← Back to home

GLOUCESTER COUNTY LIBRARY COMMISSIONLocal Government

EIN: 216000660

UEI: Y7LNMLQRNTK5

Audit also covers EIN: 216000663 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: PKF O'Connor Davies, LLP

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

GLOUCESTER COUNTY LIBRARY COMMISSION19 audit years2 findings
19
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$1,175,776 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FY 2024-12-31

NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$29,873,099 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2025 — management decision was due March 29, 2026.

2024-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Family Development and Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services – Medicaid Cluster, Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX), Assistance Listing No. 93.778 1/1/2024 – 12/31/2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement Per 42 CFR § 435.945(a) and § 435.948, state Medicaid agencies are required to verify income using electronic data sources to the extent available, and must ensure that eligibility determinations are based on accurate and verified information. Condition The GCDSS did not consistently verify income reported on the Medical Assistance applications prior to granting program eligibility to individuals. Questioned Costs Unknown. Context During our testing of eligibility determinations under the Medical Assistance program, we noted that for 3 out of 40 sampled cases, the income reported on the application was not verified prior to granting program eligibility. The documentation lacked evidence of income verification through acceptable sources such as pay stubs, employer statements, or data matches with state wage databases. Effect or Potential Effect Improper eligibility determinations may result in ineligible individuals receiving benefits, leading to questioned costs and potential disallowance by the federal agency. Cause The failure to verify income was attributed to a lapse in internal controls and staff oversight. In some cases, eligibility workers relied solely on self-attested income without initiating verification procedures. Identification as a Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation We recommend that GCDSS strengthen its internal controls over eligibility determinations by consistently documenting income verification procedures prior to approval. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Family Development and Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services – Medicaid Cluster, Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX), Assistance Listing No. 93.778 1/1/2024 – 12/31/2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement Per 42 CFR § 435.945(a) and § 435.948, state Medicaid agencies are required to verify income using electronic data sources to the extent available, and must ensure that eligibility determinations are based on accurate and verified information. Condition The GCDSS did not consistently verify income reported on the Medical Assistance applications prior to granting program eligibility to individuals. Questioned Costs Unknown. Context During our testing of eligibility determinations under the Medical Assistance program, we noted that for 3 out of 40 sampled cases, the income reported on the application was not verified prior to granting program eligibility. The documentation lacked evidence of income verification through acceptable sources such as pay stubs, employer statements, or data matches with state wage databases. Effect or Potential Effect Improper eligibility determinations may result in ineligible individuals receiving benefits, leading to questioned costs and potential disallowance by the federal agency. Cause The failure to verify income was attributed to a lapse in internal controls and staff oversight. In some cases, eligibility workers relied solely on self-attested income without initiating verification procedures. Identification as a Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation We recommend that GCDSS strengthen its internal controls over eligibility determinations by consistently documenting income verification procedures prior to approval. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

# 1 The workers will be utilizing a checklist to ensure income was verified for all members. DOVE, IEVS, or the portal verification is run for each case. A request for information letter is sent if self-reported income and DOVE/electronic verification is not within 25%. # 2 All renewals will be reviewed by a specialist, supervisor, or administrator. When an individual is self-employed we request the most recent income tax form.

About Eligibility →

FY 2024-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$15,275,398 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2025 — management decision was due March 30, 2026.

2024-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Family Development and Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services – Medicaid Cluster, Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX), Assistance Listing No. 93.778 1/1/2024 – 12/31/2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement Per 42 CFR § 435.945(a) and § 435.948, state Medicaid agencies are required to verify income using electronic data sources to the extent available, and must ensure that eligibility determinations are based on accurate and verified information. Condition The GCDSS did not consistently verify income reported on the Medical Assistance applications prior to granting program eligibility to individuals. Questioned Costs Unknown. Context During our testing of eligibility determinations under the Medical Assistance program, we noted that for 3 out of 40 sampled cases, the income reported on the application was not verified prior to granting program eligibility. The documentation lacked evidence of income verification through acceptable sources such as pay stubs, employer statements, or data matches with state wage databases. Effect or Potential Effect Improper eligibility determinations may result in ineligible individuals receiving benefits, leading to questioned costs and potential disallowance by the federal agency. Cause The failure to verify income was attributed to a lapse in internal controls and staff oversight. In some cases, eligibility workers relied solely on self-attested income without initiating verification procedures. Identification as a Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation We recommend that GCDSS strengthen its internal controls over eligibility determinations by consistently documenting income verification procedures prior to approval. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Family Development and Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services – Medicaid Cluster, Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX), Assistance Listing No. 93.778 1/1/2024 – 12/31/2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement Per 42 CFR § 435.945(a) and § 435.948, state Medicaid agencies are required to verify income using electronic data sources to the extent available, and must ensure that eligibility determinations are based on accurate and verified information. Condition The GCDSS did not consistently verify income reported on the Medical Assistance applications prior to granting program eligibility to individuals. Questioned Costs Unknown. Context During our testing of eligibility determinations under the Medical Assistance program, we noted that for 3 out of 40 sampled cases, the income reported on the application was not verified prior to granting program eligibility. The documentation lacked evidence of income verification through acceptable sources such as pay stubs, employer statements, or data matches with state wage databases. Effect or Potential Effect Improper eligibility determinations may result in ineligible individuals receiving benefits, leading to questioned costs and potential disallowance by the federal agency. Cause The failure to verify income was attributed to a lapse in internal controls and staff oversight. In some cases, eligibility workers relied solely on self-attested income without initiating verification procedures. Identification as a Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation We recommend that GCDSS strengthen its internal controls over eligibility determinations by consistently documenting income verification procedures prior to approval. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

# 1 The workers will be utilizing a checklist to ensure income was verified for all members. DOVE, IEVS, or the portal verification is run for each case. A request for information letter is sent if self-reported income and DOVE/electronic verification is not within 25%. # 2 All renewals will be reviewed by a specialist, supervisor, or administrator. When an individual is self-employed we request the most recent income tax form.

About Eligibility →

FY 2023-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$39,921,191 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2024 — management decision was due March 26, 2025.

2023-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Family Development, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Assistance Listing No. 93.558 1/1/2023 – 12/31/2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement N.J.A.C. 10:90-3.22 – Case redetermination is a review of the factors affecting WFNJ TANF eligibility and payment amount. At the time of redetermination, the recipient shall execute a formal application for continuation for assistance. WFNJ/TANF cases shall be redetermined at least every 12 months. When there is a substantial question of continuing WFNJ eligibility to be resolved, the monthly assistance benefit may be suspended, subject to timely and adequate notice provisions. N.J.A.C. 10:90-2.3 – Eligibility for cash assistance benefits shall be limited to a lifetime total of 60 cumulative months (lifetime limit) for an adult individual recipient, except as exempted in accordance with N.J.A.C. 10:90-2.4 or extended in accordance with N.J.A.C. 10:90-2.5. Condition Ineligible recipients were being paid monthly cash assistance. The GCDSS did not maintain an effective control environment over eligibility requirements of the TANF program. Questioned Costs $7,564 – Known total amount of benefits received by ineligible recipients during the year: • Failure to timely close out terminated case: $2,768 • Failure to properly exempt participant from lifetime limit: $4,796 Context 53 TANF cases were selected for testing, the following exceptions were noted: 1) 1 case continued to receive monthly benefits during 2023 when the records indicated that the case should have closed in 2022. 2) 1 case was incorrectly coded as being exempted from lifetime limit. 3) 1 case was coded as being exempted from lifetime limit; however, the GCDSS cannot locate supporting documentation. Each new case determined eligible to receive cash assistance receives an initial prorated grant amount, and continues to receive their monthly allotment on the first day of the following month. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect or Potential Effect Improper cash assistance payments to ineligible recipients. Cause Procedures not consistently followed to timely close out terminated cases; procedures not consistently followed to ensure all required exemption documentations are in the recipients’ case folder. Identification as a Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation The GCDSS should ensure internal control procedures are consistently followed to timely closeout terminated cases, and that all required documentation are in the recipients’ case folder to support eligibility to receive cash assistance benefits. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Family Development, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Assistance Listing No. 93.558 1/1/2023 – 12/31/2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement N.J.A.C. 10:90-3.22 – Case redetermination is a review of the factors affecting WFNJ TANF eligibility and payment amount. At the time of redetermination, the recipient shall execute a formal application for continuation for assistance. WFNJ/TANF cases shall be redetermined at least every 12 months. When there is a substantial question of continuing WFNJ eligibility to be resolved, the monthly assistance benefit may be suspended, subject to timely and adequate notice provisions. N.J.A.C. 10:90-2.3 – Eligibility for cash assistance benefits shall be limited to a lifetime total of 60 cumulative months (lifetime limit) for an adult individual recipient, except as exempted in accordance with N.J.A.C. 10:90-2.4 or extended in accordance with N.J.A.C. 10:90-2.5. Condition Ineligible recipients were being paid monthly cash assistance. The GCDSS did not maintain an effective control environment over eligibility requirements of the TANF program. Questioned Costs $7,564 – Known total amount of benefits received by ineligible recipients during the year: • Failure to timely close out terminated case: $2,768 • Failure to properly exempt participant from lifetime limit: $4,796 Context 53 TANF cases were selected for testing, the following exceptions were noted: 1) 1 case continued to receive monthly benefits during 2023 when the records indicated that the case should have closed in 2022. 2) 1 case was incorrectly coded as being exempted from lifetime limit. 3) 1 case was coded as being exempted from lifetime limit; however, the GCDSS cannot locate supporting documentation. Each new case determined eligible to receive cash assistance receives an initial prorated grant amount, and continues to receive their monthly allotment on the first day of the following month. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect or Potential Effect Improper cash assistance payments to ineligible recipients. Cause Procedures not consistently followed to timely close out terminated cases; procedures not consistently followed to ensure all required exemption documentations are in the recipients’ case folder. Identification as a Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation The GCDSS should ensure internal control procedures are consistently followed to timely closeout terminated cases, and that all required documentation are in the recipients’ case folder to support eligibility to receive cash assistance benefits. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

#1 - 1 case continued to receive monthly benefits during 2023 when records indicated that the case should have closed in 2022. Consolidated Report Listing FB021 will be reviewed by supervisor to ensure WFNJ cases are redetermined appropriately. #2 and #3 - 1 case was incorrectly coded as being exempted from lifetime limit. 1 case was coded as being exempted from lifetime limit; however, the GCDSS cannot locate supporting documentation. Share Data Warehouse (SDW) ‘TANF and GA Clock’ report & SDW ‘WFNJ Clock’ report will be reviewed by supervisor to ensure correct exemption coding. #2 and #3 Staff will receive refresher DIMs case separator training. All clerical DIMs staff will receive refresher DIMs procedure and indexing training. In-house QC spot checks by Supervisors.

About Eligibility →

FY 2023-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$14,841,655 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 18, 2024 — management decision was due May 18, 2025.

2023-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Family Development, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Assistance Listing No. 93.558 1/1/2023 – 12/31/2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement N.J.A.C. 10:90-3.22 – Case redetermination is a review of the factors affecting WFNJ TANF eligibility and payment amount. At the time of redetermination, the recipient shall execute a formal application for continuation for assistance. WFNJ/TANF cases shall be redetermined at least every 12 months. When there is a substantial question of continuing WFNJ eligibility to be resolved, the monthly assistance benefit may be suspended, subject to timely and adequate notice provisions. N.J.A.C. 10:90-2.3 – Eligibility for cash assistance benefits shall be limited to a lifetime total of 60 cumulative months (lifetime limit) for an adult individual recipient, except as exempted in accordance with N.J.A.C. 10:90-2.4 or extended in accordance with N.J.A.C. 10:90-2.5. Condition Ineligible recipients were being paid monthly cash assistance. The GCDSS did not maintain an effective control environment over eligibility requirements of the TANF program. Questioned Costs $7,564 – Known total amount of benefits received by ineligible recipients during the year: • Failure to timely close out terminated case: $2,768 • Failure to properly exempt participant from lifetime limit: $4,796 Context 53 TANF cases were selected for testing, the following exceptions were noted: 1) 1 case continued to receive monthly benefits during 2023 when the records indicated that the case should have closed in 2022. 2) 1 case was incorrectly coded as being exempted from lifetime limit. 3) 1 case was coded as being exempted from lifetime limit; however, the GCDSS cannot locate supporting documentation. Each new case determined eligible to receive cash assistance receives an initial prorated grant amount, and continues to receive their monthly allotment on the first day of the following month. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect or Potential Effect Improper cash assistance payments to ineligible recipients. Cause Procedures not consistently followed to timely close out terminated cases; procedures not consistently followed to ensure all required exemption documentations are in the recipients’ case folder. Identification as a Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation The GCDSS should ensure internal control procedures are consistently followed to timely closeout terminated cases, and that all required documentation are in the recipients’ case folder to support eligibility to receive cash assistance benefits. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Family Development, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Assistance Listing No. 93.558 1/1/2023 – 12/31/2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement N.J.A.C. 10:90-3.22 – Case redetermination is a review of the factors affecting WFNJ TANF eligibility and payment amount. At the time of redetermination, the recipient shall execute a formal application for continuation for assistance. WFNJ/TANF cases shall be redetermined at least every 12 months. When there is a substantial question of continuing WFNJ eligibility to be resolved, the monthly assistance benefit may be suspended, subject to timely and adequate notice provisions. N.J.A.C. 10:90-2.3 – Eligibility for cash assistance benefits shall be limited to a lifetime total of 60 cumulative months (lifetime limit) for an adult individual recipient, except as exempted in accordance with N.J.A.C. 10:90-2.4 or extended in accordance with N.J.A.C. 10:90-2.5. Condition Ineligible recipients were being paid monthly cash assistance. The GCDSS did not maintain an effective control environment over eligibility requirements of the TANF program. Questioned Costs $7,564 – Known total amount of benefits received by ineligible recipients during the year: • Failure to timely close out terminated case: $2,768 • Failure to properly exempt participant from lifetime limit: $4,796 Context 53 TANF cases were selected for testing, the following exceptions were noted: 1) 1 case continued to receive monthly benefits during 2023 when the records indicated that the case should have closed in 2022. 2) 1 case was incorrectly coded as being exempted from lifetime limit. 3) 1 case was coded as being exempted from lifetime limit; however, the GCDSS cannot locate supporting documentation. Each new case determined eligible to receive cash assistance receives an initial prorated grant amount, and continues to receive their monthly allotment on the first day of the following month. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Effect or Potential Effect Improper cash assistance payments to ineligible recipients. Cause Procedures not consistently followed to timely close out terminated cases; procedures not consistently followed to ensure all required exemption documentations are in the recipients’ case folder. Identification as a Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation The GCDSS should ensure internal control procedures are consistently followed to timely closeout terminated cases, and that all required documentation are in the recipients’ case folder to support eligibility to receive cash assistance benefits. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The responsible officials agree with the finding and will address the matter as part of their corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

#1 - 1 case continued to receive monthly benefits during 2023 when records indicated that the case should have closed in 2022. Consolidated Report Listing FB021 will be reviewed by supervisor to ensure WFNJ cases are redetermined appropriately. #2 and #3 - 1 case was incorrectly coded as being exempted from lifetime limit. 1 case was coded as being exempted from lifetime limit; however, the GCDSS cannot locate supporting documentation. Share Data Warehouse (SDW) ‘TANF and GA Clock’ report & SDW ‘WFNJ Clock’ report will be reviewed by supervisor to ensure correct exemption coding. #2 and #3 Staff will receive refresher DIMs case separator training. All clerical DIMs staff will receive refresher DIMs procedure and indexing training. In-house QC spot checks by Supervisors.

About Eligibility →

FY 2022-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$13,622,707 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 9, 2023 — management decision was due May 9, 2024.

FY 2022-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$38,845,419 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2023 — management decision was due March 29, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,057,816 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 23, 2022 — management decision was due April 23, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$31,133,838 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2023 — management decision was due August 27, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$18,284,398 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 8, 2021 — management decision was due February 8, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,873,813 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2022 — management decision was due July 6, 2022.

FY 2019-12-31

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,206,970 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2020 — management decision was due June 17, 2021.

FY 2019-12-31

NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,681,209 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 16, 2020 — management decision was due February 16, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,962,275 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2019 — management decision was due March 18, 2020.

FY 2018-12-31

NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,313,756 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 5, 2019 — management decision was due February 5, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,031,284 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 28, 2018 — management decision was due December 28, 2018.

FY 2017-12-31

NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,711,117 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 3, 2018 — management decision was due March 3, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,075,284 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 19, 2017 — management decision was due December 19, 2017.

FY 2016-12-31

NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,496,736 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 5, 2017 — management decision was due March 5, 2018.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New Jersey

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.