← Back to home

MUNICIPAL HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF UTICALocal Government

EIN: 156000653

UEI: M8UBNFLDXV87

Audited by: EFPR GROUP CPA’S, PLLC

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

MUNICIPAL HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF UTICA9 audit years1 findings
9
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$11.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,761,215 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 30, 2026 (162 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,986,413 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2024 — management decision was due March 18, 2025.

2023-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Criteria - Per 24 CFR §85.36, grantees and sub-grantees of the Public Housing Operating Fund (Assistance Listing No. 14.850) will maintain a written code of standards of conduct governing the performance of their employees engaged in the award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer or agent of the grantee of sub-grantee shall participate in selection, of in the award or administration of a contract supported by Federal funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved. Such a conflict would arise when any of the following has a financial or other interest in the firm selected for award: • An employee, officer of agent. • Any member of his or her immediate family, • His or her partner, or • An organization which employs, or is about to employ, any of the above. Condition - The Authority procured legal services from a law firm that is owned by the brother of the Executive Director. Additionally, the Authority has not issued a request for proposal (RFP) for legal services since September 2010. Cause - The Authority was unaware of the conflict of interest as the relationship between the Authority and the firm pre-dated the Executive Directors tenure with the Authority. Additionally, the firm was kept on a year to year contract with no formal RFP issued after the initial 5 year contract expired in 2016. Effect - The Authority was not in compliance with regulations or its own procurement policy. Additionally, the identified conditions may have resulted in the potential for higher legal costs due to a lack of competitive bidding. Statistical Sampling - The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs - We have identified known questioned costs related to the referenced purchases charged directly to the Public Housing Operating Fund totaling $22,150 during the year ended December 31, 2023. Authority-wide payments totaled $47,055 during the year ended December 31, 2023. Recommendation - We recommend that the Authority review and terminate the contract with the law firm having the conflict of interest, issue an immediate RFP for legal services to ensure compliance with HUD regulations, and develop a procurement schedule to periodically solicit competitive proposals for all professional services. Management's Response - (a) Comments on the finding and recommendation - The Authority agrees with the finding. The Authority also agrees with the recommendation, please see below for action taken. (b) Action taken - The Authority self-reported the issue to HUD and has taken steps to correct the issue before the date of the Independent Auditors' Report. The Authority issued an RFP for legal services and has notified the firm referred to in the finding that they will not be eligible for procured services moving forward. ( c) Planned implementation date of corrective action - Completed by December 31, 2024.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria - Per 24 CFR §85.36, grantees and sub-grantees of the Public Housing Operating Fund (Assistance Listing No. 14.850) will maintain a written code of standards of conduct governing the performance of their employees engaged in the award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer or agent of the grantee of sub-grantee shall participate in selection, of in the award or administration of a contract supported by Federal funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved. Such a conflict would arise when any of the following has a financial or other interest in the firm selected for award: • An employee, officer of agent. • Any member of his or her immediate family, • His or her partner, or • An organization which employs, or is about to employ, any of the above. Condition - The Authority procured legal services from a law firm that is owned by the brother of the Executive Director. Additionally, the Authority has not issued a request for proposal (RFP) for legal services since September 2010. Cause - The Authority was unaware of the conflict of interest as the relationship between the Authority and the firm pre-dated the Executive Directors tenure with the Authority. Additionally, the firm was kept on a year to year contract with no formal RFP issued after the initial 5 year contract expired in 2016. Effect - The Authority was not in compliance with regulations or its own procurement policy. Additionally, the identified conditions may have resulted in the potential for higher legal costs due to a lack of competitive bidding. Statistical Sampling - The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs - We have identified known questioned costs related to the referenced purchases charged directly to the Public Housing Operating Fund totaling $22,150 during the year ended December 31, 2023. Authority-wide payments totaled $47,055 during the year ended December 31, 2023. Recommendation - We recommend that the Authority review and terminate the contract with the law firm having the conflict of interest, issue an immediate RFP for legal services to ensure compliance with HUD regulations, and develop a procurement schedule to periodically solicit competitive proposals for all professional services. Management's Response - (a) Comments on the finding and recommendation - The Authority agrees with the finding. The Authority also agrees with the recommendation, please see below for action taken. (b) Action taken - The Authority self-reported the issue to HUD and has taken steps to correct the issue before the date of the Independent Auditors' Report. The Authority issued an RFP for legal services and has notified the firm referred to in the finding that they will not be eligible for procured services moving forward. ( c) Planned implementation date of corrective action - Completed by December 31, 2024.

Corrective Action Plan

Name of Auditee: Utica Municipal Housing Authority EFPR Group, CPAs, PLLC December 31, 2023 Name of Audit Firm: Period Covered by the Audit: CAP Prepared by: Robert Calli, Executive Director Phone: (315) 735-5246 (A) Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (1) Finding 2023-001 (a) Comments on the finding and recommendation - The Authority agrees with the finding. The Authority also agrees with the recommendation, please see below for action taken. (b) Action taken - The Authority self-reported the issue to HUD and has taken steps to correct the issue before the date of the Independent Auditors' Report. The Authority issued an RFP for legal services and has notified the firm referred to in the finding that they will not be eligible for procured services moving forward. ( c) Planned implementation date of corrective action - Completed by December 31, 2024.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,917,629 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2023 — management decision was due March 28, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,396,150 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,235,629 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2022 — management decision was due September 15, 2022.

FY 2019-12-31

GOING CONCERNLOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,679,993 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2021 — management decision was due September 29, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,845,302 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2019 — management decision was due March 25, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,127,050 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 23, 2018 — management decision was due March 23, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,937,638 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2017 — management decision was due March 24, 2018.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.