← Back to home

Apache Behavioral Health ServicesTribal Government

EIN: 208069371

UEI: U3MUUEH8NEU5

Audited by: SJT GROUP LLC

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 30, 2026

Apache Behavioral Health Services9 audit years8 findings5 repeat
9
Audit Years
8
Total Findings
5
Repeat Findings
$2.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,668,265 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 30, 2026 (154 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2023-002OTHER MATTERS

Employee benefits expenditures charged to the programs do not agree to supporting documentation, such as employee benefit provider premium invoices. Context: All employee benefits charged to the programs. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable Cause: The payroll module and account structure setup in the accounting system (multiple benefits going into one benefit account) made it virtually impossible to reconcile employer benefits to the employer benefits provider premium invoices and/or employee benefit election forms. Effect: ABHS may not be able to demonstrate that the costs charged to federal programs are allowable. Auditor’s Recommendations: ABHS should implement a reconciliation process to ensure that employee benefit expenditures charged to federal programs agree with employee benefit provider premiums invoices and/or employee benefit election forms. Management’s Response: ABHS has implemented a new accounting and payroll system which allows the organization to reconcile employee benefit expenditures monthly. These systems were implemented in March and April of 2025 and management expects this finding to be resolved in 2025.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-002 — Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Title: Indian Self-Determination, Medical Assistance Program ALN: 93.441, 93.778 Award period: 1/1/2024 – 12/31/2026, 1/1/2024 – 12/31/2024 Criteria: According to 2 CFR Part 200.403, to be allowable under federal awards, costs must be adequately documented. Additionally, the 2 CFR Part 200.430 requires that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: Employee benefits expenditures charged to the programs do not agree to supporting documentation, such as employee benefit provider premium invoices. Context: All employee benefits charged to the programs. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable Cause: The payroll module and account structure setup in the accounting system (multiple benefits going into one benefit account) made it virtually impossible to reconcile employer benefits to the employer benefits provider premium invoices and/or employee benefit election forms. Effect: ABHS may not be able to demonstrate that the costs charged to federal programs are allowable. Auditor’s Recommendations: ABHS should implement a reconciliation process to ensure that employee benefit expenditures charged to federal programs agree with employee benefit provider premiums invoices and/or employee benefit election forms. Management’s Response: ABHS has implemented a new accounting and payroll system which allows the organization to reconcile employee benefit expenditures monthly. These systems were implemented in March and April of 2025 and management expects this finding to be resolved in 2025.

Corrective Action Plan

2024-002 – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Corrective Action: ABHS has implemented a new accounting and payroll system which allows the organization to reconcile employee benefit expenditures monthly. These systems were implemented in March and April of 2025 and management expects this finding to be resolved in 2025. Person Responsible: Alethea Velasquez, Chief Financial Officer Estimated Completion Date: December 31, 2025

Prior Finding References

2023-002

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,767,952 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2024 — management decision was due March 30, 2025.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-002QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Employee benefits expenditures charged to the programs do not agree to supporting documentation, such as employee benefit provider premiums invoices. Additionally, the pay rate paid to an employee was different from their approved pay rate. Lastly, an employee received eight hours of birthday pay (as allowed under ABHS’s personnel policies) in two different pay periods. Context: Nine of 25 employee benefit expenditures tested did not agree with employee benefit provider premium invoices. One of 25 employees tested was paid at a rate different from their approved pay rate. One of 25 employees tested received eight hours of birthday pay in two different pay periods. Questioned Costs: $358 for the Medical Assistance Program and $0 for the COVID-19 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse program. Cause: The employer portion of employee benefit premiums are preloaded into the accounting system each year to be allocated to the different business units/programs at ABHS. ABHS does not have a process in place to subsequently reconcile these expenditures to the employer benefits provider premium invoices and/or employee benefit election forms. There was also a lack of review of approved pay rates and leave requests during 2023. Effect: ABHS may not be able to demonstrate that the costs charged to federal programs are allowable. Auditor’s Recommendations: ABHS should implement a reconciliation process to ensure that employee benefit expenditures charged to federal programs agree with employee benefit provider premiums invoices and/or employee benefit election forms.41 Management’s Response: ABHS acknowledges the finding related to employer benefits. As a corrective measure, we have initiated a comprehensive review of our current systems and identified key areas that require immediate upgrades. With the adoption of these upgrades, ABHS will perform an interim review of the expenditures recorded in the accounting system compared to the invoices.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Title: Medical Assistance Program, COVID-19 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse ALN: 93.778, 93.959 Award period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2024 Criteria: According to 2 CFR Part 200.403, to be allowable under federal awards, costs must be adequately documented. Additionally, the 2 CFR Part 200.430 requires that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: Employee benefits expenditures charged to the programs do not agree to supporting documentation, such as employee benefit provider premiums invoices. Additionally, the pay rate paid to an employee was different from their approved pay rate. Lastly, an employee received eight hours of birthday pay (as allowed under ABHS’s personnel policies) in two different pay periods. Context: Nine of 25 employee benefit expenditures tested did not agree with employee benefit provider premium invoices. One of 25 employees tested was paid at a rate different from their approved pay rate. One of 25 employees tested received eight hours of birthday pay in two different pay periods. Questioned Costs: $358 for the Medical Assistance Program and $0 for the COVID-19 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse program. Cause: The employer portion of employee benefit premiums are preloaded into the accounting system each year to be allocated to the different business units/programs at ABHS. ABHS does not have a process in place to subsequently reconcile these expenditures to the employer benefits provider premium invoices and/or employee benefit election forms. There was also a lack of review of approved pay rates and leave requests during 2023. Effect: ABHS may not be able to demonstrate that the costs charged to federal programs are allowable. Auditor’s Recommendations: ABHS should implement a reconciliation process to ensure that employee benefit expenditures charged to federal programs agree with employee benefit provider premiums invoices and/or employee benefit election forms.41 Management’s Response: ABHS acknowledges the finding related to employer benefits. As a corrective measure, we have initiated a comprehensive review of our current systems and identified key areas that require immediate upgrades. With the adoption of these upgrades, ABHS will perform an interim review of the expenditures recorded in the accounting system compared to the invoices.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: ABHS plans to optimize technology to improve the month-end closing process and allow for reconciliations to be performed on a consistent basis. Person Responsible: Alethea Velasquez, Chief Financial Officer, and CLA Estimated Completion Date: December 31, 2024

Prior Finding References

2022-002

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,960,722 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2023 — management decision was due March 27, 2024.

2022-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2021-001QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS
Show full finding ▾
Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,552,188 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2022 — management decision was due March 27, 2023.

2021-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2020-001QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS
Show full finding ▾
Prior Finding References

2020-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,466,206 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2021 — management decision was due March 29, 2022.

2020-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2019-001QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS
Show full finding ▾
Prior Finding References

2019-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2019-12-31

$2,049,731 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2021 — management decision was due July 10, 2021.

2019-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS
Show full finding ▾

FY 2018-12-31

$1,495,402 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 8, 2019 — management decision was due March 8, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

$1,014,483 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 11, 2018 — management decision was due March 11, 2019.

2017-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS
Show full finding ▾

FY 2016-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,097,100 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 28, 2017 — management decision was due February 28, 2018.

2016-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS
Show full finding ▾

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New Mexico

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.