← Back to home

ONONDAGA COMMUNITY COLLEGEHigher Education

EIN: 160973001

UEI: SJHAGXNEXB51

Audited by: Bonadio & Co. LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

ONONDAGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$27.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$27,942,305 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 20, 2026 (14 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$25,103,654 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 14, 2025 — management decision was due September 14, 2025.

FY 2023-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$24,521,108 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 10, 2024 — management decision was due October 10, 2024.

FY 2022-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$37,867,808 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2023 — management decision was due August 26, 2023.

FY 2021-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$35,876,142 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2022 — management decision was due September 7, 2022.

FY 2020-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$31,752,347 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 10, 2021 — management decision was due September 10, 2021.

FY 2019-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$31,065,108 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2020 — management decision was due September 19, 2020.

2019-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment which should include employee training, information security incident response, and general security controls. Cause: The College?s information security program does not include procedures for the performance of regular risk assessments. Effect: As the College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment, it may be unaware of the risks to its sensitive data, specifically datasets protected under GLBA. Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized and detailed risk management framework, such as those provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Risk assessment documentation should include detailed information regarding current procedures in place, justifications for scoring, safeguards for each identified risk, and remediation plans.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2019-001 - 84.268, 84.063, 84.033, 84.007 Student Financial Aid Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Grant Period ? Year ended August 31, 2019 Criteria: Institutions participating in Title IV programs are required to comply with various laws and regulations as part of their signed Program Participation Agreement (PPA), including but not limited to, the Federal Trade Commission?s Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Safeguards Rule (Title 16, Chapter I, Subchapter C, Part 314). Condition: The College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment which should include employee training, information security incident response, and general security controls. Cause: The College?s information security program does not include procedures for the performance of regular risk assessments. Effect: As the College has not performed a thorough information security risk assessment, it may be unaware of the risks to its sensitive data, specifically datasets protected under GLBA. Recommendation: The College should work to implement a standardized and detailed risk management framework, such as those provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Risk assessment documentation should include detailed information regarding current procedures in place, justifications for scoring, safeguards for each identified risk, and remediation plans.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2019-001 - 84.268, 84.063, 84.033, 84.007 Student Financial Aid Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Grant Period ? Year ended August 31, 2019 Management Response: The College will work to implement a standardized and detailed risk management framework in compliance with GLBA standards. The College will perform the following: ? Designate an employee or employees to coordinate the formation of the security program. ? Perform a campus wide risk assessment that identifies reasonable and foreseeable internal and external risks to security, confidentiality and integrity of student information that could result in unauthorized disclosure, misuse, destruction or other compromise of such information, and assess the sufficiency of any safeguards in place to control these risks. ? At a minimum, the risk assessment will include consideration of risks in each of the following operational areas: o Employee training and management, o Information systems, including network and software design as well as information processing, o Storage, transmission and disposal, and o Detection and prevention of and response to attacks, intrusions, or other system failures. ? Design and implement information safeguards to control the risks identified through risk assessment and regularly test or monitor the effectiveness of the safeguards? key controls, systems and procedures. ? Oversee service providers by taking steps to select and retain providers capable of maintaining appropriate safeguards for customer information. ? Contractually require service providers to implement and maintain such safeguards. ? Periodically evaluate and adjust the information security program, based on the results of the testing and monitoring mentioned above, any material changes to operations or any other circumstances known to have or that may have a material effect on the information security program.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$34,039,560 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 3, 2019 — management decision was due September 3, 2019.

FY 2017-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$35,750,792 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2018 — management decision was due August 8, 2018.

FY 2016-08-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$40,697,096 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 2, 2017 — management decision was due September 2, 2017.

2016-001
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.