← Back to home

Mental Retardation Community Services of Nassau County, Inc. 012-HD123Non-Profit

EIN: 202656477

UEI: GC5KQZDM3VT5

Audited by: BDO USA, P.C.

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Mental Retardation Community Services of Nassau County, Inc. 012-HD12310 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,219,708 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2026 (22 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,219,973 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 2, 2025 — management decision was due October 2, 2025.

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,221,105 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 10, 2024 — management decision was due October 10, 2024.

2023-001
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

2023-001 – Special Tests and Provisions - Noncompliance Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Award Listing Numbers 14.181. Criteria: 24 CFR section 891.435(a) requires “At the time of the initial execution of the lease, the Owner (or Borrower, as applicable) will require each household (or family, as applicable) occupying an assisted unit or residential space in a group home to pay a security deposit in an amount equal to one month’s tenant rent or $50, whichever is greater. The household (or family) is expected to pay the security deposit from its own resources or other available public or private resources. The Owner (or Borrower) may collect the security deposit on an installment basis.” Conditions: During our review of the chart of accounts for MRCS II, we noted that a separate tenant security deposit account did not exist. Per discussion with management, tenant security deposits were never remitted by tenants to MRCS II. Questioned Costs: None identified. Cause: Security deposits were not requested from tenants by management. Effect: A tenant security deposit account has not been established. Context: At inception, MRCS II submitted for approval to HUD a request to waive the tenant security deposit requirement. Due to the length of time which has passed, MRCS II has been unable to locate within its records any approval or denial from HUD. As a result, MRCS II has not requested for tenants to remit a security deposit upon being admitted as a tenant. Recommendation: We recommend management implements a process to obtain tenant security deposits from all current tenants and to ensure proper procedures are in place to collect tenant security deposits from all new tenants at the time of initial lease and to refund deposits to tenants upon vacating their unit. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: MRCS II agrees with the finding identified. MRCS II’s response to the finding is described in the accompanying management’s corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-001 – Special Tests and Provisions - Noncompliance Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Award Listing Numbers 14.181. Criteria: 24 CFR section 891.435(a) requires “At the time of the initial execution of the lease, the Owner (or Borrower, as applicable) will require each household (or family, as applicable) occupying an assisted unit or residential space in a group home to pay a security deposit in an amount equal to one month’s tenant rent or $50, whichever is greater. The household (or family) is expected to pay the security deposit from its own resources or other available public or private resources. The Owner (or Borrower) may collect the security deposit on an installment basis.” Conditions: During our review of the chart of accounts for MRCS II, we noted that a separate tenant security deposit account did not exist. Per discussion with management, tenant security deposits were never remitted by tenants to MRCS II. Questioned Costs: None identified. Cause: Security deposits were not requested from tenants by management. Effect: A tenant security deposit account has not been established. Context: At inception, MRCS II submitted for approval to HUD a request to waive the tenant security deposit requirement. Due to the length of time which has passed, MRCS II has been unable to locate within its records any approval or denial from HUD. As a result, MRCS II has not requested for tenants to remit a security deposit upon being admitted as a tenant. Recommendation: We recommend management implements a process to obtain tenant security deposits from all current tenants and to ensure proper procedures are in place to collect tenant security deposits from all new tenants at the time of initial lease and to refund deposits to tenants upon vacating their unit. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: MRCS II agrees with the finding identified. MRCS II’s response to the finding is described in the accompanying management’s corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Number: 2023-001 Program: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Award Listing Number 14.181 Planned Corrective Action: Management will implement a process to obtain tenant security deposits from all current tenants and to ensure proper procedures are in place to collect tenant security deposits from all new tenants at the time of initial lease and to refund deposits to tenants upon vacating their unit. Person(s) Responsible: Willard Derr, Chief Financial Officer Sylvester Narraine, Senior Director of Finance Brian Wahl, Accounting Supervisor Expected Completion Date: June 30, 2024

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,217,980 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2023 — management decision was due September 29, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,212,259 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2022 — management decision was due September 28, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,213,780 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2021 — management decision was due September 29, 2021.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,210,157 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2020 — management decision was due September 22, 2020.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,206,976 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2019 — management decision was due September 28, 2019.

FY 2017-12-31

$1,209,556 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 16, 2018 — management decision was due October 16, 2018.

FY 2016-12-31

$1,212,592 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 24, 2017 — management decision was due October 24, 2017.

2016-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.