← Back to home

LAS VEGAS-CLARK COUNTY URBAN LEAGUENon-Profit

EIN: 200873314

UEI: XFWFR56G11Y1

Audited by: Velez & Hardy, LLC

Cognizant agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

LAS VEGAS-CLARK COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE10 audit years3 findings
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$53.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$53,760,435 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 3, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 3, 2026 (93 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

During testing, the Organization was unable to provide required eligibility documentation for four children, representing two unique families. In addition, two providers were noted who were deficient in meeting the health and safety requirements of the Program and were subsequently terminated as participating providers. Despite the termination status, these providers later received additional program payments. The Organization was unable to provide documentation demonstrating that the providers corrected deficiencies or were re-approved prior to receiving subsequent payments. Because supporting documentation was not retained, we could not determine whether the providers met requirements to resume participation. The Organization explained that eligibility and health and safety documentation historically resided within a system of record that has been transferred entirely to the State following a transition of the program’s administration to the State. The Organization no longer retains access to that system or copies of all documentation contained therein. Cause: As part of the transition of program responsibilities back to the State, the Organization returned program records and no longer retained access to the State-managed system that housed eligibility information. The Organization did not maintain its own copies of all eligibility or health and safety documentation needed to support future audits. Effect: The Organization cannot demonstrate compliance with Federal eligibility documentation requirements for the affected participants. In addition, the Organization could not demonstrate that payments totaling $34,018 were made to providers who met health and safety requirements of the Program at the time services were delivered. These costs are considered questioned due to lack of supporting documentation. Questioned Costs: $34,018 Recommendations: The Organization should establish procedures to ensure eligibility documentation is retained by the Organization, even when a third-party system serves as the primary repository. Future programs should include a documented record-retention plan ensuring audit-ready records remain accessible.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.302(a) and 2 CFR 200.303, non-Federal entities must maintain adequate records supporting Federal program transactions and implement internal controls to ensure compliance. The OMB Compliance Supplement (2025), Part 4 – HHS, for the CCDF program requires documentation supporting eligibility determinations, including documentation to support applicable health and safety standards, and maintain compliance to remain eligible for payment. Condition: During testing, the Organization was unable to provide required eligibility documentation for four children, representing two unique families. In addition, two providers were noted who were deficient in meeting the health and safety requirements of the Program and were subsequently terminated as participating providers. Despite the termination status, these providers later received additional program payments. The Organization was unable to provide documentation demonstrating that the providers corrected deficiencies or were re-approved prior to receiving subsequent payments. Because supporting documentation was not retained, we could not determine whether the providers met requirements to resume participation. The Organization explained that eligibility and health and safety documentation historically resided within a system of record that has been transferred entirely to the State following a transition of the program’s administration to the State. The Organization no longer retains access to that system or copies of all documentation contained therein. Cause: As part of the transition of program responsibilities back to the State, the Organization returned program records and no longer retained access to the State-managed system that housed eligibility information. The Organization did not maintain its own copies of all eligibility or health and safety documentation needed to support future audits. Effect: The Organization cannot demonstrate compliance with Federal eligibility documentation requirements for the affected participants. In addition, the Organization could not demonstrate that payments totaling $34,018 were made to providers who met health and safety requirements of the Program at the time services were delivered. These costs are considered questioned due to lack of supporting documentation. Questioned Costs: $34,018 Recommendations: The Organization should establish procedures to ensure eligibility documentation is retained by the Organization, even when a third-party system serves as the primary repository. Future programs should include a documented record-retention plan ensuring audit-ready records remain accessible.

Corrective Action Plan

As noted, the Program was taken over by State subsequent to year end, and all employees that ran the program are no longer with the Organization. While we did maintain copies of records, accessibility with current staff is difficult and we expected the State would provide us with previous documentation transitioned to them which, unfortunately, they have not. Going forward if any programs are terminated we will make sure previous documentation is maintained, categorized and current staff are able to access any records easily.

About Eligibility →

FY 2024-06-30

$136,272,635 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 10, 2025 — management decision was due October 10, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$91,466,049 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 18, 2024 — management decision was due January 18, 2025.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$44,165,425 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 1, 2023 — management decision was due September 1, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$49,944,844 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 22, 2022 — management decision was due August 22, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$62,431,426 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 28, 2021 — management decision was due July 28, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$53,422,344 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2020 — management decision was due August 26, 2020.

2019-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The Organization?s financial close and reporting process did not require expenses that were received for vendor invoices after year end but incurred before year end to be recorded to correct period for the Child Care & Development Block Grant. Because this is a cost reimbursement grant, these expenditures would have been considered reimbursable and therefore, revenues should have also been recognized. Cause: The Organization was matching revenues and expenditures based on the grant period instead of when those revenues and expenditures were earned and incurred. Effect: Control deficiencies and misunderstandings noted above resulted in adjustments to the financial statements and expenditures and related revenues were recorded in the subsequent fiscal year. The adjustments had no net effect on net income but affected the revenues presented on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Recommendation: The Organization should determine when to record expenditures and related revenues to federal grants based upon when expenses become obligated instead of when grant expenditures are reimbursable. Management should be reviewing the obligation dates to validate which year expenditures and related revenues belong in. We recommend that expenses be recorded when they are incurred, and the related receivable and revenues be recorded in the same period to match those expenditures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding: 2019-001 Criteria: The Organization?s internal control and accounting systems should identify when expenses are incurred and ensure expenses and any related revenues are recorded in the correct period. Condition: The Organization?s financial close and reporting process did not require expenses that were received for vendor invoices after year end but incurred before year end to be recorded to correct period for the Child Care & Development Block Grant. Because this is a cost reimbursement grant, these expenditures would have been considered reimbursable and therefore, revenues should have also been recognized. Cause: The Organization was matching revenues and expenditures based on the grant period instead of when those revenues and expenditures were earned and incurred. Effect: Control deficiencies and misunderstandings noted above resulted in adjustments to the financial statements and expenditures and related revenues were recorded in the subsequent fiscal year. The adjustments had no net effect on net income but affected the revenues presented on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Recommendation: The Organization should determine when to record expenditures and related revenues to federal grants based upon when expenses become obligated instead of when grant expenditures are reimbursable. Management should be reviewing the obligation dates to validate which year expenditures and related revenues belong in. We recommend that expenses be recorded when they are incurred, and the related receivable and revenues be recorded in the same period to match those expenditures.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2019-001 Name of contact person: Phillip Zhang, Chief Financial Officer Corrective Action We Las Vegas Urban League agrees with the recommendation. The Urban League will pay attention to year end expenditures related to Child Care & Development Block Grant and ensure that expenses and related revenues will be recorded based off of when the provider services are incurred.

About Other →

FY 2018-06-30

$39,419,773 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 22, 2019 — management decision was due January 22, 2020.

2018-002
Eligibility
MODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$36,852,636 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2019 — management decision was due September 7, 2019.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$29,114,195 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2017 — management decision was due September 30, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Nevada

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.