per the general ledger. • There is a procedure to close the books monthly by a certain date, even if certain subcontractors have not submitted invoices for that time period. While this procedure may be fine for the interim period, at September 30, all subcontractor invoices must be recognized. We made an adjustment of $215,682 for August and September subcontractor invoices that had not been accrued. • There were no procedures to reconcile grant receivables and revenues. Our reconciliations resulted in adjustments (mostly immaterial) to all grant receivable and revenue accounts. • There was a mechanism to record unbilled grant receivables. At September 30, 2024, three of the four accounts used to record unbilled receivables had credit balances, which is not possible. Cause: There was no written procedures to require account reconciliations and the supervisory review of those reconciliations. Effect: In order for the financial statements to be fairly stated, the auditors made many adjustments, some of which were material. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement procedure to perform and review all account reconciliations on a timely basis.
Supervisory Review of Accounting Function The Financial Policies and Procedures will be reviewed and revised in the finance and audit committees for approval by the full Board of Directors in September 2025. These revisions will address internal weaknesses identified in supervisory review of accounting functions. This will include timely reconciliation, review and approval of all accounts.
The Form SF-SAC will be filed late for the year ended September 30, 2024. Cause: Turnover of accounting staff. Effect: The Association is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Recommendation: Procedures should be developed and implemented to ensure timely filings.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Late filing of Form SF-SAC Data Collection Form The Uniform Guidance requires that Form SF-SAC be filed no later than nine months after year end, in this case by June 30, 2025. Condition: The Form SF-SAC will be filed late for the year ended September 30, 2024. Cause: Turnover of accounting staff. Effect: The Association is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Recommendation: Procedures should be developed and implemented to ensure timely filings.
Late filing of Form SF-SAC Data collection Form Polices and Procedures will be revised by the September Board Meeting to include the requirement that the Director of Finance will provide to the auditor all documents necessary to start the previous fiscal year audit no later than March 31st. This will ensure that the audit and SF-SAC Data Collection form can be completed by June 30th.
FAC accepted this audit on May 30, 2024 — management decision was due November 30, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on July 5, 2023 — management decision was due January 5, 2024.
The allocation of grant expenses, for which budget approval is pending, were improperly included as administrative expenses and no accrual of grant revenue was recorded. Cause: Allocation system was flawed. Effect: The matching of revenues and expenses to the proper period was not accounted for properly. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement procedures to allocate direct and indirect costs fairly, and to provide a review process for the same.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: The allocation of direct and indirect costs of grants should be reasonable and fair. Condition: The allocation of grant expenses, for which budget approval is pending, were improperly included as administrative expenses and no accrual of grant revenue was recorded. Cause: Allocation system was flawed. Effect: The matching of revenues and expenses to the proper period was not accounted for properly. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement procedures to allocate direct and indirect costs fairly, and to provide a review process for the same.
We have revised our expense allocation system so that grant expenses, for which budget approval is pending, are now allocated to a separate cost center by grant and that the appropriate revenue accrual is made and reversed when the actual billing is made. Additionally, we will require that all expenses be allocated, so that our report of allocated revenue and expenses will be equal the trial balance, and a procedure will be implemented to verify that reconciliation monthly.
2021-001
FAC accepted this audit on November 9, 2022 — management decision was due May 9, 2023.
The schedule of functional expenses indicates negative expenses in membership and administration of $28,743 as follows: Subcontractors Transitional Services Professional Fees Communications Travel Postage and Printing$ 14,526 1,800 8,645 2,579 29 1,164 $ 28,743 Cause: The allocation system is flawed. Effect: This results in overcharging grants by at least this amount. (The amount would be increased to the extent membership and administration should have been allocated some amount of these expenses). Recommendation: We recommend that management immediately develop and implement procedures to allocate direct and indirect costs fairly, and to provide a review process for the same.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-01 Expense Allocation Criteria: The allocation of direct and indirect costs to grants should be reasonable and fair. Condition: The schedule of functional expenses indicates negative expenses in membership and administration of $28,743 as follows: Subcontractors Transitional Services Professional Fees Communications Travel Postage and Printing$ 14,526 1,800 8,645 2,579 29 1,164 $ 28,743 Cause: The allocation system is flawed. Effect: This results in overcharging grants by at least this amount. (The amount would be increased to the extent membership and administration should have been allocated some amount of these expenses). Recommendation: We recommend that management immediately develop and implement procedures to allocate direct and indirect costs fairly, and to provide a review process for the same.
NYAIL fairly allocates direct and indirect costs using one of three ratio value allocation methods, by employee FTE, by total FTEs, and by Fiscal (Budget) Splits. To prevent grants being overcharged throughout the year, any over budgeted line item found is flagged then reclassified to the membership and administrative cost center until a budget modification is created and submitted for approval. We reconcile the annual costs upon each grant's contract year end ensuring all costs are appropriate and within the annual contract budget. To ensure no grant will be overcharged moving forward, the Director of Finance will reconcile each grant monthly, NYAIL's fiscal year end, and every contract year end including any over budgeted items not yet charged to the grant. He/She will compare these reports to the annual award amount ensuring costs remain below or equal to the overall annual award amount prior to submitting reports to the various Government Entities.
The Form SF-SAC will be filed late for the year ended September 30, 2021. Cause: Turnover in the Director of Finance position and other accounting staff. Effect: The Association is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Recommendation: Procedures should be developed and implemented to ensure timely filings.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-02 Late Filing of Form SF-SAC Data Collection Form Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that Form SF-SAC be filed no later than nine months after year end, in this case by June 30, 2022. Condition: The Form SF-SAC will be filed late for the year ended September 30, 2021. Cause: Turnover in the Director of Finance position and other accounting staff. Effect: The Association is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Recommendation: Procedures should be developed and implemented to ensure timely filings.
NYAIL completely upgraded their Finance/Accounting team towards the end of the 2020-2021 fiscal year. As the team came up to speed this caused a late start to the audit again. Moving forward, the deadline to complete the internal reconciliations, review, and reports is no later than 60 days following the fiscal year end. The Director of Finance is responsible for ensuring the deadline is met.
2020-003
FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2022 — management decision was due July 6, 2022.
The Association does have established policies for subrecipients monitoring including 1) obtaining subrecipients annual audits and management letters and reviewing them for pertinent findings and 2) selecting one test month per year for each subrecipient to obtain all support documentation for an invoice and to examine the support documentation. These procedures were not performed during the year. Cause: Turnover in the Director of Finance position and other accounting staff. Effect: There were no questioned costs as a result of this finding. Subrecipients, as a result of grantor requirements, provide extensive documentation with each invoice, making it unlikely that lack subrecipients monitoring would have led to adjustments. Recommendation: We recommend that management immediately implement established procedures for subrecipients monitoring and that those procedures and resulting actions be documented. Client Response: We have requested that all subcontractors submit back-up documentation for MFP August 2021 and financial statements for ?audit?. We have received responses with supporting documentation and are reviewing their responses and documents. Starting in October 2021, we will follow the written policy of selecting one test month for each subcontractor and requesting supporting documentation as well as audited financial statements. The results of these ?audits? will be documented.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires the Association to develop and implement procedures to monitor subrecipients. A significant portion of the Association?s Federal Awards (56%) were passed through to subrecipients. Condition: The Association does have established policies for subrecipients monitoring including 1) obtaining subrecipients annual audits and management letters and reviewing them for pertinent findings and 2) selecting one test month per year for each subrecipient to obtain all support documentation for an invoice and to examine the support documentation. These procedures were not performed during the year. Cause: Turnover in the Director of Finance position and other accounting staff. Effect: There were no questioned costs as a result of this finding. Subrecipients, as a result of grantor requirements, provide extensive documentation with each invoice, making it unlikely that lack subrecipients monitoring would have led to adjustments. Recommendation: We recommend that management immediately implement established procedures for subrecipients monitoring and that those procedures and resulting actions be documented. Client Response: We have requested that all subcontractors submit back-up documentation for MFP August 2021 and financial statements for ?audit?. We have received responses with supporting documentation and are reviewing their responses and documents. Starting in October 2021, we will follow the written policy of selecting one test month for each subcontractor and requesting supporting documentation as well as audited financial statements. The results of these ?audits? will be documented.
Recommendation: We recommend that management immediately implement established procedures for subrecipients monitoring and that those procedures and resulting actions be documented. Client Response: We have requested that all subcontractors submit back-up documentation for MFP August 2021 and financial statements for ?audit?. We have received responses with supporting documentation and are reviewing their responses and documents. Starting in October 2021, we will follow the written policy of selecting one test month for each subcontractor and requesting supporting documentation as well as audited financial statements. The results of these ?audits? will be documented. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Robert Peters, Director of Finance Anticipated Completion Date for Corrective Action Plans: January 1, 2022
During the audit we noted approximately $444,000 ($235,000 of which related to a federal program) of expenses that had inaccurately been reported in 2021 instead of 2020. Cause: Oversight Effect: There were no questioned costs as a result of this finding as the additional expenses generated an equal amount of additional revenue and an adjustment was made. Recommendation: Procedures should be developed and implemented to verify that a proper cut-off revenues and expenses is made. Client Response: The Director of Finance will leave the accounting period open for a period to allow for bills to be received and invoices be generated. The Director of Finance will review all bills following period close date to assure proper coding and recording into the accounting system. The Director of Finance will also reconcile all prepaids, accrued, and deferred accounts shown on the balance sheet to assure revenue and expenses are posted into the correct period.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and the Uniform Guidance require that the Association?s records be maintained on an accrual basis, which includes proper cut-off of revenue and expenses. Condition: During the audit we noted approximately $444,000 ($235,000 of which related to a federal program) of expenses that had inaccurately been reported in 2021 instead of 2020. Cause: Oversight Effect: There were no questioned costs as a result of this finding as the additional expenses generated an equal amount of additional revenue and an adjustment was made. Recommendation: Procedures should be developed and implemented to verify that a proper cut-off revenues and expenses is made. Client Response: The Director of Finance will leave the accounting period open for a period to allow for bills to be received and invoices be generated. The Director of Finance will review all bills following period close date to assure proper coding and recording into the accounting system. The Director of Finance will also reconcile all prepaids, accrued, and deferred accounts shown on the balance sheet to assure revenue and expenses are posted into the correct period.
Recommendation: Procedures should be developed and implemented to verify that a proper cut-off revenues and expenses is made. Client Response: The Director of Finance will leave the accounting period open for a period to allow for bills to be received and invoices be generated. The Director of Finance will review all bills following period close date to assure proper coding and recording into the accounting system. The Director of Finance will also reconcile all prepaids, accrued, and deferred accounts shown on the balance sheet to assure revenue and expenses are posted into the correct period. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Robert Peters, Director of Finance Anticipated Completion Date for Corrective Action Plans: January 1, 2022
The Form SF-SAC will be filed late for the year ended September 30, 2020. Cause: Turnover in the Director of Finance position and other accounting staff. Effect: The Association is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Recommendation: Procedures should be developed and implemented to ensure timely filings. Client Response: The late completion of the audit and as a result Form SF-SAC was primarily due to a change in fiscal staff. NYAIL is committed to completing the annual audit work in a timely manner that should allow sufficient time to complete all audit requirements and reporting.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that Form SF-SAC be filed no later than nine months after year end, in this case by June 30, 2021. Condition: The Form SF-SAC will be filed late for the year ended September 30, 2020. Cause: Turnover in the Director of Finance position and other accounting staff. Effect: The Association is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Recommendation: Procedures should be developed and implemented to ensure timely filings. Client Response: The late completion of the audit and as a result Form SF-SAC was primarily due to a change in fiscal staff. NYAIL is committed to completing the annual audit work in a timely manner that should allow sufficient time to complete all audit requirements and reporting.
Recommendation: Procedures should be developed and implemented to ensure timely filings. Client Response: The late completion of the audit and as a result Form SF-SAC was primarily due to a change in fiscal staff. NYAIL is committed to completing the annual audit work in a timely manner that should allow sufficient time to complete all audit requirements and reporting. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Robert Peters, Director of Finance Anticipated Completion Date for Corrective Action Plans: January 1, 2022
FAC accepted this audit on September 9, 2020 — management decision was due March 9, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2019 — management decision was due December 30, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2018 — management decision was due September 25, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2017 — management decision was due September 12, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.