← Back to home

VILLAGE OF FAIRPORT URBAN RENEWAL AGENCYLocal Government

EIN: 160927475

UEI: HLY7Y4C9JNH6

Audited by: EFPR GROUP, CPAS, PLLC

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

VILLAGE OF FAIRPORT URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,006,937 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 22, 2026 (69 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our review of tenant rent calculations under the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program, we identified an instance where a tenant received an overpayment of housing assistance payments because the Agency did not process a change in the tenant’s rent amount. Criteria: The Agency is required to calculate housing assistance payments in accordance with HUD regulations and adjust accordingly when changes in rent occur. Cause: The Agency did not properly include the correct housing assistance payment on the HAP contract amendment notice when a change in rent occurred. Effect of Condition: The tenant received housing assistance exceeding the amount for which they were eligible. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: The Agency should review the procedures in place in regards to the HAP contract amendment notices and the steps for the reflection of changes in rent amounts. These procedures should be updated as necessary and all individuals involved should be trained accordingly. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Agency agrees with the above finding and has since made the appropriate rental adjustment to the tenant’s record. The overpayment to the landlord has been recouped. This error occurred in a tenant file at a blended-occupancy project with 30+ Section 8 participants and a tiered rent structure. The landlord’s rent increase request was complex, which contributed to the error. To prevent similar issues in the future, staff will conduct a detailed review of each tenant file at the time an increase request is submitted. Any outliers will be identified, and clear notes will be entered in the file to help avoid recurrence.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-001 - Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher - Assistance Listing No. 14.871; Grant Period - For the year ended September 30, 2025. Condition: During our review of tenant rent calculations under the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program, we identified an instance where a tenant received an overpayment of housing assistance payments because the Agency did not process a change in the tenant’s rent amount. Criteria: The Agency is required to calculate housing assistance payments in accordance with HUD regulations and adjust accordingly when changes in rent occur. Cause: The Agency did not properly include the correct housing assistance payment on the HAP contract amendment notice when a change in rent occurred. Effect of Condition: The tenant received housing assistance exceeding the amount for which they were eligible. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: The Agency should review the procedures in place in regards to the HAP contract amendment notices and the steps for the reflection of changes in rent amounts. These procedures should be updated as necessary and all individuals involved should be trained accordingly. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Agency agrees with the above finding and has since made the appropriate rental adjustment to the tenant’s record. The overpayment to the landlord has been recouped. This error occurred in a tenant file at a blended-occupancy project with 30+ Section 8 participants and a tiered rent structure. The landlord’s rent increase request was complex, which contributed to the error. To prevent similar issues in the future, staff will conduct a detailed review of each tenant file at the time an increase request is submitted. Any outliers will be identified, and clear notes will be entered in the file to help avoid recurrence.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Agency agrees with the above finding and has since made the appropriate rental adjustment to the tenant’s record. The overpayment to the landlord has been recouped. This error occurred in a tenant file at a blended-occupancy project with 30+ Section 8 participants and a tiered rent structure. The landlord’s rent increase request was complex, which contributed to the error. To prevent similar issues in the future, staff will conduct a detailed review of each tenant file at the time an increase request is submitted. Any outliers will be identified, and clear notes will be entered in the file to help avoid recurrence.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2024-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,407,459 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2025 — management decision was due July 6, 2025.

FY 2023-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,715,766 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2023 — management decision was due June 21, 2024.

FY 2022-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,812,357 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2022 — management decision was due June 20, 2023.

FY 2021-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,734,709 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2022 — management decision was due July 4, 2022.

2021-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

During our testwork, we noted there was no depository agreement with Canandaigua National Bank. Criteria: Under the special tests requirement for the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program (Assistance Listing No. 14.871), the Agency is required to enter into General Depository Agreements with their financial institution using the HUD-51999 (OMB No. 2577-0075) or a form as required by HUD in the Annual Contributions Contract (ACC). The agreements serve as safe guards for federal funds and provide third-party rights to HUD (Section 9 of the ACC). Cause: The Agency was unable to acquire a General Depository Agreement with the financial institution. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the type of requirement listed. Questioned Costs: None identified. Recommendation: We recommend the Agency contact their financial institution to obtain a General Depository Agreement with Canandaigua National Bank using HUD-51999 Form. We noted that the Agency is currently in discussions with their financial institution to resolve this matter. Management?s Response: The Required General Depository Agreement, HUD-51999 was presented to the Agency Board for approval at the December 20, 2021 meeting. Upon approval and execution, the form will be provided to HUD to resolve this deficiency.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2021-001 - SPECIAL TESTS AND PROVISIONS - DEPOSITORY AGREEMENTS - HOUSING VOUCHER CLUSTER - SECTION 8 HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHERS - ASSISTANCE LISTING 14.871 Condition: During our testwork, we noted there was no depository agreement with Canandaigua National Bank. Criteria: Under the special tests requirement for the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program (Assistance Listing No. 14.871), the Agency is required to enter into General Depository Agreements with their financial institution using the HUD-51999 (OMB No. 2577-0075) or a form as required by HUD in the Annual Contributions Contract (ACC). The agreements serve as safe guards for federal funds and provide third-party rights to HUD (Section 9 of the ACC). Cause: The Agency was unable to acquire a General Depository Agreement with the financial institution. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the type of requirement listed. Questioned Costs: None identified. Recommendation: We recommend the Agency contact their financial institution to obtain a General Depository Agreement with Canandaigua National Bank using HUD-51999 Form. We noted that the Agency is currently in discussions with their financial institution to resolve this matter. Management?s Response: The Required General Depository Agreement, HUD-51999 was presented to the Agency Board for approval at the December 20, 2021 meeting. Upon approval and execution, the form will be provided to HUD to resolve this deficiency.

Corrective Action Plan

Management?s Response: The Required General Depository Agreement, HUD-51999 was presented to the Agency Board for approval at the December 20, 2021 meeting. Upon approval and execution, the form will be provided to HUD to resolve this deficiency.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2020-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,471,892 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2020 — management decision was due June 21, 2021.

FY 2019-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,456,724 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,428,107 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2019 — management decision was due July 3, 2019.

FY 2017-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,409,406 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 1, 2018 — management decision was due July 1, 2018.

FY 2016-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,382,897 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2017 — management decision was due July 17, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.