← Back to home

FINGER LAKES COMMUNITY COLLEGEHigher Education

EIN: 161336614

UEI: RHAVTVGK6GX8

Audited by: BONADIO & CO. LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

FINGER LAKES COMMUNITY COLLEGE10 audit years6 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$19.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$19,616,493 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 19, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 19, 2026 (81 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Finding 2025-001 - 10.855 - Distance Learning and Telemedicine Loans and Grants Federal Agency – U.S. Department of Agriculture Grant Period – Year ended August 31, 2025 Compliance Requirement – L. Reporting Criteria – A requirement of receiving the Distance Learning and Telemedicine Loans and Grants was to complete project performance and financial reporting on the grant. Condition – The financial reporting of the completed SF 425 Federal Financial Report was submitted, and funds were received, which triggered the annual project performance report filing to be completed by January 31, 2026. The required annual project performance activity report was not filed by the due date. Context – The College has an obligation to ensure that all grants administered and expended within the fiscal year are appropriately monitored and all compliance requirements are satisfied. Cause – The former Director of Grants Development, who was the lead on the grant, left the College in September 2025 and had not communicated that the reporting was required to be completed. There was no formal process for tracking or communicating the status of grant requirements by anyone other than the Director, this resulted in the College missing this requirement. Effect – The annual project performance activity report was not filed timely. Recommendation – We recommend the College establish a formal, documented shared communication between the department responsible for administering the grant and the College finance department which outlines the critical grant requirements including, but not limited to, initial, interim and final reporting. This will help to ensure compliance with the necessary grant requirements in the event of turnover or absence.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025-001 - 10.855 - Distance Learning and Telemedicine Loans and Grants Federal Agency – U.S. Department of Agriculture Grant Period – Year ended August 31, 2025 Compliance Requirement – L. Reporting Criteria – A requirement of receiving the Distance Learning and Telemedicine Loans and Grants was to complete project performance and financial reporting on the grant. Condition – The financial reporting of the completed SF 425 Federal Financial Report was submitted, and funds were received, which triggered the annual project performance report filing to be completed by January 31, 2026. The required annual project performance activity report was not filed by the due date. Context – The College has an obligation to ensure that all grants administered and expended within the fiscal year are appropriately monitored and all compliance requirements are satisfied. Cause – The former Director of Grants Development, who was the lead on the grant, left the College in September 2025 and had not communicated that the reporting was required to be completed. There was no formal process for tracking or communicating the status of grant requirements by anyone other than the Director, this resulted in the College missing this requirement. Effect – The annual project performance activity report was not filed timely. Recommendation – We recommend the College establish a formal, documented shared communication between the department responsible for administering the grant and the College finance department which outlines the critical grant requirements including, but not limited to, initial, interim and final reporting. This will help to ensure compliance with the necessary grant requirements in the event of turnover or absence.

Corrective Action Plan

C. FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS – MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT Finding 2025-001 - 10.855 - Distance Learning and Telemedicine Loans and Grants Federal Agency – U.S. Department of Agriculture Grant Period – Year ended August 31, 2025 Compliance Requirement – L. Reporting 2025-001 Recommendation: We recommend the College establish a formal, documented shared communication between the department responsible for administering the grant and the College finance department which outlines the critical grant requirements including, but not limited to, initial, interim and final reporting. This will help to ensure compliance with the necessary grant requirements in the event of turnover or absence. Corrective Action Plan: The College agrees with the finding. We will be filing the late report no later than June 15, 2026 after appropriate access is obtained in the reporting platform utilized by Department of Agriculture. The College will be implementing a document that will retain all critical grant requirements needed for initial, interim and final reporting. Audit finding will be corrected by August 31, 2026. FLCC Responsible Party: Jason Tack, VP of Finance and Administration, jason.tack@flcc.edu, 585-785-1208. FLCC Responsible Party: Jason Tack, VP of Finance and Administration, jason.tack@flcc.edu, 585-785-1208.

About Reporting →

FY 2024-08-31

$19,723,835 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2025 — management decision was due September 21, 2025.

2024-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment which should include consideration of internal and external risks and the sufficiency of the safeguards in place to control the risks identified. Many of the policies in place are outdated and have not been updated for potential changes in the College’s operations. Given the pace of change in the technology environment, outdated policies are unlikely to fully capture current circumstances. Cause: The College’s information security program does not include procedures for the performance of regular risk assessments. Effect: As the College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment, it may be unaware of the risks to its sensitive data, specifically datasets protected under GLBA. Many policies are outdated and may not reflect the actual processes in place. Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized and detailed risk management framework, such as those provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Risk assessment documentation should include detailed information regarding current procedures in place, justifications for scoring, safeguards for each identified risk, and remediation plans. As part of this process, the College should then review the current policies and procedures at least annually to determine if any updates should be made.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-001 - 84.268, 84.063, 84.033, 84.007 Student Financial Aid Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Grant Period - Year ended August 31, 2024 Criteria: Institutions participating in Title IV programs are required to comply with various laws and regulations as part of their signed Program Participation Agreement (PPA), including but not limited to, the Federal Trade Commission’s Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Safeguards Rule (Title 16, Chapter I, Subchapter C, Part 314). Condition: The College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment which should include consideration of internal and external risks and the sufficiency of the safeguards in place to control the risks identified. Many of the policies in place are outdated and have not been updated for potential changes in the College’s operations. Given the pace of change in the technology environment, outdated policies are unlikely to fully capture current circumstances. Cause: The College’s information security program does not include procedures for the performance of regular risk assessments. Effect: As the College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment, it may be unaware of the risks to its sensitive data, specifically datasets protected under GLBA. Many policies are outdated and may not reflect the actual processes in place. Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized and detailed risk management framework, such as those provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Risk assessment documentation should include detailed information regarding current procedures in place, justifications for scoring, safeguards for each identified risk, and remediation plans. As part of this process, the College should then review the current policies and procedures at least annually to determine if any updates should be made.

Corrective Action Plan

SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Finding 2024-001 - 84.268, 84.063, 84.033, 84.007 Student Financial Aid Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Grant Period - Year ended August 31, 2024 2024-001 Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized and detailed risk management framework, such as those provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Risk assessment documentation should include detailed information regarding current procedures in place, justifications for scoring, safeguards for each identified risk, and remediation plans. As part of this process, the College should then review the current policies and procedures at least annually to determine if any updates should be made. Corrective Action Plan: The College agrees with the finding and as of March 2025 the College has contracted with an outside third party to perform an formal risk assessment. Once the risk assessment has been performed the College will work on ensuring the appropriate safeguards are in place and remediation plans identified. Additionally policies continue to be reviewed and updated through the governance process at the College. FLCC Responsible Party: Jason Tack, VP of Finance and Administration, jason.tack@flcc.edu, 585-785-1208. Audit finding will be corrected by 8/31/2025.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-08-31

$19,069,541 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 15, 2024 — management decision was due November 15, 2024.

FY 2022-08-31

$26,678,452 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 25, 2023 — management decision was due October 25, 2023.

2022-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2021-003OTHER MATTERS

Finding 2022-002 ? 84.268, 84.063, 84.033, 84.007 Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency ? U.S. Department of Education Grant Period ? Year ended August 31, 2022 Criteria ? In accordance with Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (Title IV) the College is required to document and determine the date of a student?s withdrawal and calculate the return of their earned student financial assistance. Condition ? There was no individual knowledgeable of the R2T4 process to lead and ensure calculations were performed timely and accurately. Context ? A sample of 40 withdrawal calculations was selected from a population of 560 students throughout the fiscal year. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Cause ? In fiscal 2021, the College?s Director of Student Financial Aid resigned, and the responsibilities of the withdrawals were transitioned from the Office of Student Accounts to Financial Aid. During the transition, the Student Accounts staff who was knowledgeable of the withdrawal process retired, leaving the remaining staff in both offices unfamiliar with the process. A new director was hired in May 2021 and tasked with restructuring the Department, training staff, and developing policies and procedures over processes, including R2T4?s. Effect ? Many improvements to the R2T4 process were noted in fiscal 2022, however, there were approximately 20 calculations in our sample that had to be redone based on a review by the Director. As a result, 22 of our sample of 40 student R2T4?s was recalculated due to incorrect withdrawal dates or incorrect aid disbursed entered into the initial calculation. All R2T4?s for fiscal 2022 were reviewed and updated. Recommendation ? We recommend the College review its current training programs and ensure individuals understand their responsibilities and how to perform assigned tasks. The College should continue training individuals as an opportunity for strengthening the process and ensuring cross-training on the R2T4 calculations. This process should include formal communication with all departments involved to ensure everyone is aware of their responsibilities. View of Responsible Officials ? We accept the findings of the Financial Aid Single Audit and we will be implementing new policies and training procedures going forward. See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-002 ? 84.268, 84.063, 84.033, 84.007 Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency ? U.S. Department of Education Grant Period ? Year ended August 31, 2022 Criteria ? In accordance with Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (Title IV) the College is required to document and determine the date of a student?s withdrawal and calculate the return of their earned student financial assistance. Condition ? There was no individual knowledgeable of the R2T4 process to lead and ensure calculations were performed timely and accurately. Context ? A sample of 40 withdrawal calculations was selected from a population of 560 students throughout the fiscal year. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Cause ? In fiscal 2021, the College?s Director of Student Financial Aid resigned, and the responsibilities of the withdrawals were transitioned from the Office of Student Accounts to Financial Aid. During the transition, the Student Accounts staff who was knowledgeable of the withdrawal process retired, leaving the remaining staff in both offices unfamiliar with the process. A new director was hired in May 2021 and tasked with restructuring the Department, training staff, and developing policies and procedures over processes, including R2T4?s. Effect ? Many improvements to the R2T4 process were noted in fiscal 2022, however, there were approximately 20 calculations in our sample that had to be redone based on a review by the Director. As a result, 22 of our sample of 40 student R2T4?s was recalculated due to incorrect withdrawal dates or incorrect aid disbursed entered into the initial calculation. All R2T4?s for fiscal 2022 were reviewed and updated. Recommendation ? We recommend the College review its current training programs and ensure individuals understand their responsibilities and how to perform assigned tasks. The College should continue training individuals as an opportunity for strengthening the process and ensuring cross-training on the R2T4 calculations. This process should include formal communication with all departments involved to ensure everyone is aware of their responsibilities. View of Responsible Officials ? We accept the findings of the Financial Aid Single Audit and we will be implementing new policies and training procedures going forward. See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The draft single audit, for the year ending August 31, 2022, found that our Return of Title IV funds process led to an unacceptable number of errors. This finding was also noted in last year's single audit, for the period ending, August 31, 2021. We accept the findings of the Financial Aid Single Audit and submit the following corrective action plan to address Return to Title IV calculation issues. Corrective Actions. 1.Megan Kennerknecht, Director of Financial Aid (megan.kennerknecht@flcc.edu/585-785-1277), and Michael Fisher, Associate VP of Enrollment Management(michael.fisher@flcc.edu/585-785- 1458) will continue the monthly internal auditing of R2T4 calculations. Audits of the previous month are completed by the 15th of the following month and a report of results is sent to Carol Urbaitis, Vice-President of Enrollment Management. 2.All counselors are taking NASFAA's Return to Title IV course to earn professional credentialing/expertise in this area, as of April 18, 2023. a.By June 2023, one counselor will be assigned as the R2T4 Lead to coordinate and assist the director of financial aid with the maintenance of procedures and serve as secondary resource in the office. 3.Counselors have been trained individually, instead of together, to perform calculations and correct errors that are consistently found. 4.Counselors, Cindy Cockhern, Jon VanBlargan, and Jia Tsao were provided updated procedures and guidance to replace the original procedures provided by the?temporary consultant in early 2021. Counselors received the updated documentation on March 17; 2023.

Prior Finding References

2021-003

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Finding 2022-003 ? 84.425 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Federal Agency ? U.S. Department of Education Grant Period ? Year ended August 31, 2022 Criteria ? A requirement of receiving and accepting the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) grant is that quarterly reporting of both the student and institutional portions be made publicly available on the College?s website. There are specific required disclosures for each round of student HEERF grants that must be disclosed, along with the Department of Education?s prescribed institutional quarterly reports. All HEERF institutional quarterly reports and student grant data must remain on the College?s website for a period of three years subsequent to the final annual reporting. Condition ? As part of the audit, we were unable to easily search or locate the required reporting on the College?s website. Effect ? The reports posted and available on the College?s website are not complete, up to date, or easily accessible. The College is not in compliance with the required reporting. Cause ? Over the past couple of years, the college has experienced significant turnover in administrative positions resulting in a lack of knowledge exchange or understanding of the reporting requirements of HEERF. Recommendation ? We recommend the College familiarize themselves with the required elements and update their website disclosures as soon as possible with all information. Certain reports have specific prescribed naming conventions for the reports to be posted. The College should ensure all documents and data are posted and easily accessible on the College?s website. View of Responsible Officials ? We acknowledge that our HEERF webpages do not include the required sections for the three HEERF awards and will be updating them to include all required elements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-003 ? 84.425 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Federal Agency ? U.S. Department of Education Grant Period ? Year ended August 31, 2022 Criteria ? A requirement of receiving and accepting the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) grant is that quarterly reporting of both the student and institutional portions be made publicly available on the College?s website. There are specific required disclosures for each round of student HEERF grants that must be disclosed, along with the Department of Education?s prescribed institutional quarterly reports. All HEERF institutional quarterly reports and student grant data must remain on the College?s website for a period of three years subsequent to the final annual reporting. Condition ? As part of the audit, we were unable to easily search or locate the required reporting on the College?s website. Effect ? The reports posted and available on the College?s website are not complete, up to date, or easily accessible. The College is not in compliance with the required reporting. Cause ? Over the past couple of years, the college has experienced significant turnover in administrative positions resulting in a lack of knowledge exchange or understanding of the reporting requirements of HEERF. Recommendation ? We recommend the College familiarize themselves with the required elements and update their website disclosures as soon as possible with all information. Certain reports have specific prescribed naming conventions for the reports to be posted. The College should ensure all documents and data are posted and easily accessible on the College?s website. View of Responsible Officials ? We acknowledge that our HEERF webpages do not include the required sections for the three HEERF awards and will be updating them to include all required elements.

Corrective Action Plan

The draft single audit, for the year ending August 31, 2022, found that our HEERF webpages do not include required sections for all three HEERF awards, specifically CRRSAA and ARP awards. We acknowledge and agree with Bonadio's finding. By April 15, Megan Kennerknecht, Director of Financial Aid(megan.kennerknecht@flcc.edu/585-785-1277}, Christine Palace-Neininger, Controller(christine.palace-neininger@flcc.edu/585-785-1438}, and myself(michael.fisher@flcc.edu/585-785-1458) will collaborate to update the webpages with therequired: institutional expenditure templates, student award methodologies, and student award totals for all three HEERF award. Furthermore, we will ensure that the webpages stay current and is updated through 2027, as required by the U.S. Department of Education.

About Reporting →

FY 2021-08-31

$22,595,927 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 17, 2022 — management decision was due February 17, 2023.

2021-003
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Finding 2021-003 ? 84.268, 84.063, 84.033, 84.007 Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency ? U.S. Department of Education Grant Period ? Year ended August 31, 2021 Criteria ? In accordance with Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (Title IV) the College is required to document and determine the date of a student?s withdrawal and calculate the return of their earned student financial assistance. Condition ? There was no individual knowledgeable of the R2T4 process to lead and ensure calculations were performed timely and accurately. Context ? A sample of 40 withdrawal calculations was selected from a population of 419 students throughout the fiscal year. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Cause ? In fiscal 2021, the College?s Director of Student Financial Aid resigned, and the responsibilities of the withdrawals were transitioned from the Office of Student Accounts to Financial Aid. During the transition, the Student Accounts staff who was knowledgeable of the withdrawal process retired, leaving the remaining staff in both offices unfamiliar with the process. Effect ? As a result of the vacancy, the process was not maintained, and the following were noted: ? 14 students had no documentation of their date of withdrawal, which was used in the R2T4 calculation, ? 5 students had the date of withdrawal which the calculation had been based on, not match the provided supporting documentation from the registrar, ? 12 students were not reported to the Clearinghouse within 45 days of the College?s date of determination of the student?s withdrawal, ? 6 students had different dates used on the R2T4 from what was documented in their file, ? 1 student?s R2T4 was calculated based on the incorrect number of calendar days in the semester, ? There was no formal documented review of the completed R2T4 calculations to ensure accuracy. Recommendation ? We recommend the College review their current policies and procedures to ensure documentation is in place in the event of another turnover or extended vacancy. With the new Director in place, this provides the College opportunity for strengthening the process and ensuring cross-training on the R2T4 calculations. This process should include formal communication with all departments involved in the process to ensure everyone is aware of their responsibilities. Part of the process should also assign the responsibility of review for the calculations to ensure all required elements are complete and supporting documentation is maintained. View of Responsible Officials ? The College accepts the observations and recommendations and is working within its system to establish processes and procedures for return to Title IV funds based on student withdrawals from the College. The director of financial aid, Megan Kennerknecht has been tasked with correcting the issues found in the major federal award program audit.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2021-003 ? 84.268, 84.063, 84.033, 84.007 Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency ? U.S. Department of Education Grant Period ? Year ended August 31, 2021 Criteria ? In accordance with Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (Title IV) the College is required to document and determine the date of a student?s withdrawal and calculate the return of their earned student financial assistance. Condition ? There was no individual knowledgeable of the R2T4 process to lead and ensure calculations were performed timely and accurately. Context ? A sample of 40 withdrawal calculations was selected from a population of 419 students throughout the fiscal year. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Cause ? In fiscal 2021, the College?s Director of Student Financial Aid resigned, and the responsibilities of the withdrawals were transitioned from the Office of Student Accounts to Financial Aid. During the transition, the Student Accounts staff who was knowledgeable of the withdrawal process retired, leaving the remaining staff in both offices unfamiliar with the process. Effect ? As a result of the vacancy, the process was not maintained, and the following were noted: ? 14 students had no documentation of their date of withdrawal, which was used in the R2T4 calculation, ? 5 students had the date of withdrawal which the calculation had been based on, not match the provided supporting documentation from the registrar, ? 12 students were not reported to the Clearinghouse within 45 days of the College?s date of determination of the student?s withdrawal, ? 6 students had different dates used on the R2T4 from what was documented in their file, ? 1 student?s R2T4 was calculated based on the incorrect number of calendar days in the semester, ? There was no formal documented review of the completed R2T4 calculations to ensure accuracy. Recommendation ? We recommend the College review their current policies and procedures to ensure documentation is in place in the event of another turnover or extended vacancy. With the new Director in place, this provides the College opportunity for strengthening the process and ensuring cross-training on the R2T4 calculations. This process should include formal communication with all departments involved in the process to ensure everyone is aware of their responsibilities. Part of the process should also assign the responsibility of review for the calculations to ensure all required elements are complete and supporting documentation is maintained. View of Responsible Officials ? The College accepts the observations and recommendations and is working within its system to establish processes and procedures for return to Title IV funds based on student withdrawals from the College. The director of financial aid, Megan Kennerknecht has been tasked with correcting the issues found in the major federal award program audit.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-003 ? Student Withdrawals The College accepts the observations and recommendations and is working within its system to establish processes and procedures for return to Title IV funds based on student withdrawals from the College. The following steps were taken during the audit, as observations were being made: ? Calculations have been re-reviewed and adjusted, as needed, for the students identified in the sample. ? FA Counselors have been retrained via NYSFAAA webinars and in-service trainings. Annual training is expected through professional associations and FSA Partners Training modules. ? FA Counselors were provided a spreadsheet of all the modules and full-length courses assigned to each semester to mitigate human error in calculating countable days and percentages. ? The director of financial aid, director of academic advising, career & transfer services and AVP of student affairs, are creating a workflow to streamline withdrawal procedures. This workflow will provide consistency, thorough documentation, and better tracking to ensure FLCC follows R2T4 regulations. ? The director of financial aid established an internal control plan to monitor R2T4 calculations, beginning with the summer 2022 semester. Each month, they will select 5 withdrawn students to review all aspects of the R2T4 calculation. The director of financial aid, Megan Kennerknecht has been tasked with correcting the issues found in the major federal award program audit to be completed by August 31, 2022 and can be reached at 585-785-1275.

About Other →

FY 2020-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$20,308,550 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 10, 2021 — management decision was due April 10, 2022.

FY 2019-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$18,018,207 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 17, 2020 — management decision was due August 17, 2020.

FY 2018-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$20,048,434 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 18, 2019 — management decision was due August 18, 2019.

FY 2017-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$20,000,505 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2018 — management decision was due July 22, 2018.

FY 2016-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$22,862,793 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2017 — management decision was due August 20, 2017.

2016-001
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.