← Back to home

Liverpool Central School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 156002530

UEI: ZDJLJ4TNC633

Audited by: Bonadio & Co., LLP

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Liverpool Central School District10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$7.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,608,783 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 14, 2026 (47 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,519,487 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 10, 2024 — management decision was due April 10, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,849,923 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 24, 2023 — management decision was due April 24, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,008,739 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 13, 2022 — management decision was due April 13, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,927,427 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2021 — management decision was due March 29, 2022.

2021-001
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

In the case of one subaward tested, the District did not obtain appropriate documentation from the subrecipient to provide evidence as to the authorized use of the funds per requirements of the program. Current internal control policies and procedures were not operating effectively to ensure compliance. Effect: The District was not in compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Context: The subaward tested for which the District did not obtain appropriate documentation from the subrecipient was an instance where the subaward was paid to another area school district. This was the only instance of a subaward to another area school district in the population. Recommendation: We recommend management enhance existing policies and procedures for the review of documentation submitted to the District to satisfy subrecipient monitoring requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Management?s Response: The District will improve enforcement of our current system where subrecipients of flow-through funds will provide documentation as to how the District's monies will be allocated for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: According to the Uniform Guidance in CFR Part 200, Part III, Section M - Subrecipient Monitoring, a pass-through entity must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Internal controls should provide reasonable assurance that the District complies with subrecipient monitoring requirements according to the Uniform Guidance. Cause/Condition: In the case of one subaward tested, the District did not obtain appropriate documentation from the subrecipient to provide evidence as to the authorized use of the funds per requirements of the program. Current internal control policies and procedures were not operating effectively to ensure compliance. Effect: The District was not in compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Context: The subaward tested for which the District did not obtain appropriate documentation from the subrecipient was an instance where the subaward was paid to another area school district. This was the only instance of a subaward to another area school district in the population. Recommendation: We recommend management enhance existing policies and procedures for the review of documentation submitted to the District to satisfy subrecipient monitoring requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Management?s Response: The District will improve enforcement of our current system where subrecipients of flow-through funds will provide documentation as to how the District's monies will be allocated for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2021-001 Corrective Action Planned: The District will improve enforcement of our current system where subrecipients of flow-through funds will provide documentation as to how the District?s monies will be allocated for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Daniel Henner, Deputy Superintendent Anticipated Completion Date for Corrective Action: December 1, 2021

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,004,940 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 6, 2020 — management decision was due April 6, 2021.

2020-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The District's current policies and procedures are not operating effectively to ensure that salary related to hourly employees charged to the Title I Grant is supported by hours worked and approved by a supervisor. Instances of timesheets not being signed as approved by a supervisor were noted. Effect: The District did not have proper documentation of internal controls over compliance with activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs and cost principles requirements. Recommendation: We recommend management develop and document policies and procedures that will allow for an appropriate approval of timesheets of hourly employees in the event of the primary supervisor being unavailable. Existing policies and procedures should also be reviewed with all supervisors to ensure compliance. Questioned Costs: None. Management?s Response: In response to the finding relating to instances of timesheets not being signed as approved by a supervisor for salary related to hourly employees charged to the Title I Grants the District will modify our policies and procedures to allow for an appropriate approval of timesheets of hourly employees in the event of the primary supervisor being unavailable. In the future if these instances occur an approval will be obtained from another Principal in the High School, there are 6 Principals in the High School/Annex buildings, and for the other buildings an Executive Director and if an Executive Director is not available the Deputy Superintendent will approve the hourly employees timesheets. If staff are being paid from a grant, the timesheet that needs approval will be sent to the Executive Director in charge of the grant, if that person is available. If the Grant Administrator is not available the approver should verify the staff being paid out of a particular grant. with the Deputy Treasurer, Dan Burns. In the event of another Executive Order, requiring all non-essential workers to work remotely we will accept email approval from the Building Administrators or other Administrators approving the hourly timesheets. This policy was communicated via email to all relevant parties on September 22, 2020.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Internal controls should provide reasonable assurance that the District complies with activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs and cost principles according to the Uniform Guidance. Cause/Condition: The District's current policies and procedures are not operating effectively to ensure that salary related to hourly employees charged to the Title I Grant is supported by hours worked and approved by a supervisor. Instances of timesheets not being signed as approved by a supervisor were noted. Effect: The District did not have proper documentation of internal controls over compliance with activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs and cost principles requirements. Recommendation: We recommend management develop and document policies and procedures that will allow for an appropriate approval of timesheets of hourly employees in the event of the primary supervisor being unavailable. Existing policies and procedures should also be reviewed with all supervisors to ensure compliance. Questioned Costs: None. Management?s Response: In response to the finding relating to instances of timesheets not being signed as approved by a supervisor for salary related to hourly employees charged to the Title I Grants the District will modify our policies and procedures to allow for an appropriate approval of timesheets of hourly employees in the event of the primary supervisor being unavailable. In the future if these instances occur an approval will be obtained from another Principal in the High School, there are 6 Principals in the High School/Annex buildings, and for the other buildings an Executive Director and if an Executive Director is not available the Deputy Superintendent will approve the hourly employees timesheets. If staff are being paid from a grant, the timesheet that needs approval will be sent to the Executive Director in charge of the grant, if that person is available. If the Grant Administrator is not available the approver should verify the staff being paid out of a particular grant. with the Deputy Treasurer, Dan Burns. In the event of another Executive Order, requiring all non-essential workers to work remotely we will accept email approval from the Building Administrators or other Administrators approving the hourly timesheets. This policy was communicated via email to all relevant parties on September 22, 2020.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-001 Corrective Action Planned: In response to the finding relating to instances of timesheets not being signed as approved by a supervisor for salary related to hourly employees charged to the Title I Grants the District will modify our policies and procedures to allow for an appropriate approval of timesheets of hourly employees in the event of the primary supervisor being unavailable. In the future if these instances occur an approval will be obtained from another Principal in the High School, there are 6 Principals in the High School/Annex buildings, and for the other buildings an Executive Director and if an Executive Director is not available the Deputy Superintendent will approve the hourly employees timesheets. If staff are being paid from a grant, the timesheet that needs approval will be sent to the Executive Director in charge of the grant, if that person is available. Grant Administrators are as follows: Title Grants - Amanda Caldwell, IDEA Grants - Amy DiVita and 21st Century and ELL - Rick Chapman. If the Grant Administrator is not available the approver should verify the staff being paid out of a particular grant. with the Deputy Treasurer, Dan Burns. In the event of another Executive Order, requiring all non-essential workers to work remotely we will accept email approval from the Building Administrators or other Administrators approving the hourly timesheets. This policy was communicated via email to all relevant parties on September 22, 2020. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Matthew Enigk, Director for School Business Administration Completion Date for Corrective Action: September 22, 2020

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,312,743 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 23, 2019 — management decision was due March 23, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,952,089 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2018 — management decision was due March 27, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,884,101 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 3, 2017 — management decision was due April 3, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,515,271 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2016 — management decision was due June 5, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.