EIN: 201163755
UEI: DEGUKU7AU7P3
Audited by: Baker Tilly US, LLP
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on April 29, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 29, 2026 (50 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Criteria: The Organization is subject to Special Reporting under the Compliance Supplement which includes the filing of a Uniform Data System (UDS) (OMB No. 0915-0193). The compliance supplement requires evaluation of key line items including Table 9E: Other Revenues, line 1g, column a and 1q, column a. HRSA's UDS manual requires that Table 9E report cash amounts drawn down from the payment Management System (PMS-272) for all 330 grants during the reporting year. Condition and Context: The amounts reported by the Organization on the 2024 UDS submission used accrual-basis revenue instead of PMS-272 cash drawdowns for UDS Table 9E reporting which is a methodology inconsistent with HRSA's reporting requirements. Cause: Management prepared the UDS reporting using financial statements and SEFA revenue amounts under the assumption that aligning the UDS reporting with audited financial statements would be preferable and not having a clear understanding of the requirement. Effect: The UDS submission did not comply with HRSA reporting instructions, resulting in inaccurate reporting of federal grant revenue on Table 9E. Although the impact was below the audit's materiality threshold, the issue represents a methodology-based noncompliance that could affect HRSA's monitoring, comparability of UDS data and future program assessments. Recommendation: Management should ensure that amounts being reported agree with the Payment Management System going forward to ensure that the methodology being used is appropriate for all future UDS submissions View of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding. Corrective Action: Management has corrected the methodology being utilized and correctly completed the 2025 UDS submission
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: The Organization is subject to Special Reporting under the Compliance Supplement which includes the filing of a Uniform Data System (UDS) (OMB No. 0915-0193). The compliance supplement requires evaluation of key line items including Table 9E: Other Revenues, line 1g, column a and 1q, column a. HRSA's UDS manual requires that Table 9E report cash amounts drawn down from the payment Management System (PMS-272) for all 330 grants during the reporting year. Condition and Context: The amounts reported by the Organization on the 2024 UDS submission used accrual-basis revenue instead of PMS-272 cash drawdowns for UDS Table 9E reporting which is a methodology inconsistent with HRSA's reporting requirements. Cause: Management prepared the UDS reporting using financial statements and SEFA revenue amounts under the assumption that aligning the UDS reporting with audited financial statements would be preferable and not having a clear understanding of the requirement. Effect: The UDS submission did not comply with HRSA reporting instructions, resulting in inaccurate reporting of federal grant revenue on Table 9E. Although the impact was below the audit's materiality threshold, the issue represents a methodology-based noncompliance that could affect HRSA's monitoring, comparability of UDS data and future program assessments. Recommendation: Management should ensure that amounts being reported agree with the Payment Management System going forward to ensure that the methodology being used is appropriate for all future UDS submissions View of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding. Corrective Action: Management has corrected the methodology being utilized and correctly completed the 2025 UDS submission
Management has corrected the methodology being utilizes and correctly completed the 2025 UDS submission
FAC accepted this audit on May 7, 2025 — management decision was due November 7, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on April 14, 2024 — management decision was due October 14, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on April 13, 2023 — management decision was due October 13, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on April 15, 2022 — management decision was due October 15, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on August 8, 2021 — management decision was due February 8, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on April 22, 2020 — management decision was due October 22, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on April 22, 2019 — management decision was due October 22, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on May 7, 2018 — management decision was due November 7, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on April 30, 2017 — management decision was due October 30, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Pennsylvania →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
