← Back to home

CANASTOTA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTLocal Government

EIN: 156002148

UEI: JFNKXHN9XBE9

Audited by: D'ARCANGELO & CO.,LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

CANASTOTA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,564,588 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 4, 2026 (28 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,687,830 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 17, 2024 — management decision was due April 17, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,030,678 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2023 — management decision was due June 19, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,737,186 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2022 — management decision was due May 1, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,242,345 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 21, 2021 — management decision was due April 21, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,654,793 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 11, 2020 — management decision was due May 11, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,341,886 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 30, 2019 — management decision was due April 30, 2020.

2019-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The District currently has effective procedural controls in place over the management of Federal awards as concluded through the testing of grant expenditures. However, key changes under the Uniform Guidance expanded the rules regarding the documentation of internal controls over Federal Awards to require that they be documented in writing in the District?s policies and that management should evaluate and document the results of ongoing monitoring to identify internal control issues. The written internal controls should specifically address each of the applicable twelve (12) compliance requirements of the Federal award programs. Criteria: On December 26, 2014 the Office of Management and Budget?s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, more commonly referred to as the ?Uniform Guidance,? became effective for all Federal awards, whether the funds are provided directly from a Federal agency or passed-through another state or local agency Cause: Unknown Effect or Potential Effect: The District is more at risk of noncompliance with Federal Grant regulations related to Uniform Administrative Requirements by not having fully effective procedural controls in place. Known Questioned costs: None noted. Context: The District manages multiple federal programs in a single year. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The District should document policies and procedures in accordance with the new Uniform Guidance. This should include monitoring procedures to ensure that internal controls over compliance for the various programs are working effectively. Managements Response: The District will develop policies and procedures for the new Uniform Guidance. Policies and procedures will be documented and monitored to ensure internal controls over compliance are working effectively

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-01 Federal Uniform Guidance Policies and Procedures Condition: The District currently has effective procedural controls in place over the management of Federal awards as concluded through the testing of grant expenditures. However, key changes under the Uniform Guidance expanded the rules regarding the documentation of internal controls over Federal Awards to require that they be documented in writing in the District?s policies and that management should evaluate and document the results of ongoing monitoring to identify internal control issues. The written internal controls should specifically address each of the applicable twelve (12) compliance requirements of the Federal award programs. Criteria: On December 26, 2014 the Office of Management and Budget?s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, more commonly referred to as the ?Uniform Guidance,? became effective for all Federal awards, whether the funds are provided directly from a Federal agency or passed-through another state or local agency Cause: Unknown Effect or Potential Effect: The District is more at risk of noncompliance with Federal Grant regulations related to Uniform Administrative Requirements by not having fully effective procedural controls in place. Known Questioned costs: None noted. Context: The District manages multiple federal programs in a single year. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The District should document policies and procedures in accordance with the new Uniform Guidance. This should include monitoring procedures to ensure that internal controls over compliance for the various programs are working effectively. Managements Response: The District will develop policies and procedures for the new Uniform Guidance. Policies and procedures will be documented and monitored to ensure internal controls over compliance are working effectively

Corrective Action Plan

Oversight Agency: New York State Education Department Canastota CSD respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2019. Independent Public Accounting Firm: D?Arcangelo & Co., LLP PO Box 4300 Rome, NY 13440 Finding: 2019-001 Federal Uniform Guidance Policies and Procedures Planned Action: We will develop required written policies and procedures as required by OMB?s Uniform Guidance. Contact Responsible: Nick Panuccio Anticipated date of Completion: June 30, 2020

About Other →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,301,043 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 25, 2018 — management decision was due April 25, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,182,390 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 16, 2017 — management decision was due April 16, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$1,141,128 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 17, 2016 — management decision was due May 17, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.