← Back to home

South Jefferson Central School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 156002112

UEI: KC5AB5K7RLF3

Audited by: Stackel & Navarra, CPA, PC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

South Jefferson Central School District10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,751,368 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on November 18, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by May 18, 2026 (113 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,352,214 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2024 — management decision was due June 13, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$4,012,332 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 13, 2023 — management decision was due May 13, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$4,841,063 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 13, 2022 — management decision was due May 13, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,015,926 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 7, 2021 — management decision was due June 7, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINION$1,615,039 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 11, 2020 — management decision was due May 11, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,541,957 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2020 — management decision was due July 6, 2020.

2019-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

CONDITION AND CRITERIA: FORM FS-10 SUBMITTED TO NYS WAS INCORRECT. IN OUR TESTING FOR THIS PROGRAM WE NOTED THAT EXPENDITURES IDENTIFIED ON THE REPORT WERE NOT CORRECT, ALTHOUGH THE TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENDITURES WERE CORRECT. CAUSE: THERE WAS A LACK OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS RESPONSIBLE FOR FEDERAL AWARDS AND THE ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT. MONITORING OF THE REPORTS SUBMITTED WAS NOT EFFECTIVE AND DID NOT IDENTIFY ERRORS. EFFECT: THE SCHOOL DISTRICT DID NOT FILE ACCURATE REPORTS WITH THE PASS-THROUGH ENTITY. QUESTIONED COSTS: NONE. AUDITORS' RECOMMENDATION: WE RECOMMEND THAT ALL INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED WITH TITLE II, PART A FUNDS RECEIVE INFORMATION TO ENSURE REPORTING IS CORRECT. ALL REPORTS THAT ARE SUBMITTED SHOULD BE CHECKED FOR ACCURACY BY THE INDIVIDUAL IN CHARGE OF THE FUNDS.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

CONDITION AND CRITERIA: FORM FS-10 SUBMITTED TO NYS WAS INCORRECT. IN OUR TESTING FOR THIS PROGRAM WE NOTED THAT EXPENDITURES IDENTIFIED ON THE REPORT WERE NOT CORRECT, ALTHOUGH THE TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENDITURES WERE CORRECT. CAUSE: THERE WAS A LACK OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS RESPONSIBLE FOR FEDERAL AWARDS AND THE ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT. MONITORING OF THE REPORTS SUBMITTED WAS NOT EFFECTIVE AND DID NOT IDENTIFY ERRORS. EFFECT: THE SCHOOL DISTRICT DID NOT FILE ACCURATE REPORTS WITH THE PASS-THROUGH ENTITY. QUESTIONED COSTS: NONE. AUDITORS' RECOMMENDATION: WE RECOMMEND THAT ALL INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED WITH TITLE II, PART A FUNDS RECEIVE INFORMATION TO ENSURE REPORTING IS CORRECT. ALL REPORTS THAT ARE SUBMITTED SHOULD BE CHECKED FOR ACCURACY BY THE INDIVIDUAL IN CHARGE OF THE FUNDS.

Corrective Action Plan

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE TITLE II, PART A EXPENDITURES WERE USED FOR ALLOWABLE GRANT ITEMS, BUT THAT REPORTING TO NEW YORK STATE WAS INCORRECT. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL CREATE A MORE THOROUGH SYSTEM OF CHECKS AND BALANCES HELPING TO ENSURE THAT REPORTING IS CORRECT AND ALIGNED WITH GRANT CRITERIA. TO DO THIS, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT HAS SHIFTED ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES SO THAT THE NEWLY HIRED ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT WILL MAKE SURE THAT ALL GRANT CRITERIA ARE MET AND THAT REPORTING IS ACCURATE. THIS WILL THEN BE CHECKED BY THE BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR FOLLOWED BY A CHECK BY THE SUPERINTENDENT.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2018-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,520,832 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 12, 2018 — management decision was due May 12, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINION$1,544,233 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 5, 2017 — management decision was due May 5, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINION$1,398,691 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2016 — management decision was due June 18, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.